A bird's-eye view of scientific trading: Dependency relations among fields of science

Journal of Informetrics

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 249-264

  Yan, Erjia ^a   Ding, Ying ^a   Cronin, Blaise ^a   Leydesdorff, Loet ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Disciplinary; Knowledge export; Knowledge import; Scientific trading

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL SCIENCES; VETERINARY MEDICINE;

BIRD'S EYE VIEW; DEPENDENCY RELATION; DISCIPLINARY; KNOWLEDGE EXPORT; KNOWLEDGE IMPORT; KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICES; SCIENTIFIC TRADING;

COMMERCE;

EID: 84872185926     PISSN: 17511577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.11.008     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Autant-Bernard C., Mairesse J., Massard N. Spatial knowledge diffusion through collaborative networks. Papers in Regional Science 2007, 86(3):341-350.
2. Barabási A.-L., Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 1999, 286(5439):509-512.
3. Bensman S.J. Distributional differences of the impact factor in the sciences versus the social sciences: an analysis of the probabilistic structure of the 2005 journal citation reports. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2008, 59(9):1366-1382.
4. Borgman C.L., Rice R.E. The convergence of information science and communication: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1992, 43(6):397-411.
5. Bourdieu P. Outline of a theory of practice 1977, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
6. Boyack K.W., Klavans R., Börner K. Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics 2005, 64(3):351-374.
7. Bradford S.C. Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering: An Illustrated Weekly Journal 1934, 137:85-86.
8. Buter R.K., Noyons E.C.M., Van Raan A.F.J. Identification of converging research areas using publication and citation data. Research Evaluation 2010, 19(1):19-27.
9. Buter R.K., Noyons E.C.M., Van Raan A.F.J. Searching for converging research using field to field citations. Scientometrics 2011, 86(2):325-338.
10. Carvalho R., Batty M. The geography of scientific productivity: scaling in US computer science. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2006, 10. 10.1088/1742-5468/2006/10/P10012.
11. Cronin B. The citation process. The role and significance of citations in scientific communication 1984, Taylor Graham, London.
12. Cronin B., Pearson S. The export of ideas from information science. Journal of Information Science 1990, 16(6):381-2391.
13. Cronin B., Davenport L. Profiling the professors. Journal of Information Science 1989, 15(1):13-20.
14. Cronin B., Meho L.I. The shifting balance of intellectual trade in information studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 2008, 59(4):551-564.
15. Garfield E., Pudovkin A.I., Istomin V.S. Algorithmic citation-linked historiography: mapping the literature of science. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Annual Meeting 2002, 39(1), pp. 14-24.
16. Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Essays of an Information Scientist 1972, 1:527-544. Retrieved February 27, 2012 from http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/V1p527y1962-73.pdf?ref=Sawos.Org.
17. Gazni A., Sugimoto C.R., Didegah F. Mapping world scientific collaboration: authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2011, 63(2):323-335.
18. Glänzel W., Moed H.F. Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics 2002, 53(2):171-193.
19. Glänzel W., Schubert A. A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics 2003, 56(3):357-367.
20. Goldstone R.L., Leydesdorff L. The import and export of cognitive science. Cognitive Science 2006, 30(6):983-993.
21. Guerrero-Bote V.P., Zapico-Alonso F.Z., Espinosa-Calvo M.E., Gomez-Crisostomo R., Moya-Anegon F. Import-export of knowledge between scientific subject categories: the iceberg hypothesis. Scientometrics 2007, 71(3):423-441.
22. Hessey, R. & Willett, P. Quantifying the value of knowledge exports from librarianship and information science research. Journal of Information Science, in press. doi:10.1177/0165551512442476.
23. Jaffe A.B., Trajtenberg M., Fogarty M.S. Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: evidence from a survey of inventors. American Economic Review 2000, 90(2):215-218.
24. Jaffe A.B., Trajtenberg M., Henderson A.D. Geographical localization of knowledge spillovers by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1993, 108(3):577-599.
25. Janssens F., Zhang L., De Moor B., Glänzel W. Hybrid clustering for validation and improvement of subject-classification schemes. Information Processing and Management 2009, 45(6):683-702.
26. Klavans R., Boyack K.W. Using global mapping to create more accurate document-level maps of research fields. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2011, 62(1):1-18.
27. Klein J.T. Crossing boundaries: knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities 1996, University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
28. Larivière V., Sugimoto C.R., Cronin B. A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science's first hundred years. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2012, 63.(5):997-1016.
29. Lenoir T. Instituting science: the cultural production of scientific disciplines 1997, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
30. Levitt J.M., Thelwall M., Oppenheim C. Variations between subjects in the extent to which the social sciences have become more interdisciplinary. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2011, 62(6):1118-1129.
31. Lewison G., Rippon I., Wooding S. Tracking knowledge diffusion through citations. Research Evaluation 2005, 14(1):5-14.
32. Leydesdorff L. "Structuration" by intellectual organization: the configuration of knowledge in relations among structural components in networks of science. Scientometrics 2011, 88(2):499-520.
33. Leydesdorff L., Probst C. The delineation of an interdisciplinary specialty in terms of a journal set: the case of communication studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60(8):1709-1718.
34. Leydesdorff L., Rafols I. A Global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60(2):348-362.
35. Leydesdorff, L., Carley, S., & Rafols, I. Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories. Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0783-8.
36. Lillquist E., Green S. The discipline dependence of citation statistics. Scientometrics 2010, 84(3):749-762.
37. Lockett A., McWilliams A. The balance of trade between disciplines: do we effectively manage knowledge?. Journal of Management Inquiry 2005, 14(2):139-150.
38. Lotka A.J. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 1926, 16:317-324.
39. Mehta A., Rysman M., Simcoe T. Identifying the age profile of patent citations. Social Science Research Network 2010, 25(7):1179-1204.
40. Merton R.K. The Matthew effect in science. Science 1968, 159(3810):56-63.
41. Morillo F., Bordons M., Gomez I. Interdisciplinarity in science: a tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2003, 54(13):1237-1249.
42. Moya-Anegón F., Vargas-Quesada B., Herrero-Solana V., Chinchilla-Rodríguez Z., Corera-álvarez E., Munoz-Fernández F.J. A new technique for building maps of large scientific domains based on the cocitation of classes and categories. Scientometrics 2004, 61(1):129-145.
43. Nederhof A.J. Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: a review. Scientometrics 2006, 66(1):81-100.
44. Nomaler Ö., Verspagen B. Knowledge flows, patent citations and the impact of science on technology. Economic Systems Research 2008, 4:339-366.
45. Ponds R., Van Oort F., Frenken K. The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Papers in Regional Science 2007, 86(3):423-443.
46. Porter A.L., Rafols I. Is science becoming more interdisciplinary?. Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics 2009, 81(3):719-745.
47. Porter A.L., Roessner J.D., Heberger A.E. How interdisciplinary is a given body of research?. Research Evaluation 2008, 17(4):273-282.
48. Porter A.L., Roessner J.D., Cohen A.S., Perreault M. Interdisciplinary research: meaning, metrics and nurture. Research Evaluation 2006, 15(3):187-195.
49. Rafols I., Leydesdorff L. Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60(9):1823-1835.
50. Rafols I., Meyer M. Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics 2010, 82(2):263-287.
51. Rafols I., Porter A.L., Leydesdorff L. Science overlay maps: a new tool for research policy and library management. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2010, 61(9):1871-1887.
52. Redner S. How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution. The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 1998, 4(2):131-134.
53. Rinia E.J., Van Leeuwen T.N., Bruins E.E.W., Van Vuren H.G., Van Raan A.F.J. Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science. Scientometrics 2002, 54(3):347-362.
54. Stigler S.M. Citation patterns in the journals of statistics and probability. Statistical Science 1994, 9(1):94-108.
55. Suppes P. Probabilistic metaphysics 1984, Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
56. Van Leeuwen T., Tijssen R. Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: analysis of cross-disciplinary citation flows. Research Evaluation 2000, 9(3):183-187.
57. Van Raan A.F.J. Bibliometric statistical properties of the 100 largest European research universities: prevalent scaling rules in the science system. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2008, 59(3):461-475.
58. Wagner C.S., Leydesdorff L. Network structure, self-organization and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy 2009, 34(10):1608-1618.
59. Wouters P. The citation culture 1998, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
60. Xhignesse L.V., Osgood C.E. Bibliographical citation characteristics of the psychological journal network in 1950 and in 1960. American Psychologist 1967, 22(9):778-791.
61. Yan E., Sugimoto C.R. Institutional interactions: exploring the social, cognitive, and geographic relationships between institutions as demonstrated through citation networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2011, 62(8):1498-1514.
62. Zhang L., Liu X., Janssens F., Liang L., Glänzel W. Subject clustering analysis based on ISI category classification. Journal of Informetrics 2010, 4(2):185-193.
63. Zitt M. Facing diversity of science: a challenge for bibliometric indicators. Measurement 2005, 3(1):38-49.