R2C: Improving ab initio residue contact map prediction using dynamic fusion strategy and Gaussian noise filter

Bioinformatics

Volumn 32, Issue 16, 2016, Pages 2435-2443

  Yang, Jing ^a   Jin, Qi Yu ^a   Zhang, Biao ^a   Shen, Hong Bin ^a  

^a Department of Automation   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; BIOLOGY; MACHINE LEARNING; MUTATION; NOISE; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PROTEIN FOLDING;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MACHINE LEARNING; MUTATION; NOISE; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 84983261954     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw181     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abu-Doleh, A.A. et al. (2012) Protein contact map prediction using multi-stage hybrid intelligence inference systems. J. Biomed. Inf., 45, 173-183.
2. Bacardit, J. et al. (2012) Contact map prediction using a large-scale ensemble of rule sets and the fusion of multiple predicted structural features. Bioinformatics, 28, 2441-2448.
3. Burger, L. and Van Nimwegen, E. (2010) Disentangling direct from indirect coevolution of residues in protein alignments. PLoS Comput. Biol., 6, e1000633.
4. Cheng, J. and Baldi, P. (2007) Improved residue contact prediction using support vector machines and a large feature set. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 113.
5. Di Lena, P. et al. (2012) Deep architectures for protein contact map prediction. Bioinformatics, 28, 2449-2457.
6. Dunn, S.D. et al. (2008) Mutual information without the influence of phylogeny or entropy dramatically improves residue contact prediction. Bioinformatics, 24, 333-340.
7. Eickholt, J. and Cheng, J. (2012) Predicting protein residue-residue contacts using deep networks and boosting. Bioinformatics, 28, 3066-3072.
8. Ekeberg, M. et al. (2013) Improved contact prediction in proteins: using pseudolikelihoods to infer Potts models. Phys. Rev. E., 87, 012707.
9. Fariselli, P. and Casadio, R. (1999) A neural network based predictor of residue contacts in proteins. Protein Eng., 12, 15-21.
10. Feizi, S. et al. (2013) Network deconvolution as a general method to distinguish direct dependencies in networks. Nat. Biotechnol., 31, 726-733.
11. Fuchs, A. et al. (2009) Prediction of helix-helix contacts and interacting helices in polytopicmembrane proteins using neural networks. Proteins, 74, 857-871.
12. Göbel, U. et al. (1994) Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins, 18, 309-317.
13. Gloor, G.B. et al. (2005) Mutual information in protein multiple sequence alignments reveals two classes of coevolving positions. Biochemistry, 44, 7156-7165.
14. Gromiha, M.M. (2011) Influence of long-range contacts and surrounding residues on the transition state structures of proteins. Anal. Biochem., 408, 32-36.
15. Immerkaer, J. (1996) Fast noise variance estimation. Comput. Vis. Image Underst., 64, 300-302.
16. Jin, Q.Y. et al. (2011) Removing gaussian noise by optimization of weights in non-local means. arXiv preprint arXiv:1109.5640.
17. Jones, D.T. et al. (2012) PSICOV: precise structural contact prediction using sparse inverse covariance estimation on large multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics, 28, 184-190.
18. Jones, D.T. et al. (2015) MetaPSICOV: combining coevolution methods for accurate prediction of contacts and long range hydrogen bonding in proteins. Bioinformatics, 31, 999-1006.
19. Kamisetty, H. et al. (2013) Assessing the utility of coevolution-based residueresidue contact predictions in a sequence-and structure-rich era. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 15674-15679.
20. Kim, D.E. et al. (2014) One contact for every twelve residues allows robust and accurate topology-level protein structure modeling. Proteins, 82, 208-218.
21. Kosciolek, T. and Jones, D.T. (2015) Accurate contact predictions using covariation techniques andmachine learning. Proteins., doi: 10.1002/prot.24863, 1-7.
22. Lee, B.C. and Kim, D. (2009) A new method for revealing correlated mutations under the structural and functional constraints in proteins. Bioinformatics, 25, 2506-2513.
23. Li, Y. et al. (2011) Predicting residue-residue contacts using random forest models. Bioinformatics, 27, 3379-3384.
24. Monastyrskyy, B. et al. (2014) Evaluation of residue-residue contact prediction in CASP10. Proteins, 82, 138-153.
25. Monastyrskyy, B. et al. (2015) New encouraging developments in contact prediction: assessment of the CASP11 results. Proteins., doi: 10.1002/prot.24943, 1-14.
26. Morcos, F. et al. (2011) Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, E1293-E1301.
27. Punta, M. and Rost, B. (2005) PROFcon: novel prediction of long-range contacts. Bioinformatics, 21, 2960-2968.
28. Seemayer, S. et al. (2014) CCMpred-fast and precise prediction of protein residue-residue contacts from correlated mutations. Bioinformatics, 30, 3128-3130.
29. Shen, H.B. and Chou, K.C. (2006) Ensemble classifier for protein fold pattern recognition. Bioinformatics, 22, 1717-1722.
30. Skwark, M.J. et al. (2014) Improved contact predictions using the recognition of protein like contact patterns. PLoS Comput. Biol., 10, e1003889.
31. Sun, H.P. et al. (2015) Improving accuracy of protein contact prediction using balanced network deconvolution. Proteins, 83, 485-496.
32. Vassura, M. et al. (2008) Reconstruction of 3D structures from protein contact maps. IEEE Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinf., 5, 357-367.
33. Wang, S. et al. (2013) Protein structure alignment beyond spatial proximity. Sci. Rep., 3, 1448.
34. Wang, Z. et al. (2011) APOLLO: a quality assessment service for single and multiple protein models. Bioinformatics, 27, 1715-1716.
35. Wang, Z. and Xu, J. (2013) Predicting protein contact map using evolutionary and physical constraints by integer programming. Bioinformatics, 29, i266-i273.
36. Wozniak, P.P. and Kotulska, M. (2014) Characteristics of protein residue-residue contacts and their application in contact prediction. J. Mol.Model., 20, 2497.
37. Wu, S. et al. (2011) Improving protein structure prediction using multiple sequence-based contact predictions. Structure, 19, 1182-1191.
38. Wu, S. and Zhang, Y. (2008) A comprehensive assessment of sequence-based and template-based methods for protein contact prediction. Bioinformatics, 24, 924-931.
39. Xu, J. et al. (2007) A parameterized algorithm for protein structure alignment. J. Comput. Biol., 14, 564-577.
40. Yang, J. et al. (2013) High-accuracy prediction of transmembrane inter-helix contacts and application to GPCR 3D structure modeling. Bioinformatics, 29, 2579-2587.
41. Zhou, H. and Skolnick, J. (2008) Protein model quality assessment prediction by combining fragment comparisons and a consensus Ca contact potential. Proteins, 71, 1211-1218.