Influence of decalcification procedures on immunohistochemistry and molecular pathology in breast cancer

Modern Pathology

Volumn 29, Issue 12, 2016, Pages 1460-1470

  Schrijver, Willemijne A M E ^a   Van Der Groep, Petra ^a   Hoefnagel, Laurien Dc ^a   Ter Hoeve, Natalie D ^a   Peeters, Ton ^a   Moelans, Cathy B ^a   Van Diest, Paul J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUFFER; DNA; EDETIC ACID; EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR 2; ESTROGEN RECEPTOR ALPHA; FORMIC ACID; PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR; RNA; TUMOR MARKER;

ADULT; AGED; ANTIGENICITY; ARTICLE; BONE METASTASIS; BREAST CANCER; CANCER TISSUE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; HORMONAL THERAPY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; VERY ELDERLY; BONE TUMOR; BREAST TUMOR; FEMALE; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SECONDARY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOMARKERS, TUMOR; BONE NEOPLASMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DECALCIFICATION TECHNIQUE; DNA, NEOPLASM; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY, MOLECULAR;

EID: 84983752720     PISSN: 08933952     EISSN: 15300285     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.116     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Hoefnagel LD, van de Vijver MJ, van Slooten HJ et al. Receptor conversion in distant breast cancer metastases. Breast Cancer Res 2010;12:R75.
2. van Diest PJ, Hoefnagel LD, van der Wall E. Testing for discordance at metastatic relapse of breast cancer matters. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:3031; author reply 3031, 2, 3032-3033.
3. Vignot S, Besse B, Andre F et al. Discrepancies between primary tumor and metastasis: a literature review on clinically established biomarkers. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2012;84:301-313.
4. Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Wolff AC et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Oncol Pract 2010;6: 195-197.
5. Carlson RW, Allred DC, Anderson BO et al. Metastatic breast cancer, version 1. 2012: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2012;10: 821-829.
6. Bussolati G, Leonardo E. Technical pitfalls potentially affecting diagnoses in immunohistochemistry. J Clin Pathol 2008;61:1184-1192.
7. Gruchy JR, Barnes PJ, Dakin Hache KA. CytoLyt(R) fixation and decalcification pretreatments alter antigenicity in normal tissues compared with standard formalin fixation. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2015;23:297-302.
8. Neves Jdos S, Omar NF, Narvaes EA et al. Influence of different decalcifying agents on EGF and EGFR immunostaining. Acta Histochem 2011;113:484-488.
9. Adegboyega PA, Gokhale S. Effect of decalcification on the immunohistochemical expression of ABH blood group isoantigens. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2003;11:194-197.
10. Reineke T, Jenni B, Abdou MT et al. Ultrasonic decalcification offers new perspectives for rapid FISH, DNA, and RT-PCR analysis in bone marrow trephines. Am J Surg Pathol 2006;30:892-896.
11. Singh VM, Salunga RC, Huang VJ et al. Analysis of the effect of various decalcification agents on the quantity and quality of nucleic acid (DNA and RNA) recovered from bone biopsies. Ann Diagn Pathol 2013;17: 322-326.
12. Brown RS, Edwards J, Bartlett JW et al. Routine acid decalcification of bone marrow samples can preserve DNA for FISH and CGH studies in metastatic prostate cancer. J Histochem Cytochem 2002;50: 113-115.
13. Wickham CL, Sarsfield P, Joyner MV et al. Formic acid decalcification of bone marrow trephines degrades DNA: alternative use of EDTA allows the amplification and sequencing of relatively long PCR products. Mol Pathol 2000;53:336.
14. Alers JC, Krijtenburg PJ, Vissers KJ et al. Effect of bone decalcification procedures on DNA in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization. EDTA is highly preferable to a routinely used acid decalcifier. J Histochem Cytochem 1999;47:703-710.
15. Matthews JB, Mason GI. Influence of decalcifying agents on immunoreactivity of formalin-fixed, paraffinembedded tissue. Histochem J 1984;16:771-787.
16. Hagberg KW, Taylor A, Hernandez RK et al. Incidence of bone metastases in breast cancer patients in the united kingdom: results of a multi-database linkage study using the general practice research database. Cancer Epidemiol 2013;37:240-246.
17. Harries M, Taylor A, Holmberg L et al. Incidence of bone metastases and survival after a diagnosis of bone metastases in breast cancer patients. Cancer Epidemiol 2014;38:427-434.
18. van Diest PJ. No consent should be needed for using leftover body material for scientific purposes. for. BMJ 2002;325:648-651.
19. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline update. J Clin Oncol 2013;31: 3997-4013.
20. Sah S, Chen L, Houghton J et al. Functional DNA quantification guides accurate next-generation sequencing mutation detection in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor biopsies. Genome Med 2013;5:77.
21. Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Bast RC et al. Use of biomarkers to guide decisions on systemic therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:2695-2704.
22. Darvishian F, Singh B, Krauter S et al. Impact of decalcification on receptor status in breast cancer. Breast J 2011;17:689-691.
23. Gertych A, Mohan S, Maclary S et al. Effects of tissue decalcification on the quantification of breast cancer biomarkers by digital image analysis. Diagn Pathol 2014;9:213.
24. Arnedos M, Nerurkar A, Osin P et al. Discordance between core needle biopsy (CNB) and excisional biopsy (EB) for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and HER2 status in early breast cancer (EBC). Ann Oncol 2009;20:1948-1952.
25. Bahreini F, Soltanian AR, Mehdipour P. A metaanalysis on concordance between immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to detect HER2 gene overexpression in breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2015;22:615-625.
26. Pitol DL, Caetano FH, Lunardi LO. Microwave-induced fast decalcification of rat bone for electron microscopic analysis: an ultrastructural and cytochemical study. Braz Dent J 2007;18:153-157.
27. Di Bernardo G, Del Gaudio S, Galderisi U et al. Comparative evaluation of different DNA extraction procedures from food samples. Biotechnol Prog 2007;23:297-301.
28. Johnson MT, Carpenter EJ, Tian Z et al. Evaluating methods for isolating total RNA and predicting the success of sequencing phylogenetically diverse plant transcriptomes. PLoS One 2012;7:e50226.
29. Wilfinger WW, Mackey K, Chomczynski P. Effect of pH and ionic strength on the spectrophotometric assessment of nucleic acid purity. Biotechniques 1997;22: 474-476, 478-481.