Scientific collaboration between BRICS countries

Scientometrics

Volumn 102, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 1139-1166

  Finardi, Ugo ^a,b  

^a CNR   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

BRICS countries; Jaccard index; Probabilistic affinity index; Salton s index; Scientific collaboration

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925543125     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1490-5     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bassecoulard, E., Okubo, Y., Zitt, M. (2001). Insights in determinants of international scientific cooperation. In: F. Havemann, R. Wagner-Döbler, H. Kretschmer (Eds.), Collaboration in science and in technology. Proceedings of the second Berlin workshop on scientometrics and informetrics September 1–3, 2000, Berlin, ISBN 3-934682-32-4.
2. Biggemann, S., & Fam, K.-S. (2011). Business marketing in BRIC Countries. Industrial Marketing Management,40(1), 5–7.
3. BRICS (2011). Sanya declaration, source: http://www.gov.cn/misc/2011-04/14/content_1844551.htm (visited June 2014).
4. BRICS. (2012). The BRICS report. New Dehly: Oxford University Press. ISBN 13: 978-0-19-808538-6.
5. BRICS. (2014). Cape town declaration, source: http://www.brics5.co.za/assets/BRICS-STI-CAPE-TOWN-COMMUNIQUE-OF-10-FEBRUARY-2014.pdf (visited May 2014).
6. Chan, L., & Daim, T. (2012). Exploring the impact of technology foresight studies on innovation: Case of BRIC Countries. Futures,44(6), 618–630.
7. de Beaver, D., & Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration—Part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics,1(1), 65–84.
8. de Beaver, D., & Rosen, R. (1979a). Studies in scientific collaboration—Part II. Scientific co-authorship, research productivity and visibility in the French scientific elite, 1799–1830. Scientometrics,1(2), 133–149.
9. de Beaver, D., & Rosen, R. (1979b). Studies in scientific collaboration Part III. Professionalization and the natural history of modern scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics,1(3), 231–245.
10. de Leeuw, J., & van der Heijden, P. G. M. (1988). Correspondence analysis of incomplete contingency tables. Psychometrika,53(2), 223–233.
11. de Solla Price, (1981). The analysis of square matrices of scientometric transaction. Scientometrics,3(1), 55–63.
12. Gauffriau, M., & Larsen, P. O. (2005). Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies. Scientometrics,64(1), 85–93.
13. Gauffriau, M., Larsen, P. O., Maye, I., Roulin-Perriard, A. N. N. E., & von Ins, M. (2007). Publication, cooperation and productivity measures in scientific research. Scientometrics,73(2), 175–214. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1800-2.
14. Gauffriau, M., Larsen, P. O., Maye, I., Roulin-Perriard, A., & von Ins, M. (2008). Comparisons of results of publication counting using different methods. Scientometrics,77(1), 147–176.
15. Gazni, A., Sugimoto, C. R., & Didegah, F. (2012). Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,63(2), 323–335.
16. Glänzel, W., Schubert, A., & Czerwon, H.-J. (1999). A bibliometric analysis of international scientific cooperation of the European Union (1985–1995). Scientometrics,45(2), 185–202.
17. Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & Tijssen, R. J. W. (2010). Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Research Policy,39(5), 662–673.
18. Jaccard, P. (1912). The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone. New Phytologist,11(2), 37–50.
19. Katz, J. S. (1994). Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration. Scientometrics,31(1), 31–43.
20. Kumar, N., & Asheulova, N. (2011). Comparative analysis of scientific output of BRIC Countries. Annals of Library and Information Studies,58(3), 228–236.
21. Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology and Human Values,17(1), 101–126.
22. Luukkonen, T., Tussen, R. J. W., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1993). The measurement of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics,28(1), 15–36.
23. Manaperi, N. (2013). The short and long-run dynamics between inflation and economic growth in BRICS. Applied Economic Letters,21(2), 140–145.
24. Montobbio, F., & Sterzi, V. (2013). The globalization of technology in emerging markets: A gravity model on the determinants of international patent collaborations. World Development,44, 281–299.
25. Nagpaul, P. S. (2003). Exploring a pseudo-regression model of transnational cooperation in science. Scientometrics,56(3), 403–416.
26. Noma, E. (1982). An improved method for analyzing square scientometric transaction matrices. Scientometrics,4(4), 297–316.
27. Okubo, Y., & Zitt, M. (2004). Searching for research integration across Europe: a closer look at international and inter-regional collaboration in France. Science and Public Policy,31(3), 213–226.
28. Pant, H. W. (2013). The BRICS Fallacy. The Washington Quarterly,36(3), 91–105.
29. Peters, H. P. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1993). Co-word-based science maps of chemical engineering. Part I: Representations by direct multidimensional scaling. Research Policy,22(1), 23–45.
30. Rip, A., & Courtial, P. (1984). co-word maps of biotechnology: an example of cognitive scientometrics. Scientometrics,6(6), 381–400.
31. Salton, G., & Bergkmark, D. (1979). A Citation Study of Computer Science Literature. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication,22(3), 146–158.
32. Schubert, A., & Glänzel, W. (2006). Cross-national preference in co-authorship, references and citations. Scientometrics,69(2), 409–428.
33. Singh, S. (2013). Future of golden BRICS. Strategic Analysis,37(4), 393–397.
34. Tijseen, R. J. W., de Leeuw, J., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1987). Quasi-correspondence analysis on scientometric transaction matrices. Scientometrics,11(5–6), 351–366.
35. Tseng, C.-Y. (2009). Technological innovation in the BRIC economies. Research-Technology Management,52(2), 29–35.
36. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2007). Bibliometric mapping of the computational intelligence field. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems,15(5), 625–645.
37. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2009). How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,60(8), 1635–1651.
38. Vikas, S. (2011). Industrial relations in BRIC nations: A study. Asia Pacific Journal of Research in Business Management,2(6), 135–157.
39. Wagner, C. S. (2005). Six case studies of international collaboration in science. Scientometrics,62(1), 3–26.
40. Wagner, C. S., & Wong, S. K. (2012). Unseen science? Representation of BRICs in global science. Scientometrics,90(3), 1001–1013.
41. Wilson, D., & Purushothaman, R. (2003). DreamingWith BRICs: The Path to 2050, Goldman Sachs Global Economic Paper No 99, October 1, 2003.
42. Yanacopulos, H. (2013). the janus faces of a middle power: South Africa’s emergence in international development. Journal of Southern African Studies, 1–14. doi:10.1080/03057070.2013.860715.
43. Yang, L. Y., Yue, T., Ding, J. L., & Han, T. (2012). A comparison of disciplinary structure in science between the G7 and the BRIC Countries by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics,93(2), 497–516.
44. Yi, Y., Qi, W., & Wu, D. (2013). Are CIVETS the next BRICs? A comparative analysis from scientometrics perspective. Scientometrics,94(2), 615–628.
45. Zitt, M., Bassecoulard, E., & Okubo, Y. (2000). Shadows of the past in international cooperation: Collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science. Scientometrics,43(3), 627–657.