The ecology of information: An overview on the ecological significance of making informed decisions

Oikos

Volumn 119, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 304-316

  Schmidt, Kenneth A ^a   Dall, Sasha R X ^b   van Gils, Jan A ^c,d  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR SEA RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

^d NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE OF ECOLOGY NIOO KNAW   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALARM SIGNAL; ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGICAL APPROACH; HABITAT SELECTION; UNCERTAINTY ROLE;

EID: 77952934013     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17573.x     Document Type: Article

References (157)

1. Bascompte J. Patchy populations in stochastic environments: critical number of patches for persistence. Am. Nat 2002, 159:128-137.
2. Beauchamp G. Learning rules for social foragers: implications for the producer-scrounger game and ideal free distribution theory. J. Theor. Biol 2000, 207:21-35.
3. Bélisle M. Measuring landscape connectivity: the challenge of behavioral landscape ecology. Ecology 2005, 86:1988-1995.
4. Bélisle M, Desrochers A. Gap-crossing decisions by forest birds: an empirical basis for parameterizing spatially-explicit, individual-based models. Landscape Ecol 2002, 17:219-231.
5. Betts M G. Social information trumps vegetation structure in breeding-site selection of a migrant songbird. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2008, 275:2257-2263.
6. Blumstein D T, Bouskila A. Assessment and decision-making in animals: a mechanistic model underlying behavioral flexibility can prevent ambiguity. Oikos 1996, 77:569-577.
7. Bonnie K E, Earley R L. Expanding the scope for social information use. Anim. Behav 2007, 74:171-181.
8. Both C. Climate change and unequal phenological changes across four trophic levels: constraints or adaptations? J. AnimEcol 2009, 78:73-83.
9. Boulinier T. Timing of prospecting and the value of information in a colonial breeding bird. J. Avian Biol 1996, 27:252-256.
10. Boulinier T. Public information affects breeding dispersal in a colonial bird: kittiwakes cue on neighbors. Biol. Lett 2008, 5:538-540.
11. Bouskila A, Blumstein D T. Rules of thumb for predation hazard assessment: predictions from a dynamic model. Am. Nat 1992, 139:161-176.
12. Bradbury J W, Vehrencamp S L. Principles of animal communication 1998, Sinauer
13. Bradshaw C J A. Tropical turmoil: a biodiversity tragedy in progress. Front. Ecol. Environ 2009, 7:79-87.
14. Brooks B W. Global warming tugs at trophic interactions. J. Anim. Ecol 2009, 778:1-3.
15. Brown J S. The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions. J. Mamm 1999, 80:385-399.
16. Bshary R, Noë R. Red colobus and Diana monkeys provide mutual protection against predators. Anim. Behav 1997, 54:1461-1474.
17. Caro T. Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals 2005, Univ. of Chicago Press
18. Clobert J. Dispersal 2001, Oxford Univ. Press
19. Coolen I. Foraging nine-spined sticklebacks prefer to rely on public information over simpler social cues. Behav. Ecol 2005, 16:865-870.
20. Cote J, Clobert J. Social information and emigration: lessons from immigrants. Ecol. Lett 2007, 10:411-417.
21. Dall S R X. Defining the concept of public information. Science 2005, 308:353-354.
22. Dall S R X, Johnstone R A. Managing uncertainty: information and insurance under the risk of starvation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2002, 357:1519-1526.
23. Dall S R X. Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol 2005, 20:187-193.
24. Danchin E. Habitat selection based on conspecific reproductive success: implications for the evolution of coloniality. Ecology 1998, 79:2415-2428.
25. Danchin E. Public information: from nosy neighbors to cultural evolution. Science 2004, 305:487-491.
26. Desrochers A, Fortin M J. Understanding avian responses to forest boundaries: a case study with chickadee winter flocks. Oikos 2000, 91:376-384.
27. Dicke M, Vet L E M. Plant-carnivore interactions: evolutionary and ecological consequences for plant, herbivore and carnivore. Herbivores: between plants an predators 1999, 483-520. Olff H, Blackwell
28. Diego-Rassila F J, Luengo R M. Heterospecific call recognition and phonotaxis in the orientation of the marbled newt, Triturus marmoratus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol 2004, 55:556-560.
29. Dodd A N. Plant circadian clocks increase photosynthesis, growth, survival and competitive advantage. Science 2005, 309:630-633.
30. Dolby A S, Grubb T C. Benefit to satellite members in mixed-species foraging groups: an experimental analysis. Anim. Behav 1998, 56:501-509.
31. Dolby A S, Grubb T C. Social context affects risk taking by a satellite species in a mixed-species foraging group. Behav. Ecol 2000, 11:110-114.
32. Doligez B. Public information and breeding habitat selection in a wild bird population. Science 2002, 297:1168-1170.
33. Doligez B. When to use public information for breeding habitat selection? The role of environmental predictability and density dependence. Anim. Behav 2003, 66:973-988.
34. Donahue M J. Allee effects and conspecific cueing jointly lead to conspecific attraction. Oecologia 2006, 149:33-43.
35. Donaldson-Matasci M C. Phenotypic diversity as an adaptation to environmental uncertainty. Evol. Ecol. Res 2008, 10:493-515.
36. Donalson-Matasci M C. The fitness value of information. Oikos 2010, 119:219-230.
37. Dukas R. Behavioural and ecological consequences of limited attention. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 2002, 357:1539-1547.
38. Elmberg J. Interspecific interaction and co-existence in dabbling ducks: observations and an experiment. Oecologia 1997, 111:129-136.
39. Fahrig L. Non-optimal animal movement in human-altered landscapes. Funct. Ecol 2007, 21:1003-1015.
40. Fletcher R T. Emergent properties of conspecific attraction in fragmented landscapes. Am. Nat 2006, 168:207-219.
41. Fletcher R T. Social information and community dynamics: nontarget effects from simulating social cues for management. Ecol. Appl 2008, 18:1764-1773.
42. Fletcher R T, Miller C W. The type and timing of social information alters offspring production. Biol. Lett 2008, 4:482-485.
43. Forbes L S, Kaiser G W. Habitat choice in breeding seabirds: when to cross the information barrier. Oikos 1994, 70:377-384.
44. Forsman J T. Positive fitness consequences of interspecific interaction with a potential competitor. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2002, 269:1619-1623.
45. Forsman J T. Competitor density cues for habitat quality facilitating habitat selection and investment decisions. Behav. Ecol 2008, 19:539-545.
46. Fryxell J M, Lundberg P. Individual behavior and community dynamics 1998, Chapman and Hall
47. Gaddis P K. Differential usage of song types by plain, bridled and tufted titmouse. Ornis Scand 1983, 14:16-23.
48. Getty T. Mate selection by repeated inspection: more on pied flycatchers. Anim. Behav 1996a, 51:739-745.
49. Getty T. The maintenance of phenotypic plasticity as a signal detection problem. Am. Nat 1996b, 148:378-385.
50. Gilbert S F. Ecological developmental biology: developmental biology meets the real world. Dev. Biol 2001, 233:1-12.
51. Giraldeau L-A. Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2002, 357:1559-1566.
52. Goodale E, Kotagama S W. Alarm calling in Sri Lankan mixed-species flocks. Auk 2005, 122:108-120.
53. Greene E. A diet-induced developmental polymorphism in a caterpillar. Science 1989, 243:643-646.
54. Gripenberg S. A tree in the eyes of a moth - temporal variation in oak leaf quality and leaf-miner performance. Oikos 2007, 116:592-600.
55. Hingee Mand, Magrath RD. Flights of fear: a mechanical wing whistle sounds the alarm in a flocking bird. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2009, doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1110.
56. Holt R D. IJEE soapbox: the unraveling of nature's information webs: the next depressing frontier in conservation? Isr. J. Ecol. Evol 2007, 53:229-236.
57. Holt R D. Simple rules for interspecific dominance in systems with exploitative and apparent competition. Am. Nat 1994, 144:741-771.
58. Jablonka E. Information: its interpretation, its inheritance and its sharing. Philos. Sci 2002, 69:578-605.
59. Kendal R L. The role of conformity in foraging when personal and social information conflict. Behav. Ecol 2004, 15:269-277.
60. Kokko H, Sutherland W J. Ecological traps in changing environments: ecological and evolutionary consequences of a behaviorally mediated Allee effect. Evol. Ecol. Res 2001, 3:537-551.
61. Koops M A. Misinformation and assessment uncertainty in the ecology of information use. 1998, PhD thesis. Univ. of Manitoba Winnipeg, Canada
62. Kriska G. Why do mayflies lay their eggs en masse on dry asphalt roads? Water-imitating polarized light reflected from asphalt attracts Ephemeroptera. J. Exp. Biol 1998, 201:2273-2286.
63. Laiolo P, Tella J L. Erosion of animal cultures in fragmented landscapes. Front. Ecol Environ 2007, 5:68-72.
64. Langerhans R B, DeWitt T J. Plasticity constrained: over-generalized induction cues cause maladaptive phenotypes. Evol. Ecol. Res 2002, 4:857-870.
65. Langham G M. Why pishing works: titmouse (Paridae) scolds elicit a generalized response in bird communities. Ecoscience 2006, 13:485-496.
66. Leibold M A. The niche concept revisited: mechanistic models and community context. Ecology 1995, 76:1371-1382.
67. Levins R. Evolution in changing environments 1968, Princeton Univ. Press
68. Lewis M A, Murray J D. Modeling territoriality and wolf-deer interactions. Nature 1993, 366:738-740.
69. Lima S L, Zollner P A. Towards a behavioral ecology of landscapes. Trends Ecol. Evol 1996, 11:131-135.
70. Lürling M, Scheffer M. Info-disruption: pollution and the transfer of chemical information between organisms. Trends Ecol. Evol 2007, 22:374-379.
71. Luttbeg B. A comparative Bayes tactic for mate assessment and choice. Behav. Ecol 1996, 7:451-460.
72. Luttbeg B, Schmitz O J. Predator and prey models with flexible individual behavior and imperfect information. Am. Nat 2000, 15:669-683.
73. Massot M, Clobert J. Processes at the origin of similarities in dispersal behavior among siblings. J. Evol. Biol 2000, 13:707-719.
74. Mathis A. Learning by embryos and the ghost of predation future. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2008, 275:2603-2607.
75. Maynard Smith J. The concept of information in biology. Philos. Sci 2000, 67:177-194.
76. McNamara J M, Houston A. The application of statistical decision theory to animal behavior. J. Theor. Biol 1980, 125:385-395.
77. McNamara J M, Dall S R X. Information is a fitness enhancing resource. Oikos 2010, 119:231-236.
78. McNamara J M. Bayes' theorem and its application in animal behavior. Oikos 2006, 112:243-251.
79. Mihoub J-B. Breeding habitat selection behaviors in heterogeneous environments: implications for modeling reintroduction. Oikos 2009, 118:663-674.
80. Mitchell W A, Valone T J. The optimization research program: studying adaptations by their function. Q. Rev. Biol 1990, 65:43-65.
81. Moller A P. Interspecific responses to playback of bird song. Ethology 1992, 90:315-320.
82. Mönkkönen M, Forsman J K. Heterospecific attraction among forest birds: a review. Ornithol. Sci 2002, 1:41-51.
83. Mönkkönen M. Numerical and behavioral responses of migrant passerines in experimental manipulation of resident tits (Parus spp.): heterospecific attraction in northern breeding bird communities? Oecologia 1990, 85:218-225.
84. Moore R P. Experimental evidence for extreme dispersal limitation in tropical forest birds. Ecol. Lett 2008, 11:960-968.
85. Moran N A. The evolutionary maintenance of alternative phenotypes. Am. Nat 1992, 139:971-989.
86. Nocera J J. Inadvertent social information in breeding site selection of natal dispersing birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2006, 273:349-355.
87. Nocera J J. Inspection of mob-calls as sources of predator information: response of migrant and resident birds in the Neotropics. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol 2008, 62:1769-1777.
88. Olsson O, Holmgren N M A. Optimal Bayesian foraging policies and prey population dynamics: some comments on Rodríguez-Gironés and Vásquez. Theor. Popul. Biol 2000, 57:369-375.
89. Olsson O, Brown J S. The foraging benefits of information and the penalty of ignorance. Oikos 2006, 112:260-273.
90. Olsson O, Brown J S. Smart, smarter, smartest: foraging information states and coexistence. Oikos 2010, 119:292-303.
91. Parejo D. The heterospecific habitat copying hypothesis: can competitors indicate habitat quality? Behav. Ecol 2005, 16:96-105.
92. Parejo D. Blue tits use fledgling quantity and quality as public information in breeding site choice. Ecology 2007, 88:2373-2382.
93. Peake T M. Eavesdropping in communication networks. Animal communication networks 2005, 13-37. McGregor P. Cambridge Univ. Press
94. Peacor S D. Phenotypic modifications to conspecific density arising from predation risk assessment. Oikos 2003, 100:409-415.
95. Pechenik J A. Larval experience and latent effects - metamorphosis is not a new beginning. Int. Comp. Biol 2006, 46:323-333.
96. Pimm S. Human impacts on the rates of recent, present, and future bird extinctions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci 2006, 29:10941-10946.
97. Plotkin H C. Darwin machines and the nature of knowledge 1997, Harvard Univ. Press
98. Pomeroy A C. Tradeoffs between food abundance and predation danger in spatial usage of a stopover site by western sandpiper, Calidris mauri. Oikos 2006, 112:629-637.
99. Pomeroy A C. Experimental evidence that migrants adjust usage at a stopover site to trade off food and danger. Behav. Ecol 2006, 17:1041-1045.
100. Pulliam H R, Danielson B J. Sources, sinks and habitat selection - a landscape perspective on population dynamics. Am. Nat 1991, 137:S50-S66.
101. Quinn J L. Noise, predation risk compensation and vigilance in the chaffinch Fringilla coelbs. J. Avian Biol 2006, 37:601-608.
102. Rabin L A. The effects of wind turbines on antipredator behavior in California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi). Biol. Conserv 2006, 131:410-420.
103. Ragusa-Netto J. Vigilance toward raptors by nuclear species in bird mixed flocks in a Brazilian savannah. Stud. Neotrop. Fauna E 2002, 37:219-226.
104. Ray C. The effect of conspecific attraction on metapopulation dynamics. Biol. J. Linn 1991, 42:123-234.
105. Reed J. Informed dispersal: prospecting by birds for breeding sites. Curr. Ornithol 1999, 15:189-259.
106. Resco V. Ecological implications of plants' ability to tell the time. Ecol. Lett 2009, 12:583-592.
107. Robertson B A, Hutto R L. A framework for understanding ecological traps and an evaluation of existing evidence. Ecology 2006, 87:1075-1085.
108. Rodenhouse N L. Site-dependent regulation of population size: a new synthesis. Ecology 1997, 78:2025-2042.
109. Rodríguez-Gironés M A, Vásquez R A. Density-dependent patch exploitation and acquisition of environmental information. Theor. Popul. Biol 1997, 52:32-42.
110. Roth T C, Lima S L. Use of prey hotspots by an avian predator: purposeful unpredictability? Am. Nat 2007, 169:264-273.
111. Schlaepfer M A. Ecological and evolutionary traps. Trends Ecol. Evol 2002, 17:474-480.
112. Schmidt K A. Site fidelity in habitats with contrasting levels of nest predation and brood parasitism. Evol. Ecol. Res 2001, 3:633-648.
113. Schmidt K A. Site-fidelity in temporally correlated environments enhances population persistence. Ecol. Lett 2004, 7:176-184.
114. Schmidt K A, Whelan C J. Nesting in and uncertain world: information and sampling the future. Oikos 2010, 119:245-253.
115. Schmidt K A. Spatial heterogeneity in predator activity, nest survivorship, and nest-site selection in two forest thrushes. Oecologia 2006, 148:22-29.
116. Schmidt K A. Eastern chipmunks increase their perception of predation risk in response to titmouse alarm calls. Behav. Ecol 2008, 19:759-763.
117. Schwartz M W, Hoeksema J D. Specialization and resource trade: biological markets as a model of mutualisms. Ecology 1998, 79:1029-1038.
118. Seppänen J-T. Social information use is a process across time, space, and ecology, reaching heterospecifics. Ecology 2007, 88:1622-1633.
119. Shannon C E, Weaver W. The mathematical theory of communication 1949, Univ. of Illinois Press
120. Sieving K E. Heterospecific facilitation of fortes-boundary crossing by mobbing birds in north-central Florida. Auk 2004, 121:738-751.
121. Sieving K E. Anti-predator communication by the tufted titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor): encoding of predation risk information. Oikos 2010, 119:264-276.
122. Sih A. A behavioral ecological view of phenotypic plasticity. Phenotypic plasticity: functional and conceptual approaches 2004, 112-125. DeWitt T JScheiner S M. Oxford Univ. Press
123. Simpson S D. Settlement-stage coral reef fish prefer the higher-frequency invertebrate-generated audible component of reef noise. Anim. Behav 2008, 75:1861-1868.
124. Slabbekoorn H, Ripmeester E A P. Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: implications and applications for conservation. Mol. Ecol 2008, 17:72-83.
125. Smith W J. The behavior of communicating: an ethological approach 1977, Harvard Univ. Press
126. Sridhar H. Why do birds participate in mixed-species foraging flocks? A large-scale synthesis. Anim. Behav 2009, 78:337-347.
127. Stamps J A. Conspecifci attraction and aggregation in a territorial species. Am. Nat 1988, 131:329-347.
128. Stamps J A. Habitat selection by dispersers: integrating proximate and ultimate approaches. Dispersal 2001, 230-242. Clobert J. Oxford Univ. Press
129. Stephens D W. Variance and the value of information. Am. Nat 1989, 134:128-140.
130. Stephens D W, Krebs J R. Foraging theory 1986, Princeton Univ. Press
131. Foraging behavior and ecology 2007, Stephens D W. Univ. of Chicago Press
132. Sullivan K A. Information exploitation by downy woodpeckers in mixed-species flocks. Behavior 1984, 91:294-311.
133. Sutherland W J, Norris K. Behavioral models of population growth rates: implications for conservation and prediction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 2002, 357:1273-1284.
134. Taylor P D. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 1993, 68:571-573.
135. Telleria J L. Behavioural responses to changing landscapes: flock structure and anti-predator strategies of tits wintering in fragmented forests. Oikos 2001, 95:253-264.
136. Templeton C N. Allometry of alarm calls: black-capped chickadees encode information about predator size. Science 2005, 308:1934-1937.
137. Terborgh J. Mixed flocks and polyspecific associations: costs and benefits of mixed groups of birds and monkeys. Am. J. Primatol 1990, 21:87-100.
138. Thomson R L. Positive interactions between migrant and resident birds: testing the heterospecific attraction hypothesis. Oecologia 2003, 134:431-438.
139. Tilman T. Resource competition and community structure 1982, Princeton Univ. Press
140. Tubelis D P. Role of mixed-species flocks in the use of adjacent savannas by forest birds in the central Cerrado, Brazil. Austral Ecol 2006, 31:38-45.
141. Valone T J. Are animals capable of Bayesian updating? An empirical review. Oikos 2006, 112:252-259.
142. Valone T J. From eavesdropping on performance to copying behavior of others: a review of public information use. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol 2007, 62:1-14.
143. van Bergen Y. Nine-spined sticklebacks exploit the most reliable source when public and private information conflict. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2004, 271:957-962.
144. van den Hout P J. Differential mortality of wintering shorebirds on the Banc d'Arguin, Mauritania, due to predation by large falcons. Ibis 2008, 150(suppl. 1):219-230.
145. van Gils J A. State-dependent Bayesian foraging on spatially auto-correlated food distributions. Oikos 2010, 119:237-244.
146. van Gils J A. Incompletely informed shorebirds that face a digestive constraint maximize net energy gain when exploiting patches. Am. Nat 2003, 161:777-793.
147. Vincent T L S. Tradeoffs and coexistence in consumer-resource models: it all depends on what and where you eat. Am. Nat 1996, 148:1038-1058.
148. Vitousek M N. Heterospecific alarm call recognition in a non-vocal reptile. Biol. Lett 2007, 3:632-634.
149. Vos M. Plant-mediated indirect effects and the persistence of parasitoid-herbivore communities. Ecol. Lett 2001, 4:38-45.
150. Vos M. Infochemicals structure marine, terrestrial, and freshwater food webs: implications for ecological informatics. Ecol. Inf 2006, 1:23-32.
151. Wagner R H, Danchin E. A taxonomy of information. Oikos 2010, 119:203-209.
152. Ward K P. Habitat selection by dispersing yellow-headed blackbirds: evidence of prospecting and the use of public information. Oecologia 2005, 145:650-657.
153. Warkentin K M. Flexible information sampling in vibrational assessment of predation risk by red-eyed treefrog embryos. J. Exp. Biol 2007, 210:614-619.
154. Welton N J. Assessing predation risk: optimal behavior and rules of thumb. Theor. Popul. Biol 2003, 64:417-430.
155. Wolters S, Zuberbühler K. Mixed-species associations of Diana and Campbell's monkeys: the costs and benefits of a forest phenomenon. Behavior 2003, 140:371-385.
156. Wong B B M. Response to perceived predation threat in fiddler crabs: trust thy neighbor as thyself? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol 2005, 58:345-350.
157. Zuk M. Silent night: adaptive disappearance of a sexual signal in a parasitized population of field crickets. Biol. Lett 2006, 2:521-524.