The shift from theory to innovation: the evolution of Brazilian research frontiers 2005-2011

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 105-119

  Toivanen, Hannes ^a  

^a VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Brazil; emerging economies; emerging technologies; innovation management; national innovation systems; R D trends; research front

Indexed keywords

COMPETITIVENESS; GLOBALIZATION; INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT;

BRAZIL;

EID: 84890787224     PISSN: 09537325     EISSN: 14653990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2013.850160     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aksnes, D.W., J.W. Schneider, and M. Gunnarsson. 2012. Ranking national research systems by citation indicators. A comparative analysis using whole and fractionalised counting methods. Journal of Informetrics 6: 36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2011.08.002
2. Bell, M., and M. Albu. 1999. Knowledge systems and technological dynamism in industrial clusters in developing countries. World Development 27: 1715-34. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00073-X
3. Börner, K. 2010. Atlas of science. Visualizing what we know. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
4. Boyack, K.W., R. Klavans, and K. Börner. 2005. Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics 64: 351-74. doi: 10.1007/s11192-005-0255-6
5. Chandra, V., I. Osorio-Rodarte, and C.A. Primo Braga. 2009. Korea and the BICs (Brazil, India and China): Catching-up experiences. In Innovation and growth. Chasing a moving frontier, ed. V. Chandra, D. Eröcal, P.C. Padoan, and C.A. Primo Braga, 25-65. Paris: OECD.
6. Chang, C.K.N., and A. Breitzman. 2009. Using patents prospectively to identify high-impact technological clusters. Research Evaluation 18, no. 5: 357-64. doi: 10.3152/095820209X481066
7. Chen, C. 2006. CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57: 359-77. doi: 10.1002/asi.20317
8. Cozzens, S., S. Gatchair, J. Kang, K.-S. Kim, H.-J. Lee, G. Ordóñez, and A. Porter. 2010. Emerging technologies: Quantitative identification and measurement. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 22: 361-76. doi: 10.1080/09537321003647396
9. Dahlman, D. 2009. Different innovation strategies, different results: Brazil, Russia, India, China and Korea (the BRICKs). In Innovation and growth. Chasing a moving frontier, ed. V. Chandra, D. Eröcal, P.C. Padoan, and C.A. Primo Braga, 131-68. Paris: OECD.
10. Falagas, M.E., E.I. Pitsouni, G.A. Malietzis, and G. Pappas. 2008. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. FASEB Journal 22: 338-42. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
11. Garfield, E. 1979. Citation indexing. Its theory and application in science, technology and humanities. New York: Wiley.
12. Garfield, E. 2006. The agony and the ecstacy - the history and meaning of the journal impact factor. The Journal of American Medical Association 296, no. 1: 90-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.1.90
13. Garfield, E., and H. Small. 1989. Identifying the changing frontiers of science. In Innovation at the crossroads between science and technology, ed. M. Kranzberg, Y. Elkana, and Z. Tadmon, 51-65. Haifa: The S. Neaman Press.
14. Gavel, Y., and L. Iselid. 2008. Web of Science and Scopus: A journal title overlap study. Online Information Review 32 no. 1: 8-21. doi: 10.1108/14684520810865958
15. Glänzel, W., J. Leta, and B. Thijs. 2006. Science in Brazil. Part 1: A macro-level comparative study. Scientometrics 67: 67-86. doi: 10.1007/s11192-006-0055-7
16. Helene, A.F., and P.D. Ribeiro. 2011. Brazilian scientific production, financial support, established investigators and doctoral graduates. Scientometrics 89: 677-86. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0470-2
17. Huang, M.-H., H.-W. Chang, and D.-Z. Chen. 2012. The trend of concentration in scientific and technological innovation: A reduction of the predominant role of the U.S. in world research & technology. Journal of Informetrics 6: 457-68. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.03.003
18. Kim, L. 1997. Imitation to Innovation. The dynamics of Korean technological learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
19. Kostoff, R.N., R.B. Barth, and C.G.Y. Lau. 2008. Quality vs. quantity of publications in nanotechnology field from the People's Republic of China. Chinese Science Bulletin 53: 1272-80. doi: 10.1007/s11434-008-0183-y
20. Kraemer-Mbula, E., and W. Wamae. eds. 2010. Innovation and the development agenda. Paris: OECD.
21. Jones, B.F., S. Wuchty, and B. Uzzi. 2008. Multi-university research teams: Shifting impact, geography and stratification in science. Science 322, no. 5905: 1259-62. doi: 10.1126/science.1158357
22. Leydesdorff, L., and T. Opthof. 2010. Normalization at the field level: Fractional counting of citations. Journal of Informetrics 4: 644-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.05.003
23. Leydesdorff, L., and I. Rafols. 2009. A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology 60: 348-62. doi: 10.1002/asi.20967
24. Liu, F.-C., D.F. Simon, Y.-T. Sun, and C. Cao. 2011. China's innovation policies: Evolution, institutional structure, and trajectory. Research Policy 40: 917-31. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.005
25. Lundvall, B.-Å. ed. 2011. BRICS and development alternatives: Innovation systems and policies. London: Anthem Press.
26. Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia. 2007. Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação para o Desenvolvimento Nacional. Plano de Ação 2007-2010. Brasília: Ministério da Ciência e Technologia.
27. Ministério da Ciência e Technologia. 2010. Plano de ação em ciência, Technologia e inovaçao. Principais resultados e avanços 2007-2010. Brasília: Ministério da Ciência e Technologia.
28. Ministério do Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação. 2012. Dispêndio do governo federal em ciência e tecnologia (C&T)(1) por atividade, 2000-2010. http://www.mct.gov.br/index.php/content/view/5013.html.
29. Moed, H.F. 2010. Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.
30. Mugnaini, R. 2006. Caminhos para adequação da avaliação da produção científica brasileira: Impacto nacional versus international. PhD diss., Universidade de São Paulo.
31. OECD. 2007. Revised field of science and technology (FOS) classifications in the Frascati Manual. DSTI/EAS/STP/NESTI(2006)19/FINAL. Paris: OECD.
32. OECD. 2012. OECD Science, technology and industry outlook 2012. Paris: OECD.
33. Pereira, L., and G.A. Plonski. 2009. Shedding light on technological development in Brazil. Technovation 29: 451-64. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.12.001
34. Porter, A.L., and S.W. Cunningham. 2005. Tech mining. Exploiting new technologies for competitive advantage. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
35. Porter, A.L., D.J. Roessner, X.-Y. Jin, and N.C. Newman. 2002. Measuring national 'emerging technology' capabilities. Science and Public Policy 29: 189-200. doi: 10.3152/147154302781781001
36. Rodriguez, A., C. Dahlman, and J. Salmi. 2008. Knowledge and innovation for competitiveness in Brazil. Washington, DC: World Bank.
37. Schoeneck, D.J., A.L. Porter, R.N. Kostoff, and E.M. Berger. 2011. Assessment of Brazil's research literature. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 23: 601-21. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2011.585029
38. Shibata, N., Y. Kajikawa, Y. Takeda, and K. Matsushima. 2008. Detecting emerging research fronts based on topological measures in citation networks of scientific publications. Technovation 28: 758-75. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.03.009
39. Small, H. 1999. Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50: 799-813. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:9<799::AID-ASI9>3.0.CO;2-G
40. Small, H. 2011. Interpreting maps of science using citation context sentiments: A preliminary investigation. Scientometrics 87: 373-88. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0349-2
41. Stehnken, T. 2010. The politics of interaction in innovation systems: Evidence from Brazilian multi-level-governance structures. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag Baden-Baden.
42. Upham, S.P., and H. Small. 2010. Emerging research fronts in science and technology: Patterns of new knowledge development. Scientometrics 83: 15-83. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0051-9
43. Waltman, L., J. van Eck Naas, T. N. van Leeuwen, M.S. Visser, and A.F.J. Raan. 2011. Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations. Journal of Informetrics 5: 37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.08.001
44. Winnink, J.J., and R. J. W. Tijssen. 2011. Searching for hot fields in science. Paper presented at the Atlanta conference on science and technology policy, September 15-17, Atlanta, GA, USA.
45. Zhang, L., X. Liu, F. Janssens, L. Liang, and W. Glänzel. 2010. Subject clustering analysis based on ISI category classification. Journal of Informetrics 4: 185-93. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2009.11.005