Automated integration of continuous glucose monitor data in the electronic health record using consumer technology

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 532-537

  Kumar, Rajiv B ^a,b   Goren, Nira D ^a   Stark, David E ^a   Wall, Dennis P ^a   Longhurst, Christopher A ^c  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Blood glucose; Clinical informatics; Electronic health records; Mobile applications; Patient generated health data

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATE; GLUCOSE; INSULIN;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE METER; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CARBOHYDRATE INTAKE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITOR; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; FEMALE; GLUCOSE SENSOR; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; HYPERGLYCEMIA; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; MALE; NOCTURNAL HYPOGLYCEMIA; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT MONITOR; PILOT STUDY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; REMOTE SENSING; SCHOOL CHILD; SMARTPHONE; TELECOMMUNICATION; WORKFLOW; DEVICES; INFANT; MEDICAL RECORD; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

ADOLESCENT; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; PATIENT GENERATED HEALTH DATA; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION;

EID: 84978950483     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocv206     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diabetes Report Card 2014. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Dept of Health and Human Services, 2015:5. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pdfs/library/dia betesreportcard2014.pdf. Accessed for verification February 2016.
2. Dabelea D, Mayer-Davis EJ, Saydah S, et al. Prevalence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes among children and adolescents from 2001 to 2009. JAMA. 2014;311(17):1778-1786.
3. Imperatore G, Boyle JP, Thompson TJ, et al. Projections of type 1 and type 2 diabetes burden in the U.S. population aged <20 years through 2050: dynamic modeling of incidence, mortality, and population growth. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(12):2515-2520.
4. White NH, Cleary PA, Dahms W, et al. Beneficial effects of intensive therapy of diabetes during adolescence: outcomes after the conclusion of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). J Pediatr. 2001;139(6):804-812.
5. Silverstein J, Klingensmith G, Copeland K, et al. Care of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(1):186-212.
6. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes- 2015: summary of revisions. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(Suppl 1):S4.
7. Bjørgaas MR. Cerebral effects of severe hypoglycemia in young people with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2012;13(1):100-107.
8. American Diabetes Association. Glycemic targets. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(Suppl 1):S33-S40.
9. Patton SR, Dolan LM, Henry R, et al. Fear of hypoglycemia in parents of young children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2008;15(3):252-259.
10. Hullmann SE, Wolfe-Christensen C, Ryan JL, et al. Parental overprotection, perceived child vulnerability, and parenting stress: a cross-illness comparison. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2010;17(4):357-365.
11. Nakamura MM, Harper MB, Castro AV, et al. Impact of the meaningful use incentive program on electronic health record adoption by US children's hospitals. JAMIA. 2015;22(2):390-398.
12. Diasend. https://www.diasend.com/us/. Accessed for verification February 2016.
13. Glooko. https://www.glooko.com/. Accessed for verification February 2016.
14. Tidepool. http://tidepool.org/. Accessed for verification February 2016.
15. Gómez EJ, Hernando ME, García A, et al. Telemedicine as a tool for intensive management of diabetes: the DIABTel experience. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2002;69(2):163-177.
16. Goldberg HI, Ralston JD, Hirsch IB, et al. Using an Internet comanagement module to improve the quality of chronic disease care. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003;29(9):443-451.
17. Bellazzi R, Arcelloni M, Ferrari P, et al. Management of patients with diabetes through information technology: tools for monitoring and control of the patients' metabolic behavior. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2004;6(5): 567-578.
18. Adler-Milstein J, DesRoches CM, Furukawa MF, et al. More than half of US hospitals have at least a basic EHR, but stage 2 criteria remain challenging for most. Health Aff. 2014;33(9):1664-1671.
19. Apple. Apple announces iOS 8 available September 17: introduces new Messages & Photo features, QuickType keyboard, extensibility, iCloud Drive & new Health app. Cupertino, CA: Apple, 2014. http://www.apple.com/pr/li brary/2014/09/09Apple-Announces-iOS-8-Available-September-17.html. Accessed for verification February 2016.
20. DeSalvo D, Buckingham B. Continuous glucose monitoring: current use and future directions. Curr Diab Rep. 2013;13(5):657-662.
21. Polonsky WH, Hessler D. What are the quality of life-related benefits and losses associated with real-time continuous glucose monitoring? A survey of current users. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013;15(4): 295-301.
22. Benhamou PY, Catargi B, Delenne B, et al. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) integrated into the treatment of type 1 diabetes: consensus of experts from SFD, EVADIAC and SFE. Diabetes Metab. 2012;38(Suppl 4):S67-S83.
23. Jeffery R, Iserman E, Haynes RB, et al. Can computerized clinical decision support systems improve diabetes management? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2013;30(6):739-745.
24. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1223-1238.
25. Wright A, Ash JS, Erickson JL, et al. A qualitative study of the activities performed by people involved in clinical decision support: recommended practices for success. JAMIA. 2014;21(3):464-472.
26. Hassan A, Fleegler EW. Using technology to improve adolescent healthcare. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2010;22(4):412-417.
27. Johnson SL, Tandon SD, Trent M, et al. Use of technology with health care providers: perspectives from urban youth. J Pediatr. 2012;160(6):997-1002.
28. American Diabetes Association. Children and Adolescents. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(Suppl 1):S70-S76.
29. Anoshiravani A, Gaskin GL, Groshek MR, et al. Special requirements for electronic medical records in adolescent medicine. J Adolesc Health. 2012;51(5):409-414.
30. Ralston JD, Revere D, Robins LS. Patients' experience with a diabetes support programme based on an interactive electronic medical record: qualitative study. BMJ. 2004;328(7449):1159-1162.
31. Ralston JD, Coleman K, Reid RJ, et al. Patient experience should be part of meaningful-use criteria. Health Aff. 2010;29(4):607-613.
32. Gray SH, Pasternak RH, Gooding HC, et al. Recommendations for electronic health record use for delivery of adolescent health care. J Adolesc Health. 2014;54(4):487-490.
33. Esmaties E, Jansa M, Roca D, et al. The efficiency of telemedicine to optimize metabolic control in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: Telemed study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014;16(7):435-441.
34. CMS CY2015 Final Physician Rule -Federal Register Vol. 79; National Physician Fee Schedule Relative Value File January 2015 release; Conversion Factor 35.7547.
35. Telgener PC, Lowe S. A look at the current reimbursement environment for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM): understanding the fundamentals. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2(4):681-684.