Knowledge diffusion from university and public research. A comparison between US, Japan and Europe using patent citations

Journal of Technology Transfer

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 169-181

  Bacchiocchi, Emanuele ^a   Montobbio, Fabio ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF INSUBRIA   (Italy)

^c BOCCONI UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Citations; Knowledge diffusion; Public research; Spillovers; University patents

Indexed keywords

CITATIONS; KNOWLEDGE DIFFUSION; PUBLIC RESEARCH; SPILLOVERS; UNIVERSITY PATENTS;

DIFFUSION; RESEARCH;

PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

EID: 58549092797     PISSN: 08929912     EISSN: 15737047     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-007-9070-y     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Azoulay, P., Ding, W., & Stuart, T. (2006). The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality, and direction of (public) research output, NBER Working Paper No. 11917.
2. Bacchiocchi, E., & Montobbio, F. (2004). EPO vs. USPTO citation lags. CESPRI Working Paper no. 161. http://www.cespri.unibocconi.it/ folder.php?vedi=2031&tbn=albero&id_folder=191.
3. Balconi, M., Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2004). Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy, 33, 127-145.
4. Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2007). The scientific productivity of academic inventors: New evidence from Italian data. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16 (2), 101-118.
5. Caballero, R. J., & Jaffe, A. B. (1993). How high are the giant shoulders: An empirical assessment of knowledge spillover and creative destruction in a model of economic growth. In O. Blanchard & S. Fisher (Eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual (Vol. 8, pp. 15-74). MIT Press.
6. Cockburn, I., Kortum, S. & Scott Stern (2002). Are all patent examiners equal? The impact of characteristics on patent statistics and litigation outcomes. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 8980.
7. Dosi, G., Llerena, P., & Sylos Labini, M. (2006). The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called 'European Paradox'. Research Policy, 35 (10), 1450-1464.
8. EPO. (2005). Guidelines for examination in the european patent office. http://www.european-patent-office.org/legal/gui_lines.
9. Geuna, A., & Nesta, L. (2006). University patenting and its effects on academic research. The emerging European evidence. Research Policy, 35 (6), 790-807.
10. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper 8498.
11. Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (1999). Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81 (3), 511-515.
12. Henderson, R., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1998). Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80 (1), 119-127.
13. Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M., (1996). Flow of knowledge from universities and federal laboratories: Modelling the flow of patent citations over time and across institutional and geographic boundaries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93, 12671-12677.
14. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M. (2002). Patents, Citations, and Innovations. A Window on the Knowledge Economy. MIT Press.
15. Lissoni, F., Llerena, P., McKelvey, M., & Sanditov, B. (2007). Academic patenting in Europe: New evidence from the KEINS database. Working Paper CESPRI no. 202. http://www.cespri.unibocconi.it/ folder.php?vedi=3903&tbn=albero&id_folder=191.
16. Lissoni, F., Sanditov, B., & Tarasconi, G. (2006). The Keins database on academic inventors: Methodology and contents, Working Paper Cespri, no.181. http://www.cespri.unibocconi.it/folder.php?vedi= 3507&tbn=albero&id_folder=191.
17. Mowery, D., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2004). Ivory tower and industrial innovation: University-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States. Stanford University Press.
18. Mowery, D., & Sampat, B. N. (2005). The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and university-industry technology transfer: A model for other OECD governments? Journal of Technology Transfer, 30, 115-127.
19. OECD. (1994). The measurement of scientific and technological activities using patent data as science and technology indicators. Patent manual 1994. OECD, Paris.
20. OECD. (2003). Turning science into business: Patenting and licensing at Public Research Organisations. OECD, Paris.
21. Sampat, B., Mowery, D., & Ziedonis, A. (2003). Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: A re-examination. International Journal of Industrial Organisation, 21, 1371-1390.
22. Sapsalis, E., van Pottlesberghe de la Potterie, B., & Navon, R. (2006). Academic vs. industry patenting: An in-depth analysis of what determines patent value. Research Policy, 35 (10), 1631-1645.
23. Sargossi, S., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2003). What patent data reveals about universities - The case of Belgium. Journal of Technology Transfer, 28 (1), 47-51.
24. Valentin, F., & Jensen, R. L. (2007). Effects on academia-industry collaboration of extending university property rights. Journal of Technology Transfer, 32, 251-276.