Accelerometer-Based Navigation Is as Accurate as Optical Computer Navigation in Restoring the Joint Line and Mechanical Axis After Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Prospective Matched Study

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 92-97

  Goh, Graham Seow Hng ^a   Liow, Ming Han Lincoln ^a   Lim, Winston Shang Rong ^a   Tay, Darren Keng Jin ^a   Yeo, Seng Jin ^a   Tan, Mann Hong ^a  

^a SINGAPORE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Accelerometer based navigation; Alignment; IASSIST; Joint line; Mechanical axis; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETER; ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY SYSTEM; CONTACT ANGLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL NAVIGATION SYSTEM; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ACCELEROMETRY; AGED; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; KNEE; KNEE REPLACEMENT; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TIBIA; VERY ELDERLY;

ACCELEROMETRY; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIBIA;

EID: 84953835674     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.06.048     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anderson K.C., Buehler K.C., Markel D.C. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20(7 Suppl 3):132.
2. Mason J.B., Fehring T.K., Estok R., et al. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(8):1097.
3. Spencer J.M., Chauhan S.K., Sloan K., et al. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2007, 89(4):477.
4. Ensini A., Catani F., Leardini A., et al. Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 457:156.
5. Bauwens K., Matthes G., Wich M., et al. Navigated total knee replacement. A metaanalysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89(2):261.
6. Canale S.T., Beaty J.H. Campbell's operative orthopaedics 2008, Elsevier Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 11th edit.
7. Nam D., Weeks K.D., Reinhardt K.R., et al. Accelerometer-based, portable navigation vs imageless, large console computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of radiographic results. J Arthroplasty 2013, 28(2):255.
8. Nam D., Cody E.A., Nguyen J.T., et al. Extramedullary guides versus portable, accelerometer-based navigation for tibial alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial: winner of the 2013 HAP PAUL award. J Arthroplasty 2014, 29(2):288.
9. Bugbee W.D., Kermanshahi A.Y., Munro M.M., et al. Accuracy of a hand-held surgical navigation system for tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2014, 21(6):1225.
10. Iorio R., Mazza D., Drogo P., et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of an accelerometer-base system for the tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2015, 39(3):461-466.
11. Scuderi G.R., Fallaha M., Masse V., et al. Total knee arthroplasty with a novel navigation system within the surgical field. Orthop Clin North Am 2014, 45(2):167.
12. Figgie H.E., Goldberg V.M., Heiple K.G., et al. The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986, 68-A:1035.
13. Engh G.A., McAuley J.P. Joint line restoration and flexion extension balance with revision total knee arthroplasty. Revision total knee arthroplasty 1997, 235. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.
14. Kawamura J., Bourne R.B. Factors affecting range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 2001, 6:248.
15. Chin P.L., Yang K.Y., Yeo S.J., et al. Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20(5):618.
16. Longstaff L.M., Sloan K., Stamp N., et al. Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24(4):570.
17. Chin P.L., Foo L.S., Yang K.Y., et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing the radiologic outcomes of conventional and minimally invasive techniques for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(6):800.
18. Ware J.E., Kosinski M., Bayliss M.S., et al. Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 1995, 33:AS264.
19. Babazadeh S., Dowsey M.M., Swan J.D., et al. Joint line position correlates with function after primary total knee replacement: a randomised controlled trial comparing conventional and computer-assisted surgery. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2011, 93(9):1223.
20. Jawhar A., Shah V., Sohoni S., et al. Joint line changes after primary total knee arthroplasty: navigated versus non-navigated. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013, 21(10):2355.
21. Hoke D., Jafari S.M., Orozco F., et al. Tibial shaft stress fractures resulting from placement of navigation tracker pins. J Arthroplasty 2011, 26(3):504.e5.
22. Owens R.F., Swank M.L. Low incidence of postoperative complications due to pin placement in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010, 25(7):1096.
23. Novak E.J., Silverstein M.D., Bozic K.J. The cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89(11):2389.
24. Zamora L., Goodall S., et al. Computer-navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty: Assessment Report: Medical Services Advisory Committee 2009, Australia. Medical Services Advisory Committee.
25. Slover J.D., Tosteson A.N., Bozic K.J., et al. Impact of hospital volume on the economic value of computer navigation for total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(7):1492.
26. Sparmann M., Wolke B., Czupalla H., et al. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2003, 85:830.
27. Duparc J., Massare C. Radiological measurement of the angular deviation of the knee in the frontal plane. Ann Radiol (Paris) 1967, 10:635.