Organizing Publicly Funded Substance Use Disorder Treatment in the United States: Moving Toward a Service System Approach

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Volumn 69, Issue , 2016, Pages 9-18

  Padwa, Howard ^a   Urada, Darren ^a   Gauthier, Patrick ^b   Rieckmann, Traci ^c   Hurley, Brian ^d   Crèvecouer MacPhail, Desirée ^a   Rawson, Richard A ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Advocates for Human Potential Inc   (United States)

^c OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Medicaid; Organized delivery systems; Public policy; Substance use disorder services

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MEDICAID; MEDICARE; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; OUTPATIENT CARE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REIMBURSEMENT; RESIDENTIAL CARE; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES; DRUG DEPENDENCE; ECONOMICS; GOVERNMENT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC SECTOR;

CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES (U.S.); DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HUMANS; MEDICAID; PUBLIC SECTOR; SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTERS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84978288348     PISSN: 07405472     EISSN: 18736483     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.06.010     Document Type: Article

References (128)

1. Ali, MM, Teich, J, Woodward, A, Han, B, The implications of the Affordable Care Act for behavioral health services utilization. Administration and policy in mental health and mental health services research, 2014 (Epub ahead of print).
2. Babor, T, Poznyak, W, The World Health Organization substance abuse instrument for mapping services: Rationale, structure and functions. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 27 (2010), 703–711.
3. Babor, TF, Treatment systems for population management of substance use disorders: Requirements and priorities from a public health perspective. el-Guebaly, N., Carrà, G., Galanter, M., (eds.) Textbook of addiction treatment: international perspectives, 2015, Springer Milan, 1213–1229.
4. Babor, TF, Stenius, K, Romelsjo, A, Alcohol and drug treatment systems in public health perspective: Mediators and moderators of population effects. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 17:S1 (2008), S50–S59.
5. Barry, CL, Huskamp, HA, Moving beyond parity—Mental health and addiction care under the ACA. New England Journal of Medicine 365 (2011), 973–975.
6. Bergmark, A, On the idea of treatment systems. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 27 (2010), 565–573.
7. Blum, TC, Davis, CD, Roman, PM, Adopting evidence-based medical assisted treatments in substance abuse treatment organizations; Roles of leadership socialization and funding streams. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration 37 (2013), 37–75.
8. Buck, JA, The looming expansion and transformation of public substance abuse treatment under the Affordable Care Act. Health Affairs 30 (2011), 1402–1410.
9. Campbell, BK, Tillotson, CJ, Choi, D, Bryant, K, DiCenzo, J, Provost, SE McCarty, D, Predicting outpatient treatment entry following detoxification for injection drug use: The impact of patient and program factors. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 38:S1 (2010), S87–S96.
10. Capoccia, VA, Grazier, KL, Toal, C, Ford, JH, Gustafson, DH, Massachusetts's experience suggests coverage alone is insufficient to increase addiction disorders treatment. Health Affairs 31 (2012), 1000–1008.
11. Carrier, E, McNeely, J, Lobach, I, Tay, S, Gourevitch, MN, Raven, MC, Factors associated with frequent utilization of crisis substance use detoxification services. Journal of Addictive Diseases 30 (2011), 116–122.
12. Carroll, K, Onken, LS, Behavioral therapies for drug abuse. American Journal of Psychiatry 162 (2005), 1452–1460.
13. Carroll, KM, Ball, SA, Nich, C, Martino, S, Frankforter, TL, Farentinos, C National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network, Motivational interviewing to improve treatment engagement and outcome in individuals seeking treatment for substance abuse: A multisite effectiveness study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 81 (2006), 301–312.
14. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Treatment improvement protocol (TIP) series, no. 34: Brief interventions and brief treatments for substance abuse. Report no.: (SMA) 99–3353, 1999, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Rockville, MD.
15. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Treatment improvement protocol (TIP) series, no. 27: Comprehensive case management for substance abuse treatment. Report no.: (SMA) 15–4215, 2000, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Rockville, MD.
16. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Treatment improvement protocol (TIP) series, no. 40: Clinical guidelines for the use of buprenorphine in the treatment of opioid addiction. Report no.: (SMA) 07–3939, 2004, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Rockville, MD.
17. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Technical assistance publication (TAP) series, no. 21: Addiction counseling competencies: the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of professional practice. Report no. (SMA) 98–3171, 2006, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Rockville, MD.
18. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Treatment improvement protocol (TIP) series, no. 45: Detoxification and substance abuse treatment. Report no.: (SMA) 06–4131, 2006, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Rockville, MD.
19. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Treatment improvement protocol (TIP) series, no. 43: Medication-assisted treatment for opioid addiction in opioid treatment programs. Report no.: (SMA) 12–4214, 2008, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Rockville, MD.
20. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Treatment improvement protocol (TIP) series, no. 49: Incorporating alcohol pharmacotherapies into medical practice. Report no.: (SMA) 13–4380, 2009, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Rockville, MD.
21. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, What are peer recovery support services?. Report no.: (SMA) 09–4454, 2009, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Rockville, MD.
22. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), About section 1115 demonstrations. Web page http://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid-chip-program-information/by-topics/waivers/1115/section-1115-demonstrations.html, 2015 (Accessed December 4, 2015).
23. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), SMD # 15–003: New service delivery opportunities for individuals with a substance use disorder. 2015, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Baltimore, MD (Retrieved from https://www.medicaid.gov/federal-policy-guidance/downloads/SMD15003.pdf).
24. Cerimele, JM, Katon, WJ, Sharma, V, Sederer, LI, Delivering psychiatric services in primary-care setting. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine: A Journal of Translational and Personalized Medicine 79 (2012), 481–489.
25. Chinman, M, George, P, Dougherty, RH, Daniels, AS, Ghose, SS, Swift, A, Delphin-Rittmon, ME, Peer support services for individuals with serious mental illnesses: assessing the evidence. Psychiatric Services 65:4 (2014), 429–441.
26. Cousins, SJ, Antonini, VP, Rawson, RA, Utilization, measurement, and funding of recovery supports and services. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 44:4 (2012), 325–333.
27. D'Aunno, T, The role of organization and management in substance abuse treatment: Review and roadmap. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 31 (2006), 221–233.
28. Dennis, M, Scott, CK, Managing addiction as a chronic condition. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice 4 (2007), 45–55.
29. Dennis, M, Scott, CK, Funk, R, An experimental evaluation of recovery management checkups (RMC) for people with chronic substance use disorders. Evaluation and Program Planning 26 (2003), 339–352.
30. Dewit, DJ, Rush, B, Assessing the need for substance abuse services: A critical review of needs assessment models. Evaluation and Program Planning 19 (1996), 41–64.
31. Dutra, L, Stathopoulou, G, Basden, SL, Leyro, TM, Powers, MB, Otto, MW, A meta-analytic review of psychosocial interventions for substance use disorders. The American Journal of Psychiatry 165 (2008), 179–187.
32. Etheridge, RM, Hubbard, RL, Anderson, J, Craddock, SG, Flynn, PM, Treatment structure and program services in the drug abuse treatment outcome study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 11 (1997), 244–260.
33. Farabee, D, Cousins, SJ, Brecht, ML, Antonini, VP, Lee, AB, Brummer, J Rawson, RA, A comparison of four telephone-based counseling styles for recovering stimulant users. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 27 (2013), 223–229.
34. Fields, D, Roman, PM, Blum, TC, Management systems, patient quality improvement, resource availability, and substance abuse treatment quality. Health Services Research 47:3 Pt 1 (2012), 1068–1090.
35. Fiorentine, R, Nakashima, J, Anglin, MD, Client engagement in drug treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 17 (1999), 199–206.
36. Fuller, BE, Rieckmann, T, Nunes, EV, Miller, M, Arfken, C, Edmunson, E, McCarty, D, Organizational readiness for change and opinions toward treatment innovations. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 33 (2007), 183–192.
37. Garner, BR, Godley, MD, Passetti, LL, Funk, RR, White, WL, Recovery support for adolescents with substance use disorders: The impact of recovery support telephone calls provided by pre-professional volunteers. Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism, 2, 2014, 1010.
38. Garnick, DW, Lee, MT, Horgan, CM, Acevedo, A, Washington Circle Public Sector Workgroup, Adapting Washington circle performance measures for public sector substance abuse treatment systems. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 36 (2009), 265–277.
39. Glaser, FB, Slouching toward a systems approach to treatment. Alcohol 11 (1994), 467–470.
40. Glaser, FB, A systems approach without a system design: A commentary on six papers on the Ontario experience. Contemporary Drug Problems 22 (1995), 137–150.
41. Glaser, FB, Conversation with Frederick B. Glaser. Addiction (Abingdon, England) 96 (2001), 1709–1723.
42. Glaser, FB, Greenberg, SW, Barrett, M, A systems approach to alcohol treatment. 1978, Alcohol Research Foundation Books, Toronto.
43. Guerrero, EG, Managerial challenges and strategic solutions to implementing organizational change in substance abuse treatment for Latinos. Administration in Social Work 37 (2013), 286–296.
44. Hingson, R, Compton, WM, Screening and brief intervention and referral to treatment for drug use in primary care: Back to the drawing board. Journal of the American Medical Association 312 (2014), 488–489.
45. Humphreys, K, Frank, RG, The Affordable Care Act will revolutionize care for substance use disorders in the United States. Addiction 109 (2014), 1957–1958.
46. Humphreys, K, McLellan, AT, Brief intervention, treatment, and recovery support services for Americans who have substance use disorders: An overview of policy in the Obama administration. Psychological Services 7 (2010), 275–284.
47. Jost, T, Implementing health reform: Medicaid & CHIP mental health and substance use disorder parity [web log post]. Health affairs blog, 2015 (Retrieved from http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2015/04/08/implementing-health-reform-medicaid-chip-mental-health-and-substance-abuse-parity/).
48. Kaplan, L, The role of recovery support services in recovery-oriented systems of care. DHHS publication no. (SMA) 08–4315, 2008, Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, MD.
49. Kaplan, L, Nugent, C, Baker, M, Clark, HW, Veysey, BM, Introduction: The recovery community services program. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly 28 (2010), 244–255.
50. Klingemann, H, Hunt, G, Drug treatment systems in an international perspective: Drugs, demons and delinquents. 1998, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
51. Klingemann, H., Takala, J.P., Hunt, G., (eds.) Cure, care, or control: Alcoholism treatment in sixteen countries, 1992, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.
52. Kosten, TR, O'Connor, PG, Management of drug and alcohol withdrawal. New England Journal of Medicine 348 (2003), 1786–1795.
53. Laudet, AB, Humphreys, K, Promoting recovery in an evolving policy context: What do we know and what do we need to know about recovery support services?. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 45 (2013), 126–133.
54. Lee, MT, Horgan, CM, Garnick, DW, Acevedo, A, Panas, L, Ritter, GA Reynolds, M, A performance measure for continuity of care after detoxification: Relationship with outcomes. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 47 (2014), 130–139.
55. Ling, W, Amass, L, Shoptaw, S, Annon, JJ, Hillhouse, M, Babcock, D Ziedonis, D, A multi-center randomized trial of buprenorphine–naloxone versus clonidine for opioid, detoxification: findings from the National Institute on Drug Abuse clinical trials network. Addiction 100:8 (2005), 1090–1100.
56. Lundgren, L, Krull, I, The Affordable Care Act: New opportunities for social work to take leadership in behavioral health and addiction treatment. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research 5 (2014), 415–438.
57. Lundgren, LM, Sullivan, L, Amodeo, M, How do treatment repeaters use the drug treatment system? An analysis of injection drug users in Massachusetts. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 30 (2006), 121–128.
58. Mark, TL, Dilonardo, JD, Chalk, M, Coffey, R, Factors associated with the receipt of treatment following detoxification. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 24 (2003), 299–304.
59. Mark, TL, Levit, KR, Coffey, RM, McKusick, DR, Harwood, HJ, King, EC Ryan, K, National expenditures for mental health services and substance abuse treatment, 1993–2003. SAMHSA publication no. SMA 07–4227, 2007, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, MD.
60. Mark, TL, Levit, KR, Vandivort-Warren, R, Buck, JA, Coffey, RM, Changes in US spending on mental health and substance abuse treatment, 1986–2005, and implications for policy. Health Affairs 30 (2011), 284–292.
61. Mark, TL, Vandivort-Warren, R, Montejano, LB, Factors affecting detoxification readmission: Analysis of public sector data from three states. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 31 (2006), 439–445.
62. Martin, GW, The core-shell model: An institutional experiment. Contemporary Drug Problems 22 (1995), 13–26.
63. McCarty, D, Gustafson, DH, Wisdom, JP, Ford, J, Choi, D, Molfenter, T Cotter, F, The network for the improvement of addiction treatment (NIATx): enhancing access and retention. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 88 (2007), 138–145.
64. McKay, JR, Is there a case for extended interventions for alcohol and drug use disorders?. Addiction 100 (2005), 1594–1610.
65. McKay, JR, Continuing care research: What we have learned and where we are going. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 36 (2009), 131–145.
66. McKay, JR, Donovan, DM, McLellan, T, Krupski, A, Hansten, M, Stark, KD Cecere, J, Evaluation of full vs. partial continuum of care in the treatment of publicly funded substance abusers in Washington state. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 28 (2002), 307–338.
67. McLellan, AT, What we need is a system: Creating a responsive and effective substance abuse treatment system. Miller, W.R., Carroll, K.M., (eds.) Rethinking substance abuse: what the science shows, and what We should do about it, 2006, Guilford Press, New York, 275–292.
68. McLellan, AT, Woodworth, AM, The Affordable Care Act and treatment for “substance use disorders”: Implications of ending segregated behavioral healthcare. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 46 (2014), 541–545.
69. McLellan, AT, Kemp, J, Brooks, A, Carise, D, Improving public addiction treatment through performance contracting: The Delaware experiment. Health Policy 87 (2008), 296–308.
70. McLellan, AT, Lewis, DC, O'Brien, CP, Kleber, HD, Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: Implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation. Journal of the American Medical Association 284 (2000), 1689–1695.
71. McLellan, AT, Starrells, JL, Tai, B, Gordon, AJ, Brown, R, Ghitza, U McNeely, J, Can substance use disorders be managed using the chronic care model? Review and recommendations from a NIDA consensus group. Public Health Reviews 35 (2014), 1–14.
72. McLellan, AT, Weinstein, RL, Shen, Q, Kendig, C, Levine, M, Improving continuity of care in a public addiction treatment system with clinical case management. American Journal on Addictions 14 (2005), 426–440.
73. Mee-Lee, D, Shulman, GD, Fishman, MJ, Gastfriend, DR, Miller, MM, Provence, SM, The ASAM criteria: Treatment criteria for addictive, substance-related, and co-occurring conditions. 3rd ed., 2013, American Society of Addiction Medicine, Chevy Chase, MD.
74. Mericle, AA, Miles, J, Way, F, Recovery residences and providing safe and supportive housing for individuals overcoming addiction. Journal of Drug Issues 45:4 (2015), 368–384.
75. Molfenter, TD, Addiction treatment centers' progress in preparing for health care reform. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 46:2 (2014), 158–164.
76. Molfenter, T, Capoccia, VA, Boyle, MG, Sherbeck, CK, The readiness of addiction treatment agencies for health care reform. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 7, 2012, 16.
77. Moos, RH, Moos, BS, Long-term influence of duration and intensity of treatment on previously untreated individuals with alcohol use disorders. Addiction 98 (2003), 325–337.
78. National Center on Addiction and Substance Use at Columbia University (NCASUCU), Addiction medicine: Closing the gap between science and practice. 2012, Author, New York.
79. Nosyk, B, Li, L, Evans, E, Urada, D, Huang, D, Wood, E Hser, YI, Utilization and outcomes of detoxification and maintenance treatment for opioid dependence in publicly-funded facilities in California, USA: 1991–2012. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 143 (2014), 149–157.
80. O'Farrell, TJ, Fals-Stewart, W, Behavioral couples therapy for alcoholism and drug abuse. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 18 (2000), 51–54.
81. O'Malley, SS, Garbutt, JC, Gastfriend, DR, Dong, Q, Kranzler, HR, Efficacy of extended-release naltrexone in alcohol-dependent patients who are abstinent before treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology 27 (2007), 507–512.
82. Padwa, H, Urada, D, Creating an organized adult system of care for substance use disorder (SUD) services: The experience in Santa Clara County. Summary prepared for the Department of Health Care Services, California health and human services agency, 2015, University of California, Los Angeles, Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, Los Angeles.
83. Pating, DR, Miller, MM, Goplerud, E, Martin, J, Ziedonis, DM, New systems of care for substance use disorders: Treatment, finance, and technology under health care reform. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 35 (2012), 327–356.
84. Perkinson, RR, Chemical dependency counseling: A practical guide. 2012, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
85. Polcin, DL, Korcha, RA, Bond, J, Galloway, G, Sober living houses for alcohol and drug dependence: 18-month outcomes. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 38 (2010), 356–365.
86. Prendergast, ML, Podus, D, Chang, E, Urada, D, The effectiveness of drug abuse treatment: A meta-analysis of comparison group studies. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 67 (2002), 53–72.
87. Prendergast, M, Podus, D, Finney, J, Greenwell, L, Roll, J, Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Addiction 101 (2006), 1546–1560.
88. Rawson, RA, McCann, MJ, Flammino, F, Shoptaw, S, Miotto, K, Reiber, C, Ling, W, A comparison of contingency management and cognitive-behavioral approaches for stimulant-dependent individuals. Addiction 101 (2006), 267–274.
89. Richter, KP, Faseru, B, Mussulman, LM, Ellerbeck, EF, Shireman, TI, Hunt, JJ Cook, DJ, Using “warm handoffs” to link hospitalized smokers with tobacco treatment after discharge: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 13, 2012, 127.
90. Rieckmann, TR, Abraham, A, Zwick, J, Rasplica, C, McCarty, D, A longitudinal study of state strategies and policies to accelerate evidence-based practices in the context of systems transformation. Health Services Research 50 (2015), 1125–1145.
91. Rieckmann, TR, Kovas, AE, Cassidy, EF, McCarty, D, Employing policy and purchasing levers to increase the use of evidence-based practices in community-based substance abuse treatment settings: Reports from single state authorities. Evaluation and Program Planning 34 (2011), 366–374.
92. Rowe, CL, Family therapy for drug abuse: Review and updates 2003–2010. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 38 (2012), 59–81.
93. Roy, AK III, Miller, MM, The medicalization of addiction treatment professionals. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 44 (2012), 107–118.
94. Roy-Byrne, P, Bumgardner, K, Krupski, A, Dunn, C, Ries, R, Donovan, D Zarkin, GA, Brief intervention for problem drug use in safety-net primary care settings: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 312 (2014), 492–501.
95. Rush, B, Tiered frameworks for planning substance use service delivery systems: Origins and key principles. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 27:6 (2010), 617–636.
96. Rush, BR, Nadeau, L, Integrated service and system planning debate. Cooper, D.B., (eds.) Responding in mental health-substance use, 2011, Radcliffe Publishing Ltd., London, 148–175.
97. Rush, B, Tremblay, J, Fougere, C, Perez, W, Fineczko, J, Development of a needs-based planning model for substance use services and supports in Canada: Final report. 2013, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON.
98. Rutkowski, BA, Gallon, S, Rawson, RA, Freese, TE, Bruehl, A, Crèvecoeur-MacPhail, D Cotter, F, Improving client engagement and retention in treatment: the Los Angeles County experience. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 39 (2010), 78–86.
99. Saitz, R, Alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care: Absence of evidence for efficacy in people with dependence or very heavy drinking. Drug and Alcohol Review 29 (2010), 631–640.
100. Saitz, R, Screening and brief intervention for unhealthy drug use: Little or no efficacy. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 5, 2014.
101. Saitz, R, ‘SBIRT’ is the answer? Probably not. Addiction 110 (2015), 1416–1417.
102. Saitz, R, Palfai, TP, Cheng, DM, Alford, DP, Bernstein, JA, Lloyd-Travaglini, CA Samet, JH, Screening and brief intervention for drug use in primary care: The ASPIRE randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 312 (2014), 502–513.
103. Sannibale, C, Hurkett, P, Van Den Bossche, D, O'Connor, D, Zador, D, Capus, C McKenzie, M, Aftercare attendance and post-treatment functioning of severely substance dependent residential treatment clients. Drug and Alcohol Review 22 (2003), 181–190.
104. Schippers, GM, Schramade, M, Walburg, JA, Reforming Dutch substance abuse treatment services. Addictive Behaviors 27 (2002), 995–1007.
105. Scott, CK, Dennis, ML, Foss, MA, Utilizing recovery management checkups to shorten the cycle of relapse, treatment reentry, and recovery. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 78 (2005), 325–338.
106. Shin, P, Sharac, J, Alvarez, C, Rosenbaum, SJ, Paradise, J, Community health centers in an era of health reform: An overview and key challenges to health center growth. Health policy faculty publications, 2013, 79 (Retrieved from http://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/sphhs_policy_facpubs/79. Accessed June 2, 2015).
107. Siegal, HA, Case management. Coombs, R.H., (eds.) Addiction counseling review: preparing for comprehensive, certification, and licensing examinations, 2004, London, Routledge, 381–400.
108. Siegal, HA, Fisher, JH, Rapp, RC, Kelliher, CW, Wagner, JH, O'Brien, WF, Cole, PA, Enhancing substance abuse treatment with case management its impact on employment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 13 (1996), 93–98.
109. Simpatico, TA, Vermont responds to its opioid crisis. Preventive Medicine, 2015 (in press).
110. Simpson, DD, Flynn, PM, Moving innovations into treatment: A stage-based approach to program change. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 33 (2007), 111–120.
111. Simpson, DD, Joe, GW, Rowan-Szal, GA, Linking the elements of change: Program and client responses to innovation. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 33 (2007), 201–209.
112. Sobell, LC, Sobell, MB, Nirenberg, TD, Behavioral assessment and treatment planning with alcohol and drug abusers: A review with an emphasis on clinical application. Clinical Psychology Review 8 (1988), 19–54.
113. Sobell, MB, Sobell, LC, Stepped care as a heuristic approach to the treatment of alcohol problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 68 (2000), 573–579.
114. Stein, BD, Kogan, JN, Sorbero, M, Substance abuse detoxification and residential treatment among Medicaid-enrolled adults: Rates and duration of subsequent treatment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 104 (2009), 100–106.
115. Stewart, MT, Horgan, CM, Garnick, DW, Ritter, G, McLellan, AT, Performance contracting and quality improvement in outpatient treatment: Effects on waiting time and length of stay. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 44 (2013), 27–33.
116. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Innovations in addictions treatment: Addiction treatment providers working with integrated primary care services. 2013, SAMHSA-HRSA Center for Integrated Health Solutions, Washington, DC.
117. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Results from the 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings. NSDUH series H-48, HHS publication no. (SMA) 14–4863, 2014, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, MD.
118. Sylvestre, DL, Zweben, JE, Integrating HCV services for drug users: A model to improve engagement and outcomes. International Journal of Drug Policy 18 (2007), 406–410.
119. Tetrault, JM, O'Connor, PG, Substance abuse and withdrawal in the critical care setting. Critical Care Clinics 24 (2008), 767–788.
120. Treatment Research Institute, Integrating appropriate services for substance use conditions in health care settings: An issue brief on lessons learned and challenges ahead. 2010, Author, Philadelphia, PA.
121. Uchtenhagen, A, Stepped care models in addiction treatment. el-Guebaly, N., Carrà, G., Galanter, M., (eds.) Textbook of addiction treatment: International perspectives, 2015, Springer Milan, 1283–1289.
122. Watkins, KE, Farmer, CM, De Vries, D, Hepner, KA, The Affordable Care Act: An opportunity for improving care for substance use disorders?. Psychiatric Services 66 (2015), 310–312.
123. Weisner, C, The Core-Shell model: Implications for treatment assessment and community work. Contemporary Drug Problems 22 (1995), 151–158.
124. Wellisch, J, Prendergast, ML, Anglin, MD, Toward a drug abuse treatment system. Journal of Drug Issues 25 (1995), 759–782.
125. White, WL, Slaying the dragon: The history of addiction treatment and recovery in America. 1998, Chestnut Health Systems/Lighthouse Institute, Bloomington, IL.
126. White, WL, Recovery management and recovery-oriented systems of care: Scientific rationale and promising practices. Recovery management: Continuing care following acute treatment. Northeast addiction technology transfer center, the Great Lakes addiction technology center, and the Philadelphia Department of Behavioral Health/mental retardation services, 2008 (Retrieved from http://www.williamwhitepapers.com/pr/2008RecoveryManagementMonograph.pdf).
127. Wittman, FD, Polcin, D, The evolution of peer run sober housing as a recovery resource for California communities. International Journal of Self Help & Self Care 8 (2014), 157–187.
128. World Health Organization (WHO), WHO technical consultation on the assessment of prevention and treatment Systems for Substance Use Disorders: report. 2006, World Health Organization, Geneva.