Evaluation of outcomes of total knee replacement with and without a navigation system;Ocena wyników całkowitej aloplastyki stawu kolanowego wykonanej z wykorzystaniem systemu nawigacji komputerowej oraz metodą tradycyjną

Ortopedia Traumatologia Rehabilitacja

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 251-261

  Synder, Marek ^a   Hatim Altimimi, Munaf A ^b   Borowski, Andrzej ^a   Sibiński, Marcin ^a   Drobniewski, Marek ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF LODZ   (Poland)

^b Imam Ali Hospital   (Iraq)

Author keywords

Computer navigation; Osteoarthritis; Total knee arthoplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE REPLACEMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROCEDURES; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84983469417     PISSN: 15093492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5604/15093492.1212869     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Kowalski M, Górecki A. Protezoplastyka stawu kolanowego z zastosowaniem systemu nawigacji komputerowej OrthoPilot. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2004; 6: 456-60.
2. Fosco M. Concepts in computer assisted total knee replacement surgery. W:Focter SK. Recent advances in hip and knee arthroplasty. Intech; 2012: 398-410.
3. Tigani D, Sabbioni G, Ben Ayad R, Filanti M, Rani N, Del Piccolo N. Comparison between two computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: gap-balancing versus measured resection technique. Knee Surg Sports TraumatolArthrosc 2010; 18: 1304-10.
4. Clayton AW, Cherian JJ, Banerjee S, et al. Does the use of navigation in total knee arthroplasty affect outcomes? J Knee Surg 2014; 27(3): 171-5.
5. Mielke RK, Clemens U, Jens JH, Kershally S. Navigation in knee endoprosthesis implantation – preliminary experiences and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation technique. Z OrthopIhreGrenzgeb 2001; 139(2): 109-16.
6. Stiehl JB, Heck DA. How precise is computer-navigated gap assessment in TKA? ClinOrthopRelat Res 2015; 473(1): 115-8.
7. Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A. Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. ClinOrthopRelat Res 2005; 433: 152-9.
8. Nam D, Weeks KD, Reinhardt KR, Nawabi DH, Cross MB, Mayman DJ. Accelerometer-based, portable navigation vs image-less, large-console computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of radiographic results. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28: 255-61.
9. Nam D, Cody EA, Nguyen JT, Figgie MP, Mayman DJ. Extramedullary guides versus portable, accelerometer-based navigation for tibial alignment in total kneearthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial: winner of the 2013 HAP PAUL award. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29: 288-94.
10. Scuderi GR, Fallaha M, Masse V, Lavigne P, Amiot LP, Berthiaume MJ. Total knee arthroplasty with a novel navigation system within the surgical field. Orthop Clin North Am 2014; 45: 167-73.
11. Seow-Hng Goh G. Accelerometer-based navigation is as accurate as optical computer navigation in restoring the joint line and mechanical axis after total knee arthroplasty. A prospective matched study. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31: 92-7.
12. Bugbee WD, Kermanshahi AY, Munro MM. Accuracy of a hand-held surgical navigation system for tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2014; 21(6): 1225-8.
13. Roberts TD, Clatworthy MG, Frampton CM, Young SW.Does computer assisted navigation improve functional outcomes and implant survivability after total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 2015; 30: 59-63.
14. Jawhar A, Shah V, Sohoni S, Scharf HP. Joint line changes after primary total knee arthroplasty: navigated versus non-navigated. Knee Surg Sports TraumatolArthrosc 2013; 21(10): 2355-62.
15. Shi J. Computer navigation and total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2014; 1: 39-43.
16. Moskal JT, Capps SG, Mann JW, Scanelli JA. Navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2014; 3: 235-48.
17. Magin MN. Computer-assisted total knee replacement (TKR) using Orthopilot navigation system.OperOrthopTraumatol 2010; 22: 63-80.
18. Clemens U, Miehlke RK. Experience using the latest OrthoPilotTKA software: a comparative study. SurgTechnolInt 2003; 11: 265-73.
19. Iorio R, Mazza D, Drogo P, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of an accelerometer-base system for the tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty. IntOrthop 2015; 39: 461-6.
20. Babazadeh S, Dowsey MM, Swan JD, Stoney JD, Choong PF. Joint line position correlates with function after primary total knee replacement: a randomised controlled trial comparing conventional and computer-assisted surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93: 1223-31.
21. Lang JE, Mannava S, Floyd AJ, et al. Robotic systems in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93: 1296-9.
22. Evanich CJ. Modified Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Scoring System. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 2006; 20: 100-1.
23. Alcelik IA, Diana G. A comparison of short-term outcomes of minimally invasive computer-assisted vs minimally invasive conventional instrumentation for primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 2016; 2: 410-8.
24. Bala A, Penrose CT, Seyler TM, Mather RC 3rd, Wellman SS, Bolognesi MP.Computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty utilization. J Knee Surg 2015; 19. [Epub ahead of print].