De novo transcriptome assembly and analysis of differentially expressed genes of two barley genotypes reveal root-zone-specific responses to salt exposure

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Hill, Camilla Beate ^a,b   Cassin, Andrew ^a   Keeble Gagnère, Gabriel ^a,b   Doblin, Monika S ^a   Bacic, Antony ^a   Roessner, Ute ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTOME;

DRUG EFFECT; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HORDEUM; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT GENE; PLANT ROOT; SALINITY; SALT TOLERANCE; VALIDATION STUDY;

GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENES, PLANT; GENOTYPE; HORDEUM; PLANT ROOTS; SALINITY; SALT-TOLERANCE; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 84982221220     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep31558     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Glenn, E. P., Brown, J. J. & Blumwald, E. Salt tolerance and crop potential of halophytes. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 18, 227-255 (1999).
2. Ouyang, B. et al. Identification of early salt stress response genes in tomato root by suppression subtractive hybridization and microarray analysis. J. Exp. Bot. 58, 507-520 (2007).
3. Ishikawa, H. & Evans, M. L. Specialized zones of development in roots. Plant Physiol. 109, 725-727 (1995).
4. Hochholdinger, F., Woll, K., Sauer, M. & Dembinsky, D. Genetic dissection of root formation in maize (Zea mays) reveals root-type specific developmental programmes. Ann. Bot. 93, 359-368 (2004).
5. Birnbaum, K. et al. A gene expression map of the Arabidopsis root. Science 302, 1956-1960 (2003).
6. Brady, S. M. et al. A high-resolution root spatiotemporal map reveals dominant expression patterns. Science 318, 801-806 (2007).
7. Moussaieff, A. et al. High-resolution metabolic mapping of cell types in plant roots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, E1232-E1241 (2013).
8. Dinneny J. R. et al. Cell identity mediates the response of Arabidopsis roots to salinity and iron stress. Science 320, 942-945 (2008).
9. Van Hintum, T. & Menting, F. Diversity in ex situ genebank collections of barley in Diversity in Barley (Hordeum vulgare) (eds von Bothmer, R. et al.) 247-257 (Elsevier Science B. V., 2003).
10. Venturini, L. et al. De novo transcriptome characterization of Vitis vinifera cv. Corvina unveils varietal diversity. BMC Genomics 14, 4 (2013).
11. Natera, S. H., Hill, C. B., Rupasinghe, T. W. & Roessner, U. Salt-stress induced alterations in the root lipidome of two barley genotypes with contrasting responses to salinity. Funct. Plant Biol. 43, 207-219 (2016).
12. Tavakkoli, E., Rengasamy, P. & McDonald, G. K. The response of barley to salinity stress differs between hydroponic and soil systems. Funct. Plant Biol. 37, 621-633 (2010).
13. Widodo et al. Metabolic responses to salt stress of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars, Sahara and Clipper, which differ in salinity tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 4089-4103 (2009).
14. Rivandi, J. et al. A SOS3 homologue maps to HvNax4, a barley locus controlling an environmentally sensitive Na+ exclusion trait. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 1201-1216 (2011).
15. Shelden, M. C., Roessner, U., Sharp, R. E., Tester, M. & Bacic, A. Genetic variation in the root growth response of barley genotypes to salinity stress. Funct. Plant Biol. 40, 516-530 (2013).
16. Grabherr, M. G. et al. Trinity: reconstructing a full-length transcriptome without a genome from RNA-Seq data. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 644-652, doi:10.1038/nbt.1883 (2011).
17. Haas B. J. et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-Seq: reference generation and analysis with Trinity. Nat. Protoc. 8, 1494-1512, doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.084 (2013).
18. Parra, G., Bradnam, K. & Korf, I. CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics 23, 1061-1067 (2007).
19. Nakasugi, K. et al. De novo transcriptome sequence assembly and analysis of RNA silencing genes of Nicotiana benthamiana. PloS One 8, e59534 (2013).
20. Zhang, S. et al. De novo characterization of fall dormant and nondormant alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) leaf transcriptome and identification of candidate genes related to fall dormancy. PloS One 10, e0122170-e0122170 (2014).
21. Kent, W. J. BLAT-the BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res. 12, 656-664 (2002).
22. Mount, D. W. Using the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST). Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2007 (7), pdb-top17 (2007).
23. Emms, D. M. & Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: solving fundamental biases in whole genome comparisons dramatically improves orthogroup inference accuracy. Genome Biol. 16, 157, doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0721-2 (2015).
24. Goodstein, D. M. et al. Phytozome: a comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 40 (D1), D1178-D1186 (2012).
25. Cotsaftis, O. et al. Root-specific transcript profiling of contrasting rice genotypes in response to salinity stress. Mol. Plant 4, 25-41 (2011).
26. Liu, J., Ishitani, M., Halfter, U., Kim, C. S. & Zhu, J. K. The Arabidopsis thaliana SOS2 gene encodes a protein kinase that is required for salt tolerance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97, 3730-3734 (2000).
27. Boutilier, K. et al. Ectopic expression of BABY BOOM triggers a conversion from vegetative to embryonic growth. Plant Cell 14, 1737-1749 (2002).
28. Tanaka, K. et al. Three distinct rice cellulose synthase catalytic subunit genes required for cellulose synthesis in the secondary wall. Plant Physiol. 133, 73-83 (2003).
29. Kobayashi, Y. et al. Abscisic acid-activated SNRK2 protein kinases function in the gene-regulation pathway of ABA signal transduction by phosphorylating ABA response element-binding factors. Plant J. 44, 939-949 (2005).
30. Rosado, A. et al. The Arabidopsis tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein TTL1 is required for osmotic stress responses and abscisic acid sensitivity. Plant Physiol. 142, 1113-1126 (2006).
31. Zhang, Y. et al. SDIR1 is a RING finger E3 ligase that positively regulates stress-responsive abscisic acid signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19, 1912-1929 (2007).
32. Goesaert, H., Gebruers, K., Brijs, K., Courtin, C. M. & Delcour, J. A. XIP-type endoxylanase inhibitors in different cereals. J. Cereal Sci. 38, 317-324 (2003).
33. Jammes, F. et al. Genome-wide expression profiling of the host response to root-knot nematode infection in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 44, 447-458 (2005).
34. Hashimoto, M. et al. A novel rice PR10 protein, RSOsPR10, specifically induced in roots by biotic and abiotic stresses, possibly via the jasmonic acid signaling pathway. Plant Cell Physiol. 45, 550-559 (2004).
35. Maas, E. V. & Hoffman, G. J. Crop salt tolerance-current assessment. J. Irrig. Drain. E-ASCE 103, 115-134 (1977).
36. Munns, R. & Tester, M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 651-681 (2008).
37. Shelden, M. C., Dias, D. A., Jayasinghe, N. S., Bacic, A. & Roessner, U. Root spatial metabolite profiling of two genotypes of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) reveals differences in response to short-term salt stress. J. Exp. Bot. 37, 3731-3745 (2016).
38. Kosová, K. et al. Expression of Dehydrin 5 during the development of frost tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare). J. Plant Physiol. 165, 1142-1151 (2008).
39. Brini, F. et al. Overexpression of wheat dehydrin DHN-5 enhances tolerance to salt and osmotic stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Rep. 26, 2017-2026 (2007).
40. El Ouakfaoui, S. et al. Control of somatic embryogenesis and embryo development by AP2 transcription factors. Plant Mol. Biol. 74, 313-326 (2010).
41. Chrispeels, M. J. & Raikhel, N. V. Lectins, lectin genes, and their role in plant defense. Plant Cell 3, 1-9 (1991).
42. Zhang, W. et al. Isolation and characterization of a jacalin-related mannose-binding lectin from salt-stressed rice (Oryza sativa) plants. Planta 210, 970-978 (2000).
43. Mignery, G. A., Pikaard, C. S. & Park, W. D. Molecular characterization of the patatin multigene family of potato. Gene 62, 27-44 (1988).
44. Takehisa, H. et al. Genome-wide transcriptome dissection of the rice root system: implications for developmental and physiological functions. Plant J. 69, 126-140 (2012).
45. Walter, A., Feil, R. & Schurr, U. Expansion dynamics, metabolite composition and substance transfer of the primary root growth zone of Zea mays L. grown in different external nutrient availabilities. Plant Cell Environ. 26, 1451-1466 (2003).
46. Peukert, M. et al. Spatially resolved analysis of small molecules by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometric imaging (MALDI-MSI). New Phytol. 193, 806-815 (2012).
47. Marcon, C. et al. A high resolution tissue-specific proteome and phosphoproteome atlas of maize primary roots reveals functional gradients along the root axis. Plant Physiol. pp-00138 (2015).
48. Karakousis, A. et al. Mapping and QTL analysis of the barley population Clipper × Sahara. Aust. J. Agr. Res. 54, 1137-1140 (2003).
49. Brown, C. T., Howe, A., Zhang, Q., Pyrkosz, A. B. & Brom, T. H. A reference-free algorithm for computational normalization of shotgun sequencing data. arXiv, 1203.4802 [q-bio.GN] (2012).
50. Suzek, B. E. et al. UniRef clusters: a comprehensive and scalable alternative for improving sequence similarity searches. Bioinformatics 31, 926-932 (2015).
51. Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357-359 (2012).
52. Li, B. & Dewey, C. N. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 323, doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-323 (2011).
53. Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139-140 (2010).
54. McCarthy, D. J., Chen, Y. & Smyth, G. K. Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 4288-4297 (2012).
55. R Development Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0 (2008). Available at: http://www.R-project.org. (Accessed: 22 December 2015).
56. Wickham, H. In ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis (eds Gentleman, R., Parmigiani, G. & Hornik, K.) (Springer, 2009).
57. Supek, F., Bošnjak, M., Škunca, N. & Šmuc, T. REVIGO Summarizes and Visualizes Long Lists of Gene Ontology Terms. PLoS One 6, e21800. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021800 (2011).
58. Stanke, M. & Waack, S. Gene prediction with a hidden Markov model and a new intron submodel. Bioinformatics 19 (Suppl 2), ii215-ii225, doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1080 (2003).
59. Amborella Genome Project. The Amborella genome and the evolution of flowering plants. Science 342, no. 6165, doi:10.1126/ science.1241089 (2013).
60. Lamesch, P. et al. The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): improved gene annotation and new tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, Database issue D1202-102012 (2012).
61. International Brachypodium Initiative. Genome sequencing and analysis of the model grass Brachypodium distachyon. Nature 463, 763-768 (2010).
62. Myburg, A. A. et al. The genome of Eucalyptus grandis. Nature 510, 356-362 (2014).
63. International Barley Genome Sequencing Consortium. A physical, genetic and functional sequence assembly of the barley genome. Nature, 491, 711-716 (2012).
64. Young, N. D. et al. The Medicago genome provides insight into the evolution of rhizobial symbioses. Nature 480, 520-524 (2011).
65. Ouyang, S. et al. The TIGR Rice Genome Annotation Resource: improvements and new features. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, Database issue D883-D887 (2007).
66. Tuskan, G. A. et al. The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 313, 1596-1604 (2006).
67. Paterson, A. H. et al. The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 457, 551-556 (2009).
68. Schnable, P. S. et al. The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science 326, 1112-1115 (2009).