In-vehicle networks outlook: Achievements and challenges

IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 1552-1571

  Zeng, Weiying ^a   Khalid, Mohammed A S ^a   Chowdhury, Sazzadur ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

Author keywords

automotive gateways; fault tolerance; In vehicle network; system cost; transmission capacity

Indexed keywords

FAULT TOLERANCE; GATEWAYS (COMPUTER NETWORKS); QUALITY OF SERVICE; RECONFIGURABLE HARDWARE; SURVEYS; VEHICLE TRANSMISSIONS; VEHICLES;

FAULT-TOLERANCE CAPABILITY; IN-VEHICLE COMMUNICATION; IN-VEHICLE NETWORKS; SECURITY THREATS; SYSTEM COSTS; TRANSMISSION CAPACITIES;

NEXT GENERATION NETWORKS;

EID: 84984788520     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1553877X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/COMST.2016.2521642     Document Type: Article

References (130)

1. K. Pretz, ?Fewer wires, lighter cars, ? IEEE-The Institute, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Apr. 12, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://theinstitute.ieee.org/benefits/standards/fewer-wires-lighter-cars, accessed on Nov. 07, 2014.
2. J. Chacko, ?Electrical build issues in automotive product development, ? M.S. thesis, Syst. Design Manage. Program, Massachusetts Inst. Technol., Cambridge, MA, USA, 2007.
3. T. R. Egel, ?Wire harness simulation and analysis techniques, ? SAE International, Warrendale, PA, USA, Tech. Paper 2000-01-1293, 2000.
4. H. Kimm and H. Ham, ?Integrated fault tolerant system for automotive bus networks, ? in Proc. IEEE 2nd Int. Conf. Comput. Eng. Appl., 2010, pp. 486-490.
5. J. B. Anderson, Digital Transmission Engineering, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2008.
6. R. Boagey, ?Ethernet: The fast track to the connected car, ? in Automotive Megatrend Magazine. Penarth, U.K.: Automotive World Ltd, 2014, pp. 36-38.
7. A. Camek et al., ?An automotive side-view system based on Ethernet and IP, ? in Proc. IEEE 26th Int. Conf. Adv. Inf. Netw. Appl. Workshops, Fukuoka, Japan, 2012, pp. 238-243.
8. Information Technology-Open Systems Interconnection-Basic Reference Model: The Basic Model, ISO/IEC 7498-1, 1994.
9. OSEK VDX Portal. Welcome to OSEK VDX [Online]. Available: http://www.osek-vdx.org/, accessed on Jul. 24, 2015.
10. Mentor Graphics. (2014). Volcano Network Architect (VNA) [Online]. Available: http://www.mentor.com/products/vnd/communicationmanagement/vna/, accessed on Nov. 08, 2014.
11. AUTOSAR (AITomotive Open System ARchitecture). (2015). AUTOSAR Specification Release 4.2 [Online]. Available: http://www. autosar.org/, accessed on Feb. 04, 2016.
12. N. Navet and F. Simonot-Lion, Automotive Embedded Systems Handbook. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2009.
13. U. Keskin, ?In-vehicle communication networks: A literature survey, ? Computer Science, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven (TU/e), Eindhoven, The Netherlands, Tech. Rep. 09-10, 2009.
14. S. Tuohy et al., ?Intra-vehicle networks: A review, ? IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 16. no. 2, pp. 534-545, Apr. 2015.
15. S. C. Talbot and S. Ren, ?Comparison of field bus systems CAN, TTCAN, flex ray and LIN in passenger vehicles, ? in Proc. 29th IEEE Int. Conf. Distrib. Comput. Syst. Workshops, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2009, pp. 26-31.
16. S. Tuohy et al., ?Next generation wired intra-vehicle networks, a review, ? in Proc. IEEE Intell. Veh. Symp. (IV), Gold Coast City, Australia, 2013, pp. 777-782.
17. N. Navet and F. Simonot-Lion, ?In-vehicle communication networks-A historical perspective and review, ? in Industrial Communication Technology Handbook, vol. 96, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2013.
18. National Instruments. FlexRay Automotive Communication Bus Overview. (2009) [Online]. Available: http://sine.ni.com/np/app/main/p/ap/icomm/lang/en/pg/1/sn/n17:icomm, n21:11972/fmid/2924/, accessed on Nov. 09, 2014.
19. LIN Specification Package, Revision 2.2A, LIN Standard, LIN Consortium, 2010.
20. A. Diarra, ?OSI layers in automotive networks, ? presented at the IEEE 802.1 Plenary Meeting, Orlando, FL, USA, 2013.
21. C. Quigley et al., ?Design approaches for integrating CAN with emerging time-triggered protocols, ? presented at IEEE Int. Conf. Commun., Istanbul, Turkey, 2006.
22. P. Koopman, ?Tutorial: Checksum and CRC data integrity techniques for aviation, ? Electr. Comput. Eng., Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA, USA, May 2012 [Online]. Available: https://users. ece.cmu.edu/~koopman/pubs/KoopmanCRCWebinar9May2012.pdf, accessed on Feb. 03, 2016.
23. T. C. Maxino and P. J. Koopman, ?The effectiveness of check sums for embedded control networks, ? IEEE Trans. Depend. Secure Comput., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 59-72, Jan./Mar. 2009.
24. G. Miller. (2013). Automotive Communication Protocols: Preparing for the Future Embedded Systems Engineering [Online]. Available: http://eecatalog.com/automotive/2013/03/13/automotivecommunication-protocols-preparing-for-the-future/, accessed on Nov. 07, 2014.
25. O. Pfeiffer. Selecting a CAN Controllerv, Embedded Systems Academy [Online]. Available: http://www.esacademy.com/en/library/technicalarticles-and-documents/can-and-canopen/selecting-a-can-controller.html, accessed on Nov. 07, 2014.
26. Road Vehicles -Controller Area Network (CAN) -Part 2: High-Speed Medium Access Unit, ISO 11898-2:2003.
27. Road vehicles -Controller area network (CAN) -Part 5: High-Speed Medium Access Unit With Low-Power Mode, ISO 11898-5:2007.
28. Road vehicles -Controller area network (CAN) -Part 3: Low-Speed, Fault-Tolerant, Medium-Dependent Interface, ISO 11898-3:2006.
29. Single Wire Can Network for Vehicle Applications, SAE International 2411A (WIP), 2000.
30. CAN Specification, Version 2.0, CAN Standard, Robert Bosch GmbH, Gerlingen, Germany, 1991.
31. W. Lawrenz, Ed., CAN System Engineering: From Theory to Practical Applications, 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2013.
32. S. Corrigan, ?Critical spacing of CAN bus connections, ? Appl. Rep. Texas Instrum., Dallas, TX, USA: Tech. Rep. SLLA279A, 2009.
33. M. Di Natale et al., Understanding and Using the Controller Area Network Communication Protocol. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2012.
34. Road Vehicles-Controller Area Network (CAN)-Part 4: Time-Triggered Communication, ISO 11898-4, 2004.
35. CAN With Flexible Data-Rate Specification, Version 1.0, CANFD Standard, Robert Bosch GmbH, Gerlingen, Germany, 2012.
36. J. Ray and P. Koopman, ?Efficient high hamming distance CRCs for embedded networks, ? in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Depend. Syst. Netw., Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2006, pp. 3-12.
37. M. Short and M. J. Pont, ?Fault-tolerant time-triggered communication using CAN, ? IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 131-142, May 2007.
38. K. Tindell, A. Burns, and A. J. Wellings, ?Calculating controller area network (CAN) message response times, ? Control Eng. Pract., vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 1163-1169, 1995.
39. L. Casparsson et al., ?Volcano-a revolution in on-board communications, ? AB Volvo, Gothenburg, Sweden, Tech. Rep. 99-02-11 17:04, 1999.
40. R. I. Davis et al., ?Controller area network (CAN) schedulability analysis: Refuted, revisited and revised, ? Real-Time Syst., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 239-272, 2007.
41. B. Susanna, ?Evaluation of static time analysis for volcano communication technologies AB, ? M.S. thesis, Dept. Comput. Sci. Eng., Malardalen Univ., Vasteras, Sweden, 2004.
42. M. Hu et al., ?Holistic scheduling of real-time applications in timetriggered in-vehicle networks, ? IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1817-1828, Aug. 2014.
43. L. Lamport, R. Shostak, and M. Pease, ?The byzantine generals problem, ? ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. TOPLAS, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 382-401, 1982.
44. B. Pattanaik and S. Chandrasekaran, ?Safety reliability enhancement in fault tolerant automotive embedded system, ? Int. J. Innovat. Technol. Explor. Eng. (IJITEE), vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 63-68, 2013.
45. G. Buja, J. R. Pimentel, and A. Zuccollo, ?Overcoming babbling-idiot failures in CAN networks: A simple and effective bus guardian solution for the FlexCAN architecture, ? IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 225-233, Aug. 2007.
46. B. Hall et al., ?ESCAPE CAN Limitations, ? SAE International, Warrendale, PA, USA, Tech. Paper 2007-01-1487, Detroit, MI, USA, 2007.
47. A. Ballesteros, M. Wagner, and D. Zobelz, ?SOAcom: Designing Service communication in adaptive automotive networks, ? in Proc. 8th IEEE Int. Symp. Ind. Embedded Syst. (SIES?13), Porto, Portugal, 2013, pp. 270-279.
48. J. Park et al., ?Designing real-time and fault-tolerant middleware for automotive software, ? in Proc. IEEE Int. Joint Conf. SICE-ICASE, Busan, Korea (South), 2006, pp. 4409-4413.
49. P. Koopman, ?The FlexRay protocol-Significant material drawn from FlexRay specification version 2.0, June, 2004, ? Elect. Comput. Eng., Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA, USA, Nov. 2015 [Online]. Available: http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~ece649/lectures/23-flexray.pdf, accessed on Feb. 03, 2016.
50. R. Cummings, ?Easing the transition of system designs from CAN to FlexRay, ? SAE International Warrendale, PA, USA, Tech. Paper 2008-01-0804, 2008.
51. C. P. Quigley et al., ?An investigation into cost modelling for design of distributed automotive electrical architectures, ? in Proc. IEEE 3rd Inst. Eng. Technol. Conf., London, U.K., 2007, pp. 1-9.
52. T. Costlow, ?FlexRay, Ethernet vie for role as safety systems share data, ? SAE International, Warrendale, PA, USA, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://articles.sae.org/12862/, accessed on Nov. 09, 2014.
53. A. Schedl, ?Goals and architecture of FlexRay at BMW, ? presented at the Vector FlexRay Symp., Stuttgart, Germany, 2007.
54. M. Heinz, V. Höss, and K. D. Müller-Glaser, ?Physical layer extraction of FlexRay configuration parameters, ? in Proc. IEEE/IFIP Int. Symp. Rapid Syst. Prototyping, Paris, France, 2009, pp. 173-180.
55. FlexRay Communication System Protocol Specification, V3.0.1., FlexRay Consortium, 2010.
56. B. Tanasa et al., ?Schedulability analysis for the dynamic segment of FlexRay: A generalization to slot multiplexing, ? in Proc. IEEE 18th Real Time Embedded Technol. Appl. Symp., Beijing, China, 2012, pp. 185-194.
57. K. Jang et al., ?Design framework for FlexRay network parameter optimization, ? Int. J. Automot. Technol., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 589-597, 2011
58. M. Lukasiewycz et al., ?FlexRay schedule optimization of the static segment, ? in Proc. 7th IEEE/ACM Int. Conf. Hardw./Softw. Codes. Syst. Synth., New York, NY, USA, 2009, pp. 363-372.
59. Y. Hua, X. Liu, and W. He, ?HOSA: Holistic scheduling and analysis for scalable fault-tolerant FlexRay design, ? in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Orlando, FL, USA, 2012, pp. 1233-1241.
60. M. Kang, K. Park, and B. Kim, ?A static message scheduling algorithm for reducing FlexRay network utilization, ? in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Ind. Electron. (ISIE?09), Seoul, Korea, 2009, pp. 1287-1291.
61. B. Vermeulen et al., ?FlexRay switch, ? ATZelektronik Worldw., vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 32-36, 2010.
62. T. Schenkelaars, B. Vermeulen, and K. Goossens, ?Optimal scheduling of switched FlexRay networks, ? in Proc. IEEE Des. Autom. Test Eur. Conf. Exhib. (DATE?11), Dresden, Germany, 2011, pp. 1-6.
63. FlexRay Communications System Electrical Physical Layer Specification, Version 3.0.1., FlexRay Consortium, 2010.
64. P. Koopman, ?Software and digital systems program -data integrity techniques, ? Electr. Comput. Eng., Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA, USA, Oct. 2013 [Online]. Available: https://users.ece. cmu.edu/~koopman/pubs/01oct2013-koopman-faa-final-presentation. pdf, accessed on Feb. 03, 2016.
65. W. Li et al., ?Optimizations of an application-level protocol for enhanced dependability in FlexRay, ? in Proc. IEEE Des. Autom. Test Eur. Conf. Exhib. (DATE?09), Nice, France, 2009, pp. 1076-1081.
66. J. Formann and K. Echtle, ?Efficient acknowledgement and retransmission techniques for bus-systems, ? in Proc. 26th Int. Conf. Archit. Compu. Syst. (ARCS?13), Prague, Czech Republic, 2013, pp. 1-8.
67. K. Klobedanz et al., ?Self-reconfiguration for fault-tolerant FlexRay networks, ? in Proc. 14th IEEE Int. Symp., Newport Beach, CA, USA, 2011, pp. 207-216.
68. R. Bouhouch et al., ?DDS on top of FlexRay vehicle networks: Scheduling analysis, ? Int. J. Comput. Sci. Artif. Intell., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 10-26, Mar. 2013.
69. P. Hank, T. Suermann, and S. Müller, ?Automotive Ethernet, A holistic approach for a next generation in-vehicle networking standard, ? in Proc. IEEE Adv. Microsyst. Automot. Appl., Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012, pp. 1076-1081.
70. ABI Research. (2014). Ethernet In-Vehicle Networking to Feature in 40% of Vehicles Shipping Globally by 2020, London, U.K.[Online]. Available: https://www.abiresearch.com/press/ethernet-in-vehiclenetworking-to-feature-in-40-of, accessed on Nov. 09, 2014.
71. H. T. Lim, L. Völker, and D. Herrscher, ?Challenges in a future IP/Ethernet-based in-car network for real-time applications, ? in Proc. IEEE 48th Des. Autom. Conf. (DAC?11), San Diego, CA, USA, 2011, pp. 7-12.
72. H.T. Lim, K. Weckemann, and D. Herrscher, ?Performance study of an in-car switched Ethernet network without prioritization, ? in Communication Technologies for Vehicles, New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2011, pp. 165-175.
73. The OPEN Alliance (One-Pair Ether-Net) Special Interest Group (SIG). [Online]. Available: http://opensig.org/, accessed on Nov. 09, 2014.
74. M. Sauerwald, ?CAN bus, Ethernet, or FPD-Link: Which is best for automotive communications?, ? Texas Instrument Analog Appl. J., vol. 1Q, pp. 20-22, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.ti.com/lit/an/slyt560/slyt560.pdf, accessed on Feb. 04, 2016.
75. IEEE P802.3bp 1000BASE-T1 PHY Task Force [Online]. Available: http://ieee802.org/3/bp/, accessed on Nov. 09, 2014.
76. IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks-Timing and Synchronization for Time-Sensitive Applications in Bridged Local Area Networks, IEEE Standard SA-802.1AS, 2011.
77. IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks-Audio Video Bridging (AVB) Systems, IEEE Standard SA-802.1BA, 2011.
78. Time-Triggered Ethernet, AS6802, 2011.
79. IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks-Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks Amendment 14: Stream Reservation Protocol (SRP), IEEE Standard SA-802.1Qat, 2010.
80. IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks-Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks Amendment 12: Forwarding and Queuing Enhancements for Time-Sensitive Streams, IEEE Standard SA -802.1Qav, 2009.
81. L. L. Bello, ?Novel trends in automotive networks: A perspective on Ethernet and the IEEE Audio Video Bridging, ? in Proc. IEEE Emerg. Technol. Fact. Autom. (ETFA?14), Barcelona, Spain, 2014, pp. 1-8.
82. T. Steinbach et al., ?Tomorrow?s in-car interconnect? A competitive evaluation of IEEE 802.1 AVB and time-triggered Ethernet (AS6802), ? in Proc. IEEE Veh. Technol. Conf. (VTC Fall?12), Quebec, Canada, 2012, pp. 1-5.
83. V. Schmidt et al., ?Evaluation of numerical bus systems used in rocket engine test facilities, ? presented at Ground-Based Space Facil. Symp., Paris, France, 2013.
84. G. Alderisi, G. Patti, and L. L. Bello, ?Introducing support for scheduled traffic over IEEE audio video bridging networks, ? in Proc. IEEE 18th Conf. Emerg. Technol. Fact. Autom. (ETFA?13), Cagliari, Italy, 2013, pp. 1-9.
85. L. L. Bello, G. Alderisi, and G. Patti. Introducing Support for Time-Sensitive Traffic Over Ethernet Switches: The Case of the IEEE Audio Video Bridging [Online]. Available: https://ece.uwaterloo. ca/~sfischme/rate/S3P3.pdf, accessed on Nov. 09, 2015.
86. L. Zhao et al., ?Improving worst-case latency analysis for rateconstrained traffic in the time-triggered Ethernet network, ? IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1927-1930, Nov. 2014.
87. R. Santos et al., ?Improving the efficiency of Ethernet switches for real-time communication, ? in Proc. 1st Int. Workshop Adapt. Resour. Manage., Stockholm, Sweden, Apr. 2010.
88. P. Koopman, ?32-bit cyclic redundancy codes for internet applications, ? in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Depend. Syst. Netw. (DSN?02), Washington, DC, USA, 2002, pp. 459-468.
89. O. Kleineberg, P. Frohlich, and D. Heffernan, ?Fault-tolerant audio and video bridging (AVB) Ethernet: A novel method for redundant stream registration configuration, ? in Proc. IEEE 17th Conf. Emerg. Technol. Fact. Autom. (ETFA?12), Kraków, Poland, 2012, pp. 1-8.
90. W. Steiner et al., ?TTEthernet dataflow concept, ? in Proc. IEEE 8th Int. Symp. Netw. Comput. Appl. (NCA?09), Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009, pp. 319-322.
91. M. Rahmani, B. Muller-Rathgeber, and E. Steinbach, ?Error detection capabilities of automotive network technologies and Ethernet-A comparative study, ? in Proc. IEEE Intell. Veh. Symp., Istanbul, Turkey, 2007, pp. 674-679.
92. M. Armbruster et al., ?Ethernet-based and function-independent vehicle control-platform: Motivation, idea and technical concept fulfilling quantitative safety-requirements from ISO 26262, ? in Advanced Microsystems for Automotive Applications, New York, NY, USA, Springer, 2012, pp. 91-107.
93. N. Navet et al., ?Trends in automotive communication systems, ? Proc. IEEE, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 1204-1223, Jun. 2005.
94. A. Bouard et al., ?Driving automotive middleware towards a secure IP-based future, ? in Proc. IEEE 10th Conf. Embedded Secur. Cars (ESCAR?12), Berlin, Germany, Nov. 2012.
95. G. M. Garner et al., ?IEEE 802.1 AVB and Its application in carriergrade Ethernet [Standards Topics], ? IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 126-134, Dec. 2007.
96. G. Alderisi et al., ?Simulative assessments of IEEE 802.1 Ethernet AVB and time-triggered Ethernet for advanced driver assistance systems and in-car infotainment, ? in Proc. IEEE Veh. Netw. Conf. (VNC?12), 2012, pp. 187-194.
97. B. Engelmann, ?MOST150-development and production launch from an OEM?s perstective, ? presented at the 11th MOST Interconnectivity Conf. Asia, Seoul, Korea, 2010.
98. A. Grzemba, MOST: The Automotive Multimedia Network, from MOST25 to MOST150. Poing, Germany: Franzis Verlag GmbH, 2011.
99. E. Zeeb, ?Optical data bus systems in cars: Current status and future challenges, ? in Proc. IEEE 27th Eur. Conf. Opt. Commun. (ECOC?01), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2001, vol. 1, pp. 70-71.
100. S. Poferl, M. Becht, and P. De Pauw, ?150 Mbit/s MOST-The Next Generation automotive infotainment system, ? in Proc. IEEE 12th Int Conf. Transparent Opt. Netw. (ICTON?10), Munich, Germany, 2010, pp. 1-2.
101. ?MOST Cooperation, ? in MOST Informative. Karlsruhe, Germany: MOST Cooperation, 2014, no. 10.
102. A. Sumorek and M. Buczaj, ?New elements in vehicle communication ?Media Oriented Systems Transport? protocol, ? Teka Kom. Motoryz. Energ. Rol., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 275-279, 2012.
103. M. Wolf, Security Engineering for Vehicular IT Systems: Improving the Trustworthiness and Dependability of Automotive IT Applications, 1st ed. Wiesbaden, Germany: Vieweg+Teubner Verlag, 2009.
104. S. Lee et al., ?MOST network system supporting full-duplexing communication, ? in Proc. IEEE 14th Int. Adv. Commun. Technol. (CACT?12), PyeongChang, Korea, 2012, pp. 1271-1275.
105. G. Dannh?user, W. Franz, and W. Rosenstiel, ?MOST and AVB: Two candidates for next generation automotive infotainment networks-A comparison, ? in Elektronik Automotive Special Issue MOST. Stuttgart, Germany: ZENIT Press Distribution GmbH, 2013.
106. Vector. (2014). Media Oriented Systems Transport (MOST) [Online]. Available: https://vector.com/vi-most-en.html, accessed on Nov. 09, 2014.
107. T. Steinbach, F. Korf, and T. C. Schmidt, ?Real-time Ethernet for automotive applications: A solution for future in-car networks, ? in Proc. IEEE Int Conf. Consum. Electron-Berlin (ICCE-Berlin?11), Berlin, Germany, 2011, pp. 216-220.
108. S. Woo, H. J. Jo, and D. H. Lee, ?A practical wireless attack on the connected car and security protocol for in-vehicle CAN, ? IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1-14, Apr. 2014.
109. P. Kleberger, T. Olovsson, and E. Jonsson, ?Security aspects of the invehicle network in the connected car, ? in Proc. IEEE Intell. Veh. Symp. (IV), Kongresshaus, Germany, 2011, pp. 528-533.
110. S. Checkoway et al., ?Comprehensive experimental analyses of automotive attack surfaces, ? in Proc. USENIX Secur. Symp., San Francisco, CA, USA, 2011, pp. 77-92.
111. H. Schweppe and Y. Roudier, ?Security and privacy for in-vehicle networks, ? in Proc. 1st Int. Workshop Veh. Commun. Sens. Comput. (VCSC?12), 2012, pp. 12-17.
112. M. Amoozadeh et al., ?Security vulnerabilities of connected vehicle streams and their impact on cooperative driving, ? IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 126-132, Jun. 2015.
113. J. Harding and G. Powell, ?Vehicle-to-vehicle communications: Readiness of V2V technology for application, ? National Highway Traffic Safety Admin., Washington, DC, Tech. Rep. DOT HS 812 014, Aug. 2014.
114. M. Wolf, A. Weimerskirch, and C. Paar, ?Secure in-vehicle communication, ? in Embedded Security in Cars, New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2006, pp. 95-109.
115. T. Kiravuo, M. Sarela, and J. Manner, ?A survey of Ethernet LAN security, ? IEEE Commun. Surv. Tuts., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1477-1491, Jul. 31, 2013.
116. A. Happel, ?Secure communication for CAN FD, ? CAN Newsletter, 2014.
117. S. Shreejith and S. A. Fahmy, ?Zero latency encryption with FPGAs for secure time-triggered automotive networks, ? in Proc. Int. Conf. Field-Programm. Technol. (FPT?14), 2014, pp. 256-259.
118. M. Wolf, A. Weimerskirch, and C. Paar, ?Security in automotive bus systems, ? in Proc. Workshop Embedded Secur. Cars, 2004.
119. A. Bogdanov et al., ?ALE: AES-based lightweight authenticated encryption, ? in Proc. 21st Int. Workshop Fast Software Encryption, London, UK, 2014, pp. 447-466.
120. G. Bansod, N. Raval, and N. Pisharoty, ?Implementation of a new lightweight encryption design for embedded security, ? IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 142-151, Jan. 2015.
121. A. Groll and C. Ruland, ?Secure and authentic communication on existing in-vehicle networks, ? in Proc. IEEE Intell. Veh. Symp., 2009, pp. 1093-1097.
122. A. H. G. Yousef, ?Methods of securing in-vehicle networks, ? Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty Eng., Cairo Univ.; M.S. thesis, Electron. Commun. Eng., Faculty Eng., Cairo Univ., Giza, Egypt, 2013.
123. C.-W. Lin and A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, ?Cyber-security for the controller area network (CAN) communication protocol, ? in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Cyber Secur., 2012, pp. 1-7.
124. C. J. Szilagyi, ?Low cost multicast network authentication for embedded control systems, ? Ph.D. dissertation, Elect. Comput. Eng., Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2012.
125. P. Mundhenk, S. Steinhorst, M. Lukasiewycz, S. A. Fahmy, and S. Chakraborty, ?Lightweight authentication for secure automotive networks, ? in Proc. Des. Autom. Test Eur. Conf. Exhib. (DATE?15), 2015, pp. 285-288.
126. C.-W. Lin, Q. Zhu, and A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, ?Security-aware mapping for TDMA-based real-time distributed systems, ? in Proc. IEEE/ACM Int. Conf. Comput.-Aided Des. (ICCAD), San Jose, CA, USA, 2014, pp. 24-31.
127. M. Wolf and T. Gendrullis, ?Design, implementation, and evaluation of a vehicular hardware security module, ? in Proc. Int. Conf. Inf. Secur. Cryptol. (ICISC?11), 2012, pp. 302-318.
128. M. Saed, S. Bone, and J. Robb, ?Security concepts and issues in intra-inter vehicle communication network, ? in Proc. Int. Conf. Secur. Manage. (SAM), 2014, p. 1.
129. R. G. Engoulou, M. Bella?che, S. Pierre, and A. Quintero, ?VANET security surveys, ? Comput. Commun., vol. 44, pp. 1-13, May 2014.
130. F. Qu, Z. Wu, F.-Y. Wang, and W. Cho, ?A security and privacy review of VANETs, ? IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1-12, Dec. 2015.