What does the best is research look like? An analysis of the AIS basket of top journals

PACIS 2009 - 13th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems: IT Services in a Global Environment

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Liu, Franklin ^a   Myers, Michael D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND BUSINESS SCHOOL   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

AIS; Information systems; Journals

Indexed keywords

AIS; BIBLIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS; CLASSIFICATION FRAMEWORK; GEOGRAPHIC DIVERSITY; JOURNALS; METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH; RESEARCH COMMUNITIES;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PUBLISHING;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84862925874     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Adams, D., & Johnson, N. (2008). The journal list and its use: motivation, perceptions, and reality. European Journal of Information Systems, 17, 158-162.
2. Alavi, M., & Carlson, P. (1992). A Review of MIS Research and Disciplinary Development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 8(4), 45-62.
3. Baskerville, R. L. (2008). For better or worse: how we apply journal ranking lists. European Journal of Information Systems, 17, 156-157.
4. Chen, W. S., & Hirschheim, R. (2004). A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001. Information Systems Journal, 14(3), 197-235. (Pubitemid 38874715)
5. Claver, E., Gonzalez, R., & Llopis, J. (2000). An analysis of research in information systems (1981 - 1997). Information & Management, 37(4), 181-195.
6. Farhoomand, A. F., & Drury, D. H. (1999). A Historiographical examination of Information Systems. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 1, 1-27.
7. Farhoomand, A. F., & Drury, D. H. (2001). Diversity and Scientific Progress in the Information Systems discipline. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 5, 1-22.
8. Galliers, R. D., & Meadow, M. (2003). A Discipline Divided: Globalization and Parochialism in Information Systems Research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 11, 108-117.
9. Galliers, R. D., & Whitley, E. A. (2007). Vive les differences? Developing a profile of European information systems research as a basis for international comparisons. European Journal of Information Systems, 16, 20-35.
10. Hamilton, S., & Ives, B. (1982). MIS Research Strategies. Information & Management, 5(6), 339-347.
11. Hardgrave, B. C., & Walstrom, K. A. (1997). Forums for MIS Scholars. Communications of the ACM, 40(11), 119-124.
12. Katerattanakul, P., Han, B., & Hong, S. (2003). Objective Quality Ranking of Computing Journals. Communications of the ACM, 46(10), 111-114.
13. Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67-94.
14. Lending, D., & Wetherbe, J. C. (1992). Update on MIS Research: A Profile of Leading Journals and U.S. Universities. Data Base, 23(3), 5-11.
15. Lowry, P. B., Romans, D., & Curtis, A. (2004). Global Journal Prestige and Supporting Disciplines: A Scientometric Study of Information Systems Journals. Journal of Management Information Systems, 5(2), 29-77.
16. Mingers, J. (2003). The paucity of multimethod research: a review of the information systems literature. Information Systems Journal, 13(3), 233-249. (Pubitemid 37208781)
17. Mylonpoulos, N. A., & Theoharakis, V. (2001). Global Perceptions of IS Journals. Communications of the ACM, 44(9), 29-33.
18. Nord, J. H., & Nord, G. D. (1995). MIS Research: Journal status assessment and analysis. Information & Management, 29(1), 29-42.
19. Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1-28.
20. Peffers, K., & Ya, T. (2003). Identifying and evaluating the universe of outlets for information systems research: ranking the journals. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 5(1), 63-84.
21. Richardson, H., & Robinson, B. (2007). The mysterious case of the missing paradigm: a review of critical information systems research 1991 - 2001. Information Systems Journal, 17(3), 251-270.
22. Straub, D. W., Ang, S., & Evaristo, R. (1994). Normative Standards for IS Research. Data Base, 25(1), 21-34.
23. Valacich, J. S., Fuller, M. A., Schneider, C., & Dennis, A. R. (2006). Publications Opportunities in Premier Business outlets: How Level is the Playing Field. Information Systems Research, 17(2), 107-125. (Pubitemid 43877852)
24. Vessey, I., Ramesh, V., & Glass, R. L. (2002). Research in Information Systems: An Empirical Study of Diversity in the Discipline and Its Journals. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(2), 129-174. (Pubitemid 35312527)
25. Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4, 74-81.
26. Whitman, M. E., Hendrickson, A. R., & Townsend, A. M. (1999). Research Commentary. Academic Rewards for Teaching, Research, and Service: Data and Discourse. Information Systems Research, 10(2), 99-109.
27. Willcocks, L., Whitley, E. A., & Avgerou, C. (2008). The ranking of top IS journals: a perspective from the London School of Econoomics. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(2), 163-168.
28. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.