Prospective, randomized, multicenter food and drug administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: Results at twenty-four months

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 93, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 705-715

  Delamarter, Rick ^a   Zigler, Jack E ^b   Balderston, Richard A ^c   Cammisa, Frank P ^d   Goldstein, Jeffrey A ^e   Spivak, Jeffrey M ^e  

^a SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER   (United States)

^b TEXAS BACK INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

^e NYU HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NARCOTIC AGENT;

ADULT; ARTHRODESIS; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DRUG USE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SENSORY EVALUATION; SHORT FORM 36; SPINAL CORD ATROPHY; SPINAL REFLEX; SPINE FUSION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT DURATION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONVALESCENCE; DEVICE APPROVAL; DISABILITY; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; DEVICE APPROVAL; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SPINAL FUSION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION;

EID: 79960948336     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: 15351386     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00680     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak JM, Linovitz RJ, Danielson GO 3rd, Haider TT, Cammisa F, Zuchermann J, Balderston R, Kitchel S, Foley K, Watkins R, Bradford D, Yue J, Yuan H, Herkowitz H, Geiger D, Bendo J, Peppers T, Sachs B, Girardi F, Kropf M, Goldstein J. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:1155-63.
2. Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, Hochschuler SH, Geisler FH, Holt RT, Garcia R Jr, Regan JJ, Ohnmeiss DD. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30:1565-75, E387-91.
3. Moore KR, Pinto MR, Butler LM. Degenerative disc disease treated with combined anterior and posterior arthrodesis and posterior instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27:1680-6.
4. Fritzell P, Hägg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A; Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:2521-34.
5. Fritzell P, Hägg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A; Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27:1131-41.
6. Kuslich SD, Danielson G, Dowdle JD, Sherman J, Fredrickson B, Yuan H, Griffith SL. Four-year follow-up results of lumbar spine arthrodesis using the Bagby and Kuslich lumbar fusion cage. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:2656-62.
7. Resnick DK, Choudhri TF, Dailey AT, Groff MW, Khoo L, Matz PG, Mummaneni P, Watters WC 3rd, Wang J, Walters BC, Hadley MN; American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 7: intractable low-back pain without stenosis or spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2:670-2.
8. Panjabi M, Malcolmson G, Teng E, Tominaga Y, Henderson G, Serhan H. Hybrid testing of lumbar CHARITE discs versus fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:959-67.
9. Panjabi M, Henderson G, Abjornson C, Yue J. Multidirectional testing of one- and two-level ProDisc-L versus simulated fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:1311-9.
10. Auerbach JD, Wills BP, McIntosh TC, Balderston RA. Evaluation of spinal kinematics following lumbar total disc replacement and circumferential fusion using in vivo fluoroscopy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:527-36.
11. Auerbach JD, Jones KJ, Milby AH, Anakwenze OA, Balderston RA. Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:2510-7.
12. Cunningham BW, McAfee PC, Geisler FH, Holsapple G, Adams K, Blumenthal SL, Guyer RD, Cappuccino A, Regan JJ, Fedder IL, Tortolani PJ. Distribution of in vivo and in vitro range of motion following 1-level arthroplasty with the CHARITE artificial disc compared with fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;8:7-12.
13. Akamaru T, Kawahara N, Tim Yoon S, Minamide A, Su Kim K, Tomita K, Hutton WC. Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28:1560-6.
14. Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Banco RJ, Bitan FD, Cappuccino A, Geisler FH, Hochschuler SH, Holt RT, Jenis LG, Majd ME, Regan JJ, Tromanhauser SG, Wong DC, Blumenthal SL. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up. Spine J. 2009;9:374-86.
15. Delamarter R, Zigler J, Spivak JM, Linovitz R, Danielson GO, Haider T, Cammisa FP Jr, Zucherman J, Balderston RA, Kitchell S, Foley K, Watkins R, Bradford D, Yue J, Yuan H, Herkowitz H, Bendo JA, Peppers T, Sachs B, Girardi FP, Kropf MA, Goldstein J. Five year results of the prospective randomized multicenter FDA IDE ProDisc®-L clinical trial [abstract]. Spine J. 2008;8:62S-3S.
16. Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Shah RV, Nanieva R, Pfeiffer F, Fenk-Mayer A, Kershaw T, Husted DS. The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30:2192-9.
17. Siepe CJ, Mayer HM, Heinz-Leisenheimer M, Korge A. Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:782-90.
18. Di Silvestre M, Bakaloudis G, Lolli F, Vommaro F, Parisini P. Two-level total lumbar disc replacement. Eur Spine J. 2009;18 Suppl 1:64-70.
19. Charnley J, Kamangar A, Longfield MD. The optimum size of prosthetic heads in relation to the wear of plastic sockets in total replacement of the hip. Med Biol Eng. 1969;7:31-9.
20. Charnley J. Present status of total hip replacement. Ann Rheum Dis. 1971;30:560-4.
21. Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr, Wright TM. The implications of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16:412-7.
22. Blackwelder WC. "Proving the null hypothesis" in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1982;3:345-53. (Pubitemid 13113168)
23. Glassman SD, Copay AG, Berven SH, Polly DW, Subach BR, Carreon LY. Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1839-47.
24. Mirza SK, Deyo RA. Systematic review of randomized trials comparing lumbar fusion surgery to nonoperative care for treatment of chronic back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:816-23.
25. FDA. FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Orthopedics and Rehabilitation Devices Panel Meeting, Friday, September 9, 2005. http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/05/transcripts/2005-4181t2.htm. Accessed January 19, 2010.
26. Ryd L, Dahlberg L. On bias. Acta Orthop Scand. 1994;65:499-504.