The undead linear model of expertise

Policy Legitimacy, Science and Political Authority: Knowledge and action in liberal democracies

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 17-37

  Durant, Darrin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85148809294     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315688060-2     Document Type: Chapter

References (55)

1. Beck, S. 2011. ‘Moving Beyond The Linear Model of Expertise? IPCC and the Test of Adaptation’. Regional Environmental Change, 11(2): 297-306.
2. Benhabib, S. 1996. ‘Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy’. In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Seyla Benhabib (ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 67-94.
3. Benhabib, S. 1999. ‘The Liberal Imagination and the Four Dogmas of Multiculturalism’. The Yale Journal of Criticism, 12(2): 401-13.
4. Bloor, D. 1999. ‘Anti-Latour’. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 30(1): 81-112.
5. Braun, K. and Kropp, C. 2010. ‘Beyond Speaking Truth? Institutional Responses to Uncertainty in Scientific Governance’. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(6): 771-82.
6. Bulkeley, H. and Mol, A.P.J. 2003. ‘Participation and Environmental Governance: Consensus, Ambivalence and Debate’. Environmental Values, 12(2): 143-54.
7. Collins, H. 2009. ‘We Cannot Live by Scepticism Alone’. Nature, 458(March 5): 30-31.
8. Collins, H. 2013. ‘The Role of the Sociologist After Half-a-Century Studying Science’. South African Review of Sociology, 44(1): 158-79.
9. Collins, H. and Evans, R. 2002. ‘The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience’. Social Studies of Science, 32(2): 235-96.
10. Collins, H. and Evans, R. 2003. ‘King Canute Meets the Beach Boys’. Social Studies of Science, 33(3): 435-52.
11. Collins, H. and Evans, R. 2007. Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Collins, H., Weinel, M. and Evans, R. 2010. ‘The Politics and Policy of the Third Wave: New Technologies and Society’. Critical Policy Studies, 4(2): 185-201.
13. Collins, H., Weinel, M. and Evans, R. 2011. ‘Object and Shadow: Responses to the CPS Critiques of Collins, Weinel and Evans’ “Politics and Policy of the Third Wave”’. Critical Policy Studies, 5(3): 340-248.
14. Dewey, J. 1981. ‘The Public and its Problems’. In The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925-1953, vol. 2. J.A. Boydston (ed.). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 235-372.
15. Durant, D. 2009a. ‘Responsible Action and Nuclear Waste Disposal’. Technology in Society, 31(2): 150-7.
16. Durant, D. 2009b. ‘Radwaste in Canada: A Political-Economy of Uncertainty’. Journal of Risk Research, 12(7/8): 897-919.
17. Durant, D. 2010. ‘Public Participation in the Making of Science Policy’. Perspectives on Science, 18(2): 189-225.
18. Durant, D. 2011. ‘Models of Democracy in Social Studies of Science’. Social Studies of Science, 41(5): 691-714.
19. Dworkin, R. 1987. ‘What is Equality? Part 4: Political Equality’. University of San Francisco Law Review, 22: 1-30.
20. Edgerton, D. 2005. ‘“The Linear Model” Did not Exist: Reflections on the History and Historiography of Science and Research in Industry in the Twentieth Century’. In The Science-Industry Nexus: History, Policy, Implications. K. Grandin, N. Wormbs, and S. Widmalm (eds). New York: Watson, 31-57.
21. Evans, R. and Plows, A. 2007 ‘Listening Without Prejudice? Re-discovering the Value of the Disinterested Citizen’. Social Studies of Science, 37(6): 827-53.
22. Fabre, C. 2003. ‘To Deliberate or Discourse. Is That the Question?’ European Journal of Political Theory, 2(1): 107-15.
23. Freudenburg, W.R., Gramling, R. and Davidson, D.J. 2008. ‘Scientific Certainty Argumentation Methods (SCAMs)’. Sociological Inquiry, 78(1): 2-38.
24. Godin, B. 2006. ‘The Linear Model of Innovation: The Historical Construction of an Analytical Framework’. Science, Technology & Human Values, 31(6): 639-67.
25. Gouldner, A. 1973. ‘Remembrance and Renewal in Sociology’. In For Sociology. New York: Basic Books, 68-81.
26. Guston, D. 1993. ‘The Essential Tension in Science and Democracy’. Social Epistemology, 7(1): 3-23.
27. Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28. Hess, D.J. 2014. ‘When Green Became Blue: Epistemic Rift and the Corralling of Climate Science’. In Fields of Knowledge: Science, Politics and Publics in the Neoliberal Age. Political Power and Social Theory, vol. 27. S. Frickel and D.J. Hess (eds). Bingley: Emerald, 123-53.
29. Hess, D.J. and Frickel, S. 2014. ‘Introduction: Fields of Knowledge and Theory Traditions in the Sociology of Knowledge,’ in Fields of Knowledge: Science, Politics and Publics in the Neoliberal Age, vol. 27. S. Frickel and D.J. Hess (eds). Bingley: Emerald Books, 1-30.
30. Hounshell, D. 2005. ‘Industrial Research: Commentary’. In The Science-Industry Nexus: History, Policy, Implications. K. Grandin, N. Wormbs and S. Widmalm (eds). New York: Watson, 59-65.
31. Jasanoff, S. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Jasanoff, S. 2003. ‘Breaking the Waves in Science Studies’. Social Studies of Science, 33(3): 389-400.
33. Jasanoff, S. 2008. ‘Speaking Honestly to Power’. Scientific American, 6(3): 240.
34. Jasanoff, S. and Wynne, B. 1998. ‘Science and Decisionmaking’. In Human Choice and Climate Change, Volume 1: The Societal Framework. S. Raynor and E.L. Malone (eds). Columbus, OH: Battelle Press, 1-86.
35. Lovbrand, E. and Oberg, G. 2005. ‘Comment on “How Science Makes Environmental Controversies Worse” by Daniel Sarewitz. Environmental Science and Policy, 7: 385-403 and “When Scientists Politicise Science: Making Sense of the Controversy over the Skeptical Environmentalist” by Roger A. Pielke Jr’ Environmental Science and Policy, 7: 405-17’. Environmental Science and Policy, 8(2): 195-7.
36. Lukes, S. 1974-2005. Power: A Radical View, 2nd edn. London: Macmillan.
37. Otway, H. 1987. ‘Experts, Risk Communication, and Democracy’. Risk Analysis, 7(2): 125-9.
38. Pielke Jr, R. 2005. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Polk, M. and Kain, J-H. 2015. ‘Co-Producing Knowledge For Sustainable Urban Futures’. In Co-producing Knowledge for Sustainable Cities: Joining Forces for Change. M. Polk (ed.). New York: Routledge, 1-22.
40. Sarewitz, D. 2000. ‘Science and Environmental Policy: An Excess of Objectivity’. In Earth Matters: The Earth Sciences, Philosophy, and the Claims of Community. R. Frodeman (ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 79-98.
41. Sarewitz, D. 2004. ‘How Science Makes Environmental Controversies Worse’. Environmental Science & Policy, 7(5): 385-403.
42. Sennett, R. 2003. Respect in a World of Inequality. New York: W.W. Norton.
43. Simon, B. 1999. ‘Undead Science: Making Sense of Cold Fusion after the (Arti)Fact’. Social Studies of Science, 29(1): 61-85.
44. Stehr, N. and Grundmann, R. 2011. Experts: The Knowledge and Power of Expertise. New York: Routledge.
45. Stehr, N. and Grundmann, R. 2012. The Power of Scientific Knowledge: From Research to Public Policy. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
46. Suryanarayanan, S. and Kleinman, D.L. 2011. ‘Disappearing Bees and Reluctant Regulators’. Issues in Science and Technology, 27(4): 31-6.
47. Suryanarayanan, S. and Kleinman, D.L. 2012. ‘Dying Bees and the Social Production of Ignorance’. Science, Technology & Human Values, 38(4): 492-517.
48. Suryanarayanan, S. and Kleinman, D.L. 2013a. ‘Be(e)coming Experts: The Controversy Over Insecticides in the Honey Bee Colony Collapse Disorder’. Social Studies of Science 43(2): 215-40.
49. Suryanarayanan, S. and Kleinman, D.L. 2013b. ‘Honey Bees Under Threat: A Political Pollinator Crisis’. The Guardian, May 8. Retrieved at: Www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2013/may/08/honey-bees-threat-political-pollinator-crisis
50. Suryanarayanan, S. and Kleinman, D.L. 2014. ‘Beekeepers’ Collective Resistance and the Politics of Pesticide Regulation in France and the United States’. In Fields of Knowledge: Science, Politics and Publics in the Neoliberal Age, vol. 27. S. Frickel and D.J. Hess (eds). Bingley: Emerald Books, 89-122.
51. Turner, S. 2001. ‘What Is the Problem with Experts?’ Social Studies of Science, 31(1): 123-49.
52. Turner, S. 2003. Liberal Democracy 3.0. London: SAGE.
53. Van der Sluijs, J. P. 2012 ‘Uncertainty and Dissent in Climate Risk Assessment: A Post-Normal Perspective’. Nature and Culture, 7(2): 174-95.
54. Wyatt, S. 2008. ‘Technological Determinism Is Dead; Long Live Technological Determinism’. In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edn. E.J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch and J. Wajcman (eds). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 165-80.
55. Wynne, B. 2006. ‘Public Engagement as Means of Restoring Trust in Science? Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music’. Community Genetics, 9(3): 211-20.