A framework for investigating university-based technology transferand commercialization

The Routledge Companion to Entrepreneurship

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 207-223

  Gianiodis, Peter ^a  

^a Bowling Green State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84987598127     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. Agrawal, A. and Henderson, R. (2002) 'Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT', Management Science 48: 44-60.
2. Ajzen, I. (1991) 'The theory of planned behavior', Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 179-211.
3. Aldridge, T. and Audretsch, D. (2011) 'The Bayh-Dole Act and scientist entrepreneurship', Research Policy40 (8): 1058-67.
4. Anderson, P. and Tushman, M. (1990) 'Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change', Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 604-34.
5. Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM) (2011) The AUTM Licensing Survey: Fiscal Year 2010, Norwalk, CT: Association of University Technology Managers.
6. Azoulay, P., Ding, W. and Stuart, T. (2007) 'The determinants of faculty patenting behavior: Demographics or opportunities?', Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 63 (4): 599-623.
7. Barr, S., Baker, T., Markham, S. and Kingon, A. (2009) 'Bridging the Valley of Death: Lessons learned from 14 years of commercialization of technology education', Academy of Management Learning & Education8 (3): 370-88.
8. Bercovitz, J. and Feldman, M.A. (2008) 'Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level', Organization Science 19: 69-89.
9. Christensen, C. (1997) The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
10. Coff, R. (1999) 'When competitive advantage doesn't lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power', Organization Science 10: 119-32.
11. Damanpour, F.R., Walker, M. and Avellaneda, C. (2009) 'Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational performance: a longitudinal study of service organizations', Journal of Management Studies46 (4): 650-75.
12. Eisenhardt, M.K. (1989) 'Agency theory: An assessment and review', Academy of Management Review 14: 57-74.
13. Etzkowitz, H. (1998) 'The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages', Research Policy 27 (8): 823-33.
14. Fabrizio, K.R. and Di Minin, A. (2008) 'Commercializing the laboratory: Faculty patenting and the open science environment', Research Policy 37: 914-31.
15. Feldman, M.A. and Bercovitz, J. (2007) 'Fishing upstream: Firm innovation strategy and university research alliances', Research Policy 36: 930-48.
16. George, G., Zahra, S. and Wood, D.R. (2002) 'The effects of business-university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: A study of publicly traded biotechnology companies', Journal of Business Venturing 17: 577-609.
17. Gianiodis, P.T. (2011) 'A Theory of Defense', in: Markman, G. and Phan, P. (eds.) Entrepreneurship and Competitive Dynamics, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press, 441-61.
18. Gianiodis, P.T., Ellis, S. and Secchi, E. (2010) 'Advancing a typology of open innovation', International Journal of Innovation Management 14 (4): 1-42.
19. Goldfarb, B. and Henrekson, M. (2003) 'Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property', Research Policy 32: 639-58.
20. Grandi, A. and Grimaldi, R. (2005) 'Academics' organizational characteristics and the generation of successful business ideas', Journal of Business Venturing 20: 821-45.
21. Granovetter, M. (1985) 'Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness', American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481-510.
22. Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D.S. and Wright, M. (2011) '30 years after Bayh-Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship', Research Policy 40 (8): 1045-57.
23. Jain, S., George, G. and Maltarich, M. (2009) 'Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity', Research Policy 38: 922-35.
24. Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, F.W. (1976) 'Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure', Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-60.
25. Jensen, R.A., Thursby, J.G. and Thursby, M.C. (2003) 'Disclosure and licensing of university inventions: The best we can do with the s**t we get to work with', International Journal of Industrial Organization21: 1271-300.
26. Kenney, M. and Goe, W.R. (2004) 'The role of social embeddedness in professional entrepreneurship: A comparison of electrical and computer science at UC-Berkeley and Stanford', Research Policy 33 (5): 691-707.
27. Kenney, M. and Goe, W.R. and Patton, D. (2011) 'Does inventor ownership encourage university research-derived entrepreneurship? A six university comparison', Research Policy 40: 1100-12.
28. Lado, A.A., Boyd, N. and Hanlon, S. (1997) 'Competition, cooperation, and the search for economic rents: A syncretic model', Academy of Management Review 22: 110-41.
29. Link, A., Siegel, D.S. and Wright, M. (in press) Chicago Handbook of University Technology Transfer, Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
30. Litan, R.E., Mitchell, L. and Reedy, E.J. (2008) ‘Commercializing university innovations: A better way’, in: Jaffe, A.B., Lerner, J. and Stern, S. (eds.) Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 8. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 31-57.
31. Markman, G.D., Gianiodis, P.T., Phan, P. and Balkin, D.B. (2004) 'Entrepreneurship from the ivory tower: Do incentive systems matter?', Journal of Technology Transfer 29: 353-64.
32. Markman, G.D., Gianiodis, P.T., Phan, P. and Balkin, D.B., Gianiodis, P.T. and Phan, P. (2008) 'Full-time faculty or part-time entrepreneurs', IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 55: 29-36.
33. Markman, G.D., Gianiodis, P.T., Phan, P. and Balkin, D.B. (2009) 'Supply-side innovation and technology commercialization', Journal of Management Studies 46: 625-49.
34. Markman, G.D., Gianiodis, P.T., Phan, P. and Balkin, D.B. (2005) 'Entrepreneurship and university based technology transfer', Journal of Business Venturing 20: 241-64.
35. McMullen, J. and Shepherd, D. (2006) 'Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur', Academy of Management Review 31: 132-52.
36. Merges, R.P. and Nelson, R.R. (1990) 'On the complexity economics of patent scope', Columbia Law Review 90: 839-912.
37. Organ, D.W., Podsakoff, P.M. and MacKenzie, S.P. (2006) Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences, London: Sage Publications.
38. Owen-Smith, J. and Powell, W. (2001) 'To Patent or not: Faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer', Journal of Technology Transfer 26: 99-114.
39. Owen-Smith, J. and Powell, W. and Powell, W. (2003) 'The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: Assessing the importance of experience and connectivity', Research Policy 32: 1695-711.
40. Rothaermel, F.T., Agung, S. and Jiang, L. (2007) 'University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature', Industrial and Corporate Change 16: 691-791.
41. Schilling, M. (1998) 'Technological lockout: An integrative model of the economic and strategic factors driving technology success and failure', Academy of Management Review 23: 267-84.
42. Schumpeter, J.A. (1942) Capitalism, socialism, and democracy, New York: Harper.
43. Shane, S. (2001) 'Technology opportunities and new firm creation', Management Science 47: 205-20.
44. Shane, S. (2002) 'Selling university technology: Patterns from MIT', Management Science 48: 122-37.
45. Shane, S. (2004) Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
46. Siegel, D.S. (ed.) (2006) Technology entrepreneurship: Institutions and agents involved in university technology transfer, vol. 1. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
47. Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M. and Floyd, S. (2003) 'Inter-firm networks and entrepreneurial behavior: A structural embeddedness perspective', Journal of Management 29: 427-42.
48. Stuart, T. and Ding, W. (2006) 'When Do Scientists Become Entrepreneurs? The Social Structural Antecedents of Commercial Activity in the Academic Life Sciences', American Journal of Sociology 112: 97-144.
49. Teece, DJ. (2000) Managing intellectual capital, New York: Oxford University Press.
50. Thursby, J.G. and Thursby, M.C. (2011) 'Faculty participation in licensing: Implications for research', Research Policy 40: 20-29.
51. Thursby, J.G. and Thursby, M.C., Fuller, A.W. (2009) 'U.S. faculty patenting: Inside and outside the university', Research Policy 38: 14-25.
52. Toole, A.A. and Czarnitzki, D. (2010) 'Commercializing Science: Is there a university "brain drain" from academic entrepreneurship?', Management Science 56 (9): 1599-614.
53. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1981) 'The framing of decisions and psychology of choice', Science 211: 453-58.
54. Van Eerde, W. and Thierry, H. (1996) 'Vroom's expectancy models and work-related criteria: A meta analysis', Journal of Applied Psychology 81: 575-86.
55. Vroom, V. (1964) Work and Motivation, New York: Wiley.
56. Wood, M. (2009) 'Does one size fit all? The multiple organizational forms leading to successful academic entrepreneurship', Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 33: 929-47.
57. Wright, M., Lockett, A., Clarysse, B. and Binks, M. (2006) 'University spin-out companies and venture capital', Research Policy 35: 481-501.
58. Zahra, S.A. and George, G. (2002) 'Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension', Academy of Management Review 27: 185-203.
59. Zucker, L., Darby, M. and Armstrong, J. (2002) 'Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology', Management Science 48: 138-53.
60. Zukin, S. and DiMaggio, P. (eds.) (1990) Structures of capital: The social organization of the economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.