Public trust in health information sharing: Implications for biobanking and electronic health record systems

Journal of Personalized Medicine

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 3-21

  Platt, Jodyn ^a,b   Kardia, Sharon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Biobanks; Health systems; Trust

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALTRUISM; ARTICLE; BIOBANKING; DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MIDDLE AGED; NORMAL HUMAN; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIVACY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; SELF ESTEEM; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84977970479     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20754426     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/jpm5010003     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Kohane, I. S. Using electronic health records to drive discovery in disease genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12, 417-428.
2. Roden, D.; Pulley, J.; Basford, M.; Bernard, G.; Clayton, E.; Balser, J.; Masys, D. Development of a large-scale de-identified DNA biobank to enable personalized medicine. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008, 84, 362-369.
3. McCarty, C. A.; Chisholm, R. L.; Chute, C. G.; Kullo, I. J.; Jarvik, G. P.; Larson, E. B.; Li, R.; Masys, D. R.; Ritchie, M. D.; Roden, D. M.; Struewing, J. P.; et al. The eMERGE Network: A consortium of biorepositories linked to electronic medical records data for conducting genomic studies. BMC Med. Genomics 2011, 4, doi: 10. 1186/1755-8794-4-13.
4. Bowton, E.; Field, J. R.; Wang, S.; Schildcrout, J. S.; van Driest, S. L.; Delaney, J. T.; Cowan, J.; Weeke, P.; Mosley, J. D.; Wells, Q. S.; et al. Biobanks and electronic medical records: Enabling cost-effective research. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014, 6, doi: 10. 1126/scitranslmed. 3008604.
5. Institute of Medicine (US). Weaving a strong trust fabric. In Digital Infrastructure for the Learning Health System: The Foundation for Continuous Improvement in Health and Health Care: Workshop Series Summary; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
6. Malin, B. A.; Emam, K. E.; O'Keefe, C. M. Biomedical data privacy: Problems, perspectives, and recent advances. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2013, 20, 2-6.
7. Malin, B.; Loukides, G.; Benitez, K.; Clayton, E. W. Identifiability in biobanks: Models, measures, and mitigation strategies. Hum. Genet. 2011, 130, 383-392.
8. Agrawal, R.; Johnson, C. Securing electronic health records without impeding the flow of information. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2007, 76, 471-479.
9. Kass, N. E.; Natowicz, M. R.; Hull, S. C.; Faden, R. R.; Plantinga, L.; Gostin, L. O.; Slutsman, J. The use of medical records in research: What do patients want? J. Law Med. Ethics 2003, 31, 429-433.
10. Faden, R. R.; Kass, N. E.; Goodman, S. N.; Pronovost, P.; Tunis, S.; Beauchamp, T. L. An ethics framework for a learning health care system: A departure from traditional research ethics and clinical ethics. Hastings Cent. Rep. 2013, 43, S16-S27.
11. Taitsman, J. K.; Grimm, C. M.; Agrawal, S. Protecting patient privacy and data security. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 977-979.
12. Wynia, M.; Coughlin, S.; Alpert, S.; Cummins, D.; Emanuel, L. Shared expectations for protection of identifiable health care information: Report of a national consensus process. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2011, 16, 100-111.
13. Thiel, D.; Platt, J.; Platt, T.; King, S.; FIsher, N.; Kardia, S. Testing an online, dynamic consent portal for large population biobank research. Publ. Health Genomics 2014, 18, doi: 10. 1159/000366128.
14. Kaye, J.; Whitley, E. A.; Lund, D.; Morrison, M.; Teare, H.; Melham, K. Dynamic consent: A patient interface for twenty-first century research networks. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2014, doi: 10. 1038/ejhg. 2014. 71.
15. Giddens, A. The Consequences of Modernity; Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA, USA, 1991.
16. Wynia, M. K. Public health, public trust and lobbying. Am. J. Bioeth. 2007, 7, 4-7.
17. Goold, S. D.; Fessler, D.; Moyer, C. A. A measure of trust in insurers. Health Serv. Res. 2006, 41, 58-78.
18. Hall, M. A.; Dugan, E.; Zheng, B.; Mishra, A. K. Trust in physicians and medical institutions: What is it, can it be measured, and does it matter? Milbank Q. 2011, 79, 613-639.
19. Farrell, H. Institutions and mid-level explanations of trust. In Whom can we trust? How Groups, Networks, and Institutions Make Trust Possible; Russell Sage Foundation: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 127-148.
20. Cook, K. S.; Hardin, R.; Levi, M. Cooperation without Trust? Russell Sage Foundation: New York, NY, USA, 2005.
21. Nannestad, P. What have we learned about generalized trust, if anything? Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 2008, 11, 413-436.
22. Hardin, R. Distrust; Russell Sage Foundation: New York, NY, USA, 2004.
23. Rousseau, D. M.; Sitkin, S. B.; Burt, R. S.; Camerer, C. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1998, 23, 393-404.
24. Ozawa, P. S.; Sripad, P. How do you measure trust in the health system? A systematic review of the literature. Soc. Sci. Med. 2013, 91, 10-14.
25. Hall, A.; Zheng, B.; Dugan, E.; Camacho, F.; Kidd, E.; Mishra, A.; Balkrishnan, R. Measuring patients' trust in their primary care providers. Med. Care Res. Rev. 2002, 59, 293-318.
26. Hall, M. A.; Camacho, F.; Dugan, E.; Balkrishnan, R. Trust in the medical profession: Conceptual and measurement issues. Health Serv. Res. 2002, 37, 1419-1439.
27. Zheng, B.; Hall, M. A.; Dugan, E.; Kidd, K. E.; Levine, D. Development of a scale to measure patients' trust in health insurers. Health Serv. Res. 2002, 37, 187-202.
28. LaVeist, T. A.; Isaac, L. A.; Williams, K. P. Mistrust of health care organizations is associated with underutilization of health services. Health Serv. Res. 2009, 44, 2093-2105.
29. McKnight, D. H.; Choudhury, V.; Kacmar, C. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Inf. Syst. Res. 2002, 13, 334-359.
30. Siegrist, M. The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Anal. 2000, 20, 195-203.
31. Mayer, R. C.; Davis, J. H.; Schoorman, F. D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1995, 20, 709-734.
32. Evans, G.; Durant, J. The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Publ. Underst. Sci. 1995, 4, 57-74.
33. Wynne, B. Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science. Publ. Underst. Sci. 1992, 1, 281-304.
34. Allum, P. S.; Sturgis, P.; Tabourazi, D.; Brunton-Smith, I. Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis. Publ. Underst. Sci. 2008, 17, 35-54.
35. Roberts, M. R.; Reid, G.; Schroeder, M.; Norris, S. P. Causal or spurious? The relationship of knowledge and attitudes to trust in science and technology. Publ. Underst. Sci. 2013, 22, 624-641.
36. Petersen, A. Biobanks engagements: Engendering trust or engineering consent? Genomics Soc. Policy 2007, 3, 31-43.
37. Hurwitz, J. B. User choice, privacy sensitivity, and acceptance of personal information collection. In European Data Protection: Coming of Age; Springer Netherlands: Berlin, Germany, 2013; pp. 295-312.
38. Gefen, D.; Karahanna, E.; Straub, D. W. Inexperience and experience with online stores: The importance of TAM and trust. Eng. Manag. IEEE Trans. 2003, 50, 307-321.
39. Lewis, D.; Weigert, J. The social dynamics of trust: Theoretical and empirical research, 1985-2012. Soc. Forces 2012, 91, 25-31.
40. Luhmann, N. Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. In Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations; Basil Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 1988; pp. 94-107.
41. Committee on the Learning Health Care System in America. Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2012.
42. Milstein, A. Code red and blue-Safely limiting health care's GDP footprint. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 1-3.
43. Coloma, P. M.; Schuemie, M. J.; Trifirò, G.; Gini, R.; Herings, R.; Hippisley-Cox, J.; Mazzaglia, G.; Giaquinto, C.; Corrao, G.; Pedersen, L.; et al. Combining electronic healthcare databases in Europe to allow for large-scale drug safety monitoring: The EU-ADR Project. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2011, 20, 1-11.
44. Kaufman, D. J.; Murphy-Bollinger, J.; Scott, J.; Hudsoon, K. L. Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009, 85, doi: 10. 1016/j. ajhg. 2009. 10. 002.
45. Pullman, D.; Etchegary, H.; Gallagher, K.; Hodgkinson, K.; Keough, M.; Morgan, D.; Street, C. Personal privacy, public benefits, and biobanks: A conjoint analysis of policy priorities and public perceptions. Genet. Med. 2012, 14, doi: 10. 1038/gim. 0b013e31822e578f.
46. Das, T. K.; Teng, B. S. The risk-based view of trust: A conceptual framework. J. Bus. Psychol. 2004, 19, 85-116.
47. Colquitt, J. A.; Scott, B. A.; LePine, J. A. Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 2007, 92, 909-927.
48. Bishop, L.; Holmes, B. J.; Kelley, C. M. National Consumer Health Privacy Survey 2005; California HealthCare Foundation: Oakland, CA, USA, 2005.
49. Visschers, V. H.; Keller, C.; Siegrist, M. Climate change benefits and energy supply benefits as determinants of acceptance of nuclear power stations: Investigating an explanatory model. Energ. Polic. 2011, 39, 3621-3629.
50. Siegrist, M.; Connor, M.; Keller, C. Trust, confidence, procedural fairness, outcome fairness, moral conviction, and the acceptance of GM field experiments. Risk Anal. 2012, 32, 1394-1403.
51. Boulware, L. E.; Cooper, L. A.; Ratner, L. E.; LaVeist, T. A.; Powe, N. R. Race and trust in the health care system. Publ. Health Rep. 2003, 118, 358-365.
52. Anderson, C. L.; Agarwal, R. The digitization of healthcare: Boundary risks, emotion, and consumer willingness to disclose personal health information. Inf. Syst. Res. 2011, 22, 469-490.
53. Thiel, D.; Platt, T.; Platt, J.; King, S.; Kardia, S. L. Community perspectives on public health biobanking: An analysis of community meetings on the Michigan Bio-Trust for health. J. Community Genet. 2014, 5, 125-138.
54. Platt, T.; Platt, J.; Thiel, D.; Fisher, N.; Kardia, S. "Cool! And creepy": Engaging with college student stakeholders in Michigan's biobank (forthcoming). J. Community Genet. 2014, 5, 349-362.
55. Smith, T. W.; Marsden, P. V.; Hout, M.; Jibum, K. General Social Surveys, 1972-2012: Cumulative Codebook; Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut: Storrs, CT, USA, 2013.
56. Schwarzer, R.; Jerusalem, M. Generalized self-efficacy scale. Measures in Health Psychology: A Users Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs; NFER-NELSON: Windsor, UK, 1995; pp. 35-37.
57. Rosenberg, M.; Schooler, C.; Schoenbach, C.; Rosenberg, F. Global self-esteem and specific self-esteem: Different concepts, different outcomes. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1995, 60, 141-156.
58. Trust Survey (Pilot). Available online: https://umich. qualtrics. com/SE/?SID=SV_dnd2Y20M8aWPcxL (accessed on 14 January 2015).
59. Buhrmester, M.; Kwang, T.; Gosling, S. D. Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2011, 6, 3-5.
60. Paolacci, G.; Chandler, J.; Ipeirotis, P. Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical turk. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 2010, 5, 411-419.
61. Willison, D. J.; Steeves, V.; Charles, C.; Schwartz, L.; Ranford, J.; Agarwal, G.; Cheng, J.; Thabane, L. Consent for use of personal information for health research: Do people with potentially stigmatizing health conditions and the general public differ in their opinions? BMC Med. Ethics 2009, 10, doi: 10. 1186/1472-6939-10-10.
62. Duquette, D.; Langbo, C.; Bach, J.; Kleyn, M. Michigan Bio-Trust for health: Public support for using residual dried blood spot samples for health research. Publ. Health Genomics 2012, 15, 146-155.
63. Botkin, J. R.; Rothwell, E.; Anderson, R.; Stark, L. A.; Mitchell, J. Public attitudes regarding the use of electronic health information and residual clinical tissues for research. J. Community Genet. 2014, 5, 205-213.
64. McWhirter, R.; Critchley, C.; Nicol, D.; Chalmers, D.; Whitton, T.; Otlowski, M.; Burgess, M.; Dickinson, J. Community engagement for big epidemiology: Deliberative democracy as a tool. J. Pers. Med. 2014, 4, 459-474.
65. Olson, J. E.; Ryu, E.; Johnson, K. J.; Koenig, B. A.; Maschke, K. J.; Morrisette, J. A.; Liebow, M.; Takahashi, P. Y.; Fredericksen, Z. S.; Sharma, R. G.; et al. The mayo clinic biobank: A building block for individualized medicine. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2013, 88, 952-962.
66. O'Doherty, K. C.; Hawkins, A. K.; Burgess, M. M. Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research: Informing institutional policy through structured public deliberation. Soc. Sci. Med. 2012, 75, 1604-1611.
67. Hartzler, A.; McCarty, C. A.; Rasmussen, L. V.; Williams, M. S.; Brilliant, M.; Bowton, E. A.; Clayton, E. W.; Faucett, W. A.; Ferryman, K.; Field, J. R.; et al. Stakeholder engagement: A key component of integrating genomic information into electronic health records. Genet. Med. 2013, 15, 792-801.
68. Kimball, B. C.; Nowakowski, K. E.; Maschke, K. J.; McCormick, J. B. Genomic data in the electronic medical record: Perspectives from a biobank community advisory board. J. Empir. Res. Hum. Res. Ethics 2014, 9, 16-24.
69. Dixon, W. G.; Spencer, K.; Williams, H.; Sanders, C.; Lund, D.; Whitley, E. A.; Kaye, J. A dynamic model of patient consent to sharing of medical record data. Br. Med. J. 2014, 348, g1294.