Applying SIENA: An illustrative analysis of the coevolution of adolescents' friendship networks, taste in music, and alcohol consumption

Methodology

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 48-56

  Steglich, Christian ^a   Snijders, Tom A B ^a   West, Patrick ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Longitudinal; Network dynamics; Social networks; Stochastic modeling

Indexed keywords

EID: 34347351289     PISSN: 16141881     EISSN: 16142241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1614-2241.2.1.48     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Baerveldt, C., & Snijders, T. A. B. (1994). Influences on and from the segmentation of networks: Hypotheses and tests. Social Networks, 16, 213-232.
2. Boer, P., Huisman, M. E., Snijders, T. A. B., & Zeggelink, E. P. H. (2003). StOCNET: An Open Software System for the Advanced Statistical Analysis of Social Networks (Version 1.4) [Computer software]. Groningen, the Netherlands: Pro-GAMMA/ICS, University of Groningen. Retrieved November 05, 2005, from http://stat.gamma.rug.nl/stocnet/
3. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge & Kegan.
4. Bryson, B. (1996). Anything but heavy metal: Symbolic exclusion and musical dislikes. American Sociological Review, 61, 884-899.
5. Bush, H., West, P., & Michell, L. (1997). The role of friendship groups in the uptake and maintenance of smoking amongst preadolescent and adolescent children: Distribution of frequencies (Working Paper No. 62 of the Medical Sociology Unit). Glasgow, Scotland: Medical Research Council.
6. Carley, K. (1991). A theory of group stability. American Sociological Review, 56, 331-354.
7. Carrington, P., Scott, J., & Wasserman, S. (Eds.). (2005). Models and methods in social network analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Doreian, P. (1990). Network autocorrelation models: Problems and prospects. In D. A. Griffith (Ed.), Spatial statistics: Past, present, future (pp. 369-389). Ann Arbor: Michigan Document Services.
9. Dorogovtsev, S. N., Goltsev, A. V., & Mendes, J. F. F. (2002). Ising model on networks with an arbitrary distribution of connections. Physical Review E, 66, 016104l, 1-5.
10. Friedkin, N. (1998). A structural theory of social influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Hogg, M. A., Abrams, D., Otten, S., & Hinkle, S. (2004). The social identity perspective. Intergroup relations, self-conception, and small groups. Small Group Research, 35, 246-276.
12. Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1973). The structural implications of measurement error in sociometry. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 3, 85-111.
13. Huisman, M. E., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2003). Statistical analysis of longitudinal network data with changing composition. Sociological Methods & Research, 32, 253-287.
14. Katz-Gerro, T. (1999). Cultural consumption and social stratification: Leisure activities, musical tastes, and social location. Sociological Perspectives, 42, 627-646.
15. Koskinen, J. (2004). Essays on Bayesian inference for social networks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
16. Latané, B., & Nowak, A. (1997). Self-organizing social systems: Necessary and sufficient conditions for the emergence of clustering, consolidation and continuing diversity. Progress in Communication Science, 13, 43-74.
17. Macy, M. W., Kitts, J., Flache, A., & Benard, S. (2003). Polarization in dynamic networks: A Hopfield model of emergent structure. In R. Breiger, K. Carley, & P. Pattison (Eds.), Dynamic social network modelling and analysis: Workshop summary and papers (pp. 162-173). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
18. Mark, N. (1998). Beyond individual differences: Social differentiation from first principles. American Sociological Review, 63, 309-330.
19. McPherson, J. M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444.
20. Michell, L., & Amos, A. (1997). Girls, pecking order and smoking. Social Science & Medicine, 44, 1861-1869.
21. Michell, L., & West, P. (1996). Peer pressure to smoke: The meaning depends on the method. Health Education Research Theory & Practice, 11, 39-49.
22. Molenaar, I. M., Sijtsma, K., & Boer, P. (2000). MSP5 for Windows. A Program for Mokken Scale Analysis for Polytomous Items (Version 5.0) [Computer software]. Groningen, the Netherlands: iec ProGAMMA.
23. Pearson, M., & West, P. (2003). Social network analysis and Markov processes in a longitudinal study of friendship groups and risk-taking. Connections, 25, 59-76.
24. Roe, K. (1985). Swedish youth and music: Listening patterns and motivations. Communication Research, 12, 353-362.
25. Roe, K. (1996). Music and identity among European youth: Music as communication. In P. Rutten (Ed.), Music in Europe: Part 2. Music, culture and society in Europe (pp. 85-97). Brussels, Belgium: European Music Office.
26. Simmel, G. (1904). Fashion. International Quarterly, 10, 130-155.
27. nijders, T. A. B. (1996). Stochastic actor-oriented models for network change. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 21, 149-176.
28. Snijders, T. A. B. (2001). The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. In M. E. Sobel & M. P. Becker (Eds.), Sociological methodology - 2001 (pp. 361-395). Boston and London: Basil Blackwell.
29. Snijders, T. A. B. (2005). Models for longitudinal network data. In P. Carrington, J. Scott, & S. Wasserman (Eds.), Models and methods in social network analysis (pp. 215-247). New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C., & Schweinberger, M. (in press). Modeling the co-evolution of networks and behavior. In K. van Montfort, H. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Longitudinal models in the behavioral and related sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C., Schweinberger, M., & Huisman, M. (2005). SIENA version 2.1 [Computer software and manual]. Groningen, the Netherlands: ICS/Department of Sociology, University of Groningen. Retrieved February 21, 2005, from http://stat.gamma.rug.nl/ stocnet.
32. Snijders, T. A. B., & van Duijn, M. A. J. (1997). Simulation for statistical inference in dynamic network models. In R. Conte, R. Hegselmann, & P. Terna (Eds.), Simulating social phenomena (pp. 493-512). Berlin: Springer.
33. Steglich, C., Snijders, T. A. B., & Pearson, M. (2004). Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Manuscript submitted for publication.
34. Suzuki, T., & Best, J. (2003). The emergence of trendsetters for fashions and fads: Kogaru in 1990s Japan. Sociological Quarterly, 44, 61-79.
35. van de Bunt, G. G., van Duijn, M. A. J., & Snijders, T. A. B. (1999). Friendship networks through time: An actor-oriented statistical network model. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 5, 167-192.
36. Veblen, T. (1899). The theory of the leisure class. New York: Macmillan.