Compositional vector space models for knowledge base inference

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn SS-15-03, Issue , 2015, Pages 31-34

  Neelakantan, Arvind ^a   Roth, Benjamin ^a   McCallum, Andrew ^a  

^a University of Massachusetts Amherst   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMBEDDINGS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; SEMANTICS; VECTORS;

BINARY RELATION; LOW DIMENSIONAL; SEMANTIC VECTORS; SUPERVISED TRAININGS; SYMBOLIC REPRESENTATION; TRADITIONAL APPROACHES; VECTOR REPRESENTATIONS; VECTOR SPACE MODELS;

VECTOR SPACES;

EID: 84987623391     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Baroni, M. and Zamparelli, R. 2010. Nouns are vectors, adjectives are matrices: Representing adjective-noun constructions in semantic space. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
2. Berant, J.: Dagan. I.; and Goldberger, J. 2011. Global learning of typed entailment rules. In Association for Computational Linguistics.
3. Bollacker, K.; Evans, C.; Parilosh. R: Sturge, T.: and Taylor. J. 2008. Freebase: a collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data.
4. Bordes, A.; Usunier. N.: Garcfa-Duran, A.: Weston. J.: and Yakhnenko, O. 2013. Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
5. Carlson, A.; Belteridge. J.: Kisiel, B. Settles, B.; Hruschka. E. R.; and A. 2010. Toward an architecture for never-ending language learning. In In AAAl.
6. Gardner, M; Talukdar. P. P.; Kisiel, B.; and Mitchell. T. M. 2013. Improving learning and inference in a large knowledge-base using latent syntactic cues. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
7. Lao, N.; Subramanya. A.; Pereira, F.; and Cohen. W. W. 2012. Reading the web with learned syntactic-semantic inference rules. In Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning.
8. Lao. N.: Mitchell. T.-. and Cohen. W. W. 2011. Random walk inference and learning in a large scale knowledge base. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
9. Larochelle. H.; Ethan, D.; and Bengio. Y. 2008. Zero-data learning of new tasks. In National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
10. Lin. D., and Pantel. P. 2001. Dirt - discovery of inference rules from text. In International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.
11. Min, B.; Grishman, R.; Wan, L.; Wang. C: and Gondek, D. 2013. Distant supervision for relation extraction with an incomplete knowledge base. In HLT-NAACL. 777-782.
12. Mintz. M.; Bills. S.; Snow, R.: and Jurafsky, D. 2009. Distant supervision for relation extraction without labeled data. In Association for Computational Linguistics and International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing.
13. Mitchell, .1., and Lapata. M. 2008. Vector-based models of semantic composition. In Association for Computational Linguistics.
14. Orr, D.; Subramanya. A.; Gabrilovich, E.; and Ring-gaard. M. 2013. 11 billion clues in 800 million documents: A web research corpus annotated with freebase concepts, http://googleresearch.blogspol.eom/2013/07/l 1-billion-clues-in-800-million.html.
15. Riedel, S.: Yao. L.: McCallum. A.: and Marlin. B. M. 201 3. Relation extraction with matrix factorization and universal schemas. In HLT-NAACL.
16. Schoenmaekers, S.; Etzioni, O.; Weld, D. S.; and Davis, .1. 2010. Learning first-order horn clauses from web text. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
17. Socher. R.: Lin. C. C.-Y.: Manning. C. D.: and Ng, A. Y. 2011. Parsing natural scenes and natural language with recursive neural networks. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML).
18. Socher, R.: Huval. B.: Manning. C. D.; and Ng. A. Y. 2012. Semantic compositionality through recursive matrix-vector spaces. In Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning.
19. Socher. R.: Perelygin, A.; Wu, J.: Chuang. J.; Manning. C. D.; Ng, A. Y: and Potts. C. 2013. Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treehank. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
20. Suchanek. F. M.: Kasneci. G.; and Weikum, G. 2007. Yago: A core of semantic knowledge. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web.
21. Yates. A., and Etzioni, O. 2007. Unsupervised resolution of objects and relations on the web. In North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
22. Yessenalina, A., and Cardie, C. 2011. Compositional matrix-space models for sentiment analysis. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.