Erratum to “Threat predictability influences seaside sparrow nest site selection when facing trade-offs from predation and flooding” (Animal Behaviour (2017) 126 (1) (S0003347216301610) (10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.08.001));Threat predictability influences seaside sparrow nest site selection when facing trade-offs from predation and flooding

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 120, Issue , 2016, Pages 135-142

  Hunter, Elizabeth A ^a   Nibbelink, Nathan P ^a   Cooper, Robert J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Ammodramus maritimus; habitat selection; MCestimate; predation; salt marsh

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; FLOODING; HABITAT SELECTION; NEST SITE; NESTING SUCCESS; PASSERINE; PREDATION RISK; PREDICTION; SALTMARSH; SURVIVAL; TRADE-OFF;

BRUNSWICK [GEORGIA]; GEORGIA; UNITED STATES;

AMMODRAMUS MARITIMUS; ANIMALIA; PASSERIDAE;

EID: 84984830163     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.01.014     Document Type: Erratum

References (55)

1. Anteau, M.J., Shaffer, T.L., Sherfy, M.H., Sovada, M.A., Stucker, J.H., Wiltermuth, M.T., Nest survival of piping plovers at a dynamic reservoir indicates an ecological trap for a threatened population. Oecologia 170 (2012), 1167–1179.
2. Bayard, T.S., Elphick, C.S., Planning for sea-level rise: Quantifying patterns of saltmarsh sparrow (Ammodramus caudacutus) nest flooding under current sea-level conditions. Auk 128 (2011), 393–403.
3. Benson, T.J., Brown, J.D., Bednarz, J.C., Identifying predators clarifies predictors of nest success in a temperate passerine. Journal of Animal Ecology 79 (2010), 225–234.
4. Burger, J., The role of reproductive success in colony-site selection and abandonment in black skimmers (Rynchops niger). Auk 99 (1982), 109–115.
5. Chalfoun, A.D., Martin, T.E., Facultative nest patch shifts in response to nest predation risk in the Brewer's sparrow: A ‘win-stay, lose-switch’ strategy?. Oecologia 163 (2010), 885–892.
6. Clark, R.G., Shutler, D., Avian habitat selection: Pattern from process in nest-site use by ducks?. Ecology 80 (1999), 272–287.
7. Colwell, R.K., Predictability, constancy, and contingency of periodic phenomena. Ecology 55 (1974), 1148–1153.
8. Creel, S., Christianson, D., Relationships between direct predation and risk effects. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23 (2008), 194–201.
9. Devereux, C.L., Whittingham, M.J., Fernández-Juricic, E., Vickery, J.A., Krebs, J.R., Predator detection and avoidance by starlings under differing scenarios of predation risk. Behavioral Ecology 17 (2005), 303–309.
10. Doligez, B., Cadet, C., Danchin, E., Boulinier, T., When to use public information for breeding habitat selection? The role of environmental predictability and density dependence. Animal Behaviour 66 (2003), 973–988.
11. Etterson, M., Nagy, L.R., Robinson, T.R., Johnson, D.H., Partitioning risk among different causes of nest failure. Auk 124 (2007), 432–443.
12. Filliater, T.S., Breitwisch, R., Nealen, P.M., Predation on northern cardinal nests: Does choice of nest site matter?. Condor 96 (1994), 761–768.
13. Fisher, R.J., Wiebe, K.L., Nest site attributes and temporal patterns of northern flicker nest loss: Effects of predation and competition. Oecologia 147 (2005), 744–753.
14. Fontaine, J.J., Martin, T.E., Parent birds assess nest predation risk and adjust their reproductive strategies. Ecology Letters 9 (2006), 428–434.
15. Forstmeier, W., Weiss, I., Adaptive plasticity in nest-site selection in response to changing predation risk. Oikos 104 (2004), 487–499.
16. Gjerdrum, C., Elphick, C.S., Rubega, M., Nest site selection and nesting success in saltmarsh breeding sparrows: The importance of nest habitat, timing, and study site differences. Condor 107 (2005), 849–862.
17. Greenberg, R., Elphick, C., Nordby, J.C., Gjerdrum, C., Spautz, H., Shriver, G., et al. Flooding and predation: Trade-offs in the nesting ecology of tidal-marsh sparrows. Studies in Avian Biology 32 (2006), 96–109.
18. Hijmans, R.J., Raster: Geographic data analysis and modeling (R package version 2.4–20). 2015, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster.
19. Hladik, C., Alber, M., Accuracy assessment and correction of a LIDAR-derived salt marsh digital elevation model. Remote Sensing of Environment 121 (2012), 224–235.
20. Houston, A.I., McNamara, J.M., Hutchinson, J., General results concerning the trade-off between gaining energy and avoiding predation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 341 (1993), 375–397.
21. Hunter, E.A., Nibbelink, N.P., Alexander, C.R., Barrett, K., Mengak, L.F., Guy, R.K., et al. Coastal vertebrate exposure to predicted habitat changes due to sea level rise. Environmental Management 56 (2015), 1528–1537.
22. Hunter, E.A., Nibbelink, N.P., Cooper, R.J., Divergent forecasts for two salt marsh specialists in response to sea level rise. Animal Conservation, 2016, 10.1111/acv.12280 Advance online publication.
23. Ibáñez-Álamo, J.D., Magrath, R.D., Oteyza, J.C., Chalfoun, A.D., Haff, T.M., Schmidt, K.A., et al. Nest predation research: Recent findings and future perspectives. Journal of Ornithology 156 (2015), 247–262.
24. Kearns, L.J., Rodewald, A.D., Within-season use of public and private information on predation risk in nest-site selection. Journal of Ornithology 154 (2012), 163–172.
25. Kern, R.A., Shriver, W.G., Sea level rise and prescribed fire management: Implications for seaside sparrow population viability. Biological Conservation 173 (2014), 24–31.
26. Kolbe, J.J., Janzen, F.J., Impact of nest-site selection on nest success and nest temperature in natural and disturbed habitats. Ecology 83 (2002), 269–281.
27. Lehmicke, A.J.J., Breeding ecology of the seaside sparrow (Ammodramus maritimus) in northern Gulf of Mexico tidal salt marshes. (Ph.D. thesis), 2014, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
28. Lima, S.L., Predators and the breeding bird: Behavioral and reproductive flexibility under the risk of predation. Biological Reviews 84 (2009), 485–513.
29. Martin, T.E., Nest predation among vegetation layers and habitat types: Revising the dogmas. American Naturalist 141 (1993), 897–913.
30. Martin, T.E., Avian life history evolution in relation to nest sites, nest predation, and food. Ecological Monographs 65 (1995), 101–127.
31. Martin, T.E., Geupel, G.R., Nest-monitoring plots: Methods for locating nests and monitoring success. Journal of Field Ornithology 64 (1993), 507–519.
32. Marzluff, J.M., Do pinyon jays alter nest placement based on prior experience?. Animal Behaviour 36 (1988), 1–10.
33. McKee, K.L., Patrick, W.H., The relationship of smooth cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) to tidal datums: A review. Estuaries 11 (1988), 143–151.
34. Morris, J.T., Sundareshwar, P.V., Nietch, C.T., Kjerfve, B., Cahoon, D.R., Responses of coastal wetlands to rising sea level. Ecology 83 (2002), 2869–2877.
35. Nordby, J.C., Cohen, A.N., Beissinger, S.R., Effects of a habitat-altering invader on nesting sparrows: An ecological trap?. Biological Invasions 11 (2008), 565–575.
36. Pakanen, V.M., Rönkä, N., Thomson, R.L., Koivula, K., Informed renesting decisions: The effect of nest predation risk. Oecologia 174 (2013), 1159–1167.
37. Peluc, S.I., Sillett, T.S., Rotenberry, J.T., Ghalambor, C.K., Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in an island songbird exposed to a novel predation risk. Behavioral Ecology 19 (2008), 830–835.
38. Picman, J., Milks, M.L., Leptich, M., Patterns of predation on passerine nests in marshes: Effects of water depth and distance from edge. Auk 110 (1993), 89–94.
39. Pietz, P.J., Granfors, D.A., Identifying predators and fates of grassland passerine nests using miniature video cameras. Journal of Wildlife Management 64 (2000), 71–87.
40. van de Pol, M., Ens, B.J., Heg, D., Brouwer, L., Krol, J., Maier, M., et al. Do changes in the frequency, magnitude and timing of extreme climatic events threaten the population viability of coastal birds?. Journal of Applied Ecology 47 (2010), 720–730.
41. Post, W., Greenlaw, J.S., Seaside sparrow (Ammodramus maritimus). Poole, A., (eds.) The birds of North America Online (No. 127), 2009, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY http://bna.birds.edu/species/127.
42. Prugh, L.R., Stoner, C.J., Epps, C.W., Bean, W.T., Ripple, W.J., Laliberte, A.S., et al. The rise of the mesopredator. BioScience 59 (2009), 779–791.
43. R Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2015, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria http://www.R-project.org/.
44. Reinert, S.E., Avian nesting response to tidal-marsh flooding: Literature review and a case for adaptation in the red-winged blackbird. Studies in Avian Biology 32 (2006), 77–95.
45. Rodewald, A.D., Kearns, L.J., Shifts in dominant nest predators along a rural-to-urban landscape gradient. Condor 113 (2011), 899–906.
46. Ruskin, K.J., Hodgman, T.P., Etterson, M., Olsen, B.J., Divergent oviposition preferences of sister species are not driven by nest survival: The evidence for neutrality. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 69 (2015), 1639–1647.
47. Schlaepfer, M.A., Runge, M.C., Sherman, P.W., Ecological and evolutionary traps. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17 (2002), 474–480.
48. Schmidt, K.A., Dall, S.R.X., van Gils, J.A., The ecology of information: An overview on the ecological significance of making informed decisions. Oikos 119 (2010), 304–316.
49. Shriver, W.G., Vickery, P.D., Hodgman, T.P., Gibbs, J.P., Flood tides affect breeding ecology of two sympatric sharp-tailed sparrows. Auk 124 (2007), 552–560.
50. Stahlschmidt, Z.R., Adamo, S.A., Warm and cozy: Temperature and predation risk interactively affect oviposition site selection. Animal Behaviour 86 (2013), 553–558.
51. Valdes, K., Hunter, E.A., Nibbelink, N.P., Elevation is a strong determinant of nest site selection for clapper rails in Georgia, USA. Journal of Field Ornithology 87 (2016), 65–73.
52. Valone, T.J., Templeton, J.J., Public information for the assessment of quality: A widespread social phenomenon. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 357 (2002), 1549–1557.
53. Warner, D.A., Shine, R., Maternal nest-site choice in a lizard with temperature-dependent sex determination. Animal Behaviour 75 (2008), 861–870.
54. Werner, E.E., Hall, D.J., Ontogenetic habitat shifts in bluegill: The foraging rate-predation risk trade-off. Ecology 69 (1988), 1352–1366.
55. Yin, G., Ma, Y., Pearson-type goodness-of-fit test with bootstrap maximum likelihood estimation. Electronic Journal of Statistics 7 (2013), 412–427.