Optimal design of friction pendulum system properties for isolated structures considering different soil conditions

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 90, Issue , 2016, Pages 74-87

  Castaldo, P ^a   Ripani, M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALERNO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Friction pendulum isolators; Non dimensional form; Optimal isolator properties; Performance based engineering; Power spectral density method; Seismic isolation; Soil condition

Indexed keywords

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); EARTHQUAKES; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; FRICTION; PENDULUMS; POWER SPECTRAL DENSITY; RANDOM PROCESSES; SEISMOLOGY; SOILS; SPECTRAL DENSITY; TRIBOLOGY; WHITE NOISE;

FRICTION PENDULUM; OPTIMAL ISOLATOR PROPERTIES; PERFORMANCE-BASED ENGINEERING; POWER SPECTRAL DENSITY METHOD; SEISMIC ISOLATION; SOIL CONDITIONS;

STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES;

FRICTION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC ISOLATION; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 84983494466     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.08.025     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. [1] Christopoulos, C., Filiatrault, A., Principles of passive supplemental damping and seismic isolation. 2006, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
2. [2] Su, L., Ahmadi, G., Tadjbakhsh, I.G., Comparative study of base isolation systems. J Eng Mech 115:9 (1989), 1976–1992.
3. [3] Zayas, V.A., Low, S.S., Mahin, S.A., A simple pendulum technique for achieving seismic isolation. Earthq Spectra, 6(2), 1990 317–33.
4. [4] Mosqueda, G., Whittaker, A.S., Fenves, G.L., Characterization and modeling of Friction Pendulum bearings subjected to multiple components of excitation. J Struct Eng 130:3 (2004), 433–442.
5. [5] Mokha, A., Constantinou, M.C., Reinhorn, A.M., Teflon bearings in base isolation. I: Testing. J Struct Eng 116:2 (1990), 438–454.
6. [6] Constantinou, M.C., Mokha, A., Reinhorn, A.M., Teflon bearings in base isolation. II: Modeling. J Struct Eng 116:2 (1990), 455–474.
7. [7] Constantinou MC, Whittaker AS, Kalpakidis Y, Fenz DM, Warn GP. Performance of seismic isolation hardware under service and seismic loading. Technical Report MCEER-07-0012; 2007.
8. [8] Almazàn, J.L., De la Llera, J.C., Physical model for dynamic analysis of structures with FPS isolators. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 32:8 (2003), 1157–1184.
9. [9] Landi, L., Grazi, G., Diotallevi, P.P., Comparison of different models for friction pendulum isolators in structures subjected to horizontal and vertical ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 81 (2016), 75–83.
10. [10] Ryan, K.L., Chopra, A.K., Estimating the seismic displacement of friction pendulum isolators based on non-linear response history analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 33:3 (2004), 359–373.
11. [11] Barroso, L.R., Performance evaluation of vibration controlled steel structures under seismic loads [Ph.D. thesis]. 1999, Stanford University, California, US.
12. [12] Barroso, L.R., Winterstein, S., Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of controlled steel moment-resisting frame structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31:12 (2002), 2049–2066.
13. [13] Castaldo, P., Tubaldi, E., Influence of fps bearing properties on the seismic performance of base-isolated structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 44:15 (2015), 2817–2836.
14. [14] Castaldo, P., Palazzo, B., Della Vecchia, P., Seismic reliability of base-isolated structures with friction pendulum bearings. Eng Struct 95 (2015), 80–93.
15. [15] Castaldo, P., Palazzo, B., Della Vecchia, P., Life-cycle cost and seismic reliability analysis of 3D systems equipped with FPS for different isolation degrees. Eng Struct 125 (2016), 349–363, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.056.
16. [16] Castaldo, P., Amendola, G., Palazzo, B., Seismic fragility and reliability of structures isolated by friction pendulum devices: seismic reliability-based design (SRBD). Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 2016, 10.1002/eqe.2798.
17. [17] Palazzo B, Castaldo P, Della Vecchia P. Seismic reliability analysis of base-isolated structures with friction pendulum system. In: 2014 IEEE workshop on environmental, energy and structural monitoring systems Proceedings, Napoli, September 17–18; 2014.
18. [18] Jangid, R.S., Optimum frictional elements in sliding isolation systems. Comput Struct 76:5 (2000), 651–661.
19. [19] Jangid, R.S., Optimum friction pendulum system for near-fault motions. Eng Struct 27:3 (2005), 349–359.
20. [20] Chung, L.L., Kao, P.S., Yang, C.Y., Wu, L.Y., Chen, H.M., Optimal frictional coefficient of structural isolation system. J Vib Control, 2013, 10.1177/1077546313487938.
21. [21] Iemura, H., Taghikhany, T., Jain, S., Optimum design of resilient sliding isolation system for seismic protection of equipments. Bull Earthq Eng 5:1 (2007), 85–103.
22. [22] Bucher, C., Probability-based optimization of friction-based seismic isolation devices. Struct Saf 31:6 (2009), 500–507.
23. [23] Fallah, N., Zamiri, G., Multi-objective optimal design of sliding base isolation using genetic algorithm. Sci Iran A 20:1 (2013), 87–96.
24. [24] Dicleli, M., Buddaram, S., Effect of isolator and ground motion characteristics on the performance of seismic-isolated bridges. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35:2 (2006), 233–250.
25. th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering; 1996 [paper no. 1430].
26. [26] Saritaş, F., Hasgür, Z., Dynamic behavior of an isolated bridge pier under earthquake effects for different soil layers and support conditions. Digest, 2014, 1733–1756.
27. [27] Kulkarni, J.A., Jangid, R.S., Effects of superstructure flexibility on the response of base-isolated structures. Shock Vib 26 (2003), 1–13.
28. [28] Shinozuka, M., Deodatis, G., Simulation of stochastic processes by spectral representation. Appl Mech Rev 44:4 (1991), 191–203.
29. [29] Pinto, P., Giannini, R., Franchin, P., Seismic reliability analysis of structures. 2004, Iuss Press, Pavia.
30. [30] Kelly, J.M., Earthquake-resistant design with rubber. 2nd ed., 1997, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York.
31. [31] Building Seismic Safety Council. NEHRP recommended provisions: design examples FEMA 451 – Washington, D.C.; August 2006.
32. [32] Karavasilis, T.L., Seo, C.Y., Makris, N., Dimensional response analysis of bilinear systems subjected to non-pulse like earthquake ground motions. J Struct Eng 137:5 (2011), 600–606.
33. [33] Barbato, M., Tubaldi, E., A probabilistic performance-based approach for mitigating the seismic pounding risk between adjacent buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 42:8 (2013), 1203–1219.
34. [34] Palazzo B. Seismic Behavior of base-isolated Buildings. In: Proceedings of the international meeting on earthquake protection of buildings, Ancona; 1991.
35. [35] Aslani, H., Miranda, E., Probability-based seismic response analysis. Eng Struct 27:8 (2005), 1151–1163.
36. [36] Porter KA. An overview of PEER's performance-based earthquake engineering methodology. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on application of statistics and probability in civil engineering (ICASP9), San Francisco, California; 2003.
37. [37] Pradlwarter, H.J., SchuiRler, G.I., Dorka, U., Reliability of MDOF-systems with hysteretic devices. Eng Struct 20:8 (1998), 685–691.
38. [38] Tung ATY, Wang JN, Kiremidjian A, Kavazanjian E. Statistical parameters of AM and PSD functions for the generation of site-specific strong ground motions. In: Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, vol. 2, Madrid, Spain; 1992. p. 867–72.
39. [39] Kanai, K., Semiempirical formula for the seismic characteristics of the ground. Bull Earthq Res Inst 35 (1957), 309–325.
40. [40] Tajimi H. A statistical method of determining the maximum response of a building structure during an earthquake. In: Proceedings of the 2nd world conference on earthquake Engineering, vol. II; 1960. p. 781–98.
41. [41] Clough, R.W., Penzien, J., Dynamics of Structures. 2nd ed., 1993, McGraw-Hill, New York.
42. [42] Zentner I., Allain F., Humbert N., Caudron M. Generation of spectrum compatible ground motion and its use in regulatory and performance-based seismic analysis. In: Proceedings of the 9th Internat. Conf. on Str. Dyn.s, EURODYN 2014 Porto, Portugal; 30 June – 2 July 2014.
43. [43] Peng, Y., Chen, J., Li, J., Nonlinear response of structures subjected to stochastic excitations via probability density evolution method. Adv Struct Eng 17:6 (2014), 801–816.
44. [44] Li, C., Liu, Y., Ground motion dominant frequency effect on the design of multiple tuned mass dampers. J Earthq Eng 8:1 (2004), 89–105.
45. [45] Lopez-Garcia, D., Soong, T.T., Assessment of the separation necessary to prevent seismic pounding between linear structural systems. Prob Eng Mech 24 (2009), 210–223.
46. [46] Tubaldi, E., Barbato, M., Ghazizadeh, S., A probabilistic performance-based risk assessment approach for seismic pounding with efficient application to linear systems. Struct Saf 36–37 (2012), 14–22.
47. [47] Talaslidis D.G., Manolis G.D., Paraskevopoulos E.A., Panagiotopoulos C.G. Risk analysis of industrial structures with hazardous materials under seismic input, In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada; August 1-6, 2004.
48. [48] Shinozuka, M., Sato, Y., Simulation of nonstationary random process. J Eng Mech Div 93:1 (1967), 11–40.
49. [49] NTC08. Norme tecniche per le costruzioni. Gazzetta Ufficiale del 04.02.08. DM 14.01.08, Ministero delle Infrastrutture.
50. [50] Hancock, J., Bommer, J.J., A state-of-knowledge review of the influence of strong- motion duration on structural damage. Earthq Spectra 22:3 (2006), 827–845.
51. [51] Hancock, J., Bommer, J.J., Using spectral matched records to explore the influence of strong-motion duration on inelastic structural response. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27 (2007), 291–299.
52. th Arab Structural Engineering Conf., Abu Dhabi, UAE; Nov. 29 – Dec. 1, 2003. p. 331–40.
53. [53] Ryan, K., Chopra, A., Estimation of seismic demands on isolators based on nonlinear analysis. J Struct Eng 130:3 (2004), 392–402.
54. [54] Karavasilis, T., Seo, C., Seismic structural and non-structural performance evaluation of highly damped self-centering and conventional systems. Eng Struct 33:8 (2011), 2248–2258.
55. [55] Cornell, C., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R., Foutch, D., Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines. J Struct Eng 128:4 (2002), 526–533.
56. [56] Ang, A.H.S., Tang, W.H., Probability concepts in engineering-emphasis on applications to civil and environmental engineering. 2007, John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.
57. [57] Math Works Inc., MATLAB-High performance numeric computation and visualization software. User's guide. 1997, Natick, MA, USA.
58. [58] Vassiliou, F.M., Tsiavos, A., Stojadinović, B., Dynamics of inelastic base-isolated structures subjected to analytical pulse ground motions. Earth Eng Str Dyn 42:14 (2013), 2043–2060.