Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: Survey of published systematic reviews

BMJ (Online)

Volumn 338, Issue 7700, 2009, Pages 932-935

  Song, Fujian ^a   Loke, Yoon K ^a   Walsh, Tanya ^b   Glenny, Anne Marie ^b   Eastwood, Alison J ^c   Altman, Douglas G ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL STUDY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EVALUATION RESEARCH; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDLINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 67649215130     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b1147     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Pocok SJ. Clinical trials: a practical approach. New York: Wiley, 1996.
2. Glenny AM, Altman DG, Song F, Sakarovitch C, Deeks JJ, D'Amico R, et al. Indirect comparisons of competing interventions. Health Technol Assess 2005;9:1-134. (Pubitemid 41309635)
3. Ioannidis JP. Indirect comparisons: the mesh and mess of clinical trials. Lancet 2006;368:1470-1472 (Pubitemid 44634678)
4. Song F, Altman DG, Glenny AM, Deeks JJ. Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;326:472-475 (Pubitemid 36269627)
5. Bucher HC, Guyatt GH, Griffith LE, Walter SD. The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:683-691 (Pubitemid 27341818)
6. Jorenby DE, Leischow SJ, Nides MA, Rennard SI, Johnston JA, Hughes AR, et al. A controlled trial of sustained-release bupropion, a nicotine patch, or both for smoking cessation. N Engl JMed 1999;340:685-691 (Pubitemid 29110752)
7. Song F, Harvey I, Lilford R. Adjusted indirect comparisonmay be less biased than direct comparison for evaluating new pharmaceutical interventions. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:455-463
8. Caldwell DM, Ades AE, Higgins JP. Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence. BMJ 2005;331:897-900. (Pubitemid 41502718)
9. Higgins JP, Whitehead A. Borrowing strength from external trials in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 1996;15:2733-2749 (Pubitemid 27011054)
10. Song F, Glenny AM, Altman DG. Indirect comparison in evaluating relative efficacy illustrated by antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery. Control Clin Trials 2000;21:488-497 (Pubitemid 30702455)
11. Lumley T. Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Stat Med 2002;21:2313-2324 (Pubitemid 34905450)
12. Lu G, Ades AE. Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Stat Med 2004;23:3105-3124 (Pubitemid 39334902)
13. Chou R, Fu R, Huffman LH, Korthuis PT. Initial highly-active antiretroviral therapy with a protease inhibitor versus a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor: discrepancies between direct and indirect meta-analyses. Lancet 2006;368:1503-1515 (Pubitemid 44634694)
14. Hasselblad V, Kong DF. Statistical methods for comparison to placebo in active-control trials. Drug Inf J 2001;35:435-449 (Pubitemid 32524896)
15. Cochran WG. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 1954;3:101-129
16. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177-188 (Pubitemid 17189972)
17. Lu GA, Ades AE. Assessing evidence inconsistency in mixed treatment comparisons. JASA 2006;101:447-459 (Pubitemid 43972289)
18. Altman DG, Bland JM. Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates. BMJ 2003;326:219.
19. Fisher LD, Gent M, Buller HR. Active-control trials: how would a new agent compare with placebo? A method illustrated with clopidogrel, aspirin, and placebo. Am Heart J 2001;141:26-32. (Pubitemid 32061308)