The effects of chronic intracortical microstimulation on neural tissue and fine motor behavior

Journal of Neural Engineering

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2015, Pages

  Rajan, Alexander T ^a,b   Boback, Jessica L ^b   Dammann, John F ^b   Tenore, Francesco V ^c   Wester, Brock A ^c   Otto, Kevin J ^d   Gaunt, Robert A ^e   Bensmaia, Sliman J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY   (United States)

^d J Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; ASSAYS; ELECTRODES; MAMMALS; NEURAL PROSTHESES; NEURONS; SENSORY FEEDBACK;

CORTICAL TISSUES; CURRENT AMPLITUDE; FINE MOTOR CONTROL; IMPLANTED ELECTRODES; MICROSTIMULATION; NON-HUMAN PRIMATE; PRIMARY SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; STIMULATION PARAMETERS;

TISSUE;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ASTROCYTE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN DAMAGE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN NECROSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE IMPLANT; ELECTRODE IMPLANTATION; FEMALE; GLIOSIS; HISTOPATHOLOGY; INTRACORTICAL MICROSTIMULATION; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MICROELECTRODE; NERVE CELL DEGENERATION; NONHUMAN; PRIMARY SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RHESUS MONKEY; THERAPY EFFECT; TISSUE ADHESION; TISSUE INJURY; ANIMAL; ELECTROSTIMULATION; HAND STRENGTH; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SENSORY NERVE CELL; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX;

ANIMALS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; MACACA MULATTA; MALE; MICROELECTRODES; MOTOR SKILLS; SENSORY RECEPTOR CELLS; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX;

EID: 84983268861     PISSN: 17412560     EISSN: 17412552     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/12/6/066018     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bensmaia S J and Miller L E 2014 Restoring sensorimotor function through intracortical interfaces: progress and looming challenges Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 15 313-25
2. Collinger J L, Wodlinger B, Downey J E, Wang W, Tyler-Kabara E C, Weber D J, McMorland A J, Velliste M, Boninger M L and Schwartz A B 2013 High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia Lancet 381 557-64
3. Hochberg L R et al 2012 Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm Nature 485 372-5
4. Tabot G A, Kim S S, Winberry J E and Bensmaia S J 2014 Restoring tactile and proprioceptive sensation through a brain interface Neurobiol. Dis.
5. Johansson R S and Flanagan J R 2009 Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10 345-59
6. Tabot G A, Dammann J F, Berg J A, Tenore F V, Boback J L, Vogelstein R J and Bensmaia S J 2013 Restoring the sense of touch with a prosthetic hand through a brain interface Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110 18279-84
7. Berg J A et al 2013 Behavioral demonstration of a somatosensory neuroprosthesis IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 21 500-7
8. O'Doherty J E, Lebedev M A, Ifft P J, Zhuang K Z, Shokur S, Bleuler H and Nicolelis M A 2011 Active tactile exploration using a brain-machine-brain interface Nature 479 228-31
9. O'Doherty J E, Lebedev M A, Hanson T L, Fitzsimmons N A and Nicolelis M A 2009 A brain-machine interface instructed by direct intracortical microstimulation Front Integr. Neurosci. 3 20
10. London B M, Jordan L R, Jackson C R and Miller L E 2008 Electrical stimulation of the proprioceptive cortex (area 3a) used to instruct a behaving monkey IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 16 32-6
11. Dadarlat M C, O'Doherty J E and Sabes P N 2015 A learning-based approach to artificial sensory feedback leads to optimal integration Nat. Neurosci. 18 138-44
12. Thomson E E, Carra R and Nicolelis M A 2013 Perceiving invisible light through a somatosensory cortical prosthesis Nat. Commun. 4 1482
13. Venkatraman S and Carmena J M 2011 Active sensing of target location encoded by cortical microstimulation IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 19 317-24
14. O'Connor D H, Hires S A, Guo Z V, Li N, Yu J, Sun Q Q, Huber D and Svoboda K 2013 Neural coding during active somatosensation revealed using illusory touch Nat. Neurosci. 16 958-65
15. Semprini M, Bennicelli L and Vato A 2012 A parametric study of intracortical microstimulation in behaving rats for the development of artificial sensory channels Proc. of the IEEE Ann. Int. Conf. of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society pp 799-802
16. Negi S, Bhandari R, Rieth L, Van Wagenen R and Solzbacher F 2010 Neural electrode degradation from continuous electrical stimulation: comparison of sputtered and activated iridium oxide J. Neurosci. Methods 186 8-17
17. Parker R A, Davis T S, House P A, Normann R A and Greger B 2011 The functional consequences of chronic, physiologically effective intracortical microstimulation Prog. Brain Res. 194 145-65
18. Davis T S, Parker R A, House P A, Bagley E, Wendelken S, Normann R A and Greger B 2012 Spatial and temporal characteristics of V1 microstimulation during chronic implantation of a microelectrode array in a behaving macaque J. Neural Eng. 9 065003
19. Koivuniemi A S and Otto K J 2011 Asymmetric versus symmetric pulses for cortical microstimulation IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 19 468-76
20. McCreery D B, Agnew W F and Bullara L A 2002 The effects of prolonged intracortical microstimulation on the excitability of pyramidal tract neurons in the cat Ann. Biomed. Eng. 30 107-19
21. McCreery D, Pikov V and Troyk P R 2010 Neuronal loss due to prolonged controlled-current stimulation with chronically implanted microelectrodes in the cat cerebral cortex J. Neural Eng. 7 036005
22. Yuen T G, Agnew W F, Bullara L A, Jacques S and McCreery D B 1981 Histological evaluation of neural damage from electrical stimulation: considerations for the selection of parameters for clinical application Neurosurgery 9 292-9
23. Negi S, Bhandari R, Rieth L and Solzbacher F 2010 In vitro comparison of sputtered iridium oxide and platinum-coated neural implantable microelectrode arrays Biomed. Mater. 5 15007
24. Normann R A, Maynard E M, Rousche P J and Warren D J 1999 A neural interface for a cortical vision prosthesis Vis. Res. 39 2577-87
25. Maynard E M, Fernandez E and Normann R A 2000 A technique to prevent dural adhesions to chronically implanted microelectrode arrays J. Neurosci. Methods 97 93-101
26. Maynard E M, Nordhausen C T and Normann R A 1997 The Utah intracortical electrode array: a recording structure for potential brain-computer interfaces Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 102 228-39
27. Rousche P J and Normann R A 1999 Chronic intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of cat sensory cortex using the Utah intracortical electrode array IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 7 56-68
28. Zaaimi B, Ruiz-Torres R, Solla S A and Miller L E 2013 Multi-electrode stimulation in somatosensory cortex increases probability of detection J. Neural Eng. 10 056013
29. Kim S, Callier T, Tabot G A, Tenore F V and Bensmaia S J 2015 Sensitivity to microstimulation of somatosensory cortex distributed over multiple electrodes Front Syst. Neurosci. 9 47
30. McCreery D B, Agnew W F, Yuen T G and Bullara L 1990 Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 37 996-1001
31. Shannon R V 1992 A model of safe levels for electrical stimulation IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 39 424-6
32. Xerri C, Merzenich M M, Peterson B E and Jenkins W 1998 Plasticity of primary somatosensory cortex paralleling sensorimotor skill recovery from stroke in adult monkeys J. Neurophysiol. 79 2119-48
33. Love S, Arie P, Ironside J and Budka H 2015 Greenfield's Neuropathology (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press)
34. Agnew W F, McCreery D B, Yuen T G and Bullara L A 1989 Histologic and physiologic evaluation of electrically stimulated peripheral nerve: considerations for the selection of parameters Ann. Biomed. Eng. 17 39-60
35. McConnell G C, Rees H D, Levey A I, Gutekunst C A, Gross R E and Bellamkonda R V 2009 Implanted neural electrodes cause chronic, local inflammation that is correlated with local neurodegeneration J. Neural. Eng. 6 056003
36. Grill W M and Mortimer J T 1994 Electrical properties of implant encapsulation tissue Ann. Biomed. Eng. 22 23-33
37. Freeman G H and Halton J H 1951 Note on an exact treatment of contingency, goodness of fit and other problems of significance Biometrika 38 141-9
38. Biran R, Martin D C and Tresco P A 2005 Neuronal cell loss accompanies the brain tissue response to chronically implanted silicon microelectrode arrays Exp. Neurol. 195 115-26
39. Williams J C, Hippensteel J A, Dilgen J, Shain W and Kipke D R 2007 Complex impedance spectroscopy for monitoring tissue responses to inserted neural implants J. Neural. Eng. 4 410-23
40. Liu X, McCreery D B, Carter R R, Bullara L A, Yuen T G and Agnew W F 1999 Stability of the interface between neural tissue and chronically implanted intracortical microelectrodes IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 7 315-26
41. Chen K H, Dammann J F, Boback J L, Tenore F V, Otto K J, Gaunt R A and Bensmaia S J 2014 The effect of chronic intracortical microstimulation on the electrode-tissue interface J. Neural Eng. 11 026004
42. Graziano M S, Taylor C S and Moore T 2002 Complex movements evoked by microstimulation of precentral cortex Neuron 34 841-51
43. Koivuniemi A, Regele O B, Brenner J H and Otto K J 2011 Rat behavioral model for high-throughput parametric studies of intracortical microstimulation Proc. of the IEEE Ann. Int. Conf. of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society pp 7541-4
44. Koivuniemi A S and Otto K J 2012 The depth, waveform and pulse rate for electrical microstimulation of the auditory cortex Proc. of the IEEE Ann. Int. Conf. of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society pp 2489-92
45. Tehovnik E J and Slocum W M 2003 Microstimulation of macaque V1 disrupts target selection: effects of stimulation polarity Exp. Brain Res. 148 233-7
46. Johnson M D, Otto K J and Kipke D R 2005 Repeated voltage biasing improves unit recordings by reducing resistive tissue impedances IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 13 160-5
47. Otto K J, Johnson M D and Kipke D R 2006 Voltage pulses change neural interface properties and improve unit recordings with chronically implanted microelectrodes IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 53 333-40
48. Deuschl G et al 2006 Deep brain stimulation: postoperative issues Mov. Disord. 21 S219-37 Suppl 14
49. Torab K, Davis T S, Warren D J, House P A, Normann R A and Greger B 2011 Multiple factors may influence the performance of a visual prosthesis based on intracortical microstimulation: nonhuman primate behavioural experimentation J Neural. Eng. 8 035001
50. Bradley D C et al 2005 Visuotopic mapping through a multichannel stimulating implant in primate V1 J. Neurophysiol. 93 1659-70
51. Callier T, Schluter E, Tabot G, Miller L, Tenore F and Bensmaia S long-term stability of sensitivity to intracortical microstimulation of somatosensory cortex J. Neural Eng. 12 056010
52. Brochier T, Boudreau M J, Pare M and Smith A M 1999 The effects of muscimol inactivation of small regions of motor and somatosensory cortex on independent finger movements and force control in the precision grip Exp. Brain Res. 128 31-40