Acoustics and activity noise in school classrooms in Finland

Applied Acoustics

Volumn 114, Issue , 2016, Pages 252-259

  Sala, Eeva ^a   Rantala, Leena ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Acoustics; Learning space; Noise; School classroom; Voice disorder; Voice ergonomics

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ARCHITECTURAL ACOUSTICS; EDUCATION; ERGONOMICS; REVERBERATION; SPEECH COMMUNICATION; SPEECH TRANSMISSION; TEACHING;

ACOUSTIC ENVIRONMENT; BACKGROUND NOISE LEVELS; CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION; LEARNING SPACE; NOISE; SCHOOL CLASSROOM; SPEECH TRANSMISSION INDEX; VOICE DISORDERS;

ACOUSTIC NOISE;

EID: 84981744982     PISSN: 0003682X     EISSN: 1872910X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.08.009     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. [1] Pekkarinen (Sala), E., Viljanen, V., Acoustic conditions for speech communication in classrooms. Scand Audiol 20 (1991), 257–263.
2. [2] Shield, B., Dockrell, J.E., External and internal noise surveys of London primary schools. J Acoust Soc Am 115 (2004), 730–738.
3. [3] Pekkarinen (Sala), E., Viljanen, V., The effect of sound-absorbing treatment on speech discrimination in rooms. Audiology 29 (1990), 219–227.
4. [4] Sala, E., Airo, E., Olkinuora, P., Simberg, S., Ström, U., Laine, A., et al. Vocal loading among day care center teachers. Log Phon Vocol 27 (2002), 21–28.
5. [5] Sala, E., Viljanen, V., Honka, J., Improvement of acoustic conditions for speech communication in classrooms. Appl Acoust 45 (1995), 81–91.
6. [6] Ziegler, J.C., Pech-Georgel, C., George, Florence, Lorenzi, C., Noise on, voicing off: speech perception deficits in children with specific language impairment. J Exp Child Psychol 110 (2011), 362–372.
7. [7] Neuman, A.C., Wroblewski, M., Hajicek, J., Rubinstein, A., Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults. Ear Hear 31 (2010), 336–344.
8. [8] Howard, C.S., Munro, K.J., Plack, C.J., Listening effort at signal-to-noise ratios that are typical of the school classroom. Int J Audiol 49 (2010), 928–932.
9. [9] Ferguson, M.A., Hall, R.L., Riley, A., Moore, D.R., Communication, listening, cognitive and speech perception skills in children with auditory processing disorder (APD) or Specific Language Impairment (SLI). J Speech Lang Hear Res 54 (2011), 211–227, 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0167).
10. [10] Crandell, C.C., Smaldino, J.J., Children with normal hearing and with hearing impairment. Lang, Speech, Hear Serv Schools 31 (2000), 362–370.
11. [11] Ljung, R., Israelsson, K., Hygge, S., Speech intelligibility and recall of spoken material heard at different signal-to-noise ratios and the role played by working memory capacity. Appl Cogn Psychol 27 (2013), 198–203.
12. [12] Barkley, R.A., Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychol Bull 121 (1997), 65–94, 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.65.
13. [13] Weismer, S.E., Evans, J., Hesketh, L.J., An examination of verbal working memory capacity in children with specific language impairment. J Speech Lang Hear Res 42 (1999), 1249–1260.
14. [14] Söderlund, G., Sikström, S., Smart, A., Listen to the noise: noise is beneficial for cognitive performance in ADHD. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 48 (2007), 840–847, 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01749.
15. [15] Brattico, E., Kujala, T., Tervaniemi, M., Long-term exposure to occupational noise alters the cortical organization of sound processing. Clin Neurophysiol 116 (2005), 190–203.
16. [16] Astolfi, A., Pellerey, F., Subjective and objective assessment of acoustical and overall environmental quality in secondary school classrooms. J Acoust Soc Am 123 (2008), 163–173.
17. [17] Bonzaft, A.L., McCarthy, D.P., The effects of elevated train noise on reading ability. Environ Behav 7 (1975), 517–527.
18. [18] Bronzaft, A.L., The effect of a noise abatement program on reading ability. J Environ Psychol 1 (1981), 217–222.
19. [19] Evans, G.W., Lepore, S.J., Nonauditory effects of noise on children: a critical review. Child Environ 10 (1993), 31–51.
20. [20] Hygge S, Ljung R, Israelsson K. Acoustical conditions in the classroom I – speech intelligibility and recall of spoken material heard at different signal-to-noise ratios. Paper 0970. In: Proc Internoise 2013 Innsbruck.
21. [21] Ljung, R., Sörqvist, P., Hygge, S., Effects of road traffic noise and irrelevant speech on children's reading and mathematical performance. Noise Health 11 (2009), 194–198.
22. [22] Stansfeld, S.A., Berglund, B., Clark, C., Fischer, I.L.-B., Öhrström, E., Haines, M.M., et al. Aircraft and road traffic noise and children's cognition and health: a cross–national study. Lancet 365 (2005), 1942–1949.
23. [23] Lyberg Åhlander, V., Rydell, R., Löfqvist, A., Speaker's comfort in teaching environments. Voice problems in Swedish teaching staff. J Voice 25 (2011), 430–440.
24. [24] Dockrell, J.E., Shield, B., Children's perceptions of their acoustic environment at school and at home. J Acoust Soc Am 115 (2004), 2964–2973.
25. [25] ISO 9921-1, Ergonomic assessment of speech communication. Part 1: Speech interference level and communication distances for persons with normal hearing capacity in direct communication (SIL method). 1996, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
26. [26] Lane, H., Tranel, B., The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech. J Speech Hear Res 14 (1971), 677–709.
27. [27] Amazi, D.K., Barber, S.R., The Lombard sign as a function of age and task. J Speech Hear Res 25 (1982), 581–585.
28. [28] Summers, W.V., Pisoni, D.B., Bernacki, R.H., Pedlow, R.I., Stokes, M.A., Effects of noise on speech production: acoustic and perceptual analyses. J Acoust Soc Am 84:3 (1988), 917–928, 10.1121/1.396660.
29. [29] Cooke, M., Lu, Y., Spectral and temporal changes to speech produced in the presence of energetic and informational maskers. J Acoust Soc Am 128 (2010), 2059–2069.
30. [30] Sala, E., Laine, A., Simberg, S., Pentti, J., Suonpää, T., The prevalence of voice disorders among day care center teachers compared with nurses: a questionnaire and clinical study. J Voice 15 (2001), 413–423.
31. [31] Mattiské, J.A., Oates, J.M., Greenwood, K.M., Vocal problems among teachers: a review of prevalence, causes, prevention and treatment. J Voice 12 (1998), 489–499.
32. [32] Simberg, S., Sala, E., Vehmas, K., Laine, A., Changes in prevalence of vocal symptoms among teachers during a twelve-year period. J Voice 19 (2005), 95–102.
33. [33] Roy, N., Merrill, R.M., Thibeault, S., Parsa, R.A., Gray, S.D., Smith, E.M., Prevalence of voice disorders in teachers and the general population. J Speech Lang Hear Res 47 (2004), 281–293.
34. [34] Simberg, S., Santtila, P., Soveri, A., Varjonen, M., Sala, E., Sandnabba, K., Exploring genetic and environmental factors of dysphonia: a twin study. J Speech Lang Hear Res 52 (2009), 153–163.
35. [35] Nybacka, I., Simberg, S., Santtila, P., Sala, E., Sandnabba, K., Genetic and environmental effects on vocal symptoms and their intercorrelations. J Speech Lang Hear Res 55 (2012), 1–13.
36. [36] Shield B, Conetta R, Cox T, Mydlarz C, Dockrell J, Connolly D. Acoustics and noise in English secondary schools. Paper 1131. In: Proc Internoise 2013 Innsbruck.
37. [37] Jonsdottir, V., Oskarsson, G.K., Sala, E., Rantala, L., How does educational and pedagogical ideology affect experience of noise loudness and noise levels in preschools?. Noise Health 17 (2015), 282–293.
38. [38] Sato, H., Bradley, J.S., Evaluation of acoustical conditions for speech communication in working elementary school classrooms. J Acoust Soc Am 123 (2008), 2064–2077.
39. [39] McAllister, A., Granqvist, S., Sjölander, P., Sundberg, J., Child voice and noise: a pilot study of noise in day cares and the effects on 10 children's voice quality according to perceptual evaluation. J Voice 23 (2009), 587–593.
40. [40] SFS 5907 Acoustic classification of spaces of buildings. Finnish Standards Association SFS 2004-09-06.
41. [41] ANSI/ASA S12.60. Part 1. Acoustical performance criteria, design requirements, and guidelines for schools, Part 1: Permanent Schools American National Standards Institute, Inc.; 2010.
42. [42] Knecht, H.A., Nelson, P.B., Whitelaw, G.M., Background noise levels and reverberation times in unoccupied classrooms: predictions and measurements. Am J Audiol 11 (2002), 65–71.
43. [43] Zannin, P.H.T., Marcon, C.R., Objective and subjective evaluation of the acoustic comfort in classrooms. Appl Ergonom 38 (2007), 675–680.
44. [44] Patel, R., Schell, K.W., The influence of linguistic content on the Lombard effect. J Speech Lang Hear Res 51 (2008), 209–220.
45. [45] Houtgast, T., Steeneken, H.J.M., Plomp, R., Predicting speech intelligibility in rooms from the modulation transfer function. I. General room acoustics. Acustica 46 (1980), 60–72.
46. [46] Kob, M., Behler, G., Kamprolf, A., Goldschmidt, O., Neuschaefer-Rube, C., Experimental investigations of the influence of room acoustics on the teacher's voice. Acoust Sci Tech 29 (2008), 86–94.
47. [47] Klatte, M., Hellbrück, J., Seidel, J., Leistner, P., Effects of classroom acoustics on performance and well-being in elementary school children: a field study. Environ Behav 42 (2010), 659–692.
48. [48] Campbell C, Svensson CP. Classroom acoustic research findings on speech behaviour of teachers and students. Paper 0982. In: Proc Internoise 2013 Innsbruck.
49. [49] ISO-354, Measurement of sound absorption in a reverberation room. Acoustics. 2003, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
50. [50] ISO-3382 Acoustics, Measurements of the reverberation time of rooms with reference to other acoustical parameters. 1997, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
51. [51] IEC 60268-16, Sound system equipment – Part 16: objective rating of speech intelligibility by speech transmission index. 2003, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland.
52. [52] European Commission Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities. How to avoid or reduce the exposure of workers to noise at work. Non-binding guide to good practice for the application of Directive 2003/10/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the minimum safety and health requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents; 2007. Available from < http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/health_safety/index_en.htm>.
53. [53] Picard, M., Bradley, J.S., Revisiting speech interference in classrooms. Audiology 40 (2001), 221–244.
54. [54] Oberdörster, M., Tiesler, G., Acoustic ergonomics of school. Publication series from the federal institute for occupational safety and health. Research Report Fb 1071, 2006, Dortmund, Berlin, Dresden.
55. [55] Larsen, J.B., Blair, J.C., The effect of classroom amplification on the signal-to-noise ratio in classrooms while class is in session. Lang, Speech, Hear Services in Schools 39 (2008), 451–460.
56. [56] Södersten, M., Granqvist, S., Hammarberg, B., Szabo, A., Vocal behavior and vocal loading factors for preschool teachers at work studied with binaural DAT recordings. J Voice 16 (2002), 356–371.
57. [57] Sjödin, F., Kjellberg, A., Knutsson, A., Lindberg, L., Landström, U., Noise exposure and auditory effects on preschool personnel. Noise Health 14 (2012), 72–82.