A bibliometric study of China’s science and technology policies: 1949–2010

Scientometrics

Volumn 102, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 1521-1539

  Huang, Cui ^a   Su, Jun ^a   Xie, Xiang ^b   Ye, Xuanting ^a   Li, Zhang ^a   Porter, Alan ^c   Li, Jiang ^d  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b BEIJING JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Bibliometric analysis; China; Co word analysis; Network analysis; Policy making agency; S T policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921864816     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1406-4     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics,22(1), 155–205.
2. Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information,22(2), 191–235.
3. Coleman, T. F., & Moré, J. J. (1983). Estimation of sparse Jacobian matrices and graph coloring blems. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis,20(1), 187–209.
4. Coulter, N., Monarch, I., & Konda, S. (1998). Software engineering as seen through its research literature: A study in co-word analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,49(13), 1206–1223.
5. Courtial, J. P. (1994). A coword analysis of scientometrics. Scientometrics,31(3), 251–260.
6. Crouch, D., Irvine, J., & Martin, B. R. (1986). Bibliometric analysis for science policy: An evaluation of the United Kingdom’s research performance in ocean currents and protein crystallography. Scientometrics,9(5), 239–267.
7. Debackere, K., & Glänzel, W. (2004). Using a bibliometric approach to support research policy making: The case of the Flemish BOF-key. Scientometrics,59(2), 253–276.
8. Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Information Processing and Management,37(6), 817–842.
9. Fang, X. (2010). Re-examining the reform of China’s science and technology system: A historical perspective. Journal of Science and Technology Policy in China,1(1), 7–17.
10. Franklin, J. J., & Johnston, R. (1988). Co-citation bibliometric modeling as a tool for S&T policy and R&D management: Issues, applications, and developments (Vol. 325). Elsevier Science Publishers BV (North-Holland), Amsterdam.
11. Gao, Z., & Tisdell, C. (2004). China’s reformed science and technology system: an overview and assessment 1. Prometheus,22(3), 311–331.
12. Hicks, D. (1987). Limitations of co-citation analysis as a tool for science policy. Social Studies of Science,17(2), 295–316.
13. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,102(46), 16569–16572.
14. Huang, C., Amorim, C., Spinoglio, M., Gouveia, B., & Medina, A. (2004). Organization, programme and structure: An analysis of the Chinese innovation policy framework. R&D Management,34(4), 367–387.
15. Huang, C., Su, J., Xie, X., & Li, J. (2014). Basic research is overshadowed by applied research in China: a policy perspective. Scientometrics,. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1199-x.
16. Lin, J. Y., & Yang, D. T. (2000). Food availability, entitlements and the Chinese famine of 1959–61. The Economic Journal,110(460), 136–158.
17. Newman, M. E. J. (2010). Networks: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. OECD. (2002). Science and technology in China: Trends and policy challenges. Paris: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook.
19. OECD. (2008). OECD reviews of innovation policy: China 2008. Paris: OECD Publishing.
20. Sociedade Portuguesa de Inovacao. (2002). InnoChina—policies, structures and training programmes to foster innovation in the science and technology sector in China. Retrieved July 12, 2013 from http://www.spi.pt/en/documents/studies.asp.
21. Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage Publications.
22. Smith, K., & Marinova, D. (2005). Use of bibliometric modelling for policy making. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation,69(1), 177–187.
23. US Embassy Beijing. (2002). An evaluation of China’s science & technology system and its impact on the research community. A special report for the environment, science & technology section. Beijing: US Embassy Retrieved July 12, 2013 from http://www.usembassy-china.org.cn/sandt/ST-Report.doc.
24. Ventura, O. N., & Mombrú, A. W. (2006). Use of bibliometric information to assist research policy making. A comparison of publication and citation profiles of Full and Associate Professors at a School of Chemistry in Uruguay. Scientometrics,69(2), 287–313.
25. Wang, Z. Y., Li, G., Li, C. Y., & Li, A. (2012). Research on the semantic-based co-word analysis. Scientometrics,90(3), 855–875.
26. Yu, Q. Y. (1999). The implementation of China’s science and technology policy. Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Group.
27. Zhao, S. X., Zhang, P. L., Li, J., Tan, A. M., & Ye, F. Y. (2014). Abstracting the core subnet of weighted networks based on link strengths. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(5), 984–994.
28. Zhong, X., & Yang, X. (2007). Science and technology policy reform and its impact on China’s national innovation system. Technology in Society,29(3), 317–325.