Precision of dental implant digitization using intraoral scanners

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 277-283

  Flügge, Tabea Viktoria ^a   Att, Wael ^a   Metzger, Marc C ^a   Nelson, Katja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TOOTH IMPLANT;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DEVICES; DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; EDENTULOUSNESS; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MATERIALS TESTING; PATHOLOGY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TOOTH IMPLANT;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MATERIALS TESTING;

EID: 84978869377     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11607/ijp.4417     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Joda T, Wittneben JG, Brägger U. Digital implant impressions with the "Individualized Scanbody Technique" for emergence profile support. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:395-397.
2. Stimmelmayr M, Güth JF, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, Beuer F. Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fit-An in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:851-856.
3. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: An overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505-511.
4. Andriessen FS, Rijkens DR, van der Meer WJ, Wismeijer DW. Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: A pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111:186-194.
5. Logozzo S, Franceschini A, Kilpelä A, Caponi M, Governi L, Blois L. A comparative analysis of intraoral 3D digital scanners for restorative dentistry. The Internet Journal of Medical Technology. 2011;5:1-18.
6. Lee SJ, Gallucci GO. Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: Efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:111-115.
7. Christensen GJ. Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions? J Am Dent Assoc 2008; 139:761-763.
8. Stein JM. Stand-alone scanning systems simplify intraoral digital impressioning. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2011;32:56,58-59.
9. Flügge TV, Schlager S, Nelson K, Nahles S, Metzger MC. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:471-478.
10. Jemt T, Lie A. Accuracy of implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw: Analysis of precision of fit between cast gold-alloy frameworks and master casts by means of a three-dimensional photogrammetric technique. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:172-180.
11. Tan KB, Rubenstein JE, Nicholls JI, Yuodelis RA. Three-dimensional analysis of the casting accuracy of one-piece, osseointegrated implant-retained prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:346-363.
12. Goll GE. Production of accurately fitting full-arch implant frameworks: Part I-Clinical procedures. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66: 377-384.
13. Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in edentulous jaws: A study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6: 270-276.
14. Klineberg IJ, Murray GM. Design of superstructures for osseointegrated fixtures. Swed Dent J Suppl 1985;28:63-69.
15. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Bohsali K, Goodacre CJ, Lang BR. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:7-13.
16. ISO. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results-Part 1: General principles and definitions. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization 1994:17.
17. Ender A, Mehl A. Full arch scans: Conventional versus digital impressions-an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 2011;14:11-21.
18. van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D, Ren Y. Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One 2012;7:e43312.
19. Karl M, Graef F, Schubinski P, Taylor T. Effect of intraoral scanning on the passivity of fit of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. Quintessence Int 2012;43:555-562.
20. Lin C, Perry M (eds). Shape description using surface triangulation. [Proceedings of the Workshop on Computer Vision: Representation and Control, August 1982, Rindge, NH.]
21. Flügge T, Att W, Metzger M, Nelson K. A novel method to evaluate precision of optical implant impressions with commercial scanbodies: An experimental approach [epub ahead of print, 14 Oct 2015]. J Prosthodont doi: 10.1111/jopr.12362.
22. Maintz JB, Viergever MA. A survey of medical image registration. Med Image Anal 1998;2:1-36.
23. Pratt V. Direct least-squares fitting of algebraic surfaces. SIGGRAPH Comput Graph 1987;21:145-152.
24. Wegner K, Weskott K, Zenginel M, Rehmann P, Wöstmann B. Effects of implant system, impression technique, and impression material on accuracy of the working cast. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:989-995.
25. Bergin JM, Rubenstein JE, Mancl L, Brudvik JS, Raigrodski AJ. An in vitro comparison of photogrammetric and conventional completearch implant impression techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110: 243-251.