Meta-Analysis of Contemporary Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Strategies: Irrigated Radiofrequency Versus Duty-Cycled Phased Radiofrequency Versus Cryoballoon Ablation

JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 377-390

  Kabunga, Peter ^a,b   Phan, Kevin ^b,c   Ha, Hakeem ^c   Sy, Raymond W ^a,b  

^a ROYAL PRINCE ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

atrial fibrillation; cryoballoon ablation; radiofrequency ablation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; COCHRANE LIBRARY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPLICATION; CRYOBALLOON ABLATION; DUTY CYCLED PHASED RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; IRRIGATED RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PUBLICATION; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SAFETY;

EID: 84979207719     PISSN: 2405500X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2015.12.013     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. 1 Chugh, S.S., Havmoeller, R., Narayanan, K., et al. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Circulation 129 (2014), 837–847.
2. 2 Haïssaguerre, M., Jaïs, P., Shah, D.C., et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med 339 (1998), 659–666.
3. 3 Cappato, R., Calkins, H., Chen, S.A., et al. Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 3 (2010), 32–38.
4. 4 Higgins, J.P.T., Whitehead, A., Borrowing strength from external trials in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 15 (1996), 2733–2749.
5. 5 Jansen, J.P., Fleurence, R., Devine, B., et al. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR task force on indirect treatment comparisons good research practices. Part 1. Value Health 14 (2011), 417–428.
6. 6 Bafeta, A., Trinquart, L., Seror, R., Ravaud, P., Analysis of the systematic reviews process in reports of network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review. BMJ, 347, 2013, f3675.
7. 7 Donegan, S., Williamson, P., Gamble, C., Tudur-Smith, C., Indirect comparisons: a review of reporting and methodological quality. PLoS One, 5, 2010, e11054.
8. 8 Cipriani, A., Higgins, J.P., Geddes, J.R., Salanti, G., Conceptual and technical challenges in network meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 159 (2013), 130–137.
9. 9 Song, F., Loke, Y.K., Walsh, T., Glenny, A.M., Eastwood, A.J., Altman, D.G., Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews. BMJ, 338, 2009, b1147.
10. 10 McCready, J., Chow, A.W., Lowe, M.D., et al. Safety and efficacy of multipolar pulmonary vein ablation catheter vs. irrigated radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized multicentre trial. Europace 16 (2014), 1145–1153.
11. 11 Bittner, A., Monnig, G., Zellerhoff, S., et al. Randomized study comparing duty-cycled bipolar and unipolar radiofrequency with point-by-point ablation in pulmonary vein isolation. Heart Rhythm 8 (2011), 1383–1390.
12. 12 Bulava, A., Hanis, J., Sitek, D., et al. Catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized comparison between multielectrode catheter and point-by-point ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 33 (2010), 1039–1046.
13. 13 Zellerhoff, S., Ritter, M.A., Kochhauser, S., et al. Modified phased radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation reduces the number of cerebral microembolic signals. Europace 16 (2014), 341–346.
14. 14 Spitzer, S., Karolyi, L., Weinmann, T., et al. Multielectrode phased radiofrequency ablation compared with point-by-point ablation for pulmonary vein isolation–outcomes in 539 patients. Int J Nanomedicine 9 (2014), 1883–1889.
15. 15 De Greef, Y., Buysschaert, I., Schwagten, B., Stockman, D., Tavernier, R., Duytschaever, M., Duty-cycled multi-electrode radiofrequency vs. conventional irrigated point-by-point radiofrequency ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation: comparative 3-year data. Europace 16 (2014), 820–825.
16. 16 Richter, B., Gwechenberger, M., Kriegisch, M., Albinni, S., Marx, M., Gossinger, H.D., Combined circular multielectrode catheter and point-by-point ablation is superior to point-by-point ablation alone in eliminating atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol 168 (2013), 3721–3727.
17. 17 Tivig, C., Dang, L., Brunner-La Rocca, H.-P., Ozcan, S., Duru, F., Scharf, C., Duty-cycled unipolar/bipolar versus conventional radiofrequency ablation in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol 157 (2012), 185–191.
18. 18 Khaykin, Y., Zarnett, L., Friedlander, D., et al. Point-by-point pulmonary vein antrum isolation guided by intracardiac echocardiography and 3D mapping and duty-cycled multipolar AF ablation: effect of multipolar ablation on procedure duration and fluoroscopy time. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 34 (2012), 303–310.
19. 19 Beukema, R.J., Elvan, A., Smit, J.J.J., Delnoy, P.P.H.M., Misier, A.R.R., Reddy, V., Pulmonary vein isolation to treat paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: conventional versus multi-electrode radiofrequency ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 34 (2012), 143–152.
20. 20 Herrera Siklody, C., Deneke, T., Hocini, M., et al. Incidence of asymptomatic intracranial embolic events after pulmonary vein isolation: comparison of different atrial fibrillation ablation technologies in a multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol 58 (2011), 681–688.
21. 21 Gaita, F., Leclercq, J.F., Schumacher, B., et al. Incidence of silent cerebral thromboembolic lesions after atrial fibrillation ablation may change according to technology used: comparison of irrigated radiofrequency, multipolar nonirrigated catheter and cryoballoon. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 22 (2011), 961–968.
22. 22 Choo, W.K., Farwell, D., Harris, S., Experience of atrial fibrillation ablation in a new cardiac center using three-dimensional mapping and multielectrode duty-cycled radiofrequency ablation. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 104 (2011), 396–402.
23. 23 Looi, K.L., Gajendragadkar, P., Taha, T., et al. Long-term outcomes (>2 years) of atrial fibrillation ablation using a multi-electrode ablation catheter in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 36 (2013), 61–69 discussion 69.
24. 24 Perez-Castellano, N., Fernandez-Cavazos, R., Moreno, J., et al. The COR trial: a randomized study with continuous rhythm monitoring to compare the efficacy of cryoenergy and radiofrequency for pulmonary vein isolation. Heart Rhythm 11 (2014), 8–14.
25. 25 Herrera Siklody, C., Arentz, T., Minners, J., et al. Cellular damage, platelet activation, and inflammatory response after pulmonary vein isolation: a randomized study comparing radiofrequency ablation with cryoablation. Heart Rhythm 9 (2012), 189–196.
26. 26 Schmidt, B., Gunawardene, M., Krieg, D., et al. A prospective randomized single-center study on the risk of asymptomatic cerebral lesions comparing irrigated radiofrequency current ablation with the cryoballoon and the laser balloon. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 24 (2013), 869–874.
27. 27 Mugnai, G., Chierchia, G.B., de Asmundis, C., et al. Comparison of pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon versus conventional radiofrequency for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 113 (2014), 1509–1513.
28. 28 Schmidt, M., Dorwarth, U., Andresen, D., et al. Cryoballoon versus RF ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from the German Ablation Registry. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 25 (2014), 1–7.
29. 29 Mandell, J., Amico, F., Parekh, S., Snow, J., Germano, J., Cohen, T.J., Early experience with the cryoablation balloon procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation by an experienced radiofrequency catheter ablation center. J Invasive Cardiol 25 (2013), 288–292.
30. 30 Schmidt, M., Marschang, H., Clifford, S., et al. Trends in inflammatory biomarkers during atrial fibrillation ablation across different catheter ablation strategies. Int J Cardiol 158 (2012), 33–38.
31. 31 Neumann, T., Kuniss, M., Conradi, G., et al. MEDAFI-Trial (micro-embolization during ablation of atrial fibrillation): comparison of pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon technique vs. radiofrequency energy. Europace 13 (2011), 37–44.
32. 32 Chierchia, G.B., Capulzini, L., Droogmans, S., et al. Pericardial effusion in atrial fibrillation ablation: a comparison between cryoballoon and radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation. Europace 12 (2010), 337–341.
33. 33 Kojodjojo, P., O'Neill, M.D., Lim, P.B., et al. Pulmonary venous isolation by antral ablation with a large cryoballoon for treatment of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation: medium-term outcomes and non-randomised comparison with pulmonary venous isolation by radiofrequency ablation. Heart 96 (2010), 1379–1384.
34. 34 Sorgente, A., Chierchia, G.B., Capulzini, L., et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation: a single center comparison between remote magnetic navigation, cryoballoon and conventional manual pulmonary vein isolation. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol 10 (2010), 486–495.
35. 35 Kuhne, M., Suter, Y., Altmann, D., et al. Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: biomarkers of myocardial injury, recurrence rates, and pulmonary vein reconnection patterns. Heart Rhythm 7 (2010), 1770–1776.
36. 36 Sauren, L.D., Vanb, Y., Der, L., et al. Transcranial measurement of cerebral microembolic signals during endocardial pulmonary vein isolation: comparison of three different ablation techniques. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 20 (2009), 1102–1107.
37. 37 Linhart, M., Bellmann, B., Mittmann-Braun, E., et al. Comparison of cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary veins in 40 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a case-control study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 20 (2009), 1343–1348.
38. 38 Malmborg, H., Lonnerholm, S., Blomstrom, P., Blomstrom-Lundqvist, C., Ablation of atrial fibrillation with cryoballoon or duty-cycled radiofrequency pulmonary vein ablation catheter: a randomized controlled study comparing the clinical outcome and safety: the AF-COR study. Europace 15 (2013), 1567–1573.
39. 39 Erdogan, A., Grumbrecht, S., Neumann, T., Neuzner, J., Pitschner, H.F., Microwave, irrigated, pulsed, or conventional radiofrequency energy source: which energy source for which catheter ablation?. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 26 (2003), 504–506.
40. 40 Chae, S., Oral, H., Good, E., et al. Atrial tachycardia after circumferential pulmonary vein ablation of atrial fibrillation: mechanistic insights, results of catheter ablation, and risk factors for recurrence. J Am Coll Cardiol 50 (2007), 1781–1787.
41. 41 Jarman, J.W., Panikker, S., Das, M., et al. Relationship between contact force sensing technology and medium-term outcome of atrial fibrillation ablation: a multicenter study of 600 patients. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 26 (2015), 378–384.
42. 42 Hanninen, M., Yeung-Lai-Wah, N., Massel, D., et al. Cryoablation versus RF ablation for AVNRT: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 24 (2013), 1354–1360.
43. 43 Xu, J., Huang, Y., Cai, H., et al. Is cryoballoon ablation preferable to radiofrequency ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation by pulmonary vein isolation? A meta-analysis. PLoS One, 9, 2014, e90323.
44. 44 Furnkranz, A., Brugada, J., Albenque, J.P., et al. Rationale and design of FIRE AND ICE: a multicenter randomized trial comparing efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation using a cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation with 3D-reconstruction. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 25 (2014), 1314–1320.
45. 45 Giovanni, G.D., Wauters, K., Chierchia, G.B., et al. One-year follow-up after single procedure cryoballoon ablation: a comparison between the first and second generation balloon. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 25 (2014), 834–839.
46. 46 Julia, J., Chierchia, G.B., de Asmundis, C., et al. Regular atrial tachycardias following pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a retrospective comparison between the cryoballoon and conventional focal tip radiofrequency techniques. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 42 (2015), 161–169.
47. 47 Akerstrom, F., Bastani, H., Insulander, P., Schwieler, J., Arias, M.A., Jensen-Urstad, M., Comparison of regular atrial tachycardia incidence after circumferential radiofrequency versus cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation in real-life practice. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 25 (2014), 948–952.
48. 48 DeVille, J.B., Svinarich, J.T., Dan, D., et al. Comparison of resource utilization of pulmonary vein isolation: cryoablation versus RF ablation with three-dimensional mapping in the Value PVI study. J Invasive Cardiol 26 (2014), 268–272.
49. 49 Klein, G., Lickfett, L., Schreieck, J., et al. Comparison of “anatomically designed” and “point-by-point” catheter ablations for human atrial fibrillation in terms of procedure timing and costs in German hospitals. Europace 17 (2015), 1030–1037.
50. 50 Chierchia, G.B., Di Giovanni, G., Sieira-Moret, J., et al. Initial experience of three-minute freeze cycles using the second-generation cryoballoon ablation: acute and short-term procedural outcomes. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 39 (2014), 145–151.
51. 51 Vogt, J., Heintze, J., Gutleben, K.J., Muntean, B., Horstkotte, D., Nolker, G., Long-term outcomes after cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation: results from a prospective study in 605 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 61 (2013), 1707–1712.
52. 52 Deshmukh, A., Patel, N.J., Pant, S., et al. In-hospital complications associated with catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the United States between 2000 and 2010: analysis of 93 801 procedures. Circulation 128 (2013), 2104–2112.
53. 53 Medtronic. Urgent field safety notice: Medtronic model 990018 multi-channel RF ablation GENius generator software version 11. Available at: https://www.swissmedic.ch/recalllists_dl/04584/Vk_20110510_03-e1.pdf. Accessed November 1, 2015.
54. 54 Haines, D.E., Stewart, M.T., Dahlberg, S., et al. Microembolism and catheter ablation I: a comparison of irrigated radiofrequency and multielectrode-phased radiofrequency catheter ablation of pulmonary vein ostia. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 6 (2013), 16–22.
55. 55 Haines, D.E., Stewart, M.T., Barka, N.D., et al. Microembolism and catheter ablation II: effects of cerebral microemboli injection in a canine model. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 6 (2013), 23–30.
56. 56 Verma, A., Debruyne, P., Nardi, S., et al. Evaluation and reduction of asymptomatic cerebral embolism in ablation of atrial fibrillation, but high prevalence of chronic silent infarction: results of the evaluation of reduction of asymptomatic cerebral embolism trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 6 (2013), 835–842.
57. 57 Andrade, J.G., Dubuc, M., Guerra, P.G., et al. Cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol 12 (2012), 39–53.
58. 58 Andrade, J.G., Khairy, P., Guerra, P.G., et al. Efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of published studies. Heart Rhythm 8 (2011), 1444–1451.
59. 59 Metzner, A., Reissmann, B., Rausch, P., et al. One-year clinical outcome after pulmonary vein isolation using the second-generation 28-mm cryoballoon. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 7 (2014), 288–292.
60. 60 Furnkranz, A., Bordignon, S., Schmidt, B., et al. Luminal esophageal temperature predicts esophageal lesions after second-generation cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation. Heart Rhythm 10 (2013), 789–793.
61. 61 Straube, F., Dorwarth, U., Vogt, J., et al. Differences of two cryoballoon generations: insights from the prospective multicenter, multinational FREEZE cohort substudy. Europace, 2014.
62. 62 Verma, A., Jiang, C.Y., Betts, T.R., et al. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 372 (2015), 1812–1822.
63. 63 Song, F., Loke, Y.K., Walsh, T., Glenny, A.M., Eastwood, A.J., Altman, D.G., Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews. BMJ, 338, 2009, b1147.
64. 64 Lip, G.Y., Larsen, T.B., Skjoth, F., Rasmussen, L.H., Indirect comparisons of new oral anticoagulant drugs for efficacy and safety when used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 60 (2012), 738–746.
65. 65 Calkins, H., Kuck, K.H., Cappato, R., et al. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design: a report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS); and in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed by the governing bodies of the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Heart Rhythm Society. Heart Rhythm 9 (2012), 632–696.e21.