Improved accuracy of minimally invasive transpedicular screw placement in the lumbar spine with 3-dimensional stereotactic image guidance: A comparative meta-analysis

Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques

Volumn 28, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 324-329

  Bourgeois, Austin C ^a   Faulkner, Austin R ^a   Bradley, Yong C ^a   Pasciak, Alexander S ^a,b,c   Barlow, Patrick B ^a   Gash, Judson R ^a   Reid, William S ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c Fluoroscopic Safety   (United States)

^d Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Image guidance; Lumbar spine; Minimally invasive; Neuronavigation; Pedicle screw; Stereotactic

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BONE SCREW; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY SYSTEM; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEURONAVIGATION; PEDICLE SCREW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDARTHROSIS; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; STEREOTACTIC PROCEDURE; STEREOTAXIS; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYNOVIAL CYST; THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS; AGED; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; META ANALYSIS; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; SPINE FUSION; SURGERY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; PEDICLE SCREWS; SPINAL FUSION; STEREOTAXIC TECHNIQUES;

EID: 84944886900     PISSN: 15360652     EISSN: 15392465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000152     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Albee FH. Transplantation of a portion of the tibia into the spine for Pott's disease: a preliminary report 1911. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;460:885-886.
2. Hibbs RA. An operation for progressive spinal deformities: a preliminary report of three cases from the service of the orthopaedic hospital.1911. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;460:17-20.
3. Esses SI, Sachs BL, Dreyzin V. Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation. A selected survey of ABS members. Spine. 1993;18:2231-2238; discussion 2238-2239.
4. Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C. Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine. 2007;32:E111-E120.
5. Merloz P, Troccaz J, Vouaillat H, et al. Fluoroscopy-based navigation system in spine surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2007;221:813-820.
6. Kabins MB, Weinstein JN. The history of vertebral screw and pedicle screw fixation. Iowa Orthop J. 1991;11:127-136.
7. Parker SL, McGirt MJ, Farber SH, et al. Accuracy of free-hand pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar spine: analysis of 6816 consecutive screws. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:170-178.
8. Amiot LP, Lang K, Putzier M, et al. Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. Spine. 2000;25:606-614.
9. Chen HJ. Clinical experiences in neuronavigation. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2001;76:145-147.
10. Gebhard F, Weidner A, Liener UC, et al. Navigation at the spine. Injury. 2004;35:35-45.
11. Holly LT, Foley KT. Intraoperative spinal navigation. Spine. 2003;28(suppl):S54-S61.
12. Schulze CJC, Munzinger EE, Weber UU. Clinical relevance of accuracy of pedicle screw placement. A computed tomographic-supported analysis. Spine. 1998;23:2215-2220.
13. Fraser J, Gebhard H, Irie D, et al. Iso-C/3-dimensional neuro-navigation versus conventional fluoroscopy for minimally invasive pedicle screw placement in lumbar fusion. Minim Invasive Neuro-surg. 2010;53:184-190.
14. Ishikawa Y, Kanemura T, Yoshida G, et al. Clinical accuracy of three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement: a retrospective comparative study of conventional versus computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;13:606-611.
15. Kalfas IHI, Kormos DWD, Murphy MAM, et al. Application of frameless stereotaxy to pedicle screw fixation of the spine. J Neurosurg. 1995;83:641-647.
16. Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Bulsara KR, et al. Utility of computerized isocentric fluoroscopy for minimally invasive spinal surgical techniques. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18:369-375.
17. Shin BJ, James AR, Njoku IU, et al. Pedicle screw navigation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perforation risk for computer-navigated versus freehand insertion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;17:113-122.
18. Silbermann J, Riese F, Allam Y, et al. Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement in lumbar and sacral spine: comparison between free-hand and O-arm based navigation techniques. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:875-881.
19. Neyeloff JL, Fuchs SC, Moreira LB. Meta-analyses and Forest plots using a microsoft excel spreadsheet: step-by-step guide focusing on descriptive data analysis. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:52-58.
20. Papadakis M, Aggeliki L, Papadopoulos EC, et al. Common surgical complications in degenerative spinal surgery. World J Orthop. 2013;4:62-66.
21. Wiesner L, Kothe R, Schulitz KP, et al. Clinical evaluation and computed tomography scan analysis of screw tracts after percutaneous insertion of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine. Spine. 2000;25:615-621.
22. Waschke A, Walter J, Duenisch P, et al. CT-navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of pedicle screws at the thoracolum-bar spine: single center experience of 4, 500 screws. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:654-660.
23. Kim M-C, Chung H-T, Cho J-L, et al. Factors affecting the accurate placement of percutaneous pedicle screws during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:1635-1643.
24. Ravi B, Zahrai A, Rampersaud R. Clinical accuracy of computer-assisted two-dimensional fluoroscopy for the percutaneous placement of lumbosacral pedicle screws. Spine. 2011;36:84-91.
25. Smith ZA, Sugimoto K, Lawton CD, et al. Incidence of lumbar spine pedicle breach following percutaneous screw fixation: a radiographic evaluation of 601 screws in 151 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012. [Epub ahead of print].
26. Nakashima HH, Sato KK, Ando TT, et al. Comparison of the percutaneous screw placement precision of isocentric C-arm 3-dimensional fluoroscopy-navigated pedicle screw implantation and conventional fluoroscopy method with minimally invasive surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009;22:468-472.
27. Schizas C, Michel J, Kosmopoulos V, et al. Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw insertion in percutaneous posterior transpedicular stabilization. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:613-617.
28. Oh HS, Kim J-S, Lee S-H, et al. Comparison between the accuracy of percutaneous and open pedicle screw fixations in lumbosacral fusion. Spine J. 2013;13:1751-1757.
29. Lau D, Terman SW, Patel R, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for superior facet violation in minimally invasive versus open pedicle screw placement during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;18:356-361.
30. Raley DA, Mobbs RJ. Retrospective computed tomography scan analysis of percutaneously inserted pedicle screws for posterior transpedicular stabilization of the thoracic and lumbar spine: accuracy and complication rates. Spine. 2012;37:1092-1100.
31. Luther N, Iorgulescu JB, Geannette C, et al. Comparison of navigated versus non-navigated pedicle screw placement in 260 patients and 1434 screws: screw accuracy, screw size, and the complexity of surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013;28:E298-E303.
32. Boucher HH. A method of spinal fusion. J Bone and Joint Surg. 1959;41-B:248-259.
33. Roy-Camille R. Osteosynthesis du rachis dorsal, lombaire et lombo-sacre par plaques metalliques vissees dans les pedicules vertebraux et les apophyses articulaires. Presse Med. 1970;578:1447.
34. Tian N-F, Xu H-Z. Image-guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2009;33:895-903.