Total 3D Airo® Navigation for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

BioMed Research International

Volumn 2016, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Lian, Xiaofeng ^a,b   Navarro Ramirez, Rodrigo ^a   Berlin, Connor ^a   Jada, Ajit ^a   Moriguchi, Yu ^a   Zhang, Qiwei ^a   Härtl, Roger ^a  

^a NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY AFFILIATED SIXTH PEOPLE S HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAMINECTOMY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PEDICLE SCREW; SPINE FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING; DEVICES; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEURONAVIGATION; PEROPERATIVE CARE; PROCEDURES; SURGERY; VERY ELDERLY; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; NEURONAVIGATION; SPINAL FUSION; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84982142284     PISSN: 23146133     EISSN: 23146141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2016/5027340     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. S. C. Humphreys, S. D. Hodges, A. G. Patwardhan, J. C. Eck, R. B. Murphy, and L. A. Covington, "Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion, " Spine, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 567-571, 2001.
2. Y. Park and J. W. Ha, "Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach, " Spine, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 537-543, 2007.
3. C. Seng, M. A. Siddiqui, K. P. L. Wong et al., "Five-year outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a matched-pair comparison study, " Spine, vol. 38, no. 23, pp. 2049-2055, 2013.
4. A. P. Wong, Z. A. Smith, J. A. Stadler III et al., "Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF): surgical technique, long-term4-year prospective outcomes, and complications compared with an open TLIF cohort, " Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 279-304, 2014.
5. N. R. Khan, A. J. Clark, S. L. Lee, G. T. Venable, N. B. Rossi, and K. T. Foley, "Surgical outcomes for minimally invasive vs open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: an updated systematic review andmeta-analysis, " Neurosurgery, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 847-874, 2015.
6. J. Y. Kim, J. Y. Park, K. H. Kim et al., "Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis: comparison between isthmic and degenerative spondylolisthesis, " World Neurosurgery, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 1284-1293, 2015.
7. G. M. V. Barbagallo, M. Piccini, A. Alobaid, A. Al-Mutair, V. Albanese, and F. Certo, "Bilateral tubular minimally invasive surgery for low-dysplastic lumbosacral lytic spondylolisthesis (LDLLS): Analysis of a series focusing on postoperative sagittal balance and review of the literature, " European Spine Journal, vol. 23, pp. S705-S713, 2014.
8. G. B. Brodano, K. Martikos, F. Lolli et al., "Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative disk disease and spondylolisthesis grade I: minimally invasive versus open surgery, " Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. E559-E564, 2015.
9. K. Phan, P. J. Rao, A. C. Kam, and R. J. Mobbs, "Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: systematic review and meta-analysis, " European Spine Journal, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1017-1030, 2015.
10. K. H. Lee, W. M. Yue, W. Yeo, H. Soeharno, and S. B. Tan, "Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, " European Spine Journal, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 2265-2270, 2012.
11. K. Singh, S. V. Nandyala, A. Marquez-Lara et al., "A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, " The Spine Journal, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 1694-1701, 2014.
12. S. L. Parker, O. Adogwa, A. Bydon, J. Cheng, and M. J. McGirt, "Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis associated low-back and leg pain over two years, " World Neurosurgery, vol. 78, no. 1-2, pp. 178-184, 2012.
13. J. Torres, A. James, M. Alimi, A. Tsiouris, C. Geannette, and R. Härtl, "Screw placement accuracy for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery: a study on 3-d neuronavigation-guided surgery, " Global Spine Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 143-152, 2012.
14. C. W. Kim, Y.-P. Lee, W. Taylor, A. Oygar, and W. K. Kim, "Useof navigation-assisted fluoroscopy to decrease radiation exposure during minimally invasive spine surgery, " Spine Journal, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 584-590, 2008.
15. U. Hubbe, R. Sircar, C. Scheiwe et al., "Surgeon, staff, and patient radiation exposure in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: impact of 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation partially replacing conventional fluoroscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial, " Trials, vol. 16, no. 1, article 142, 2015.
16. T. T. Kim, D. Drazin, F. Shweikeh, R. Pashman, and J. P. Johnson, "Clinical and radiographic outcomes of minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw placement with intraoperative CT (O-arm) image guidance navigation, " Neurosurgical Focus, vol. 36, no. 3, p. E1, 2014.
17. B. J. Shin, I. U. Njoku, A. J. Tsiouris, and R. Härtl, "Navigated guide tube for the placement of mini-open pedicle screws using stereotactic 3D navigation without the use of K-wires; Technical note, " Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 178-183, 2013.
18. T. Laine, K. Mäkitalo, D. Schlenzka, K. Tallroth, M. Poussa, and A. Alho, "Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion: a prospective CT study in 30 low back patients, " European Spine Journal, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 402-405, 1997.
19. M. W. Mariscalco, T. Yamashita, M. P. Steinmetz, A. A. Krishnaney, I. H. Lieberman, and T. E. Mroz, "Radiation exposure to the surgeon during open lumbar microdiscectomy and minimally invasive microdiscectomy: a prospective, controlled trial, " Spine, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 255-260, 2011.
20. N. Bronsard, T. Boli, M. Challali et al., "Comparison between percutaneous and traditional fixation of lumbar spine fracture: intraoperative radiation exposure levels and outcomes, " Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 162-168, 2013.
21. R. K. Bindal, S. Glaze, M. Ognoskie, V. Tunner, R. Malone, and S. Ghosh, "Surgeon and patient radiation exposure in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical article, " Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 570-573, 2008.
22. E. Yu and S. N. Khan, "Does less invasive spine surgery result in increased radiation exposure? A systematic review, " Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 472, no. 6, pp. 1738-1748, 2014.
23. J. Lange, A. Karellas, J. Street et al., "Estimating the effective radiation dose imparted to patients by intraoperative conebeam computed tomography in thoracolumbar spinal surgery, " Spine, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. E306-E312, 2013.
24. J. Zhang, V. Weir, L. Fajardo, J. Lin, H. Hsiung, and E. R. Ritenour, "Dosimetric characterization of a cone-beam O-arm- imaging system, " Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 305-317, 2009.
25. E. Tabaraee, A. G. Gibson, D. G. Karahalios, E. A. Potts, J.-P. Mobasser, and S. Burch, "Intraoperative cone beam-computed tomography with navigation (O-ARM) versus conventional fluoroscopy (C-ARM): a cadaveric study comparing accuracy, efficiency, and safety for spinal instrumentation, " Spine, vol. 38, no. 22, pp. 1953-1958, 2013.
26. B. P. Yang, M. M. Wahl, and C. S. Idler, "Percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw placement aided by computer-assisted fluoroscopy-based navigation: perioperative results of a prospective, comparative, multicenter study, " Spine, vol. 37, no. 24, pp. 2055-2060, 2012.
27. T. Laine, T. Lund, M. Ylikoski, J. Lohikoski, and D. Schlenzka, "Accuracy of pedicle screwinsertion with andwithout computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients, " European Spine Journal, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 235-241, 2000.
28. C. Schizas, J. Michel, V. Kosmopoulos, and N. Theumann, "Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw insertion in percutaneous posterior transpedicular stabilization, " European Spine Journal, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 613-617, 2007.
29. M.-C. Kim, H.-T. Chung, J.-L. Cho, D.-J. Kim, and N.-S. Chung, "Factors affecting the accurate placement of percutaneous pedicle screws during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, " European Spine Journal, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1635-1643, 2011.
30. A. C. Bourgeois, A. R. Faulkner, Y. C. Bradley et al., "Improved accuracy of minimally invasive transpedicular screw placement in the lumbar spine with 3-dimensional stereotactic image guidance: a comparative meta-analysis, " Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 324-329, 2015.