How does science-based policy advice matter in policy making? The RIU model as a framework for analyzing and explaining processes of scientific knowledge transfer

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 68, Issue , 2016, Pages 65-72

  Böcher, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; INTEGRATION; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

ENVIRONMENT AGENCY; POLICY MAKING; PRACTICAL PROBLEMS; PROBLEM SOLUTIONS; SCIENCE SYSTEMS; SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE; WASTE POLICY;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84979743513     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Becker, R., Donnevert, G., Römbke, J., Biologische Testverfahren zur ökotoxikologischen Charakterisierung von Abfällen. 2007, UBA, Dessau-Roßlau.
2. Böcher, M., Federal Environment Agency (Germany). Guston, D., Golson, J.G., (eds.) Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society, 2010, SAGE, Thousand Oaks, 234–235.
3. Böcher, M., Wissenschaftsbasierte Politikberatung auf Abruf – zur Rolle der Ressortforschungseinrichtungen für Ministerien am Beispiel des BMU. der moderne Staat 5:2 (2012), 459–480.
4. Böcher, M., Krott, M., Umsetzung des Konzepts einer modernen Ressortforschung im Geschäftsbereich des BMU (UBA-Texte Vol. 39/2010). 2010, Umweltbundesamt, Dessau-Roßlau.
5. Böcher, M., Krott, M., Institutionalisierung multi- und transdisziplinärer Umweltwissenschaften durch Ressortforschungseinrichtungen. Fischer, K., Laitko, H., Parthey, H., (eds.) Interdisziplinarität und Institutionalisierung der Wissenschaft (Wissenschaftsforschung Jahrbuch 2010), 2011, Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, Berlin, 59–80.
6. Böcher, M., Krott, M., Nachhaltigkeitsforschung in Österreich. GAIA – Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc. 21:2 (2012), 155–157.
7. Böcher, M., Krott, M., Professionelle Integration als zentraler Baustein zur Qualitätssicherung von Politikberatung. Z. Polit.(5), 2012, 13–22.
8. Böcher, M., Krott, M., Mit Wissen bewegen! Erfolgsfaktoren für Wissenstransfer in den Umweltwissenschaften. 2014, Oekom, München.
9. Böcher, M., Krott, M., The RIU model as an analytical framework for scientific knowledge transfer – the case of the “decision support system for sustainable forest management within climate change”. Biodivers. Conserv. 23:14 (2014), 3641–3656.
10. Böcher, M., Krott, M., Science Makes the World Go 'Round. Successful Scientific Knowledge Transfer for the Environment, 2016, Springer.
11. Böcher, M., Töller, A.E., Umweltpolitik in Deutschland. Eine politikfeldanalytische Einführung, Reihe Grundwissen Politik, 2012, Springer VS, Wiesbaden.
12. Boehmer-Christiansen, S., Reflections on scientific advice and EC transboundary pollution policy. Sci. Public Policy 22:3 (1995), 195–203.
13. Dharmawan, B., Böcher, M., Krott, M., Failure of Science-based Win-win Solution in Fishery Management: Learnings from Segara Anakan Waters. 2016, Central Java, Indonesia (under review).
14. Döhler, M., Die politische Steuerung der Verwaltung. Eine empirische Studie über politisch-administrative Interaktionen auf der Bundesebene, 2007, Nomos, Baden-Baden (Staatslehre und politische Verwaltung Vol. 11).
15. Durant, D., The undead linear model of expertise. Heazle, M., Kane, J., (eds.) Policy Legitimacy, Science and Political Authority: Knowledge and Action in Liberal Democracies, 2015, Routledge, Abingdon, New York, 17–38.
16. Grundmann, R., The role of expertise in governance processes. Forest Policy Econ., 11(498–503), 2009.
17. Gulbrandsen, M., Research institutes as hybrid organizations: central challenges to their legitimacy. Policy. Sci. 44 (2011), 215–230.
18. Gupta, A., Andresen, S., Siebenhüner, B., Biermann, F., Science Networks. Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., (eds.) Global Environmental Governance Reconsidered, 2013, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 69–93.
19. Guston, D.H., Toward a “best practice” of constructing “serviceable truths”. Hisschemöller, M., Hoppe, Robert, Dunn, William N., Ravetz, Jerome R., (eds.) Knowledge, Power, and Participation in Environmental Policy Analysis. Policy Studies Review Annual No. 12, 2001, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick/London, 97–118.
20. Haas, P.M., Science and international environmental governance. Dauvergne, P., (eds.) Handbook of Global Environmental Politics, 2005, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 383–401.
21. Hahn, R.W., Economic prescriptions for environmental problems: how the patient followed the doctor's orders. J. Econ. Perspect. 3 (1989), 95–114.
22. Heim, J., Böcher, M., CITES and science: using the RIU-model to analyze institutionalized scientific policy advice in Germany for the case of ivory trade. J. Int. Wildl. Law Policy 19:2 (2016), 1–17.
23. Hubo, C., Krott, M., How programs like chance. natur can foster success factors for nature conservation (Erfolgsfaktoren im Naturschutz und ihre Förderung durch Programme am Beispiel chance. natur). GAIA-Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc. 21:2 (2012), 135–142.
24. Hulme, M., Why We Disagree About Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. 2009, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
25. Jasanoff, S., The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. 1990, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass.
26. Jasanoff, S., Wynne, B., Science and decisionmaking. Rayner, S., Malone, E., (eds.) Human Choice and Climate Change Volume I: The Societal Framework, 1998, Batelle Press, Columbus, Ohio, 1–88.
27. Klenk, N.L., Hickey, G., Government science in forestry: characteristics and policy utilization. Forest Policy Econ. 13 (2011), 37–45.
28. Krott, M., Management vernetzter Umweltforschung: Wissenschaftspolitisches Lehrstück Waldsterben. 1994, Böhlau, Wien.
29. Krott, M., Musterlösungen als Instrumentarien wissenschaftlicher Politikberatung. Das Beispiel des Naturschutzes. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 1999, 673–686.
30. Krott, M., Evaluation of transdisciplinary research. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Vol. 3, 2002.
31. Krott, M., Controlling für Programmforschung. 2005, Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Kultur, Wien.
32. Krott, M., Forest Policy Analysis. 2005, Springer Science & Business Media.
33. Krott, M., Value and risks of the use of analytical theory in science for forest policy. Forest Policy Econ. 16 (2012), 35–42.
34. Krott, M., Bader, A., Schusser, C., Devkota, R., Maryudi, A., Giessen, L., Aurenhammer, H., Actor-centred power: the driving force in decentralised community based forest governance. Forest Policy Econ. 49 (2014), 34–42.
35. Lavis, J.N., Robertson, Dave, Woodside, Jennifer M., McLeod, Christopher B., Abelson, Julia, et al. How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers?. Milbank Q. 81:2 (2003), 221–248.
36. Lentsch, J., Weingart, P., (eds.) The Politics of Scientific Advice. Institutional Design for Quality Assurance, 2011, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
37. Lidskog, R., Sundqvist, G., From consensus to credibility: policy-relevant science in late modernity. Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res. 17:3 (2004), 205–226.
38. Miller, N., Environmental Politics. Stakeholders, Interests and Policy Making, 2nd Edition, 2009, Routledge, New York, London.
39. Moser, H., Römbke, J., (eds.) Ecotoxicological Characterization of Waste: Results and Experiences of an International Ring Test, 2009, Springer, New York.
40. Nagasaka, K., Böcher, M., Krott, M., Science-Policy Interaction: Who Does What? Case of the Forest and Forestry Revitalisation Plan in Japan. 2016 (under review).
41. Pregernig, M., Framings of science-policy interactions and their discursive and institutional effects: examples from conservation and environmental policy. Biodivers. Conserv. 23:14 (2014), 3615–3639.
42. Pregernig, M., Böcher, M., Normative and analytical perspectives on the role of science and expertise in environmental governance. Hogl, K., Kvarda, E., Nordbeck, R., Pregernig, M., (eds.) Environmental Governance: The Challenge of Legitimacy and Effectiveness, 2012, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 199–219.
43. Römbke, J., Ketelhut, R., Weiterentwicklung der UBA-Handlungsempfehlung zur ökotoxikologischen Charakterisierung von Abfällen (UBA-Texte Vol. 19/2014). 2014, UBA, Dessau-Roßlau.
44. Rose-Ackermann, S., Controlling Environmental Policy. The Limits of Public Law in Germany and the United States, 1995, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
45. Stevanov, M., Böcher, M., Krott, M., Orlovic, S., Vuletic, D., Krajter, S., Analitički model resornoga istraživanja kao znanstveno utemeljenoga savjetovanja sudionika u političkom procesu - Analiza znanstveno-istraživačke djelatnosti Instituta za nizinsko šumarstvo i okoliš iz Novog Sada (analytical model of departmental research as science-based advising of actors in political process). Sumarski list Sci. Tech. Prof. J. Croatia Forestry Soc. 9–10 (2011), 449–466.
46. Stevanov, M., Böcher, M., Krott, M., Krajter, S., Vuletic, D., Orlovic, S., The Research, Integration and Utilization (RIU) model as analytical framework for the professionalization of departmental research organizations: case studies of publicly funded forest research institutes in Serbia and Croatia. Forest Policy Econ. 37 (2013), 20–28, 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.03.006.
47. Turnhout, E., Dewulf, A., Hulme, M., What does policy-relevant global environmental knowledge do? The cases of climate and biodiversity. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 18 (2016), 65–72.
48. UBA, Produktkatalog 2009–2012. 2009, UBA, Dessau-Roßlau.
49. Wutt, J., Walther, M., Recommendations for the Ecotoxicological Characterization of Wastes. 2013, UBA, Dessau-Roßlau.