Percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw placement aided by computer-assisted fluoroscopy-based navigation: Perioperative results of a prospective, comparative, multicenter study

Spine

Volumn 37, Issue 24, 2012, Pages 2055-2060

  Yang, Benson P ^a   Wahl, Melvin M ^b   Idler, Cary S ^c  

^a Northwestern Neurosurgical Associates   (United States)

^b Kadlec Health System and Spine   (United States)

^c Orthopaedic Specialists of NC   (United States)

Author keywords

computer aided surgery; fluoroscopy; minimally invasive; navigation guidance; radiation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MULTICENTER STUDY; PEDICLE SCREW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; AGED; BONE SCREWS; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL DISEASES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84870189587     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31825c05cd     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Gepstein R, Shabat S, Reichel M, et al. Treatment of postdiscec-tomy low back pain by percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus open posterior lumbar fusion with pedicle screws. Spine J 2008; 8:741-6.
2. Kim DY, Lee SH, Chung SK, et al. Comparison of multifi dus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fi xation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30:123-9.
3. Isaacs RE, Hyde J, Goodrich JA, et al. A prospective, nonrandom-ized, multicenter evaluation of extreme lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis: perioperative outcomes and complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35:22-30.
4. Mroz TE, Abdullah KG, Steinmetz MP, et al. Radiation exposure to the surgeon during percutaneous pedicle screw placement. J Spinal Disord Tech 2011; 24:264-7.
5. Nakashima H, Sato K, Ando T, et al. Comparison of the percutaneous screw placement precision of isocentric C-arm 3-dimensional fl uoroscopy-navigated pedicle screw implantation and conventional fl uoroscopy method with minimally invasive surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009; 22:468-72.
6. Verma R, Krishan S, Haendlmayer K, et al. Functional outcome of computer-assisted spinal pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies including 5, 992 pedicle screws. Eur Spine J 2010; 19:370-5.
7. von JR, Finn MA, Yonemura KS, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous transpedicular screw fi xation: increased accuracy and reduced radiation exposure by means of a novel electromagnetic navigation system. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011; 153:589-96.
8. Ravi B, Zahrai A, Rampersaud R. Clinical accuracy of computer-assisted two-dimensional fl uoroscopy for the percutaneous placement of lumbosacral pedicle screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36:84-91.
9. Lotfi nia I, Sayahmelli S, Gavami M. Postoperative computed tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement accuracy. Turk Neurosurg 2010; 20:500-7.
10. von Jako RA, Carrino JA, Yonemura KS, et al. Electromagnetic navigation for percutaneous guide-wire insertion: accuracy and effi-ciency compared to conventional fl uoroscopic guidance. Neuroimage 2009; 47: T127-32.
11. Kim CW, Lee YP, Taylor W, et al. Use of navigation-assisted fl uo-roscopy to decrease radiation exposure during minimally invasive spine surgery. Spine J 2008; 8:584-90.
12. Fu TS, Wong CB, Tsai TT, et al. Pedicle screw insertion: computed tomography versus fl uoroscopic image guidance. Int Orthop 2008; 32:517-21.
13. Kamimura M, Ebara S, Itoh H, et al. Accurate pedicle screw insertion under the control of a computer-assisted image guiding system: laboratory test and clinical study. J Orthop Sci 1999; 4:197-206.
14. Lekovic GP, Potts EA, Karahalios DG, et al. A comparison of two techniques in image-guided thoracic pedicle screw placement: a retrospective study of 37 patients and 277 pedicle screws. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 7:393-8.
15. Merloz P, Tonetti J, Pittet L, et al. Computer-assisted spine surgery. Comput Aided Surg 1998; 3:297-305.
16. Park P, Foley KT, Cowan JA, et al. Minimally invasive pedicle screw fi xation utilizing O-arm fl uoroscopy with computer-assisted navi-gation: Feasibility, technique, and preliminary results. Surg Neurol Int 2010; 1:44.
17. Smith HE, Welsch MD, Sasso RC, et al. Comparison of radiation exposure in lumbar pedicle screw placement with fl uoroscopy vs computer-assisted image guidance with intraoperative three-dimensional imaging. J Spinal Cord Med 2008; 31:532-7.
18. Tormenti MJ, Kostov DB, Gardner PA, et al. Intraoperative computed tomography image-guided navigation for posterior thoraco-lumbar spinal instrumentation in spinal deformity surgery. Neuro-surg Focus 2010; 28: E11.
19. Wood MJ, Mannion RJ. Improving accuracy and reducing radiation exposure in minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2010; 12:533-9.
20. Zausinger S, Scheder B, Uhl E, et al. Intraoperative computed tomography with integrated navigation system in spinal stabilizations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34:2919-26.
21. Idler C, Rolfe KW, Gorek JE. Accuracy of percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw placement using the oblique or "owl's-eye" view and novel guidance technology. J Neurosurg Spine 2010; 13:509-15.
22. Gertzbein SD, Robbins SE. Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1990; 15:11-4.
23. Modi HN, Suh SW, Fernandez H, et al. Accuracy and safety of pedicle screw placement in neuromuscular scoliosis with free-hand technique. Eur Spine J 2008; 17:1686-96.
24. Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C. Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32: E111-20.
25. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe ? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29:333-42.
26. Isaacs RE, Podichetty VK, Sandhu FA, et al. Thoracic microendo-scopic discectomy: a human cadaver study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30:1226-31.
27. Krag MH, Weaver DL, Beynnon BD, et al. Morphometry of the thoracic and lumbar spine related to transpedicular screw placement for surgical spinal fi xation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1988; 13:27-32.
28. George DC, Krag MH, Johnson CC, et al. Hole preparation techniques for transpedicle screws. Effect on pull-out strength from human cadaveric vertebrae. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1991; 16:181-4.
29. Acikbas SC, Arslan FY, Tuncer MR. The effect of transpedicular screw misplacement on late spinal stability. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2003; 145:949-54.
30. Rampersaud YR, Foley KT, Shen AC, et al. Radiation exposure to the spine surgeon during fl uoroscopically assisted pedicle screw insertion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25:2637-45.
31. Scheufl er KM, Cyron D, Dohmen H, et al. Less invasive surgical correction of adult degenerative scoliosis. Part II: Complications and clinical outcome. Neurosurgery 2010; 67:1609-21.
32. Laine T, Lund T, Ylikoski M, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J 2000; 9:235-40.
33. Rao G, Brodke DS, Rondina M, et al. Inter-and intraobserver reliability of computed tomography in assessment of thoracic pedicle screw placement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28:2527-30.
34. Kosmopoulos V, Theumann N, Binaghi S, et al. Observer reliability in evaluating pedicle screw placement using computed tomography. Int Orthop 2007; 31:531-6.