Supporting 'participation' in mobile participation

Innovation and the Public Sector

Volumn 21, Issue , 2014, Pages 3-12

  Ertiö, Titiana Petra ^a   Ruoppila, Sampo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Application development; Electronic participation; Mobile participation; Participation practices; Participation support

Indexed keywords

EID: 84984866268     PISSN: 18711073     EISSN: 09289038     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-429-9-3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Michels, A. (2011). Innovations in democratic governance: how does citizen participation contribute to a better democracy? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77, 275-293.
2. Ertiö, T. (2013). M-participation: The emergence of participatory planning applications. Turku Urban Research Programme's Research Briefings 6b/2013. 9 pp.
3. Korn, M. (2013). Situating engagement: Ubiquitous infrastructures for in-situ civic engagement. PhD thesis, Aarhus University. http://pure.au.dk/portal/files/56904964/phd2013.pdf (Accessed 18.2.2014).
4. Clark, B. Y., Brudney, J. L., Jang, S. G. (2013) Coproduction of government services and the new information technology: investigating the distributional biases. Public Administration Review, 73, 687- 701.
5. Gonçalves, J., Kostakos, V., Karapanos, E., Barreto, M., Camacho, T., Tomasic, A. & Zimmerman, J. (2013). Citizen Motivation on the Go: The Role of Psychological Empowerment. Interacting with Computers, Advance Access published July 3, 2013.
6. Konomi, S., Sasao, T., Arikawa, M. & Fujita, H. (2013). A mobile phone-based exploratory citizen sensing environment. Paper presented at UbiComp'13, September 8-12, 2013, Zurich, Switzerland.
7. van Deursen, A., van Dijk, J. & Peters, O. (2011). Rethinking Internet skills: The contribution of gender, age, education, Internet experience, and hours online to medium-And content-related Internet skills. Poetics, 39, 125-144.
8. van Dijk, J. (2005). The Deepening Divide. Inequality in the Information Society. London: Sage Publications.
9. van Dijk, J. (2006). Digital divide research: Achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34, 221-235.
10. Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people's online skills. First Monday, 7.
11. van Deursen, A. & van Dijk, J. (2013). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, doi:10.1177/1461444813487959.
12. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R.M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024-1037.
13. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R.M. (2000). The what and why of goal pursuits: human needs and the selfdetermination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
14. Johns, G. (1996). Organizational Behavior: Understanding and Managing Life at Work, 4th ed. New York: HarperCollins.
15. Osterloh, M. & Frey, B. (2000). Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organization Science, 11, 538-550.
16. Sansone, C. (1986). A question of competence: The effects of competence on task feedback on intrinsic interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 918-931.
17. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G. & O'Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 351-401.
18. Powell, W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. In Staw, B. & Cummings, L. (Eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295-336.
19. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Ostrom, E. (1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action, presidential address. The American Political Science Review, 92, 1-22.
21. Desouza, K. (2012). Challenge.gov: Using Competitions and Awards to Spur Innovation, IBM Center for the Business of Government.http://www.businessofgovernment.org/article/challengegov-usingcompetitions-And-Awards-spur-innovation (Accessed 19.04.2014).
22. Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23. Luoma-Aho, V. (2007). Neutral reputation and public sector organizations. Corporate Reputation Review, 10, 124-143.
24. Sztompka, P. (2000). Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
26. Posner, R. & Rasmusen, E. (1999). Creating and enforcing norms, with special reference to sanctions. International Review of Law and Economics, 19, 369-382.
27. Whatley, M. A., Webster, J. M., Smith, R. H., & Rhodes, A. (1999). The effect of a favor on public and private compliance: How internalized is the norm of reciprocity. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2, 251-259.
28. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
29. Kandori, M. (1992). Social norms and community enforcement. Review of Economic Studies, 59, 63-80.
30. Brown, G. & Chin, S. (2013) Assessing the effectiveness of public participation in neighborhood planning. Planning Practice & Research, 28, 563-588.
31. Lowndes, V., Pratchett, L. & Stoker, G. (2006). Diagnosing and remedying the failings of official participation schemes: The CLEAR framework. Social Policy and Society, 5, 281-291.
32. Brown, G. (2012). Public participation GIS (PPGIS) for regional and environmental planning: Reflections on a decade of empirical research. URISA Journal, 25, 5-18.
33. Miller, C.C. (2006). A beast in the field: The Google Maps mashup as GIS/2. Cartographica, 41, 187- 199.
34. Nuojua J. (2010). WebMapMedia: A map-based Web application for facilitating participation in spatial planning. Multimedia Systems, 16, 3-21.
35. Jones, P., Layard, A., Speed, C. and Lorne, C. (2013). MapLocal: use of smartphones for crowdsourced planning. Paper presented in Using ICT, Social Media and Mobile Technologies to Foster Self- Organisation in Urban and Neighbourhood Governance, May 16-17, 2013, Delft, the Netherlands.
36. Bohøj, M., Borchorst, N., Bødker, S., Korn, M. & Zander, P-O. (2011) Public deliberation in municipal planning: supporting action and reflection with mobile technology. Proceedings of the Communities & Technology conference, Brisbane, Australia, 88-97.
37. Korn, M. & Bødker, S. (2012). Looking ahead - How field trials can work in iterative and exploratory design of ubicomp systems. Paper presented at UbiComp' 12, Sep 5 - Sep 8, 2012, Pittsburgh, USA.
38. Olsson T.D., Savisalo A.T., Hakkarainen, M. and Woodward, C. (2012). User evaluation of mobile augmented reality in architectural planning. In: Gudnason & Scherer (eds.) eWork and eBusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction: ECPPM 2012. London: Taylor & Francis, 733-740.
39. Poplin, A. (2012). Playful public participation in urban planning: A case study for online serious games. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 36, 195-206.
40. Kawasaki, H., Yamamoto, A., Kurasawa, H., Sato, H., Nakamura, M. & Kakinuma, R. (2013). An evaluation of method for encouraging participation. UbiComp '13 Adjunct Proceedings of the 2013 ACM conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing adjunct publication.