ALIF and total disc replacement versus 2-level circumferential fusion with TLIF: a prospective, randomized, clinical and radiological trial

European Spine Journal

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 1558-1566

  Hoff, Eike K ^a   Strube, Patrick ^b   Pumberger, Matthias ^a   Zahn, Robert K ^a   Putzier, Michael ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

ALIF; Hybrid construct; Lumbar fusion; Lumbar spine; TLIF; Total disc replacement

Indexed keywords

2 LEVEL CIRCUMFERENTIAL FUSION; ADULT; ANTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEGENERATIVE DISC DISEASE; DEVICE FAILURE; DISKOGRAPHY; DURAL TEAR; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; ILIAC VEIN INJURY; LEFT SYMPATHETIC PLEXUS TRANSIENT AFFECTION; LORDOSIS; LUMBAR LORDOSIS; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION DEVICE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; PROSTHESIS MIGRATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SPINE DISEASE; SPINE EXTENSION; SPINE FLEXION; SPINE FUSION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE STABILIZATION; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT; TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; TRANSPEDICULAR STABILIZATION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATION DURATION; PROCEDURES;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 84924229467     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: 14320932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-3852-y     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A (2001) 2001 Volvo award winner in clinical studies: lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2521–2532
2. Kumar MN, Baklanov A, Chopin D (2001) Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur Spine J 10:314–319
3. Kumar MN, Jacquot F, Hall H (2001) Long-term follow-up of functional outcomes and radiographic changes at adjacent levels following lumbar spine fusion for degenerative disc disease. Eur Spine J 10:309–313
4. Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, Hoff JT, McGillicuddy JE (2004) Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:1938–1944
5. Chrastil J, Patel AA (2012) Complications associated with posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20:283–291
6. Jones-Quaidoo SM, Djurasovic M, Owens RK 2nd, Carreon LY (2013) Superior articulating facet violation: percutaneous versus open techniques. J Neurosurg Spine 18:593–597
7. Dede O, Thuillier D, Pekmezci M, Ames CP, Hu SS, Berven SH, Deviren V (2013) Revision surgery for lumbar pseudarthrosis. Spine J [Epub, ahead of print]
8. David T (2007) Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITE artificial disc in 106 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:661–666
9. Delamarter R, Zigler JE, Balderston RA, Cammisa FP, Goldstein JA, Spivak JM (2011) Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:705–715
10. Panjabi M, Henderson G, Abjornson C, Yue J (2007) Multidirectional testing of one- and two-level ProDisc-L versus simulated fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:1311–1319
11. Harrop JS, Youssef JA, Maltenfort M, Vorwald P, Jabbour P, Bono CM, Goldfarb N, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS (2008) Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:1701–1707
12. Le Huec JC (2011) Artificial disks: modest medium- and long-term benefits and a need for better patient selection. Joint Bone Spine 78:441–444
13. Pellet N, Aunoble S, Meyrat R, Rigal J, Le Huec JC (2011) Sagittal balance parameters influence indications for lumbar disc arthroplasty or ALIF. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):647–662
14. Tournier C, Aunoble S, Le Huec JC, Lemaire JP, Tropiano P, Lafage V, Skalli W (2007) Total disc arthroplasty: consequences for sagittal balance and lumbar spine movement. Eur Spine J 16:411–421
15. Saberi H, Rahimi L, Jahani L (2009) A comparative MRI study of upper and lower lumbar motion segments in patients with low back pain. J Spinal Disord Tech 22:507–510
16. Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr, Marnay T (2005) Lumbar total disc replacement. Seven to eleven-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:490–496
17. Siepe CJ, Mayer HM, Heinz-Leisenheimer M, Korge A (2007) Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:782–790
18. Strube P, Hoff EK, Perka CF, Gross C, Putzier M (2012) Influence of the type of the sagittal profile on clinical results of lumbar total disc replacement after a mean follow-up of 39 months. J Spinal Disord Tech [E-pub, ahead of print]
19. Strube P, Hoff EK, Schmidt H, Dreischarf M, Rohlmann A, Putzier M (2013) Parameters influencing the outcome after total disc replacement at the lumbosacral junction. Part 2: distraction and posterior translation lead to clinical failure after a mean follow-up of 5 years. Eur Spine J 22:2279–2287
20. Siepe CJ, Zelenkov P, Sauri-Barraza JC, Szeimies U, Grubinger T, Tepass A, Stabler A, Mayer MH (2010) The fate of facet joint and adjacent level disc degeneration following total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective clinical, X-ray, and magnetic resonance imaging investigation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:1991–2003
21. Hoff E, Strube P, Gross C, Hartwig T, Putzier M (2010) Monosegmental anterior lumbar interbody fusion with the SynFix-LR device. A prospective 2-year follow-up study. Orthopade 39:1044–1050
22. Aunoble S, Meyrat R, Al Sawad Y, Tournier C, Leijssen P, Le Huec JC (2010) Hybrid construct for two levels disc disease in lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 19:290–296
23. Strube P, Tohtz S, Hoff E, Gross C, Perka C, Putzier M (2010) Dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion: part I. biomechanical effects on lumbar spinal motion. Eur Spine J 19:2171–2180
24. Glassman SD, Carreon LY, Djurasovic M, Dimar JR, Johnson JR, Puno RM, Campbell MJ (2009) Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication. Spine J 9:13–21
25. Goldstein CL, Macwan K, Sundararajan K, Rampersaud YR (2014) Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:1727–1737
26. Geisler FH, Blumenthal SL, Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Regan JJ, Johnson JP, Mullin B (2004) Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption study of Charite intervertebral disc. Invited submission from the joint section meeting on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine 1:143–154
27. Fan S, Hu Z, Zhao F, Zhao X, Huang Y, Fang X (2010) Multifidus muscle changes and clinical effects of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive procedure versus conventional open approach. Eur Spine J 19:316–324
28. Motosuneya T, Asazuma T, Tsuji T, Watanabe H, Nakayama Y, Nemoto K (2006) Postoperative change of the cross-sectional area of back musculature after 5 surgical procedures as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:318–322
29. He B, Yan L, Guo H, Liu T, Wang X, Hao D (2014) The difference in superior adjacent segment pathology after lumbar posterolateral fusion by using 2 different pedicle screw insertion techniques in 9-year minimum follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:1093–1098
30. Barrey C, Jund J, Noseda O, Roussouly P (2007) Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases. Eur Spine J 16:1459–1467
31. Jiang SD, Chen JW, Jiang LS (2012) Which procedure is better for lumbar interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:1259–1266
32. Schwab F, Lafage V, Patel A, Farcy JP (2009) Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:1828–1833
33. Umehara S, Zindrick MR, Patwardhan AG, Havey RM, Vrbos LA, Knight GW, Miyano S, Kirincic M, Kaneda K, Lorenz MA (2000) The biomechanical effect of postoperative hypolordosis in instrumented lumbar fusion on instrumented and adjacent spinal segments. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:1617–1624
34. Hoh DJ, Wang MY, Ritland SL (2010) Anatomic features of the paramedian muscle-splitting approaches to the lumbar spine. Neurosurgery 66:13–24
35. Yoshihara H, Yoneoka D (2015) National trends in the surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative disc disease: United States, 2000 to 2009. Spine J 15:265–271