Total knee arthroplasty with a novel navigation system within the surgical field

Orthopedic Clinics of North America

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 167-173

  Scuderi, Giles R ^a   Fallaha, Michel ^b   Masse, Vincent ^b   Lavigne, Patrick ^b   Amiot, Louis Philippe ^c   Berthiaume, Marie Josee ^b  

^a Insall Scott Kelly Institute   (United States)

^b MAISONNEUVE ROSEMONT HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c Zimmer CAS   (Canada)

Author keywords

Computer navigation; Smart instrumentation; Total knee alignment; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; BONE RESECTION; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY SYSTEM; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ELECTRONICS; FEMORAL COORDINATE SYSTEM REGISTRATION; FEMUR; FLUOROSCOPY; FLUOROSCOPY SYSTEM; HUMAN; IMAGE DIGITIZER; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; OPERATING ROOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; SURGICAL ANATOMY; SURGICAL NAVIGATION SYSTEM; TIBIA; TIBIAL COORDINATE SYSTEM REGISTRATION; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VALGUS KNEE; VALIDATION PROCESS; VARUS KNEE; WIRELESS COMMUNICATION;

COMPUTER NAVIGATION; SMART INSTRUMENTATION; TOTAL KNEE ALIGNMENT; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMUR; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIBIA;

EID: 84897115744     PISSN: 00305898     EISSN: 15581373     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2013.11.002     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Ritter M.A., Davis K.E., Meding J.B., et al. The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement. JBone Joint Surg Am 2011, 93(17):1588-1596.
2. Sikorski J.M. Alignment in total knee replacement. JBone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90(9):1121-1127.
3. Ritter M.A. The Anatomical Graduated Component total knee replacement: a long-term evaluation with 20-year survival analysis. JBone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91(6):745-749.
4. Petersen T.L., Engh G.A. Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. JArthroplasty 1988, 3(1):67-72.
5. Weng Y.J., Hsu R.W., Hsu W.H., et al. Comparison of computer-assisted navigation and conventional instrumentation for bilateral total knee arthroplasty. JArthroplasty 2009, 24(5):668-673.
6. Mullaji A., Shetty G.M. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty for arthritis with extra-articular deformity. JArthroplasty 2009, 24(8):1164-1169.e1.
7. Biasca N., Schneider T.O., Bungartz M., et al. Minimally invasive computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2009, 40(4):537-563.
8. Carter R.E., Rush P.F., Smid J.A., et al. Experience with computer-assisted navigation for total knee arthroplasty in a community setting. JArthroplasty 2008, 23(5):707-713.
9. Dutton A.Q., Yeo S.J. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. Surgical technique. JBone Joint Surg Am 2009, 91(Suppl 2 Pt 1):116-130.
10. Choong P.F., Dowsey M.M., Stoney J.D., et al. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. JArthroplasty 2009, 24(4):560-569.
11. Conteduca F., Massai F., Iorio R., et al. Blood loss in computer-assisted mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with a conventional technique. Int Orthop 2009, 33(6):1609-1613.
12. Daniilidis K., Tibesku C.O. Acomparison of conventional and patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2013, [Epub ahead of print].
13. Daniilidis K., Tibesku C.O. Frontal plane alignment after total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific instruments. Int Orthop 2013, 37(1):45-50.
14. Hendel M.D., Bryan J.A., Barsoum W.K., et al. Comparison of patient-specific instruments with standard surgical instruments in determining glenoid component position: a randomized prospective clinical trial. JBone Joint Surg Am 2012, 94(23):2167-2175.
15. Stevens A., Beurskens A., Köke A., et al. The use of patient-specific measurement instruments in the process of goal-setting: a systematic review of available instruments and their feasibility. Clin Rehabil 2013, 27(11):1005-1019.
16. Nam D., Weeks K.D., Reinhardt K.R., et al. Accelerometer-based, portable navigation vs imageless, large-console computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of radiographic results. JArthroplasty 2013, 28(2):255-261.
17. Nam D., Jerabek S.A., Haughom B., et al. Radiographic analysis of a hand-held surgical navigation system for tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty. JArthroplasty 2011, 26(8):1527-1533.
18. Khan H., Walker P.S., Zuckerman J.D., et al. The potential of accelerometers in the evaluation of stability of total knee arthroplasty. JArthroplasty 2013, 28(3):459-462.
19. Chauhan S.K., Clark G.W., Lloyd S., et al. Computer-assistedtotal knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). JBone Joint Surg Br 2004, 86(6):818-823.