Coordination and cross-sectoral integration in REDD+: experiences from seven countries

Climate and Development

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 458-471

  Korhonen Kurki, Kaisa ^a,b   Brockhaus, Maria ^a   Bushley, Bryan ^c   Babon, Andrea ^a   Gebara, Maria F ^d   Kengoum, Felicien ^e   Pham, Thuy Thu ^a   Rantala, Salla ^f   Moeliono, Moira ^a   Dwisatrio, Bimo ^a   Maharani, Cynthia ^a  

^a CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY RESEARCH   (Indonesia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^d FEDERAL RURAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^e CIFOR   (Cameroon)

^f FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

climate change; forests; mitigation; REDD+

Indexed keywords

ACTION PLAN; CLIMATE CHANGE; DEFORESTATION; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GLOBAL CLIMATE; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; STAKEHOLDER; TROPICAL FOREST;

BRAZIL; CAMEROON; INDONESIA; NEPAL; PAPUA NEW GUINEA; TANZANIA; VIET NAM;

EID: 84933073605     PISSN: 17565529     EISSN: 17565537     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17565529.2015.1050979     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. W.N.Adger, K.Brown, & E.L.Tompkins, (2005). The political economy of cross-scale networks in resource co-management. Ecology and Society, 10(2), 9. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art9/
2. A.Angelsen, & D.McNeil, (2012). The evolution of REDD+. In A.Angelsen, M.Brockhaus, W.D.Sunderlin, & L.Verchot (Eds.), Analysing REDD+:Challenges and choices (pp. 59–78). Bogor:CIFOR.
3. D.Armitage, (2008). Governance and the commons in a multilevel world. International Journal of the Commons, 2, 7–32. doi:10.18352/ijc.28
4. B.Berg, (2009). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (7th ed.). Boston:Pearson.
5. F.Biermann, & A.Gupta, (2011). Accountability and legitimacy:An analytical challenge for earth system governance. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 1854–1855. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.07.017
6. M.Bovens, (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability:A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13, 447–468. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
7. A.Boyd, (2012). MRV across multilevel governance:National, provincial and municipal institutions in South Africa. Energy Research Centre. World resources institute for the measurement and performance tracking project. MAPT institutions case study series. Retrieved from http://www.erc.uct.ac.za/Research/publications/13-Boyd-MRV_Multilevel_Governance.pdf
8. M.Brockhaus, & A.Angelsen, (2012). Seeing REDD+ through 4Is:A political economy framework. In A.Angelsen, M.Brockhaus, W.D.Sunderlin, & L.V.Verchot (Eds.), Analysing REDD+:Challenges and choices (pp. 15–30). Bogor:CIFOR.
9. M.Brockhaus, & M.Di Gregorio, (2012). A brief overview:Component 1 on national REDD+ policies and processes. CIFOR Infobrief 13, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
10. M.Brockhaus, M.Di Gregorio, & R.Carmenta, (2014). REDD+ policy networks:Exploring actors and power structures in an emerging policy domain. Ecology and Society, 19(4), 29. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss4/art29/ doi:10.5751/ES-07098-190429
11. M.Brockhaus, M.Di Gregorio, & S.Wertz-Kanounnikoff, (2012). Guide for country profiles:Global comparative study on REDD (GCS-REDD) component 1 on national REDD+ Policies and Processes. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
12. M.Buizer, W.Jong De, & D.Humphreys, (2014). Climate change and deforestation:The evolution of an intersecting policy domain. Environmental Science & Policy, 35, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2013.06.001
13. B.Bushley, & D.B.Khatri, (2011). REDD+:Reversing, reinforcing or reconfiguring decentralized forest governance in Nepal? Discussion Paper Series 11:3. Forest Action Nepal. Retrieved from www.forestaction.org/app/webroot/js/tinymce/editor/plugins/filemanager/files/Final%20Draft%20Discussion%20Paper%20Series%2011%203.pdf
14. E.Corbera, & H.Schroeder, (2011). Governing and implementing REDD+. Environmental Science and Policy, 14, 89–99. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.11.002
15. E.Doherty, & H.Schroeder, (2011). Forest tenure and multilevel governance in avoiding deforestation under REDD. Global Environmental Politics, 11, 66–88. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00084
16. Forest Carbon Partnership Facility. (2014). REDD readiness progress fact sheet, Country:Tanzania. August 27, 14. Retrieved January 14, 2015, from https://forestcarbonpartnership.org/sites/fcp/files/2014/August/FCPF%20Country%20Progress%20fact%20Sheet%20August%202014-Tanzania.pdf
17. T.Forsyth, (2009). Multilevel, multiactor governance in REDD+. In A.Angelsen, with M.Brockhaus, M.Kanninen, E.Sills, W.D.Sunderlin, & S.Wertz-Kanounnikoff (Eds.), Realising REDD+:National strategy and policy options (pp. 113–122). Bogor:CIFOR.
18. M.Fosci, (2013). The economic case for prioritizing governance over financial incentives in REDD+. Climate Policy, 13(2), 170–190. doi:10.1080/14693062.2013.745112
19. G.Gallemore, M.Di Gregorio, M.Moeliono, M.Brockhaus, & R.D.Prasti, (2015). Transaction costs, power, and multi-level forest governance in Indonesia. Ecological Economics, 114, 168–179. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.024
20. M.F.Gebara, (2013). Importance of local participation in achieving equity in benefit-sharing mechanisms for REDD+:A case study from the Juma sustainable development reserve. International Journal of the Commons, 7(2), 473–497. doi:10.18352/ijc.301
21. C.C.Gibson, E.Ostrom, & T.K.Ahn, (2000). The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change:A survey. Ecological Economics, 32, 217–239. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00092-0
22. L.Hooghe, & G.Marks, (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multilevel governance. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233–243.
23. M.Kanninen, D.Murdiyarso, F.Seymour, A.Angelsen, S.Wunder, & L.German, (2007). Do trees grow on money? The implications of deforestation research for policies to promote REDD+. Bogor:CIFOR.
24. A.Karsenty, & S.Ongolo, (2012). Can “fragile states” decide to reduce their deforestation? The inappropriate use of the theory of incentives with respect to the REDD mechanism. Forest Policy and Economics, 18, 38–45. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2011.05.006
25. K.Korhonen-Kurki, M.Brockhaus, A.E.Duchelle, S.Atmadja, P.Pham Thu Thuy, & L.Schofield, (2013). Multiple levels and multiple challenges for measurement, reporting and verification of REDD+. International Journal of the Commons, 7(2), 344–366. doi:10.18352/ijc.372
26. K.Korhonen-Kurki, J.Sehring, M.Brockhaus, & M.DiGreggio, (2014). Enabling factors for establishing REDD+ in a context of weak governance:A qualitative comparative analysis. Climate Policy, 14(2), 167–186. doi:10.1080/14693062.2014.852022
27. A.Larson, & J.Lewis-Mendoza, (2012). Decentralisation and devolution in Nicaragua's North Atlantic autonomous region:Natural resources and indigenous peoples’ rights. International Journal of the Commons, 6, 179–199. doi:10.18352/ijc.315
28. C.Luttrell, L.Loft, M.F.Gebara, D.Kweka, M.Brockhaus, A.Angelsen, & W.D.Sunderlin, (2013). Who should benefit from REDD+? Rationales and realities. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 52. doi:10.5751/ES-05834-180452
29. C.Mitchell, (2000). Case and situation analysis. In R.Romm & P.Foster (Eds.), Case study method (pp. 234–258). London:Sage.
30. E.Mwangi, & A.Wardell, (2012). Multilevel governance of forest resources. International Journal of the Commons, 6, 79–103. doi:10.18352/ijc.374
31. E.Ostrom, (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
32. L.Pedroni, M.Dutschke, C.Streck, & M.Estrada Porrúa, (2009). Creating incentives for avoiding further deforestation:The nested approach. Climate Policy, 9, 207–220. doi:10.3763/cpol.2008.0522
33. L.Peskett, & M.Brockhaus, (2009). When REDD+ goes national:A review of realities, opportunities and challenges. In A.Angelsen, with M.Brockhaus, M.Kanninen, E.Sills, W.D.Sunderlin, & W.-S.KanounnikoffWertz-S. (Eds.), Realising REDD+:National strategy and policy options (pp. 25–44). Bogor:CIFOR.
34. J.Phelps, E.Webb, & A.Agrawal, (2010). Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance? Science, 328, 312–313. doi:10.1126/science.1187774
35. A.Poteete, (2012). Levels, scales, linkages, and other ‘multiples’ affecting natural resources. International Journal of the Commons, 6, 134–150. doi:10.18352/ijc.318
36. A.R.Poteete, & J.C.Ribot, (2011). Repertoires of domination:Decentralization as process in Botswana and Senegal. World Development, 39(3), 439–449. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.09.013
37. S.Rantala, & M.Di Gregorio, (2014). Multistakeholder environmental governance in action:REDD+ discourse coalitions in Tanzania. Ecology and Society, 19(2), 66. doi:10.5751/ES-06536-190266
38. S.Rantala, R.Hajjar, & M.Skutsch, (2014). Multilevel governance for forests and climate change:Learning from Southern Mexico. Forests, 5(12), 3147–3168. doi:10.3390/f5123147
39. A.Ravikumar, A.Larson, R.Myers, & J.Gonzalez, (2014). Multilevel governance challenges and opportunities for REDD+:Evidence from 23 pilot projects. Paper presented at the carbon-land-property conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1–4 July 2014.
40. J.C.Ribot, A.T.Chhatre, & T.Lankina (2008). Introduction:Institutional choice and recognition in the formation and consolidation of local democracy. Conservation and Society, 6(1), 1–11.
41. G.W.Ryan, & H.R.Bernard, (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109. doi:10.1177/1525822X02239569
42. M.Skutsch, & P.van Laake, (2008). REDD as multilevel governance in the making. Energy and Environment, 19, 831–844. doi:10.1260/095830508785363622
43. M.Skutsch, & M.McCall, (2010). Reassessing REDD:Governance, markets and the hype cycle’. Springboard Editorial. Climatic Change, 100, 395–402. doi:10.1007/s10584-009-9768-y
44. O.R.Young, (2008). Institutions and environmental change:The scientific legacy of a decade of IDGEC research. In O.R.Young, L.A.King, & H.Schroeder (Eds.), Institutions and environmental change:Principal findings, applications, and research frontiers (pp. 3–45). Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
45. S.Wertz-Kanounnikoff, & D.McNeill, (2012). Performance indicators and REDD+ implementation. In A.Angelsen, M.Brockhaus, W.D.Sunderlin, & L.Verchot (Eds.), Analysing REDD+:Challenges and choices (pp. 233–246). Bogor:CIFOR.
46. M.Wilder, & P.Lankao, (2006). Paradoxes of decentralisation:Water reform and social implications in Mexico. World Development, 34(11), 1977–1995. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.026