Between participation and collective action-from occasional liaisons towards long-term co-management for urban resilience

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 8, Issue 7, 2016, Pages

  Schauppenlehner Kloyber, Elisabeth ^a   Penker, Marianne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

Author keywords

Cities; Co management; Collaboration agreements; Collective action; Participation; Self organization; Urban commons; Urban planning; Urban resilience

Indexed keywords

COLLECTIVE ACTION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; STATE ROLE; URBAN AREA; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING; DESIGN METHOD; INNOVATION; LONG-TERM CHANGE; SELF ORGANIZATION;

AUSTRIA; KORNEUBURG BASIN; LOWER AUSTRIA;

EID: 84982684422     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su8070664     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Goal 11. Make Cities Inclusive, Safe, Resilient and Sustainable. Available online: http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/cities/ (accessed on 5 September 2015).
2. Jakubowski, P. Resilienz: Eine zusätzliche Denkfigur für gute Stadtentwicklung. Inf. Raumentwickl. 2013, 4, 371-378.
3. Adger, W.N. Social and ecological resilience: Are they related? Prog. Hum. Geogr. 2000, 24, 347-364.
4. Berkes, F., Ross, H. Community resilience: Toward an integrated approach. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2013, 26, 5-20.
5. Kim, D., Lim, U. Urban resilience in climate change adaptation: A conceptual framework. Sustainability 2016, 8, 405.
6. Olsson, P., Gunderson, L.H., Carpenter, S.R., Ryan, P., Lebel, L., Folke, C., Holling, C.S. Shooting the rapids: Navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 2006, 11, 18.
7. Birkmann, J., Bach, C., Vollmer, M. Tools for resilience building and adaptive spatial governance. Raumforsch. Raumordn. 2012, 70, 293-308.
8. Deppisch, S. Urbane sozial-ökologische Resilienz. In Multidisziplinäre Perspektiven der Resilienzforschung; Wink, R., Ed., Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden: Wiesbaden, Germany, 2016; pp. 199-213.
9. Kegler, H. Resilienz: Strategien and Perspektiven für Die Widerstandsfähige und Lernende Stadt; Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland, 2014; Volume 151.
10. Brandt, U.S., Svendsen, G.T. Is local participation always optimal for sustainable action? The costs of consensus-building in Local Agenda 21. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 129, 266-273.
11. Irvin, R.A., Stansbury, J. Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Adm. Rev. 2004, 64, 55-65.
12. Reed, M.S. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biol. Conser. 2008, 141, 2417-2431.
13. Turnhout, E., van Bommel, S., Aarts, N. How participation creates citizens: Participatory governance as performative practice. Ecol. Soc. 2010, 15, 26.
14. Vogt, S., Haas, A. The future of public participation in Germany: Empirical analyses of administration experts' assessments. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2015, 98, 157-173.
15. Boonstra, B., Boelens, L. Self-organization in urban development: Towards a new perspective on spatial planning. Urban Res. Pract. 2011, 4, 99-122.
16. Tahvilzadeh, N. Understanding participatory governance arrangements in urban politics: Idealist and cynical perspectives on the politics of citizen dialogues in Göteborg, Sweden. Urban Res. Pract. 2015, 8, 238-254.
17. Bell, S., Morse, S. Breaking through the Glass Ceiling: Who really cares about sustainability indicators? Local Environ. 2001, 6, 291-309.
18. Holden, M. Public participation and local sustainability: Questioning a common agenda in urban governance. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 2011, 35, 312-329.
19. Klages, H., Vetter, A. Bürgerbeteiligung auf Kommunaler Ebene: Perspektiven für Eine Systematische und Verstetigte Gestaltung; Edition Sigma: Berlin, Germany, 2013; Volume 43.
20. Arnstein, S.R. A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Inst. Planners 1969, 35, 216-224.
21. Collins, K., Ison, R. Jumping off Arnstein's ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation. Environ. Policy Gov. 2009, 19, 358-373.
22. Tritter, J.Q., McCallum, A. The snakes and ladders of user involvement: Moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy 2006, 76, 156-168. [PubMed]
23. Foster, S. Collective action and the urban commons. Notre Dame Law Rev. 2011, 87, 57-133.
24. Foster, S., Iaione, C. The city as a commons. Yale Law Policy Rev. 2016.
25. Garnett, N.S. Managing the urban commons. Univ. PA. Law Rev. 2012, 160, 1995-2027.
26. Iaione, C. City as a commons. In Second Thematic Conference of the IASC on Design and Dynamics of Institutions for Collective Action: A Tribute to Prof. Elinor Ostrom, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 29 November-1 December 2012; Volume 29, pp. 109-151.
27. O'Brien, D.T. Managing the urban commons: The relative influence of individual and social incentives on the treatment of public space. Hum. Nat. 2012, 23, 467-489.
28. Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, NY, USA, 1990.
29. Ross, H., Buchy, M., Proctor,W. Laying down the ladder: A typology of public participation in Australian natural resource management. Aust. J. Environ. Manag. 2002, 9, 205-217.
30. Aarts, N., Leeuwis, C. Participation and power: reflections on the role of government in land use planning and rural development. J. Agric. Educ. Ext. 2010, 16, 131-145.
31. Bovaird, T. Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Adm. Rev. 2007, 67, 846-860.
32. Hurlbert, M., Gupta, J. The split ladder of participation: A diagnostic, strategic, and evaluation tool to assess when participation is necessary. Environ. Sci. Policy 2015, 50, 100-113.
33. Wilcox, D. The Guide to Effective Participation; Partnership: Brighton, UK, 1994.
34. Wondolleck, J.M., Manring, N.J., Crowfoot, J.E. Teetering at the top of the ladder: The experience of citizen group participants in alternative dispute resolution processes. Sociol. Perspect. 1996, 39, 249-262.
35. Pestoff, V. Collective action and the sustainability of co-production. Public Manag. Rev. 2014, 16, 383-401.
36. Gardesse, C. The fraught 'menage à trois' of public actors, private players and inhabitants: Problems of participation in French urban development projects. Urban Stud. 2014, 312-348.
37. Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., Norberg, J. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ann. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2005, 30, 441-473.
38. Ahern, J. From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2011, 100, 341-343.
39. Goldstein, B.E. Resilience to surprises through communicative planning. Ecol. Soc. 2009, 14, 33.
40. Desouza, K.C., Flanery, T.H. Designing, planning, and managing resilient cities: A conceptual framework. Cities 2013, 35, 89-99.
41. Newig, J. Does public participation in environmental decisions lead to improved environmental quality? towards an analytical framework. Commun. Coop. Part. Int. J. Sustain. Commun. 2007, 1, 51-71.
42. Schauppenlehner-Kloyber, E., Penker, M. Managing group processes in transdisciplinary future studies: How to facilitate social learning and capacity building for self-organised action towards sustainable urban development? Futures 2015, 65, 57-71.
43. Albert, C., Zimmermann, T., Knieling, J., von Haaren, C. Social learning can benefit decision-making in landscape planning: Gartow case study on climate change adaptation, Elbe valley biosphere reserve. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2012, 105, 347-360.
44. Dlouhá, J., Barton, A., Janoušková, S., Dlouhỳ, J. Social learning indicators in sustainability-oriented regional learning networks. J. Cleaner Prod. 2013, 49, 64-73.
45. Garmendia, E., Stagl, S. Public participation for sustainability and social learning: Concepts and lessons from three case studies in Europe. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69, 1712-1722.
46. Nelson, D.R., Adger,W.N., Brown, K. Adaptation to environmental change: Contributions of a resilience framework. Ann. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2007, 32, 395-419.
47. Berkes, F. Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 1692-1702. [PubMed]
48. Schauppenlehner-Kloyber, E., Penker, M., Braito, M. Kollektive Strategien für zukunftsfähige Stadtentwicklung-Erfahrungen aus einem partizipativen Szenarienprozess in Niederösterreich. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society, Italy, Rome, 20-23 May 2013; Schrenk, M., Popovich, V.V., Zeile, P., Elisei, P., Eds., CORP: Schwechat, Austria, 2013; pp. 485-495.
49. Kornberger, M., Borch, C. Introduction. In Urban Commons. Rethinking the City; Borch, C., Kornberger, M., Eds., Routledge: Abingdon, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 2-21.
50. Hardin, G. The Tragedy of the commons. Science 1968, 162, 1243-1248.
51. Howard, E. Garden Cities of To-Morrow; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1965; Volume 23.
52. Ostrom, E. Design principles of robust property-rights institutions: What have we learned? In Property Rights and Land Policies; Ingram, G.K., Hong, Y.-H., Eds., Lincoln Institute of Land Policy: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009; pp. 25-51.
53. Cox, M., Arnold, G., Villamayor Tomás, S. A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecology Soc. 2010, 15, 38.
54. Wilson, D.S., Ostrom, E., Cox, M.E. Generalizing the core design principles for the efficacy of groups. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2013, 90, S21-S32.
55. Armour, A. The citizens' jury model of public participation: A critical evaluation. In Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse; Renn, O., Webler, T., Wiedemann, P., Eds., Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995; pp. 175-187.
56. Teck, G.L.H., Ali, N.E.H., Siong, H.C., Ali, H.M. Ostrom's design principles in residential public open space governance: Conceptual framework and literature review. Int. J. Built Environ. Sustain. 2014, 1, 27-37.
57. Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., Stern, P.C. The struggle to govern the commons. Science 2003, 302, 1907-1912.
58. McGinnis, M.D., Ostrom, E. Design principles for local and global commons. In Linking Local and Global Commons; Harvard Center for International Affairs: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1992.
59. Lorenz, D.F. The diversity of resilience: Contributions from a social science perspective. Nat. Hazar. 2010, 67, 7-24.
60. Pendall, R., Foster, K.A., Cowell, M. Resilience and regions: Building understanding of the metaphor. Cambr. J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 2009.
61. Anderies, J.M., Folke, C., Walker, B., Ostrom, E. Aligning key concepts for global change policy: Robustness, resilience, and sustainability. Ecol. Soc. 2013, 18, 8.