Science networks

Global Environmental Governance Reconsidered

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 69-93

  Gupta, Aarti ^a   Andresen, Steinar ^b   üner, Bernd Siebenh ^c   Biermann, Frank ^d,e  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b FRIDTJOF NANSEN INSTITUTE   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

^d VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^e LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894853712     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (65)

1. Andresen Steinar, 2000. The Whaling Regime. In Science and Politics in International Environmental Regimes: Between Integrity and Involvement, ed. Steinar Andresen, Tora Skodvin, Arild Underdal, and J ø rgen Wettestad, 35-68. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
2. Andresen, Steinar, 2008. The Volatile Nature of the International Whaling Commission: Power, Institutions, and Norms. In International Governance of Fisheries Ecosystems: Learning from the Past, Finding Solutions for the Future, ed. Michael Schechter, Nancy Leonard, and William Taylor, 173-189. Betheseda, MD: American Fisheries Society.
3. Andresen, Steinar, and Jon Birger Skj æ rseth, 2007. Science and Technology: From Agenda Setting to Implementation. In The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law, ed. Daniel Bodansky, Jutta Brunn é e, and Ellen Hey, 182-202. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Andresen, Steinar, and Tora Skodvin, 2011. The Climate Regime: Achievements and Challenges. In The World Ocean in Globalization: Challenges and Responses, ed. Vidas Davor and Peter Johan Schei, 165-186. Boston: Brill.
5. Andresen, Steinar, Tora Skodvin, Arild Underdal, and Jørgen Wettestad, eds. 2000. Science and Politics in International Environmental Regimes: Between Integrity and Involvement. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
6. Beck, Ulrich, 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
7. Beck, Ulrich, 2002. Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
8. Biermann, Frank, 2001. Big Science, Small Impacts - in the South? The Influence of Global Environmental Assessments on Expert Communities in India. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions 11 (4): 297-309.
9. Biermann, Frank, 2002. Institutions for Scientific Advice: Global Environmental Assessments and Their Influence in Developing Countries. Global Governance 8 (2): 195-219.
10. Biermann, Frank, 2006. Whose Experts? The Role of Geographic Representation in Global Environmental Assessments. In Global Environmental Assessments: Information and Influence, ed. Ronald B. Mitchell, William C. Clark, David W. Cash, and Nancy M. Dickson, 87-112. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Bolin, Bert, 2007. A History of the Science and Policy of Climate Change: The Role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Cartagena Protocol, 2000. Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity: Text and Annexes. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
13. Christoforou, Theofanis, 2000. Settlement of Science-based Trade Disputes in the WTO: A Critical Review of the Developing Case Law in the Face of Scientific Uncertainty. New York University Environmental Law Journal 8: 622-648.
14. Clark, William C, 2001. Research Systems for a Transition toward Sustainability. In Challenges of a Changing Earth, ed. Will Steffen, Jill Jäger, David J. Carson, and Clare Bradshaw, 197-199. Berlin: Springer.
15. Codex Alimentarius Commission. 2003. Report of the Fourth Session of the Codex Ad Hoc Intergovernmental Task Force on Foods Derived from Biotechnology. Yokohama, Japan, 11-14 March.
16. Codex Alimentarius Commission. n.d. Statement of Principle Regarding the Role of Science in the Codex Decision-making Process and the Extent to Which Other Factors are Taken into Account. In Codex Alimentarius Commission Procedural Manual 14 th Edition. Appendix: General Decisions of the Commission.
17. DeSombre, Elizabeth R, 2001. Distorting Global Governance: Membership, Voting and the IWC. In Towards a Sustainable Whaling Regime, ed. Robert L. Friedheim, 183-200. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
18. Edwards, Paul N., and Stephan H. Schneider, 2001. Self-governance and Peer Review in Science-for-Policy: The Case of the IPCC Second Assessment Report. In Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance, ed. Clark Miller and Paul N. Edwards, 219-246. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Forrester, John, 1999. The Logistics of Public Participation in Environmental Assessments. International Journal of Environment and Pollution 11: 316-330.
20. Funtowicz, Silvio O., and Jerome R. Ravetz, 1991. A New Scientific Methodology for Global Environmental Issues. In Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability, ed. Robert Costanza, 137-152. New York: Columbia University Press.
21. Funtowicz, Silvio O., and Jerome R. Ravetz, 1992. The Good, the True and the Post-modern. Futures 24 (10): 963-976.
22. Funtowicz, Silvio O., and Jerome R. Ravetz, 1993. Science for the Post-normal Age. Futures 27 (9): 739-755.
23. Gallopin, Gilberto C., Silvio O. Funtowicz, Martin O'Connor, and Jerry O. Ravetz, 2001. Science for the 21st Century: From Social Contract to the Scientific Core. International Social Science Journal 53: 219-229.
24. Gambell, Ray, 1995. Management of Whaling in Coastal Communities. In Whales, Seals, Fish, and Man, ed. Arnoldus S. Blix, Lars Wall ø e, and Ø yvind Ulltang, 699-708. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
25. Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, and Helga Nowotny, 1995. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
26. Gieryn, Thomas, 1995. Boundaries of Science. In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, ed. Sheila Jasanoff, Gerald E. Markle, James C. Peterson, and Trevor J. Pinch, 393-443. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Girod, Bastien, Arnim Wiek, Harald Mieg, and Mike Hulme, 2009. The Evolution of the IPCC's Emissions Scenarios. Environmental Science and Policy 12 (2): 103-118.
28. Grundmann, Reiner, 2007. Climate Change and Knowledge Politics. Environmental Politics 16 (3): 414-432.
29. Gupta, Aarti, 2001. Advance Informed Agreement: A Shared Basis to Govern Trade in Genetically Modified Organisms? Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 91 (1): 265-281.
30. Gupta, Aarti, 2002. Ensuring " Safe Use " of Biotechnology: Key Challenges. Economic and Political Weekly, July 6: 2762-2769.
31. Gupta, Aarti, 2004. When Global Is Local: Negotiating Safe Use of Biotechnology. In Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance, ed. Sheila Jasanoff and Marybeth Long-Martello, 127-148. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Gupta, Aarti, 2006. Problem Framing in Assessment Processes: The Case of Biosafety. In Global Environmental Assessments: Information and Influence, ed. Ronald B. Mitchell, William C. Clark, David W. Cash, and Nancy M. Dickson, 57-86. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Gupta, Aarti, 2008. Global Biosafety Governance: Emergence and Evolution. In Institutional Interplay: Biosafety and Trade, ed. Oran R. Young, W. Bradnee Chambers, Joy A. Kim, and Claudia ten Have, 19-46. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
34. Gupta, Aarti, 2010. Transparency as Contested Political Terrain: Who Knows What about the Global GMO Trade and Why Does It Matter? Global Environmental Politics 10 (3): 32-52.
35. Gupta, Aarti, 2011. An Evolving Science-Society Contract in India: The Search for Legitimacy in Anticipatory Risk Governance. Food Policy 36:736-741.
36. Haas, Peter M, 1992. Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization 46 (1): 1-35.
37. Haas, Peter M, 2004. When Does Power Listen to Truth? A Constructivist Approach to the Policy Process. Journal of European Public Policy 11 (4): 569-592.
38. Haas, Peter M, 2005. Science and International Environmental Governance. In Handbook of Global Environmental Politics, ed. Peter Dauvergne, 383-401. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
39. Herrick, Charles, and Daniel Sarewitz, 2000. Ex-post Evaluation: A More Effective Role for Scientific Assessments in Environmental Policy. Science, Technology and Human Values 25 (3): 309-331.
40. Jasanoff, Sheila, 1987. Contested Boundaries in Policy-Relevant Science. Social Studies of Science 17 (2): 195-230.
41. Jasanoff, Sheila, 1998. Contingent Knowledge: Implications for Implementation and Compliance. In Engaging Countries: Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords, ed. Edith Brown Weiss and Harold K. Jacobson, 63-87. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Jasanoff, Sheila, 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge.
43. Joss, Simon, and Sergio Bellucci, eds. 2002. Participatory Technology Assessment: European Perspectives. London: Center for the Study of Democracy.
44. Kasemir, Bernd, Jill Jäger, Carlo C. Jaeger, and M. T. Gardner, eds. 2003. Public Participation in Sustainability Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45. Kastner, Justine, and Rosa K. Pawsey, 2002. Harmonizing Sanitary Measures and Resolving Trade Disputes through the WTO-SPS Framework. Part I: A Case Study of the US-EU Hormone-treated Beef Dispute. Food Control 13: 49-55.
46. Kates, Robert W., William C. Clark, Robert Corell, J. Michael Hall, Carlo C. Jaeger, Ian Lowe, James J. McCarthy, et al, 2001. Sustainability Science. Science 292 (5517): 641-642.
47. Litfin, Karen T, 1994. Ozone Discourses: Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press.
48. Miles, Edward L., Arild Underdal, Steinar Andresen, Jørgen Wettestad, Jon Birger Skj æ rseth, and Elaine M. Carlin, eds. 2001. Environmental Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Mitchell, Ronald B., William C. Clark, David W. Cash, and Nancy M. Dickson, eds. 2006. Global Environmental Assessments: Information and Influence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Press, Daniel, 1994. Democratic Dilemmas in the Age of Ecology: Trees and Toxics in the American West. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
51. Renn, Ortwin, Thomas Webler, and Peter M. Wiedemann, 1995. Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
52. Rose-Ackerman, Susan, 1995. Controlling Environmental Policy: The Limits of Public Law in Germany and the United States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
53. Sarewitz, Daniel, 1996. Frontiers of Illusion: Science, Technology, and the Politics of Progress. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
54. Sarewitz, Daniel, 2000. Science and Environmental Policy: An Excess of Objectivity. In Earth Matters: The Earth Sciences, Philosophy, and the Claims of Community, ed. Robert Frodemen, 49-98. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
55. Schweder, Tore, 2001. Protecting Whales by Distorting Uncertainty: Non-precautionary Mismanagement? Fisheries Research 52: 217-225.
56. Shackley, Simon, and Brian Wynne, 1996. Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority. Science, Technology and Human Values 21 (3): 275-302.
57. Siebenhüner, Bernd, 2003. The Changing Role of Nation States in International Environmental Assessments: The Case of the IPCC. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions 13: 113-123.
58. Siebenhüner, Bernd, 2004. Social Learning and Sustainability Science: Which Role Can Stakeholder Participation Play? International Journal of Sustainable Development 7: 146-163.
59. Simonis, Udo E, 2009. The IPCC and Climate Politics: Small Potatoes. Environmentalist 29 (3): 330-332.
60. Skodvin, Tora, 2000. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In Science and Politics in International Environmental Regimes: Between Integrity and Involvement, ed. Steinar Andresen, Tora Skodvin, Arild Underdal, and J ø rgen Wettestad, 146-181. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
61. Underdal, Arild, 2000. Comparative Conclusions. In Science and Politics in International Environmental Regimes: Between Integrity and Involvement, ed. Steinar Andresen, Tora Skodvin, Arild Underdal, and J ø rgen Wettestad, 181-202. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
62. UNEP [United Nations Environment Programme] 2000. Report on the Extraordinary Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity for Adoption of the Protocol on Biosafety. UNEP/CBD/ExCOP/1/3.
63. WTO [World Trade Organization] .-SPS Agreement. 1994. Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures. Annex IA to the Final Act Embodying the Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations. Marrakesh, 15 April.
64. Young, Oran R., W. Bradnee Chambers, Joy A. Kim, and Claudia ten Have, 2008. Institutional Interplay: Biosafety and Trade. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
65. Zurek, Laylah, 2007. The European Communities Biotech Dispute: How the WTO Fails to Consider Cultural Factors in the Genetically Modified Food Debate. Texas International Law Journal 42: 345-368.