Quantitative susceptibility mapping using a superposed dipole inversion method: Application to intracranial hemorrhage

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 76, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 781-791

  Sun, Hongfu ^a   Kate, Mahesh ^a   Gioia, Laura C ^a   Emery, Derek J ^a   Butcher, Kenneth ^a   Wilman, Alan H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

artifact reduction; intracranial hemorrhage; mask inversion; quantitative susceptibility mapping; superposed dipole inversion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIPOLE; FEMALE; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC FIELD; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; QUANTITATIVE SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RADIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; SUPERPOSED DIPOLE INVERSION METHOD; SUSCEPTIBILITY WEIGHTED IMAGING; VERY ELDERLY;

EID: 84982267382     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25919     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Sacco S, Totaro R, Toni D, Marini C, Cerone D, Carolei A. Incidence, case-fatalities and 10-year survival of subarachnoid hemorrhage in a population-based registry. Eur Neurol 2009;62:155–160.
2. Bradley WG. MR appearance of hemorrhage in the brain. Radiology 1993;189:15–26.
3. Yeatts SD, Palesch YY, Moy CS, Selim M. High dose deferoxamine in intracerebral hemorrhage (Hi-Def) trial: rationale, design, and methods. Neurocrit Care 2013;19:257–266.
4. Haacke EM, Mittal S, Wu Z, Neelavalli J, Cheng Y-CN. Susceptibility-weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, part 1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:19–30.
5. Mitsumori F, Watanabe H, Takaya N, Garwood M, Auerbach EJ, Michaeli S, Mangia S. Toward understanding transverse relaxation in human brain through its field dependence. Magn Reson Med 2012;68:947–953.
6. Haacke EM, Cheng NYC, House MJ, Liu Q, Neelavalli J, Ogg RJ, Khan A, Ayaz M, Kirsch W, Obenaus A. Imaging iron stores in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2005;23:1–25.
7. De Rochefort L, Liu T, Kressler B, Liu J, Spincemaille P, Lebon V, Wu J, Wang Y. Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction from MR phase data using bayesian regularization: validation and application to brain imaging. Magn Reson Med 2010;63:194–206.
8. Schweser F, Deistung A, Lehr BW, Reichenbach JR. Quantitative imaging of intrinsic magnetic tissue properties using MRI signal phase: an approach to in vivo brain iron metabolism? Neuroimage 2011;54:2789–2807.
9. Liu J, Liu T, de Rochefort L, et al. Morphology enabled dipole inversion for quantitative susceptibility mapping using structural consistency between the magnitude image and the susceptibility map. Neuroimage 2012;59:2560–2568.
10. Kressler B, de Rochefort L, Liu T, Spincemaille P, Jiang Q, Wang Y. Nonlinear regularization for per voxel estimation of magnetic susceptibility distributions from MRI field maps. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2010;29:273–281.
11. Shmueli K, de Zwart JA, van Gelderen P, Li T-Q, Dodd SJ, Duyn JH. Magnetic susceptibility mapping of brain tissue in vivo using MRI phase data. Magn Reson Med 2009;62:1510–1522.
12. Wharton S, Bowtell R. Whole-brain susceptibility mapping at high field: a comparison of multiple- and single-orientation methods. Neuroimage 2010;53:515–525.
13. Wu B, Li W, Guidon A, Liu C. Whole brain susceptibility mapping using compressed sensing. Magn Reson Med 2012;67:137–147.
14. Bilgic B, Pfefferbaum A, Rohlfing T, Sullivan E V, Adalsteinsson E. MRI estimates of brain iron concentration in normal aging using quantitative susceptibility mapping. Neuroimage 2012;59:2625–2635.
15. Li W, Wu B, Liu C. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial variation in tissue composition. Neuroimage 2011;55:1645–1656.
16. Sun H, Wilman AH. Quantitative susceptibility mapping using single-shot echo-planar imaging. Magn Reson Med 2015;73:1932–1938.
17. Liu C, Li W, Tong KA, Yeom KW, Kuzminski S. Susceptibility-weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the brain. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;42:23–41.
18. Wang Y, Liu T. Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM): decoding MRI data for a tissue magnetic biomarker. Magn Reson Med 2015;73:82–101.
19. Langkammer C, Schweser F, Krebs N, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) as a means to measure brain iron? A post mortem validation study. Neuroimage 2012;62:1593–1599.
20. Zheng W, Nichol H, Liu S, Cheng Y-CN, Haacke EM. Measuring iron in the brain using quantitative susceptibility mapping and X-ray fluorescence imaging. Neuroimage 2013;78:68–74.
21. Sun H, Walsh AJ, Lebel RM, Blevins G, Catz I, Lu J-Q, Johnson ES, Emery DJ, Warren KG, Wilman AH. Validation of quantitative susceptibility mapping with Perls' iron staining for subcortical gray matter. Neuroimage 2014;105:486–492.
22. Wang S, Lou M, Liu T, Cui D, Chen X, Wang Y. Hematoma volume measurement in gradient echo MRI using quantitative susceptibility mapping. Stroke 2013;44:2315–2317.
23. Chen W, Zhu W, Kovanlikaya I, Kovanlikaya A, Liu T, Wang S, Salustri C, Wang Y. Intracranial calcifications and hemorrhages: characterization with quantitative susceptibility mapping. Radiology 2014;270:496–505.
24. Salomir R, de Senneville BD, Moonen CT. A fast calculation method for magnetic field inhomogeneity due to an arbitrary distribution of bulk susceptibility. Concepts Magn Reson 2003;19B:26–34.
25. Marques JP, Bowtell R. Application of a Fourier-based method for rapid calculation of field inhomogeneity due to spatial variation of magnetic susceptibility. Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng 2005;25B:65–78.
26. Abdul-Rahamn HS, Gdeisat MA, Burton DR, Lalor MJ, Lilley F, Moore CJ. Fast and robust three-dimensional best path phase unwrapping algorithm. Appl Opt 2007;46:6623.
27. Jenkinson M. Fast, automated, N-dimensional phase-unwrapping algorithm. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:193–197.
28. Witoszynskyj S, Rauscher A, Reichenbach JR, Barth M. Phase unwrapping of MR images using Phi UN–a fast and robust region growing algorithm. Med Image Anal 2009;13:257–268.
29. Schofield MA, Zhu Y. Fast phase unwrapping algorithm for interferometric applications. Opt Lett 2003;28:1194–1196.
30. Bagher-Ebadian H, Jiang Q, Ewing JR. A modified Fourier-based phase unwrapping algorithm with an application to MRI venography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27:649–652.
31. Li W, Avram AV, Wu B, Xiao X, Liu C. Integrated Laplacian-based phase unwrapping and background phase removal for quantitative susceptibility mapping. NMR Biomed 2014;27:219–227.
32. Langkammer C, Bredies K, Poser BA, Barth M, Reishofer G, Fan AP, Bilgic B, Fazekas F, Mainero C, Ropele S. Fast quantitative susceptibility mapping using 3D EPI and total generalized variation. Neuroimage 2015;111:622–630.
33. Bilgic B, Fan AP, Polimeni JR, Cauley SF, Bianciardi M, Adalsteinsson E, Wald LL, Setsompop K. Fast quantitative susceptibility mapping with L1-regularization and automatic parameter selection. Magn Reson Med 2014;72:1444–1459.
34. Liu T, Liu J, de Rochefort L, Spincemaille P, Khalidov I, Ledoux JR, Wang Y. Morphology enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) from a single-angle acquisition: comparison with COSMOS in human brain imaging. Magn Reson Med 2011;66:777–783.
35. Schweser F, Deistung A, Lehr BW, Reichenbach JR. Differentiation between diamagnetic and paramagnetic cerebral lesions based on magnetic susceptibility mapping. Med Phys 2010;37:5165.
36. Walsh DO, Gmitro AF, Marcellin MW. Adaptive reconstruction of phased array MR imagery. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:682–690.
37. Smith SM. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 2002;17:143–155.
38. Sun H, Wilman AH. Background field removal using spherical mean value filtering and Tikhonov regularization. Magn Reson Med 2013;1157:1151–1157.
39. Cheng Y-CN, Neelavalli J, Haacke EM. Limitations of calculating field distributions and magnetic susceptibilities in MRI using a Fourier based method. Phys Med Biol 2009;54:1169–1189.
40. Liu T, Spincemaille P, de Rochefort L, Kressler B, Wang Y. Calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling (COSMOS): a method for conditioning the inverse problem from measured magnetic field map to susceptibility source image in MRI. Magn Reson Med 2009;61:196–204.
41. Li W, Wang N, Yu F, Han H, Cao W, Romero R, Tantiwongkosi B, Duong TQ, Liu C. A method for estimating and removing streaking artifacts in quantitative susceptibility mapping. Neuroimage 2015;108:111–122.
42. Liu T, Wisnieff C, Lou M, Chen W, Spincemaille P, Wang Y. Nonlinear formulation of the magnetic field to source relationship for robust quantitative susceptibility mapping. Magn Reson Med 2013;69:467–476.
43. Buch S, Liu S, Ye Y, Cheng Y-CN, Neelavalli J, Haacke EM. Susceptibility mapping of air, bone, and calcium in the head. Magn Reson Med 2015;73:2185–2194.
44. Neelavalli J, Cheng Y-CN, Jiang J, Haacke EM. Removing background phase variations in susceptibility-weighted imaging using a fast, forward-field calculation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;29:937–948.
45. Topfer R, Schweser F, Deistung A, Reichenbach JR, Wilman AH. SHARP edges: recovering cortical phase contrast through harmonic extension. Magn Reson Med 2015;73:851–856.
46. Zhou D, Liu T, Spincemaille P, Wang Y. Background field removal by solving the Laplacian boundary value problem. NMR Biomed 2014;27:312–319.