Optimised method to estimate octanol water distribution coefficient (logD) in a high throughput format

European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Volumn 92, Issue , 2016, Pages 110-116

 

^a Ivan)   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Distribution coefficient; DMSO concentration; Lipophilicity; Miniaturised shake flask; Octanol water

Indexed keywords

ALPRENOLOL; AMLODIPINE; ASTEMIZOLE; CAFFEINE; CARBAMAZEPINE; CHLORPROMAZINE; CLOZAPINE; DEXAMETHASONE; DIAZEPAM; DICLOFENAC; DIETHYLSTILBESTROL; GLIBENCLAMIDE; HALOPERIDOL; KETOCONAZOLE; LABETALOL; METOPROLOL; METRONIDAZOLE; OCTANOL; PHENACETIN; PREDNISOLONE; PREDNISONE; PROPRANOLOL; SOTALOL; STRYCHNINE; SULFAPHENAZOLE; SUMATRIPTAN; TESTOSTERONE; TOLBUTAMIDE; TOLNAFTATE; VANILLIN; DIMETHYL SULFOXIDE; WATER;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DILUTION; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; LIPOPHILICITY; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WATER SUPPLY; CHEMISTRY;

1-OCTANOL; DIMETHYL SULFOXIDE; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING ASSAYS; WATER;

EID: 84978209546     PISSN: 09280987     EISSN: 18790720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2016.06.024     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Alelyunas, Y.W., Pelosi-Kilby, L., Turcotte, P., Kary, M.B., Spreen, R.C., A high throughput dried DMSO LogD lipophilicity measurement based on 96-well shake-flask and atmospheric pressure photoionization mass spectrometry detection. J. Chromat A. 1217 (2010), 1950–1955.
2. Andrés, A., Rosés, M., Ràfols, C., Bosch, E., Espinosa, S., Segarra, V., Huerta, J.M., Setup and validation of shake-flask procedures for the determination of partition coefficients (logD) from low drug amounts. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 76 (2015), 181–191.
3. Austin, R.P., Barton, P., Mohmed, S., Riley, R.J., The binding of drugs to hepatocytes and its relationship to physicochemical properties. Drug Metab. Dispos. 33:3 (2005), 419–425.
4. Benet, L.Z., Broccatelli, F., Oprea, T.I., BDDCS applied to over 900 drugs. AAPS J. 13:4 (2011), 519–547.
5. Dearden, J.C., Bresnen, G.M., The measurement of partition coefficients. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 7 (1988), 133–144.
6. Dohta, Y., Yamashita, T., Horiike, S., Nakamura, T., Fukami, T., A system for LogD screening of 96-well plates using a water-plug aspiration/injection method combined with high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 79:21 (2007), 8312–8315.
7. 2O), Shake Flask Method. http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0151-0031, 1996.
8. Ford, H. Jr., Merski, C.L., Kelley, J.A., A rapid microscale method for the determination of partition coefficient by HPLC. J. Liq. Chromatogr. 14:18 (1991), 3365–3386.
9. Fujita, T., Iwasa, J., Hansch, C., A new substituent constant, P, derived from partition coefficients. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 86 (1964), 5175–5180.
10. Hitzel, L., Watt, A.P., Locker, K.L., An increased throughput method for the determination of partition coefficients. Pharm. Res. 17:11 (2000), 1389–1395.
11. Kruve, A., Leito, I., Comparison of different methods aiming to account for/overcome matrix effects in LC/ESI/MS on the example of pesticide analyses. Anal. Methods 5 (2013), 3035–3044.
12. Lombardo, F., Faller, B., Shalaeva, M., Tetko, I., Tilton, S., Mannhold, R., (eds.) The Good, the Bad and the Ugly of Distribution Coefficients: Current Status, Views and Outlook, in Molecular Drug Properties - Measurement and Prediction, 2007, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, 10.1002/9783527621286.ch16.
13. Lombardo, F., Shalaeva, M., Tupper, K., Gao, F., ElogDoct: a tool for lipophilicity determination in drug discovery. 2. Basic and neutral compounds. J. Med. Chem. 44 (2001), 2490–2497.
14. Lombardo, F., Shalaeva, M., Tupper, K., Gao, F., Abraham, M., ElogPoct: a tool for lipophilicity determination in drug discovery. J. Med. Chem. 43 (2000), 2922–2928.
15. OECD 107 Method, OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals Adopted by the Council on 27th July 1995 Partition Coefficient (n-Octanol/water): Shake Flask Method. http://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/risk-assessment/1948169.pdf, 1995.
16. OECD 117 Method, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. Partition Coefficient (n-Octanol/water), High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Method. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/9711701e.pdf, 2004.
17. Smith, D.A., Allerton, C., Kalgutkar, A., Van De Waterbeemd, H., Walker, D.K., Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism in Drug Discovery. third ed., 2012, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. (KGaA).
18. Stiefl, N., Gedeck, P., Chin, D., Hunt, P., Lindvall, M., Spiegel, K., Springer, C., Biller, S., Buenemann, C., Kanazawa, T., Kato, M., Lewis, R., Martin, E., Polyakov, V., Tommasi, R., van Drie, J., Vash, B., Whitehead, L., Xu, Y., Abagyan, R., Raush, E., Totrov, M., FOCUS–development of a global communication and modeling platform for applied and computational medicinal chemists. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 55:4 (2015), 896–908.
19. Takacs-Novaks, K., Avdeef, A., Inter-laboratory study of log P determination by shake-flask and potentiometric methods. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 14 (1996), 1405–1413.
20. Valko, K., Bevan, C., Reynolds, D., Chromatographic hydrophobicity index by fast-gradient RP-HPLC: a high-throughput alternative to log P/log D. Anal. Chem. 69 (1997), 2022–2029.
21. Wager, T., Hou, X., Verhoest, P., Villalobos, A., Moving beyond rules: the development of a central nervous system multi-parameter optimization (CNS MPO) approach to enable alignment of drug like properties. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 1 (2010), 435–449.
22. Wan, H., Ulander, J., High-throughput pKa screening and prediction amenable for ADME profiling. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2:1 (2006), 139–155.
23. Wilson, D.M., Wang, X., Walsh, E., Rourick, R.A., High throughput log D determination using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 4:6 (2001), 511–519.
24. Yamashita, T., Yamamoto, E., Kushida, I., Frozen water phase method for logD measurement using a 96-well plate. Talanta 84:3 (2011), 809–813.
25. Yamazaki, K., Kanaoka, M., Computational prediction of the plasma protein-binding percent of diverse pharmaceutical compounds. J. Pharm. Sci. 93 (2004), 1480–1494.