Does Computer Assisted Navigation Improve Functional Outcomes and Implant Survivability after Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 30, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 59-63

  Roberts, Timothy D ^a   Clatworthy, Mark G ^a   Frampton, Chris M ^b   Young, Simon W ^c  

^a MIDDLEMORE HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^c NORTH SHORE HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Computer assisted surgery; Joint registry; Navigated total knee; Oxford Knee Score; Revision rate; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OXFORD KNEE SCORE; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; REGISTER; SURGICAL NAVIGATION SYSTEM; SURVIVAL; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; KNEE; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE REPLACEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEW ZEALAND; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; REOPERATION; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEW ZEALAND; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; REGISTRIES; REOPERATION; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84938532646     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.12.036     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Delp S.L., Stulberg S.D., Davies B., et al. Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998, 354:49.
2. Jenny J., Miehlke R.K., Giurea A. Learning curve in navigated total knee replacement. A multi-centre study comparing experienced and beginner centres. Knee 2008, 15:80.
3. Siston R.A., Giori N.J., Goodman S.B., et al. Surgical navigation for total knee arthroplasty: a perspective. J Biomech 2007, 40:728.
4. Bankes M.J.K., Back D.L., Cannon S.R., et al. The effect of component malalignment on the clinical and radiological outcome of the Kinemax total knee replacement. Knee 2003, 10:55.
5. Mahaluxmivala J., Bankes M.J., Nicolai P., et al. The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 Press Fit Condylar posterior cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2001, 16:635.
6. Oberst M., Bertsch C., Würstlin S., et al. CT analysis of leg alignment after conventional vs. navigated knee prosthesis implantation. Initial results of a controlled, prospective and randomized study. Unfallchirurg 2003, 106:941.
7. Hetaimish B.M., Khan M.M., Simunovic N. Meta-analysis of navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012, 27:1177.
8. Cheng T., Zhao S., Peng X., et al. Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012, 20:1307.
9. Nam D., Cody E.A., Nguyen J.T., et al. Extramedullary guides versus portable, accelerometer-based navigation for tibial alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial: winner of the 2013 HAP PAUL award. J Arthroplasty 2014, 29:288.
10. Rebal B.A., Babatunde O.M., Lee J.H., et al. Imageless computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty provides superior short term functional outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 2014, 29:938.
11. Siston R.A., Patel J.J., Goodman S.B., et al. The variability of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:2276.
12. Decking R., Markmann Y., Fuchs J., et al. Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:282.
13. Seon J.K., Song E.K. Functional impact of navigation-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2005, 28:1251.
14. Burnett R.S.J., Barrack R.L. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty is currently of no proven clinical benefit: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013, 471:264.
15. Rothwell A.G., Hooper G.J., Hobbs A., et al. An analysis of the Oxford hip and knee scores and their relationship to early joint revision in the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010, 92:413.
16. Murgatroyd S.E., Frampton C.M.A., Wright M.S. The effect of body mass index on outcome in total hip arthroplasty: early analysis from the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Arthroplasty 2014, 29:1884.
17. Tomlinson M., Harrison M. The New Zealand Joint Registry: report of 11-year data for ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Clin 2012, 17:719.
18. Garratt A.M., Brealey S., Gillespie W.J. Patient-assessed health instruments for the knee: a structured review. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004, 43:1414.
19. Ritter M.A., Davis K.E., Meding J.B., et al. The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011, 93:1588.
20. Fang D., Ritter M.A. Malalignment: forewarned is forearmed. Orthopedics 2009, 32:2.
21. Parratte S., Pagnano M.W., Trousdale R.T. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010, 92:2143.
22. Choong P.F., Dowsey M.M., Stoney J.D. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008, 24:560.
23. Lee D., Park J., Song D., et al. Accuracy of soft tissue balancing in TKA: comparison between navigation-assisted gap balancing and conventional measured resection. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009, 18:381.
24. Berger R.A., Crossett L.S., Jacobs J.J., et al. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998, 356:144.
25. Barrack R.L., Schrader T., Bertot A.J., et al. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 392:46.
26. Novak E.J., Silverstein M.D., Bozic K.J. The cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:2389.
27. Schnurr C., Csécsei G., Eysel P., et al. The effect of computer navigation on blood loss and transfusion rate in TKA. Orthopedics 2010, 13:474.
28. Church J.S., Scadden J.E., Gupta R.R., et al. Embolic phenomena during computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89:481.