Total disc replacement compared to lumbar fusion: A randomised controlled trial with 2-year follow-up

European Spine Journal

Volumn 18, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1512-1519

  Berg, Svante ^a   Tullberg, Tycho ^a   Branth, Björn ^a   Olerud, Claes ^a   Tropp, Hans ^b  

^a Section North   (Sweden)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Degenerative disc disease; Patients global assessment of back pain; Prospective randomised controlled trial; Spinal fusion; Total disc replacement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; LEG PAIN; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPINE FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISKECTOMY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REOPERATION; SCIATICA; SPINAL FUSION; SPONDYLOSIS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70349656831     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1047-0     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. T Andersen TS Videbaek ES Hansen, et al. 2008 The positive effect of posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion is preserved at long-term follow-up: a RCT with 11-13 year follow-up Eur Spine J 17 272 280 10.1007/s00586-007-0494-8 17851701 10.1007/s00586-007-0494-8 (Pubitemid 351197878)
2. R Bertagnoli S Kumar 2002 Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications Eur Spine J 11 130 136 10.1007/s005860100316 10.1007/s005860100316 (Pubitemid 34328115)
3. R Bertagnoli J Yue R Shah, et al. 2005 The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis Spine 30 2192 2199 10.1097/01.brs.0000181061. 43194.18 16205346 10.1097/01.brs.0000181061.43194.18 (Pubitemid 41429200)
4. S Blumenthal P McAfee R Guyer, et al. 2005 A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the Charite artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: I. Evaluation of clinical outcomes Spine 30 1565 1575 10.1097/01.brs.0000170587.32676.0e 16025024 10.1097/01.brs.0000170587.32676.0e (Pubitemid 41024950)
5. CM Bono SR Garfin 2004 History and evolution of disc replacement Spine 4 145S 150S 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.005 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.005 (Pubitemid 39497297)
6. AE Dmitriev NW Gill TR Kuklo, et al. 2008 Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on the operative- and adjacent-level kinematics and intradiscal pressures: an in vitro human cadaveric assessment Spine J 8 6 918 925 18178528 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.034
7. BJ Freeman J Davenport 2006 Total disc replacement in the lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature Eur Spine J 15 Suppl 3 439 447 10.1007/s00586-006-0186-9 10.1007/s00586-006-0186-9 (Pubitemid 44371023)
8. P Fritzell O Hägg P Wessberg, et al. 2001 Volvo award winner in clinical studies: lumbar fusion versus non-surgical treatment for chronic low back pain. A multi-centre randomised controlled trial from the Swedish lumbar spine study group Spine 26 2521 2534 10.1097/00007632-200112010-00002 11725230 10.1097/00007632-200112010-00002 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnnvV2lsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 33134299)
9. P Fritzell O Hägg A Nordwall, et al. 2003 Complications in lumbar fusion surgery for chronic low back pain: comparison of three surgical techniques used in a prospective randomized study. A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group Eur Spine J 12 178 189 12709856
10. F Geisler S Blumenthal R Guyer, et al. 2004 Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicentre, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption study of Charite intervertebral disc J Neurosurg (Spine 2) 1 143 154 10.3171/spi.2004.1.2.0143
11. G Ghiselli JC Wang NN Bhatia, et al. 2004 Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine J Bone Joint Surg Am 86 1497 1503 15252099
12. JA Gibson G Waddell 2005 Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis: updated Cochrane review Spine 30 2312 2320 10.1097/01.brs.0000182315.88558.9c 16227895 10.1097/01.brs.0000182315.88558.9c (Pubitemid 41504902)
13. P Gillet 2003 The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion J Spinal Disord Tech 16 338 345 12902949
14. JC Le Huec Y Basso H Mathews, et al. 2005 The effect of single-level, total disc arthroplasty on sagittal balance parameters: a prospective study Eur Spine J 14 480 486 10.1007/s00586-004-0843-9 15761708 10.1007/s00586-004-0843-9 (Pubitemid 40922196)
15. JC Le Huec H Mathews Y Basso, et al. 2005 Clinical results of Maverick lumbar total disc replacement: two-year prospective follow-up Orthop Clin North Am 36 315 322 10.1016/j.ocl.2005.02.001 15950691 10.1016/j.ocl.2005.02.001 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MzgsValsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 40805092)
16. R Lehr 1992 Sixteen S-squared over D-squared: a relation for crude sample size estimates Stat Med 11 1099 1102 10.1002/sim.4780110811 1496197 10.1002/sim.4780110811 1:STN:280:DyaK38zlvVSitg%3D%3D
17. A Mannion A Elferim 2006 Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment Eur Spine J 15 S93 S108 10.1007/s00586-005-1045-9 16320033 10.1007/s00586-005-1045-9 (Pubitemid 43188553)
18. RW Molinari T Gerlinger 2001 Functional outcomes of instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion in active-duty US servicemen: a comparison with nonoperative management Spine 1 215 224 10.1016/S1529-9430(01)00015-8 10.1016/S1529-9430(01)00015-8 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3srhsFSjsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 33376282)
19. H Möller R Hedlund 2000 Surgery versus conservative management in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis Spine 25 1711 1715 10.1097/00007632-200007010- 00016 10870148 10.1097/00007632-200007010-00016 (Pubitemid 30460474)
20. M Moumene F Geisler 2007 Comparison of biomechanical function at ideal and varied surgical placement for two lumbar artificial disc implant designs, mobile-core versus fixed-core Spine 32 1840 1851 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31811ec29c 17762291 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31811ec29c (Pubitemid 47356565)
21. M Putzier J Funk S Schneider, et al. 2006 Charité total disc replacement-clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years Eur Spine J 15 183 195 10.1007/s00586-005-1022-3 16254716 10.1007/s00586-005-1022-3
22. C Shim S Lee H Shin, et al. 2007 Charite versus ProDisc: a comparative study of a minimum 3-year follow-up Spine 32 1012 1018 10.1097/01.brs. 0000260795.57798.a0 17450077 10.1097/01.brs.0000260795.57798.a0 (Pubitemid 46642559)
23. C Siepe M Mayer K Wiechert, et al. 2006 Clinical results of total lumbar disc replacement with ProDisc II. Three-year results for different indications Spine 31 1923 1932 10.1097/01.brs.0000228780.06569.e8 16924209 10.1097/01.brs.0000228780.06569.e8 (Pubitemid 44297772)
24. C Siepe M Mayer M Heinz-Leisenheimer, et al. 2007 Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels Spine 32 782 790 10.1097/01.brs.0000259071.64027.04 17414914 10.1097/01.brs.0000259071.64027.04 (Pubitemid 46573332)
25. B Strömqvist P Fritzell O Hägg, et al. 2005 One-year report from the Swedish National Spine Register Acta Orthop Scand 76 5 1 24
26. W Zeegers L Bohnen M Laaper, et al. 1999 Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charité III: two-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients Eur Spine J 8 210 217 10.1007/s005860050160 10413347 10.1007/s005860050160 1:STN:280:DyaK1MzjvFKqsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29287487)
27. J Zigler R Delamarter J Spivak, et al. 2007 Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease Spine 32 1155 1162 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318054e377 17495770 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318054e377 (Pubitemid 46743014)