Correction to: Total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses (European Spine Journal, (2017), 26, 3, (806-815), 10.1007/s00586-016-4714-y);Total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses

European Spine Journal

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 806-815

  Ding, Fan ^a   Jia, Zhiwei ^b   Zhao, Zhigang ^a   Xie, Lin ^a   Gao, Xinfeng ^a   Ma, Dezhang ^a   Liu, Ming ^a  

^a HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b 306 HOSPITAL OF PLA   (China)

Author keywords

Lumbar degenerative disc disease; Lumber fusion; Meta analysis; Total disc replacement

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISEASE; LUMBAR DEGENERATIVE DISC DISEASE; META ANALYSIS; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; SPINE FUSION; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);

HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SPINAL FUSION; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT;

EID: 84979628369     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: 14320932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5735-5     Document Type: Erratum

References (32)

1. van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM (1995) A cost-of-illness study of back pain in The Netherlands. Pain 62(2):233–240
2. Walker BF, Muller R, Grant WD (2003) Low back pain in Australian adults: the economic burden. Asia Pac J Public Health 15(2):79–87
3. Frelinghuysen P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr (2005) Lumbar total disc replacement part I: rationale, biomechanics, and implant types. Orthop Clin N Am 36(3):293–299
4. Kalanithi PS, Patil CG, Boakye M (2009) National complication rates and disposition after posterior lumbar fusion for acquired spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(18):1963–1969
5. Gamradt SC, Wang JC (2005) Lumbar disc arthroplasty. Spine J 5(1):95–103
6. Auerbach JD, Jones KJ, Milby AH, Anakwenze OA, Balderston RA (2009) Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(23):2510–2517
7. Delamarter RB, Bae HW, Pradhan BB (2005) Clinical results of ProDisc-II lumbar total disc replacement: report from the United States clinical trial. Orthop Clin N Am 36(3):301–313
8. Moreno P, Boulot J (2008) Comparative study of short-term results between total artificial disc prosthesis and anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 94(3):282–288
9. Gornet MF, Burkus JK, Dryer RF, Peloza JH (2011) Lumbar disc arthroplasty with Maverick disc versus stand-alone interbody fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(25):E1600–E1611
10. Sasso RC, Foulk DM, Hahn M (2008) Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(2):123–131
11. Delamarter R, Zigler JE, Balderston RA, Cammisa FP, Goldstein JA, Spivak JM (2011) Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(8):705–715
12. Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, Hochschuler SH, Geisler FH, Holt RT, Garcia R Jr, Regan JJ, Ohnmeiss DD (2005) A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(14):1565–1575 (discussion E1387–E1591)
13. Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak JM, Linovitz RJ, Danielson GO 3rd, Haider TT, Cammisa F, Zuchermann J, Balderston R, Kitchel S, Foley K, Watkins R, Bradford D, Yue J, Yuan H, Herkowitz H, Geiger D, Bendo J, Peppers T, Sachs B, Girardi F, Kropf M, Goldstein J (2007) Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(11):1155–1162 (discussion 1163)
14. Berg S, Tullberg T, Branth B, Olerud C, Tropp H (2009) Total disc replacement compared to lumbar fusion: a randomised controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 18(10):1512–1519
15. Rao MJ, Cao SS (2014) Artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(2):149–158
16. Wei J, Song Y, Sun L, Lv C (2013) Comparison of artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int Orthop 37(7):1315–1325
17. Nie H, Chen G, Wang X, Zeng J (2015) Comparison of total disc replacement with lumbar fusion: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 25(1):60–67
18. Yajun W, Yue Z, Xiuxin H, Cui C (2010) A meta-analysis of artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease. Eur Spine J 19(8):1250–1261
19. Jacobs W, Van der Gaag NA, Tuschel A, de Kleuver M, Peul W, Verbout AJ, Oner FC (2012) Total disc replacement for chronic back pain in the presence of disc degeneration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD008326
20. Mascarenhas R, Cvetanovich GL, Sayegh ET, Verma NN, Cole BJ, Bush-Joseph C, Bach BR Jr (2015) Does double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction improve postoperative knee stability compared with single-bundle techniques? A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Arthroscopy 31(6):1185–1196
21. Zhao JG, Wang J, Wang C, Kan SL (2015) Intramedullary nail versus plate fixation for humeral shaft fractures: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Medicine (Baltimore) 94(11):e599
22. Mascarenhas R, Chalmers PN, Sayegh ET, Bhandari M, Verma NN, Cole BJ, Romeo AA (2014) Is double-row rotator cuff repair clinically superior to single-row rotator cuff repair: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Arthroscopy 30(9):1156–1165
23. Zhao JG, Wang J, Long L (2015) Surgical versus conservative treatments for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Medicine (Baltimore) 94(26):e1057
24. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000100
25. Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD (2003) Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(1):1–3
26. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, Porter AC, Tugwell P, Moher D, Bouter LM (2007) Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 7:10
27. Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, Kristjansson E, Grimshaw J, Henry DA, Boers M (2009) AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 62(10):1013–1020
28. Shea BJ, Bouter LM, Peterson J, Boers M, Andersson N, Ortiz Z, Ramsay T, Bai A, Shukla VK, Grimshaw JM (2007) External validation of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR). PLoS One 2(12):e1350
29. Jadad AR, Cook DJ, Browman GP (1997) A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews. CMAJ 156(10):1411–1416
30. Phan K, Rao PJ, Kam AC, Mobbs RJ (2015) Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 24(5):1017–1030
31. Hoff EK, Strube P, Pumberger M, Zahn RK, Putzier M (2016) ALIF and total disc replacement versus 2-level circumferential fusion with TLIF: a prospective, randomized, clinical and radiological trial. Eur Spine J 25(5):1558–1566
32. Noshchenko A, Hoffecker L, Lindley EM, Burger EL, Cain CM, Patel VV (2015) Long-term treatment effects of lumbar arthrodeses in degenerative disk disease: systematic review with meta-analysis. J Spinal Disord Tech 28(9):E493–E521