Social Network Methods for the Educational and Psychological Sciences

Educational Psychologist

Volumn 51, Issue 3-4, 2016, Pages 381-394

  Sweet, Tracy M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84985034388     PISSN: 00461520     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2016.1208093     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. S.Adhikari, B.W.Junker, T.M.Sweet, & A.C.Thomas, (2014). Hlsm:Hierarchical latent space network model (R package ver. 3.0.0) [Computer software manual].
2. E.M.Airoldi, D.S.Choi, & P.J.Wolfe, (2011). Confidence sets for network structure. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining:The ASA Data Science Journal, 4, 461–469.
3. C.Anderson, & S.Wasserman, (1992). Building stochastic blockmodels* 1. Social Networks, 14, 137–161.
4. B.Dabbs, B.W.Junker, T.M.Sweet, & A.Thomas, (2014). Cidnetworks:Generative models for complex networks with conditionally independent dyadic structure (R package version 3.0.0) [Computer software manual].
5. P.Erdös, & A.Rényi,. (1959). On random graphs. Publicationes Mathematicae, 6(290–297), 53–54.
6. O.Frank, & D.Strauss, (1986). Markov graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(395), 832–842. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2289017
7. L.Freeman, (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35–41.
8. A.Gelman, J.B.Carlin, H.S.Stern, & D.B.Rubin, (2013). Bayesian data analysis (3rd ed.). New York, NY:Taylor & Francis.
9. S.Geven, J.Weesie, & F.van Tubergen, (2013). The influence of friends on adolescents' behavior problems at school:The role of ego, alter and dyadic characteristics. Social Networks, 35, 583–592.
10. E.Gilbert, (1959). Random graphs. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 30, 1141–1144.
11. A.Goldenberg, A.Zheng, S.Fienberg, & E.Airoldi, (2009). A survey of statistical network models. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 2, 129–133.
12. M.Handcock, (2003). Assessing degeneracy in statistical models of social networks (Working Paper No. 39). Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
13. M.Handcock, D.Hunter, C.Butts, S.Goodreau, & M.Morris, (2006). Statnet:An R package for the statistical analysis and simulation of social networks [Manual]. University of Washington.
14. M.S.Handcock, D.R.Hunter, C.T.Butts, S.M.Goodreau, M.Morris, & P.Krivitsky, (2010). ergm:A package to fit, simulate and diagnose exponential-family models for networks (Version 2.2-4) [Computer software manual]. Seattle, WA.
15. P.D.Hoff, A.E.Raftery, & M.S.Handcock, (2002). Latent space approaches to social network analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97, 1090–1098.
16. P.Holland, K.Laskey, & S.Leinhardt, (1983). Stochastic blockmodels:First steps. Social Networks, 5, 109–137.
17. P.Holland, & S.Leinhardt, (1981). An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76(373), 33–50.
18. M.Hopkins, R.Lowenhaupt, & T.M.Sweet, (2015, June). Organizing instruction in new immigrant destinations:District infrastructure and subject-specific school practice. American Educational Research Journal, 52, 408–439. doi:10.3102/0002831215584780
19. M.Hopkins, J.P.Spillane, P.Jakopovic, & R.M.Heaton, (2013). Infrastructure redesign and instructional reform in mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 114, 200–224.
20. D.Hunter, M.Handcock, C.Butts, S.Goodreau, & M.Morris, (2008). ergm:A package to fit, simulate and diagnose exponential-family models for networks. Journal of Statistical Software, 24(3), 1–29.
21. P.Krivitsky, M.Handcock, & M.P.N.Krivitsky, (2009). The latentnet package (Statnet project, ver. 2–1).
22. E.Lazega, & M.van Duijn, (1997). Position in formal structure, personal characteristics and choices of advisors in a law firm:A logistic regression model for dyadic network data. Social Networks, 19, 375–397. doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(97)00006-3
23. G.Robins, P.Pattison, Y.Kalish, & D.Lusher, (2007). An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks, 29, 173–191. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2006.08.002
24. G.Robins, T.Snijders, P.Wang, M.Handcock, & P.Pattison, (2007). Recent developments in exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks, 29, 192–215. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2006.08.003
25. M.Sentse, J.K.Dijkstra, C.Salmivalli, & A.H.N.Cillessen, (2013). The dynamics of friendships and victimization in adolescence:A longitudinal social network perspective. Aggressive Behavior, 39, 229–238.
26. T.A.B.Snijders, P.E.Pattison, G.L.Robins, & M.S.Handcock, (2006). New specification for exponential random graph models. Sociological Methodology, 36(1), 99–153.
27. T.A.Snijders, C.E.Steglich, M.Schweinberger, & M.Huisman, (2008). [Manual for siena version 3.2]. University of Groningen, ICS, Department of Sociology, Groningen, The Netherlands.
28. J.Spillane, M.Hopkins, & T.Sweet, (2015, November). Intra- and inter-school instructional interactions:Exploring conditions for instructional knowledge production within and between schools. American Journal of Education, 122(1), 71–110.
29. J.P.Spillane, C.M.Kim, & K.A.Frank, (2012). Instructional advice and information providing and receiving behavior in elementary schools exploring tie formation as a building block in social capital development. American Educational Research Journal, 119(1), 72–102.
30. C.Steglich, P.Sinclair, J.Holliday, & L.Moore, (2012). Actor-based analysis of peer influence in a stop smoking in schools trial (assist). Social Networks, 34, 359–369.
31. C.Steglich, T.A.Snijders, & P.West, (2006). Applying siena:An illustrative analysis of the coevolution of adolescents' friendship networks, taste in music, and alcohol consumption. Methodology:European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 2(1), 48–56.
32. T.M.Sweet, (2015). Incorporating covariates into stochastic blockmodels. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 40, 635–664.
33. T.M.Sweet, A.C.Thomas, & B.W.Junker, (2013). Hierarchical network models for education research:Hierarchical latent space models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 38, 295–318.
34. T.M.Sweet, A.C.Thomas, & B.W.Junker, (2014). Hierarchical mixed membership stochastic blockmodels for multiple networks and experimental interventions. In E.Airoldi, D.Blei, E.Erosheva, & S.Fienberg (Eds.), Handbook on mixed membership models and their applications (pp. 463–488). Boca Raton, FL:Chapman & Hall/CRC.
35. T.M.Sweet, & Q.Zheng, (2015). Multilevel social network models:incorporating network-level covariates into hierarchical latent space models. In J.R.H., L. M. StapletonJ. R. Harring, & S.N.Beretvas (Eds.), Advances in multilevel modeling for educational research:addressing practical issues found in real-world applications (pp. 361–389). Charlotte, NC:Information Age.
36. M.van Duijn, T.Snijders, & B.Zijlstra, (2004). p2:A random effects model with covariates for directed graphs. Statistica Neerlandica, 58, 234–254.
37. S.Wasserman, & K.Faust, (1994). Social network analysis:Methods and applications (Vol. 8). New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
38. S.Wasserman, & P.Pattison, (1996). Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks:I. An introduction to Markov graphs and p*. Psychometrika, 61, 401–425. doi:10.1007/BF02294547