Hierarchical Network Models for Education Research: Hierarchical Latent Space Models

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 295-318

  Sweet, Tracy M ^a   Thomas, Andrew C ^a   Junker, Brian W ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian modeling; field trials in education research; partial exchangeability; professional communities; social network analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877999086     PISSN: 10769986     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/1076998612458702     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Airoldi E.,Blei D.,Fienberg S.,Xing E.Mixed membership stochastic block-models.The Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2008;9:1981-2014.
2. Bonsignore E.,Hansen D.,Galyardt A.,Aleahmad T.,Hargadon S.Breakthrough teaching and learning: How educational and assistive technologies are driving innovation. Gray T.Silver-Pacuilla H., ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2011:25-52.
3. Coburn C.,Russell J.District policy and teachers' social networks.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 2008;30:203-235.
4. Daly A.,Moolenaar N.,Bolivar J.,Burke P.Relationships in reform: The role of teachers' social networks.Journal of Educational Administration. 2010;48:359-391.
5. Fienberg S.,Meyer M.,Wasserman S.Statistical analysis of multiple sociometric relations.Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1985;80:51-67.
6. Frank K. A.,Penuel W. R.,Sun M.,Chong M. K.,Singleton C.The organization as a filter of institutional diffusion.Teachers College Record. 2013;115 (1):.
7. Frank K. A.,Zhao Y.,Borman K.Social capital and the diffusion of innovations within organizations: The case of computer technology in schools.Sociology of Education. 2004;77:148-171.
8. Gelman A.,Carlin J.,Stern H.,Rubin D.Bayesian data analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press; 2004:.
9. Glennan T. K.,Resnick L. B.School districts as learning organizations: A strategy for scaling education reform. Glennan T. K.Bodill S. J.Galegher J. R.Kerr K. A., ed. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2004:517-563.
10. Goldenberg A.,Zheng A.,Fienberg S.,Airoldi E.A survey of statistical network models.Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning. 2009;2:129-133.
11. Harris K.,Halpern C.,Whitsel E.,Hussey J.,Tabor J.,Entzel P.,Udry J.The national longitudinal study of adolescent health: Research design. 2009:.
12. Hoff P. D.,Raftery A. E.,Handcock M. S.Latent space approaches to social network analysis.Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2002;97:1090-1098.
13. Hord S.,Roussin J.,Sommers W.Guiding professional learning communities: Inspiration, challenge, surprise and meaning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin/Sage; 2010:.
14. Johnson M.,Junker B.Using data augmentation and Markov chain Monte Carlo for the estimation of unfolding response models.Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 2003;28:195.
15. Kolaczyk E.Statistical analysis of network data: Methods and models. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2009:.
16. Lazega E.,van Duijn M.Position in formal structure, personal characteristics and choices of advisors in a law firm: A logistic regression model for dyadic network data.Social Networks. 1997;19:375-397.
17. Lin N.Building a network theory of social capital.Connections. 1999;22:28-51.
18. Matsumura L.,Garnier H.,Resnick L.Implementing literacy coaching: The role of school social resources.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 2010;32:249-272.
19. McLaughlin M.,Talbert J.Building school-based teacher learning communities: Professional strategies to improve student achievement. New York, NY: Teachers College Press; 2006:.
20. Moreno J.Who shall survive?: A new approach to the problem of human interrelations. Washington, DC: Nervous and Mental Disease; 1934:.
21. Moolenaar N.,Daly A.,Sleegers P.Occupying the principal position: Examining relationships between transformational leadership, social network position, and schools' innovative climate.Educational Administration Quarterly. 2010;46:623.
22. Penuel W.,Riel M.,Joshi A.,Pearlman L.,Kim C.,Frank K.The alignment of the informal and formal organizational supports for reform: Implications for improving teaching in schools.Educational Administration Quarterly. 2010;46:57-95.
23. Penuel W.,Riel M.,Krause A.,Frank K.Analyzing teachers' professional interactions in a school as social capital: A social network approach.The Teachers College Record. 2009;111:124-163.
24. Penuel W. R.,Frank K. A.,Krause A.Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Learning sciences. Indiana University, Bloomington, IN: International Society of the Learning Sciences; 2006:522-528.
25. Pitts V.,Spillance J.Using social network methods to study school leadership.International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2009;32:185-207.
26. Polak M.,Heiser W.,De Rooij M.,Busing F.A comparison of correspondence analysis, multidimensional unfolding and the generalized graded unfolding model for single-peaked data. Paper presented at the 13th International Meeting of the Psychometric Society Chia Laguna (Cagliari); July 2003Italy; July 2003.
27. R: A language for data analysis and graphics. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2011:.
28. Raudenbush S.,Bryk A.Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2002:.
29. Snijders T.,Kenny D.The social relations model for family data: A multilevel approach.Personal Relationships. 1999;6:471-486.
30. Snijders T.,Nowicki K.Estimation and prediction for stochastic blockmodels for graphs with latent block structure.Journal of Classification. 1997;14:75-100.
31. Spillane J.,Correnti R.,Junker B.Learning leadership: Kernel routines for instructional improvement. (IES Grant Proposal). Chicago, IL: Author; 2009:.
32. Sweet T.,Thomas A. C.,Junker B.Handbook on mixed membership models. 2012:.
33. Templin J.,Ho M.-H.,Anderson C.,Wasserman S.Proceedings of the American Statistical Association:Bayesian Statistical Sciences Section, (pp. 4198-4024). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association; 2003:.
34. Thomas S.Ties that bind: A social network approach to understanding student integration and persistence.The Journal of Higher Education. 2000;71:591-615.
35. Wasserman S.,Pattison P.Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs and p*.Psychometrika. 1996;61:401-425.
36. Weinbaum E.,Cole R.,Weiss M.,Supovitz J.The implementation gap: Understanding reform in high schools. Supovitz J.Weinbaum E., ed. New York, NY: Teachers College Press; 2008:68-102.
37. Zijlstra B.,van Duijn M.,Snijders T.The multilevel p 2 model.Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. 2006;2:42-47.