Journal copyright restrictions and actual open access availability: a study of articles published in eight top information systems journals (2010–2014)

Scientometrics

Volumn 109, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 1167-1189

  Laakso, Mikael ^a   Lindman, Juho ^b  

^a HANKEN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Academic social networks; Copyright; Information systems; Open access

Indexed keywords

EID: 84979599326     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-016-2078-z     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Archambault, E., Amyot, D., Deschamps, P., Nicol, A., Provencher, F., Rebout, L., and Roberge, G. (2014). Proportion of open access papers published in peer-reviewed journals at the European and world levels: 1996–2013. Science-Metrix report. Produced for the European commission DG research and innovation. http://science-metrix.com/files/science-metrix/publications/d_1.8_sm_ec_dg-rtd_proportion_oa_1996-2013_v11p.pdf. Accessed 1 Jul 2016.
2. Arvidsson, V., Holmström, J., & Lyytinen, K. (2014). Information systems use as strategy practice: A multi-dimensional view of strategic information system implementation and use. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(1), 45–61. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2014.01.004.
3. Beall, J. (2013). The Open-access movement is not really about open access. tripleC, 11(2), 589–597. http://triplec.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/525. Accessed 1 Jul 2016.
4. Björk, B.-C., & Paetau, P. (2012). Open access to the scientific journal literature—status and challenges for the information systems community. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 38(5), 39–44. doi:10.1002/bult.2012.1720380512.
5. Björk, B-C., Welling, P., Laakso, M. (2011). Open accessibility to information systems research articles. In Proceedings of the 2011 ECIS Conference. Paper 149. http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1148andcontext=ecis2011. Accessed 1 Jul 2016.
6. Bohannon, B. (2016). Who’s downloading pirated papers? Everyone. Science., 352(6285), 508–512. doi:10.1126/science.352.6285.508.
7. Craig, I., Plume, A., McVeigh, M., Pringle, J., & Amin, M. (2007). Do open access articles have greater citation impact? A review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 239–248. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2007.04.001.
8. Gargouri, Y., Lariviére, V., Gingras, Y., and Harnad, S. (2012). Green and gold open access percentages and growth, by discipline. In E. Archambault, Y. Gingras, and V. Lariviére (Eds.), In Proceedings of 17th international conference on science and technology indicators. Montréal: Science-Metrix and OST. http://sticonference.org/Proceedings/vol1/Gargouri_Green_285.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2015.
9. Harnad, S. (1995). Electronic scholarly publication: Quo vadis? Serials Review, 21(1), 70–72. http://cogprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/archive/00001691/00/harnad95.quo.vadis.html.
10. Jamali, H. R., & Nabavi, M. (2015). Open access and sources of full-text articles in Google Scholar in different subject fields. Scientometrics, 105(3), 1635–1651. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1642-2.
11. Kingsley, DA., Kennan, MA. (2015). Open access: The whipping boy for problems in scholarly publishing, Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 37(1), 329–350. http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol37/iss1/14. Accessed 1 Jul 2016.
12. Laakso, M. (2014). Green open access policies of scholarly journal publishers: a study of what, when, and where self-archiving is allowed. Scientometrics, 99(2), 475–494. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1205-3.
13. Laakso, M., & Björk, B.-C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high-impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329. doi:10.1002/asi.22856.
14. Li, X., Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2015). The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(6), 614–635. doi:10.1108/ajim-03-2015-0049.
15. Lindman, J. (2015). Open access: A cause, but not the cause. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(1), 352–356. Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol37/iss1/15. Accessed 20 Aug 2015.
16. Lowry, P.B., Moody, G., Gaskin, J., Galletta, D.F., Humpherys, Sean, Barlow, J., and Wilson, D. (2013). Evaluating Journal Quality and the Association for Information Systems (AIS) Senior Scholars’ Journal Basket via Bibliometric Measures: Do Expert Journal Assessments Add Value? MIS Quarterly, 37(4), 993–1012. http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3136andcontext=misq. Accessed 20 Aug 2015.
17. Martín-Martín, A., Orduña-Malea, E., Ayllón, J.M. and Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2014). Does Google Scholar contain all highly cited documents (1950–2013)? EC3 Working Papers, 19. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1410.8464v4.pdf. Accessed 1 Jul 2016.
18. Myers, M., Liu, F. (2009) What does the best is research look like? An analysis of the ais basket of top journals. PACIS 2009 Proceedings, 61. http://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2009/61.
19. Niyazov, Y., Vogel, C., Price, R., Lund, B., Judd, D., et al. (2016). Open access meets discoverability: Citations to articles posted to academia.edu. PLoS One, 11(2), e0148257. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148257.
20. oad.simmons.edu-Disciplinary repositories. http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Disciplinary_repositories. Accessed 27 Mar 2016.
21. opendoar.org-The Directory of open access repositories. http://www.opendoar.org Accessed 20 Aug 2015.
22. Orduña-Malea, E., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2015). The dark side of open access in Google and Google Scholar: the case of Latin-American repositories. Scientometrics, 102(1), 829–846. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1369-5.
23. Pitol, S. P., & De Groote, S. L. (2014). Google Scholar versions: do more versions of an article mean greater impact? Library Hi Tech, 32(4), 594–611. doi:10.1108/LHT-05-2014-0039.
24. ResearchGate (2015). Celebrating seven million members and seven years of ResearchGate. Retrieved August 13, 2015, from https://www.researchgate.net/blog/post/celebrating-seven-million-members-and-seven-years-of-researchgate.
25. ResearchGate (2015). ResearchGate fact sheet. Retrieved August 13, 2015, from http://www.researchgate.net/aboutus.AboutUsPress.downloadFile.html?name=rg_fact_sheet.pdf.
26. SHERPA/RoMEO (2016) SHERPA/RoMEO: Publisher copyright policies and self-archiving. http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/. Accessed 20 Aug 2015.
27. Sotudeh, H., Ghasempour, Z., & Yaghtin, M. (2015). The citation advantage of author-pays model: The case of Springer and Elsevier OA journals. Scientometrics, 104(2), 581–608. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1607-5.
28. SPARC (2015) SPARC-The open access citation advantage: List of studies and results to date. http://sparceurope.org/oaca_table/. Accessed 27 Mar 2016.
29. Suber, P. (2012). Open access. MIT Press. http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/open-access. Accessed 20 Aug 2015.
30. van Noorden, R. (2014). Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network. Nature, 512, 126–129. doi:10.1038/512126a.
31. van Noorden, R. (2016). Social-sciences preprint server snapped up by publishing giant Elsevier. Nature News,. doi:10.1038/nature.2016.19932.
32. Willinsky, J. (2005). The access principle: the case for open access to research and scholarship. MIT Press. http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/access-principle.