Using path-based approaches to examine the dynamic structure of discipline-level citation networks: 1997–2011

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 67, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 1943-1955

  Yan, Erjia ^a   Yu, Qi ^b  

^a Drexel University   (United States)

^b SHANXI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

informetrics

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

CITATION NETWORKS; CRITICAL PATHS; DISCIPLINE LEVELS; DYNAMIC STRUCTURE; INFORMETRICS; MAXIMUM SPANNING TREE; SCIENCE , TECHNOLOGY , ENGINEERING , AND MATHEMATICS; SCOPUS DATABASE;

SOCIAL SCIENCES COMPUTING;

BIOCHEMISTRY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EXTRACT; HUMAN; MATHEMATICS; MEDICINE; PHYSICS; SCOPUS; SOCIOLOGY;

EID: 84978945354     PISSN: 23301635     EISSN: 23301643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23516     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999). Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 45(7), 905–917.
2. Autant-Bernard, C., Mairesse, J., & Massard, N. (2007). Spatial knowledge diffusion through collaborative networks. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 341–350.
3. Bacchiocchi, E., & Montobbio, F. (2009). Knowledge diffusion from university and public research. A comparison between US, Japan and Europe using patent citations. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(2), 169–181.
4. Barabási, A.L. (2002). Linked: How everything is connected to everything else and what it means for business, science, and everyday life. New York: Penguin Group.
5. Bettencourt, L.M.A., Kaiser, D.I., Kaur, J., Castillo-Chávez, C., & Wojick, D.E. (2008). Population modeling of the emergence and development of scientific fields. Scientometrics, 75(3), 495–518.
6. Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Hagberg, A., Bettencourt, L., Chute, R., Rodriguez, M.A., & Balakireva, L. (2009). Clickstream data yields high-resolution maps of science. PLoS ONE, 4(3), e4803.
7. Boyack, K.W., Klavans, R., & Börner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351–374.
8. Börner, K., Penumarthy, S., Meiss, M., & Ke, W. (2006). Mapping the diffusion of scholarly knowledge among major U.S. research institutions. Scientometrics, 68(3), 415–426.
9. Börner, K., Klavans, R., Patek, M., Zoss, A.M., Biberstine, J.R., Light, R.P., & Boyack, K.W. (2012). Design and update of a classification system: The UCSD map of science. PLoS One, 7(7), e39464.
10. Buter, R.K., Noyons, E.C.M., & Van Raan, A.F.J. (2010). Identification of converging research areas using publication and citation data. Research Evaluation, 19(1), 19–27.
11. Chen, C., & Hicks, D. (2004). Tracing knowledge diffusion. Scientometrics, 59(2), 199–211.
12. Chen, C., & Leydesdorff, L. (2014). Patterns of connections and movements in dual-map overlays: A new method of publication portfolio analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 65(2), 334–351.
13. Chen, C., & Morris, S. (2003). Visualizing evolving networks: Minimum spanning trees versus pathfinder networks. In Information Visualization, 2003. INFOVIS 2003. IEEE Symposium on (pp. 67–74). IEEE.
14. Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R., & Walsh, J.P. (2002). Links and impacts: The Influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1–23.
15. Cronin, B., & Davenport, L. (1989). Profiling the professors. Journal of Information Science, 15(1), 13–20.
16. Cronin, B., & Pearson, S. (1990). The export of ideas from information science. Journal of Information Science, 16(6), 381–2391.
17. David, P.A., & Foray, D. (2002). An introduction to the economy of the knowledge society. International Social Science Journal, 54(171), 9–23.
18. Flores-Fernández, J.M., Herrera-López, E.J., Sánchez-Llamas, F., Rojas-Calvillo, A., Cabrera-Galeana, P.A., Leal-Pacheco, G., & Martínez-Velázquez, M. (2012). Development of an optimized multi-biomarker panel for the detection of lung cancer based on principal component analysis and artificial neural network modeling. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(12), 10851–10856.
19. Geroski, P.A. (2000). Models of technology diffusion. Research Policy, 29(4), 603–625.
20. Gomez-Rodriguez, M., Leskovec, J., & Krause, A. (2010). Inferring networks of diffusion and influence. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 1019–1028). New York: ACM Press.
21. Hethcote, H.W. (2000). The mathematics of infectious diseases. SIAM Review, 42(4), 599–653.
22. Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (1999). International knowledge flows: Evidence from patent citations. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8(1–2), 105–136.
23. Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, A.D. (1993). Geographical localization of knowledge spillovers by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–599.
24. Kiss, I.Z., Broom, M., Craze, P.G., & Rafols, I. (2010). Can epidemic models describe the diffusion of topics across disciplines? Journal of Informetrics, 4(1), 74–82.
25. Klavans, R., & Boyack, K.W. (2009). Toward a consensus map of science. Journal of the American Society for information science and technology, 60(3), 455–476.
26. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Kruskal, J.B. (1956). On the shortest spanning subtree of a graph and the traveling salesman problem. Proceedings of the American Mathematical society, 7(1), 48–50.
28. Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C.R., & Cronin, B. (2012). A bibliometric chronicling of Library and Information Science's first hundred years. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(5), 997–1016.
29. Lewison, G., Rippon, I., & Wooding, S. (2005). Tracking knowledge diffusion through citations. Research Evaluation, 14(1), 5–14.
30. Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 348–362.
31. Lockett, A., & McWilliams, A. (2005). The balance of trade between disciplines: Do we effectively manage knowledge? Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(2), 139–150.
32. MacGarvie, M. (2005). The determinants of international knowledge diffusion as measured by patent citations. Economics Letters, 87(1), 121–126.
33. Moody, J. (2004). The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American Sociological Review, 69(2), 213–238.
34. Narin, F., Hamilton, K.S., & Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science. Research Policy, 26(3), 317–330.
35. Ponds, R., Van Oort, F., & Frenken, K. (2007). The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 423–443.
36. Rafols, I., Porter, A.L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1871–1887.
37. Rosvall, M., & Bergstrom, C.T. (2008). Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(4), 1118–1123.
38. Singh, J. (2005). Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Science, 51(5), 756–770.
39. Stigler, S.M. (1994). Citation patterns in the journals of statistics and probability. Statistical Science, 9(1), 94–108.
40. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(1), 27–43.
41. Van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.
42. Van Leeuwen, T., & Tijssen, R. (2000). Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: Analysis of cross-disciplinary citation flows. Research Evaluation, 9(3), 183–187.
43. Vitanov, N.K., & Ausloos, M.R. (2012). Knowledge epidemics and population dynamics models for describing idea diffusion. In A. Scharnhorst, K. Börner, & P. van den Besselaar (Eds.), Models of Science Dynamics (pp. 69–125). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
44. Wagner, C.S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34(10), 1608–1618.
45. Waltman, L., van Eck, N.J., & Noyons, E. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629–635.
46. White, H.D. (2003). Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 423–434.
47. Wuchty, S., Jones, B.F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039.
48. Yan, E. (2014). Finding knowledge paths among scientific disciplines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 65(11), 2331–2347.
49. Yan, E., Ding, Y., Cronin, B., & Leydesdorff, L. (2013). A bird's-eye view of scientific trading: Dependency relations among fields of science. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 249–264.