Investigate the metabolic reprogramming of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for enhanced resistance to mixed fermentation inhibitors via 13C metabolic flux analysis

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 8, 2016, Pages

  Guo, Weihua ^a   Chen, Yingying ^b   Wei, Na ^b   Feng, Xueyang ^a  

^a Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University   (United States)

^b University of Notre Dame   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; FURFURAL; REDUCED NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE; REDUCED NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE PHOSPHATE; BIOFUEL; CARBON; LIGNIN; LIGNOCELLULOSE; NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE; NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE PHOSPHATE;

ARTICLE; CARBON METABOLISM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FERMENTATION; FUNGAL METABOLISM; METABOLIC FLUX ANALYSIS; METABOLIC REPROGRAMMING; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; BIOSYNTHESIS; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECTS; GENETICS; ISOTOPE LABELING; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PROCEDURES;

ACETIC ACID; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; BIOFUELS; CARBON ISOTOPES; CELL PROLIFERATION; FERMENTATION; FURALDEHYDE; ISOTOPE LABELING; LIGNIN; METABOLIC FLUX ANALYSIS; NAD; NADP; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84984804841     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161448     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Palmqvist E, Grage H, Meinander NQ, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Main and interaction effects of acetic acid, furfural, and p-hydroxybenzoic acid on growth and ethanol productivity of yeasts. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 1999; 63(1):46-55. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19990405)63:1<46::AID-BIT5>3.0. CO;2-J PMID: 10099580
2. Heer D, Sauer U. Identification of furfural as a key toxin in lignocellulosic hydrolysates and evolution of a tolerant yeast strain. Microbial biotechnology. 2008; 1(6):497-506. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2008. 00050.x. PMC3815291. PMID: 21261870
3. Almeida JRM, Modig T, Petersson A, Hähn-Hägerdal B, Lidén G, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. Increased tolerance and conversion of inhibitors in lignocellulosic hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology. 2007; 82(4):340-9. doi: 10.1002/jctb.1676
4. Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. I: inhibition and detoxification. Bioresource Technology. 2000; 74(1):17-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00160-1.
5. Maiorella B, Blanch HW, Wilke CR. By-product inhibition effects on ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 1983; 25(1):103-21. doi: 10.1002/bit. 260250109 PMID: 18548541
6. Jönsson LJ, Alriksson B, Nilvebrant N-O. Bioconversion of lignocellulose: inhibitors and detoxification. Biotechnology for Biofuels. 2013; 6(1):1-10.
7. Keating JD, Panganiban C, Mansfield SD. Tolerance and adaptation of ethanologenic yeasts to lignocellulosic inhibitory compounds. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2006; 93(6):1196-206. doi: 10.1002/bit.20838 PMID: 16470880
8. Krebs HA, Gurin S, Eggleston LV. The pathway of oxidation of acetate in baker's yeast. Biochemical Journal. 1952; 51(5):614-28. PMC1197907. PMID: 13018136
9. Palmqvist E, Almeida JS, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Influence of furfural on anaerobic glycolytic kinetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch culture. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 1999; 62(4):447-54. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19990220)62:4<447::AID-BIT7>3.0.CO;2-0 PMID: 9921153
10. Sárvári Horváth I, Franzén CJ, Taherzadeh MJ, Niklasson C, Lidén G. Effects of Furfural on the Respiratory Metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in Glucose-Limited Chemostats. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2003; 69(7):4076-86. doi: 10.1128/aem.69.7.4076-4086.2003 PMID: 12839784
11. Hohmann S, Mager WH. Yeast stress responses: Springer Science & Business Media; 2003.
12. Liu ZL. Molecular mechanisms of yeast tolerance and in situ detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolysates. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011; 90(3):809-25. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3167-9 PMID: 21380517
13. Giannattasio S, Guaragnella N, Ždralevic M, Marra E. Molecular mechanisms of Saccharomyces cerevisiae stress adaptation and programmed cell death in response to acetic acid. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2013; 4. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00033
14. Sousa MJ, Ludovico P, Rodrigues F, Leão C, Côrte-Real M. Stress and Cell Death in Yeast Induced by Acetic Acid2012 2012-01-25.
15. Semchyshyn HM, Abrat OB, Miedzobrodzki J, Inoue Y, Lushchak VI. Acetate but not propionate induces oxidative stress in bakers' yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Redox Report. 2011; 16(1):15-23. doi: 10.1179/174329211X12968219310954 PMID: 21605494.
16. Lee YJ, Jang JW, Kim KJ, Maeng PJ. TCA cycle-independent acetate metabolism via the glyoxylate cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 2011; 28(2):153-66. doi: 10.1002/yea.1828 PMID: 21246628
17. Bauer BE, Rossington D, Mollapour M, Mamnun Y, Kuchler K, Piper PW. Weak organic acid stress inhibits aromatic amino acid uptake by yeast, causing a strong influence of amino acid auxotrophies on the phenotypes of membrane transporter mutants. European Journal of Biochemistry. 2003; 270 (15):3189-95. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03701.x PMID: 12869194
18. Chen Y, Stabryla L, Wei N. Improved acetic acid resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by overexpression of the WHI2 gene identified through inverse metabolic engineering. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2016. doi: 10.1128/aem.03718-15
19. Chen Y, Sheng J, Jiang T, Stevens J, Feng X, Wei N. Transcriptional profiling reveals molecular basis and novel genetic targets for improved resistance to multiple fermentation inhibitors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnology for Biofuels. 2016; 9(1):1-18. doi: 10.1186/s13068-015-0418-5
20. Mira NP, Teixeira MC, Sá-Correia I. Adaptive Response and Tolerance to Weak Acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A Genome-Wide View. OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology. 2010; 14(5):525-40. doi: 10.1089/omi.2010.0072 PMID: 20955006
21. Zheng D-Q, Wu X-C, Wang P-M, Chi X-Q, Tao X-L, Li P, et al. Drug resistance marker-aided genome shuffling to improve acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010; 38(3):415-22. doi: 10.1007/s10295-010-0784-8 PMID: 20652356
22. Mira NP, Palma M, Guerreiro JF, Sá-Correia I. Genome-wide identification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes required for tolerance to acetic acid. Microbial Cell Factories. 2010; 9(1):1-13. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-9-79
23. Hasunuma T, Sanda T, Yamada R, Yoshimura K, Ishii J, Kondo A. Metabolic pathway engineering based on metabolomics confers acetic and formic acid tolerance to a recombinant xylose-fermenting strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbial Cell Factories. 2011; 10(1):1-13. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-10-2
24. Zhang J-G, Liu X-Y, He X-P, Guo X-N, Lu Y, Zhang B-r. Improvement of acetic acid tolerance and fermentation performance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by disruption of the FPS1 aquaglyceroporin gene. Biotechnology Letters. 2010; 33(2):277-84. doi: 10.1007/s10529-010-0433-3 PMID: 20953665
25. Jarboe LR, Liu P, Royce LA. Engineering inhibitor tolerance for the production of biorenewable fuels and chemicals. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering. 2011; 1(1):38-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. coche.2011.08.003.
26. Martín C, Marcet M, Almazán O, Jönsson LJ. Adaptation of a recombinant xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain to a sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate with high content of fermentation inhibitors. Bioresource Technology. 2007; 98(9):1767-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.07.021. PMID: 16934451
27. Lin F-M, Qiao B, Yuan Y-J. Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Tolerance and Adaptation of Ethanologenic Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Furfural, a Lignocellulosic Inhibitory Compound. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2009; 75(11):3765-76. doi: 10.1128/aem.02594-08 PMID: 19363068
28. Heer D, Heine D, Sauer U. Resistance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to High Concentrations of Furfural Is Based on NADPH-Dependent Reduction by at Least Two Oxireductases. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2009; 75(24):7631-8. doi: 10.1128/aem.01649-09 PMID: 19854918
29. Gorsich SW, Dien BS, Nichols NN, Slininger PJ, Liu ZL, Skory CD. Tolerance to furfural-induced stress is associated with pentose phosphate pathway genes ZWF1, GND1, RPE1, and TKL1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006; 71(3):339-49. doi: 10.1007/s00253-005-0142-3 PMID: 16222531
30. Banerjee N, Bhatnagar R, Viswanathan L. Inhibition of glycolysis by furfural in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. European Journal of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 1981; 11(4):226-8. 2.
31. Taherzadeh MJ, Gustafsson L, Niklasson C, Lidén G. Inhibition effects of furfural on aerobic batch cultivation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae growing on ethanol and/or acetic acid. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2000; 90(4):374-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1723(01)80004-9. PMID: 16232875
32. Li B-Z, Yuan Y-J. Transcriptome shifts in response to furfural and acetic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010; 86(6):1915-24. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2518-2 PMID: 20309542
33. Guo W, Sheng J, Feng X. 13C-Metabolic Flux Analysis: An Accurate Approach to Demystify Microbial Metabolism for Biochemical Production. Bioengineering. 2016; 3(1):3. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering3010003
34. Feng X, Zhuang W-Q, Colletti P, Tang Y. Metabolic Pathway Determination and Flux Analysis in Nonmodel Microorganisms Through 13C-Isotope Labeling. In: Navid A, editor. Microbial Systems Biology. Methods in Molecular Biology. 881: Humana Press; 2012. p. 309-30.
35. Zamboni N, Fendt S-M, Ruhl M, Sauer U. 13C-based metabolic flux analysis. Nat Protocols. 2009; 4 (6):878-92. http://www.nature.com/nprot/journal/v4/n6/suppinfo/nprot.2009.58-S1.html. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.58 PMID: 19478804
36. Chen Y, Stabryla L, Wei N. Improved acetic acid resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by overexpression of the WHI2 gene identified through inverse metabolic engineering. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2016:AEM. 03718-15.
37. Mumberg D, Müller R, Funk M. Yeast vectors for the controlled expression of heterologous proteins in different genetic backgrounds. Gene. 1995; 156(1):119-22. PMID: 7737504
38. J-i Nikawa, Y Tsukagoshi, S Yamashita. Isolation and characterization of two distinct myo-inositol transporter genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1991; 266(17):11184-91. PMID: 2040626
39. Kim S-R, Skerker JM, Kang W, Lesmana AL, Wei N, Arkin AP, et al. Rational and evolutionary engineering approaches uncover a small set of genetic changes efficient for rapid xylose fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLOS One. 2013; 8(2):e57048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057048.g001 PMID: 23468911
40. Feng X, Zhao H. Investigating xylose metabolism in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae via 13C metabolic flux analysis. Microbial Cell Factories. 2013; 12(1):114-23. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-12-114. 1
41. Wahl SA, Dauner M, Wiechert W. New tools for mass isotopomer data evaluation in 13C flux analysis: Mass isotope correction, data consistency checking, and precursor relationships. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2004; 85(3):259-68. doi: 10.1002/bit.10909 PMID: 14748080
42. Cvijovic M, Olivares-Hernández R, Agren R, Dahr N, Vongsangnak W, Nookaew I, et al. BioMet Toolbox: genome-wide analysis of metabolism. Nucleic Acids Research. 2010; 38(suppl 2):W144-W9. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq404
43. Çakir T, Kirdar B, Ülgen KÖ. Metabolic pathway analysis of yeast strengthens the bridge between transcriptomics and metabolic networks. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2004; 86(3):251-60. doi: 10.1002/bit.20020 PMID: 15083505
44. Casal M, Cardoso H, Leao C. Mechanisms regulating the transport of acetic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology. 1996; 142(6):1385-90. doi: 10.1099/13500872-142-6-1385
45. Lambert RJ, Stratford M. Weak-acid preservatives: modelling microbial inhibition and response. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 1999; 86(1):157-64. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00646.x PMID: 10030018