Genetic factors underlying dry-milling efficiency and flaking-grit yield examined in US maize germplasm

Crop Science

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 2516-2526

  Macke, Joshua A ^a,b   Bohn, Martin O ^a   Rausch, Kent D ^a   Mumm, Rita H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b Dow AgroSciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84984828005     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: 14350653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2016.01.0024     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bernardo, R. 2010. Breeding for quantitative traits in plants. 2nd ed. Stemma Press, Woodbury, MN.
2. Blandino, M., M.C. Mancini, A. Peila, L. Rolle, F. Vanara, and A. Reyneri. 2010. Determination of maize kernel hardness: Comparison of different laboratory tests to predict dry-milling performance. J. Sci. Food Agric. 90:1870-1878.
3. Chen, Y., and T. Lübberstedt. 2010. Molecular basis of trait correlations. Trends Plant Sci. 15:454-461. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2010.05.004
4. Dorsey-Redding, D., L.A. Hurburgh, L. Johnson, and S.R. Fox. 1991. Relationships among maize quality factors. Cereal Chem. 68:602-605.
5. Gardner, C., and S. Eberhart. 1966. Analysis and interpretation of the variety cross diallel and related populations. Biometrics 22:439-452. doi:10.2307/2528181
6. Germplasm Resources Information Network. 2012. USDA-ARS National Plant Germplasm System. http://www.ars-grin.gov/npgs/index.html (accessed 18 May 2016).
7. Holland, J.B. 2006. Estimating genotypic correlations and their standard errors using multivariate restricted maximum likelihood estimation with SAS PROC MIXED. Crop Sci. 46:642-654. doi:10.2135/cropsci2005.0191
8. Jackson, D., L. Rooney, O. Kunze, and R. Waniska. 1988. Alkaline processing properties of stress-cracked and broken corn (Zea mays L.). Cereal Chem. 65:133-137.
9. Johnson, G.R. 2008. A commercial-grade mapping population. In: Proc. of the 44th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School, Champaign, IL. 3-4 Mar. 2008 Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL
10. Kirleis, A., and R. Stroshine. 1990. Effects of hardness and drying air temperature on breakage susceptibility and dry-milling characteristics of yellow dent corn. Cereal Chem. 67:523-528.
11. Kutner, M.H., C.J. Nachtsheim, and J. Neter. 2004. Applied linear regression models. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York
12. Lee, E.A., J.A. Young, J.A. Frégeau-Reid, and B.G. Good. 2012. Genetic architecture underlying kernel quality in food-grade maize. Crop Sci. 52:1561-1571. doi:10.2135/cropsci2011.10.0545
13. Lee, K., T.J. Herrman, S.R. Bean, D.S. Jackson, and J. Lingenfelser. 2007a. Classification of dry-milled maize grit yield groups using quadratic discriminant analysis and decision tree algorithm. Cereal Chem. 84:152-161. doi:10.1094/CCHEM-84-2-0152
14. Lee, K., T.J. Herrman, J. Lingenfelser, and D.S. Jackson. 2005. Classification and prediction of maize hardness-associated properties using multivariate statistical analyses. J. Cereal Sci. 41:85-93. doi:10.1016/j.jcs.2004.09.006
15. Lee, K., T.J. Herrman, L. Rooney, D.S. Jackson, J. Lingenfelser, K.D. Rausch, J. McKinney, C. Iiams, L. Byrum, J. Hurburgh, R. Charles, L.A. Johnson, and S.R. Fox. 2007b. Corroborative study on maize quality, dry-milling and wet-milling properties of selected maize hybrids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 55:10751-10763. doi:10.1021/jf071863f
16. Litchfield, J.B., and G.C. Shove. 1990. Dry milling of U.S. hardendosperm corn in japan: Product yield and corn properties. Appl. Eng. Agric. 6:629-634. doi:10.13031/2013.26440
17. Mehra, S.K., and S. Eckhoff. 1997. Single-stage short-duration tempering of corn for dry-milling. Cereal Chem. 74:484-488. doi:10.1094/CCHEM.1997.74.4.484
18. Mikel, M.A. 2006. Availability and analysis of proprietary dent corn inbred lines with expired U.S. plant variety protection. Crop Sci. 46:2555-2560. doi:10.2135/cropsci2006.05.0358
19. Mikel, M.A., and J.W. Dudley. 2006. Evolution of North American dent corn from public to proprietary germplasm. Crop Sci. 46:1193-1205. doi:10.2135/cropsci2005.10-0371
20. Mode, C.J., and H.F. Robinson. 1959. Pleiotropism and genetic variance and covariance. Biometrics 15:518-537. doi:10.2307/2527650
21. Narváez-González, E.D., J. de Dios Figueroa-Cárdenas, S. Taba, E.C. Tostado, R.Á.M. Peniche, and F.R. Sánchez. 2006. Relationships between the microstructure, physical features, and chemical composition of different maize accessions from Latin America. Cereal Chem. 83:595-604. doi:10.1094/CC-83-0595
22. Pan, Z., S. Eckhoff, M. Paulsen, and J. Litchfield. 1996. Physical properties and dry-milling characteristics of six selected high-oil maize hybrids. Cereal Chem. 73:517-520.
23. Paulsen, M., and L. Hill. 1985. Corn quality factors affecting dry milling performance. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 31:255-263. doi:10.1016/0021-8634(85)90092-7
24. Philippeau, C., J. Landry, and B. Michalet-Doreau. 2000. Influence of the protein distribution of maize endosperm on ruminal starch degradability. J. Sci. Food Agric. 80:404-408. doi:10.1002/1097-0010(200002)80:3<404::AID-JSFA541>3.0.CO;2-Z
25. Pomeranz, Y., and Z. Czuchajowska. 1987. Laboratory tests to predict the commercial yield of flaking or large grits in dry corn milling. J. Food Sci. 52:830-830. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1987.tb06740.x
26. Rausch, K.D., L.E. Pruiett, P. Wang, L. Xu, R.L. Belyea, and M. Tumbleson. 2009. Laboratory measurement of yield and composition of dry-milled corn fractions using a shortened, single-stage tempering procedure. Cereal Chem. 86:434-438. doi:10.1094/CCHEM-86-4-0434
27. SAS Institute. 2008. SAS software, version 9.2. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.
28. Schwab, E.C., R.D. Shaver, J.G. Lauer, and J.G. Coors. 2003. Estimating silage energy value and milk yield to rank corn hybrids. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 109:1-18. doi:10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00210-4
29. Seebauer, J.R., G.W. Singletary, P.M. Krumpelman, M.L. Ruffo, and F.E. Below. 2010. Relationship of source and sink in determining kernel composition of maize. J. Exp. Bot. 61:511-519. doi:10.1093/jxb/erp324
30. Sughroue, J.R., and A.R. Hallauer. 1997. Analysis of the diallel mating design for maize inbred lines. Crop Sci. 37:400-405. doi:10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700020016x
31. Teklewold, A., and H.C. Becker. 2005. Heterosis and combining ability in a diallel cross of Ethiopian mustard inbred lines. Crop Sci. 45:2629-2635. doi:10.2135/cropsci2005.0085
32. USDA-ARS. 2008. Entry 001. Stiff stalk synthetic (SSS). Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA. http://www.public.iastate.edu/~usda-gem/Field_Day/Handouts/GEM_FD_08_Sings.ppt (accessed 1 June 2012).
33. USDA-ERS. 2016. Agricultural Baseline Projections. UDDA, Economic Research Service. Washington, DC. http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/farm-economy/agricultural-baseline-projections/baseline-related-historical-data.aspx (accessed 13 May 2016).
34. Whittaker, D., E.R. Williams, and J.A. John. 1999. CycDesign: A package for the computer generation of experimental designs, Version 1.2. CSIRO Forestry and Forest Products and The Univ. of Waikato, Canberra and Hamilton. Canberra, Australia.
35. Wolf, M., C. Buzan, M.M. MacMasters, and C. Rist. 1952. Structure of the mature corn kernel. 1. Gross anatomy and structural relationships. Cereal Chem. 29:321-333.
36. Wu, Y.V., and R.R. Bergquist. 1991. Relation of corn grain density to yields of dry-milling products. Cereal Chem. 68:542-544
37. Yuan, J., and R.A. Flores. 1996. Laboratory dry-milling performance of white corn: Effect of physical and chemical corn characteristics. Cereal Chem. 73:574-578.
38. Zare, M., R. Choukan, E.M. Heravan, M.R. Bihamta, and K. Ordookhani. 2011. Gene action of some agronomic traits in corn (Zea mays L.) using diallel cross analysis. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 6:693-703