A qualitative study of the activities performed by people involved in clinical decision support: Recommended practices for success

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 464-472

  Wright, Adam ^a,b,c   Ash, Joan S ^d   Erickson, Jessica L ^a,b   Wasserman, Joe ^e   Bunce, Arwen ^d   Stanescu, Ana ^f   St Hilaire, Daniel ^a   Panzenhagen, Morgan ^b   Gebhardt, Eric ^d   McMullen, Carmit ^g   Middleton, Blackford ^a,b,c,h   Sittig, Dean F ⁱ  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b PARTNERS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Kaiser Health Plan Northwest   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^g CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH   (United States)

^h HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTERIZED PROVIDER ORDER ENTRY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DOCUMENTATION; ETHNOGRAPHIC RESEARCH; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; LEADERSHIP; MANAGEMENT; MANAGER; MEANINGFUL USE CRITERIA; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MONITORING; MOTIVATION; NURSE; PHARMACIST; PHYSICIAN; PURCHASING; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESPONSIBILITY; STAFF TRAINING; STANDARD; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; VISIBILITY; CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT; DECISION MAKING; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; GOVERNANCE; HOSPITAL PERSONNEL; IMPLEMENTATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; MANPOWER; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; RAPID ASSESSMENT PROCESS; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT; GOVERNANCE; IMPLEMENTATION; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; RAPID ASSESSMENT PROCESS;

DATA COLLECTION; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; PERSONNEL, HOSPITAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION;

EID: 84901849519     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001771     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Buntin MB, Burke MF, Hoaglin MC, et al. The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Aff 2011;30:464-71.
2. Lyman JA, Cohn WF, Bloomrosen M, et al. Clinical decision support: progress and opportunities. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17:487-92.
3. Kawamoto K, Lobach DF. Proposal for fulfilling strategic objectives of the U.S. Roadmap for national action on clinical decision support through a service-oriented architecture leveraging HL7 services. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:146-55.
4. Garg AX, Adhikari NKJ, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes. JAMA 2005;293:1223-38.
5. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, et al. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005;330:765.
6. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:742-52.
7. Blumenthal D. Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1477-9.
8. Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med 2010;363:501-4.
9. Marcotte L, Seidman J, Trudel K, et al. Achieving meaningful use of health information technology: a guide for physicians to the EHR incentive programs. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:731-6.
10. Love JS, Wright A, Simon SR, et al. Are physicians' perceptions of healthcare quality and practice satisfaction affected by errors associated with electronic health record use? J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;19:610-14.
11. Hersh W, Wright A. What workforce is needed to implement the health information technology agenda? Analysis from the HIMSS analytics database. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008:303-7.
12. Hillestad R, Bigelow J, Bower A, et al. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Aff 2005;24:1103-17.
13. Sittig DF, Wright A, Osheroff JA, et al. Grand challenges in clinical decision support. J Biomed Inform 2008;41:387-92.
14. Sittig DF, Wright A, Meltzer S, et al. Comparison of clinical knowledge management capabilities of commercially-available and leading internally-developed electronic health records. BMC Med Inform Decis Making 2011;11:13.
15. McCormack JL, Ash JS. Clinician perspectives on the quality of patient data used for clinical decision support: a qualitative study. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2012;2012: 1302-9.
16. Wright A, Sittig DF, Ash JS, et al. Governance for clinical decision support: case studies and recommended practices from leading institutions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:187-94.
17. Richardson JE, Ash JS, Sittig DF, et al. Multiple perspectives on the meaning of clinical decision support. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings; 2010, American Medical Informatics Association, 2010:1427.
18. Ash JS, Sittig DF, Guappone KP, et al. Recommended practices for computerized clinical decision support and knowledge management in community settings: a qualitative study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2012;12:6.
19. Ash JS, Stavri PZ, Dykstra R, et al. Implementing computerized physician order entry: the importance of special people. Int J Med Inform 2003;69:235-50.
20. Sittig DF, Singh H. A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Qual Saf Health Care 2010;19(Suppl 3):i68-74.
21. Linstone H. Decision making for technology executives: using multiple perspectives to improve performance. Artech House, 1999.
22. McMullen CK, Ash JS, Sittig DF, et al. Rapid assessment of clinical information systems in the healthcare setting: an efficient method for time-pressed evaluation. Methods Inf Med 2010;50:299-307.
23. Sittig DF, Guappone K, Campbell EM, et al. A survey of U.S.A. acute care hospitals' computer-based provider order entry system infusion levels. Stud Health Technol Inform 2007;129(Pt 1):252-6.
24. Trotter R, Needle R, Goosby E. A methodological model for rapid assessment, response, and evaluation: the RARE program in public health. Field Methods 2001;13:137-59.
25. Ryan GW, Bernard HR. Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods 2003;15:85-109.
26. Wright A, Feblowitz JC, Pang JE, et al. Use of order sets in inpatient computerized provider order entry systems: a comparative analysis of usage patterns at seven sites. Int J Med Inform 2012;81:733-45.
27. Sittig DF, Wright A, Simonaitis L, et al. The state of the art in clinical knowledge management: an inventory of tools and techniques. Int J Med Inform 2010;79:44-57.